Ƶ

Top UN court says Israel’s settlement policy in occupied territories violates international law

Top UN court says Israel’s settlement policy in occupied territories violates international law
Magistrates are seen at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) as part of South Africa's request on a Gaza ceasefire in The Hague, on May 24, 2024. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 19 July 2024

Top UN court says Israel’s settlement policy in occupied territories violates international law

Top UN court says Israel’s settlement policy in occupied territories violates international law
  • The ruling is expected to have more effect on international opinion than it will on Israeli policies
  • Israel has built over 100 settlements, according to anti-settlement monitoring group Peace Now

THE HAGUE: The top United Nations court said Israel's settlement policy in the West Bank and east Jerusalem violates international law, as it delivered a non-binding advisory opinion on the legality of Israel’s 57-year occupation of lands sought for a Palestinian state, a ruling that could have more effect on international opinion than it will on Israeli policies.
International Court of Justice President Nawaf Salam was expected to take about an hour to read out the full opinion of the panel, which is made up of 15 judges from around the world.
In part of the opinion, he said the panel had found that "the transfer by Israel of settlers to the West Bank and Jerusalem as well as Israel’s maintenance of their presence, is contrary to article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention.” The court also noted with “grave concern” that Israel’s settlement policy has been expanding.
The court also found that Israel's use of natural resources was “inconsistent” with its obligations under international law as an occupying power.
Friday’s hearing comes against the backdrop of Israel’s devastating 10-month military assault on Gaza, which was triggered by the Hamas-led attacks in southern Israel. In a separate case, the International Court of Justice is considering a South African claim that Israel’s campaign in Gaza amounts to genocide, a claim that Israel vehemently denies.
Israel captured the West Bank, east Jerusalem and Gaza Strip in the 1967 Mideast war. The Palestinians seek all three areas for an independent state.
Israel considers the West Bank to be disputed territory, whose future should be decided in negotiations, while it has moved population there in settlements to solidify its hold. It has annexed east Jerusalem in a move that is not internationally recognized, while it withdrew from Gaza in 2005 but maintained a blockade of the territory after Hamas took power in 2007. The international community generally considers all three areas to be occupied territory.
At hearings in February, then-Palestinian Foreign Minister Riad Malki accused Israel of apartheid and urged the United Nations’ top court to declare that Israel’s occupation of lands sought by the Palestinians is illegal and must end immediately and unconditionally for any hope for a two-state future to survive.
Israel, which normally considers the United Nations and international tribunals as unfair and biased, did not send a legal team to the hearings. But it submitted written comments, saying that the questions put to the court are prejudiced and “fail to recognize Israel’s right and duty to protect its citizens,” address Israeli security concerns or acknowledge Israel-Palestinian agreements to negotiate issues, including “the permanent status of the territory, security arrangements, settlements, and borders.”
The Palestinians presented arguments in February along with 49 other nations and three international organizations.
Erwin van Veen, a senior research fellow at the Clingendael think tank in The Hague, said that if the court rules that Israel’s policies in the West Bank and east Jerusalem breach international law, that is unlikely to change Israeli policies but it would “isolate Israel further internationally, at least from a legal point of view.”
He said such a ruling would “worsen the case for occupation. It removes any kind of legal, political, philosophical underpinning of the Israeli expansion project.”
It would also strengthen the hand of “those who seek to advocate against it” — such as the grassroots Palestinian-led movement advocating boycotts, divestment and sanctions against Israel.
He said it also could increase the number of countries that recognize the state of Palestine, in particular in the Western world, following the recent example of Spain and Norway and Ireland.”
It is not the first time the ICJ has been asked to give its legal opinion on Israeli policies. Two decades ago, the court ruled that Israel’s West Bank separation barrier was “contrary to international law.” Israel boycotted those proceedings, saying they were politically motivated.
Israel says the barrier is a security measure. Palestinians say the structure amounts to a massive land grab because it frequently dips into the West Bank.
The U.N. General Assembly voted by a wide margin in December 2022 to ask the world court for the advisory opinion. Israel vehemently opposed the request that was promoted by the Palestinians. Fifty countries abstained from voting.
Israel has built well over 100 settlements, according to the anti-settlement monitoring group Peace Now. The West Bank settler population has grown by more than 15% in the past five years to more than 500,000 Israelis, according to a pro-settler group.
Israel also has annexed east Jerusalem and considers the entire city to be its capital. An additional 200,000 Israelis live in settlements built in east Jerusalem that Israel considers to be neighborhoods of its capital. Palestinian residents of the city face systematic discrimination, making it difficult for them to build new homes or expand existing ones.
The international community considers all settlements to be illegal or obstacles to peace since they are built on lands sought by the Palestinians for their state.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s hard-line government is dominated by settlers and their political supporters. Netanyahu has given his finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich, a former settler leader, unprecedented authority over settlement policy. Smotrich has used this position to cement Israel’s control over the West Bank by pushing forward plans to build more settlement homes and to legalize outposts.
Authorities recently approved the appropriation of 12.7 square kilometers (nearly 5 square miles) of land in the Jordan Valley, a strategic piece of land deep inside the West Bank, according to a copy of the order obtained by The Associated Press. Data from Peace Now, the tracking group, indicate it was the largest single appropriation approved since the 1993 Oslo accords at the start of the peace process.


Lebanon’s central bank bans transactions with Hezbollah financial affiliate

Lebanon’s central bank bans transactions with Hezbollah financial affiliate
Updated 15 sec ago

Lebanon’s central bank bans transactions with Hezbollah financial affiliate

Lebanon’s central bank bans transactions with Hezbollah financial affiliate
  • 12 people killed and several injured in series of surprise Israeli attacks on targets in Bekaa Valley
  • Members of the Lebanese parliament criticize government for delays in efforts to ensure possession of weapons is restricted to state forces

BEIRUT: Karim Souaid, the governor of Lebanon’s central bank, on Tuesday banned banks and other organizations from doing business with Al-Qard Al-Hassan, a financial institution affiliated with Hezbollah.

Seen as a major step by the Lebanese state, the move coincided with the launch by the Israeli army of more than 10 surprise raids on targets in western and eastern mountain ranges of the Bekaa Valley. The Lebanese Ministry of Health said six people were wounded in the strikes.

A subsequent raid struck a well-drilling machine in the border town of Wadi Faara, killing 12 people, including five Lebanese nationals and seven Syrians from the same family, and injuring several more. Israeli strikes also hit the towns of Bodai, Kasarnaba, Shmistar and Brital. One missile landed near Shmistar Secondary School while exams were taking place, shattering windows and causing panic and distress among students.

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said the strikes sent a clear message to Hezbollah, as he accused the organization of attempting to rebuild its forces to threaten his country.

A resident of Shmistar told Arab News the areas targeted by the attacks were “abandoned sites.” The Israeli army said its fighter jets, “guided by the Intelligence Directorate and Northern Command,” had targeted military compounds in the Bekaa Valley affiliated with Hezbollah.

Avichay Adraee, a military spokesperson, said the strikes focused on camps that were used by Hezbollah’s elite Radwan Force to store weapons and train for attacks against Israeli forces. Hezbollah members and weapons depots were identified at the sites, he added, as he accused the militant group of violating the November 2024 ceasefire agreement.

Meanwhile, Banque du Liban, Lebanon’s central bank, said: “Lebanese financial institutions are banned from providing or facilitating financial, monetary or transfer services or brokerage services in favor of unlicensed institutions, companies and associations.”

The statement specifically identified “Al-Qard Al-Hassan Association, Tasheelat S.A.L., Al-Yusr for Finance and Investment, Bayt Al-Mal Lil Muslimin, and any entity listed on international sanctions lists.”

The ban also covers “establishing or implementing financing, leasing or lending arrangements, or facilitating access for such entities or their branches to the Lebanese banking system, in any currency.”

The central bank said the decision was part of “preventive measures aimed at protecting Lebanon’s financial and economic sectors from dealing with unlicensed or internationally sanctioned entities.”

It continued: “Violations of this decision will trigger strict legal action, which may include the suspension or revocation of licenses, freezing of accounts and assets, and referral to the Special Investigation Commission.”

The US Department of State designates Hezbollah as a Foreign Terrorist Organization and a Specially Designated Global Terrorist. It has imposed sanctions on Al-Qard Al-Hassan and affiliated officials, and accused them this month of facilitating attempts by Hezbollah to evade sanctions and enable Al-Qard Al-Hassan to conduct millions of dollars of transactions through “shadow” accounts. Israeli forces struck branches of the institution during the war against Hezbollah last year.

In other developments, during a plenary session, members of the Lebanese parliament criticized delays by the government in efforts to ensure possession of weapons is restricted to state forces; its failure to disclose a US proposal for a mechanism to implement the ceasefire agreement with Israel and UN Resolution 1701; for diluting the issue of recovery of depositors’ funds in Lebanese banks; and for failing to resolve the issue of Syrian refugees in Lebanon.

Resolution 1701 was adopted by the Security Council in 2006 with the aim of resolving the conflict that year between Israel and Hezbollah. It calls for an end to hostilities, the withdrawal of Israeli forces from Lebanon, the withdrawal of Hezbollah and other forces from parts of the country south of the Litani River, and the disarmament of Hezbollah and other armed groups.

The criticisms from opposition MPs came during a discussion about the performance of Prime Minister Nawaf Salam’s government after its first 150 days in office.

Lebanese Forces MP George Adwan condemned “the government’s failure to set a timetable for dismantling and handing over weapons and imposing sovereignty.”

He added: “The government must move quickly to end the presence of military structures on Lebanese territory. No one can hope for the return of Arab and international relations to Lebanon if this is not done,” given that “the government is unable to protect the UNIFIL (the UN’s Interim Force in Lebanon peacekeeping mission) forces that support Lebanon.”

MP Gebran Bassil, head of the Free Patriotic Movement, said: “The current authority is acting as a bystander, neither starting to disarm nor to take possession of the weapons. What is happening is a process of buying time until a US-Iranian agreement takes place.

“The question is, if that does not happen, do we remain like this? Instead of taking the initiative to present a Lebanese paper to address this issue, we wait for the US paper and discuss what can be done with it.”

Independent MP Michel Moawad said: “Lebanon is facing a historic opportunity to address weapons and the military groups outside state control, rebuild the nation and break free from isolation.

“While the government’s stance is good, it lacks implementation. The opportunity is present now; failure to act will lead to further occupation, destruction and isolation, and ultimately everything will be lost.”

Fouad Makhzoumi, also an independent MP, expressed regret that “the government’s decision has devolved into negotiating with every weapon outside the state’s authority.”

He added: “What is required of those who carry weapons is to hand them over to the state. Those bearing arms are required to surrender them to the state, enabling it to defend itself against the threat of war, have the means to recover and liberate the five points from the renewed occupation (by Israeli forces), secure the return of prisoners, and initiate negotiations to delineate the Blue Line.”

He urged the government to “fully implement the ceasefire agreement, the Taif Agreement and Resolution 1701 in all its provisions, and to mandate the army to prevent any of the repeated and systematic attacks on UNIFIL.”

Hezbollah MP Ibrahim Al-Moussawi criticized what he described as a failure to provide the Lebanese army with “weapons to protect the homeland against the enemy.”

He said: “We are among the first advocates for a just Lebanese state for all its citizens but where is this state? We do not question anyone’s patriotism and the army is our army, but there is a foreign ‘veto’ that prevents arming the army.

“Lebanon has fully implemented all its obligations under the ceasefire agreement, while Israel has failed to implement a single clause.”

He warned that “whoever thinks they are dealing with others based on a political logic of victors and vanquished is a traitor to Lebanon,” and added: “What we are witnessing is an existential threat, and any understanding on any other basis will put us all in a circle of loss.”


14 million children did not receive a single vaccine in 2024, UN estimates

14 million children did not receive a single vaccine in 2024, UN estimates
Updated 36 min 48 sec ago

14 million children did not receive a single vaccine in 2024, UN estimates

14 million children did not receive a single vaccine in 2024, UN estimates
  • WHO and UNICEF said about 89 percent of children under 1 year old got a first dose of the diphtheria, tetanus and whooping cough vaccine in 2024
  • About 85 percent completed the three-dose series, up from 84 percent in 2023

LONDON: More than 14 million children did not receive a single vaccine last year — about the same number as the year before — according to UN health officials. Nine countries accounted for more than half of those unprotected children.

In their annual estimate of global vaccine coverage, released Tuesday, the World Health Organization and UNICEF said about 89 percent of children under 1 year old got a first dose of the diphtheria, tetanus and whooping cough vaccine in 2024, the same as in 2023. About 85 percent completed the three-dose series, up from 84 percent in 2023.

Officials acknowledged, however, that the collapse of international aid this year will make it more difficult to reduce the number of unprotected children. In January, US President Trump withdrew the country from the WHO, froze nearly all humanitarian aid and later moved to close the US AID Agency. And last month, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said it was pulling the billions of dollars the US had previously pledged to the vaccines alliance Gavi, saying the group had “ignored the science.”

Kennedy, a longtime vaccine skeptic, has previously raised questions the diphtheria, tetanus and whooping cough vaccine — which has proven to be safe and effective after years of study and real-world use. Vaccines prevent 3.5 million to 5 million deaths a year, according to UN estimates.

“Drastic cuts in aid, coupled with misinformation about the safety of vaccines, threaten to unwind decades of progress,” said WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

UN experts said that access to vaccines remained “deeply unequal” and that conflict and humanitarian crises quickly unraveled progress; Sudan had the lowest reported coverage against diphtheria, tetanus and whooping cough. The data showed that nine countries accounted for 52 percent of all children who missed out on immunizations entirely: Nigeria, India, Sudan, Congo, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Yemen, Afghanistan and Angola.

WHO and UNICEF said coverage against measles rose slightly, with 76 percent of children worldwide receiving both vaccine doses. But experts say measles vaccine rates need to reach 95 percent to prevent outbreaks of the extremely contagious disease. WHO noted that 60 countries reported big measles outbreaks last year.

The US is now having its worst measles outbreak in more than three decades, while the disease has also surged across Europe, with 125,000 cases in 2024 — twice as many as the previous year, according to WHO.

Last week, British authorities reported a child died of measles in a Liverpool hospital. Health officials said that despite years of efforts to raise awareness, only about 84 percent of children in the UK are protected.

“It is hugely concerning, but not at all surprising, that we are continuing to see outbreaks of measles,” said Helen Bradford, a professor of children’s health at University College London. “The only way to stop measles spreading is with vaccination,” she said in a statement. “It is never too late to be vaccinated — even as an adult.”


Lebanon’s worst drought on record drains largest reservoir

Lebanon’s worst drought on record drains largest reservoir
Updated 15 July 2025

Lebanon’s worst drought on record drains largest reservoir

Lebanon’s worst drought on record drains largest reservoir
  • The Litani River National Authority said inflows to Lake Qaraoun during this year’s wet season did not exceed 45 million cubic meters
  • Last year, the figure stood at 230 million

QARAOUN, Lebanon: Water levels at Lebanon’s largest reservoir on the Litani River have fallen to historic lows amid what experts describe as the country’s worst drought on record, threatening agriculture, electricity production, and domestic water supplies.

The Litani River National Authority said inflows to Lake Qaraoun during this year’s wet season did not exceed 45 million cubic meters, a fraction of the 350 million cubic meters annual average.

Last year, the figure stood at 230 million. The water currently available in Lake Qaraoun — around 61 million cubic meters — was unusable due to severe pollution, the authority said.

“There were dry years in 1989, 1990 and 1991, but this year is the driest,” said Sami Alawieh, head of the river authority. “We are facing a water scarcity problem across all Lebanese territories and water basins.”

Drone footage of Lake Qaraoun shows a dramatically receded shoreline, exposing cracked earth and dead vegetation.

Lebanon’s hydroelectric plants tied to the Litani basin have been shut down, Alawieh said, causing financial losses and intensifying electricity rationing by Electricite du Liban.

“We have two factors: the decline in rainfall and the pressure on groundwater,” he said.

A study by the authority found climate warming and shifting weather patterns have contributed to more frequent dry seasons and higher temperatures, exacerbating soil moisture loss and reducing the recharging of groundwater reservoirs.

The state utility has slashed supply in some areas from 20 hours a day to as little as 10.

In the fertile area around Qaraoun village, in the Bekaa Valley, farmers were already feeling the impact.

“I have never seen such drought or scarcity of rain as this year,” said Safa Issa. “We used to get snow up to a meter high. Now, it’s been 10 years since we’ve seen any.”

The strain has been compounded by erratic supply of electricity needed to run irrigation systems.

“You irrigate for three hours, then stop for three,” said Fayez Omais, another local farmer.

Suzy Hoayek, an adviser to the Ministry of Energy and Water in Beirut, said a nationwide awareness campaign to reduce consumption would be launched within 10 days.

“The most important thing is to manage demand,” she said.


Jordanian anti-narcotics authorities thwart smuggling attempt on border with Syria

Jordanian anti-narcotics authorities thwart smuggling attempt on border with Syria
Updated 15 July 2025

Jordanian anti-narcotics authorities thwart smuggling attempt on border with Syria

Jordanian anti-narcotics authorities thwart smuggling attempt on border with Syria
  • Jordanian troops forced the smugglers to retreat into Syrian territory after they deployed rapid response patrols and applied rules of engagement
  • Jordan and the Syrian Arab Republic reached an agreement to establish a joint security committee aimed at securing their border in January

LONDON: The Jordanian Armed Forces thwarted a drug smuggling attempt on their northeastern border with Syria on Tuesday morning as they intensified efforts to protect national security.

The Eastern Command, which includes units from Ar-Ramtha and Mafraq near the Iraqi and Syrian borders, thwarted an infiltration and smuggling attempt involving a large quantity of narcotics, in coordination with the Anti-Narcotics Department.

Jordanian troops forced the smugglers to retreat into Syrian territory after they deployed rapid response patrols and applied rules of engagement, according to the Petra news agency. A search of the area resulted in the seizure of a large quantity of narcotics by authorities.

Last week, Jordanian anti-narcotics authorities prevented an attempt to smuggle narcotics using a drone across the country’s western border.

In January, Jordan and the Syrian Arab Republic reached an agreement to establish a joint security committee aimed at securing their border, combating arms and drug smuggling, and preventing the resurgence of the Daesh terror group.


Divided EU weighs action against Israel over Gaza war

European Union High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas speaks.
European Union High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas speaks.
Updated 15 July 2025

Divided EU weighs action against Israel over Gaza war

European Union High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas speaks.
  • Bloc’s foreign policy chief put forward 10 potential steps after Israel was found to have breached cooperation deal between two sides on human rights grounds

BRUSSELS: EU foreign ministers on Tuesday discussed options for action against Israel over the war in Gaza — but looked unlikely to agree on any.
The bloc’s foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas has put forward 10 potential steps after Israel was found to have breached a cooperation deal between the two sides on human rights grounds.
The measures range from suspending the entire accord or curbing trade ties to sanctioning Israeli ministers, imposing an arms embargo and halting visa-free travel.
Despite growing anger over the devastation in Gaza, EU states remain divided over how to tackle Israel and diplomats say there appears to be no critical mass for any move.
“I can’t predict how the discussion will go,” Kallas said, ahead of the foreign ministers’ talks in Brussels.
She said the main focus would likely be on how the EU could leverage improvements to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
That comes after Kallas on Thursday announced a deal with Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Saar, to open more entry points and allow in more food.
Gaza’s two million residents face dire humanitarian conditions as Israel has severely limited aid during its war with Palestinian militant group Hamas.
“We see some positive signs when it comes to border crossings open, we see some positive signs of them reconstructing the electricity lines, providing water, also more trucks of humanitarian aid coming in,” Kallas said Monday.
But she said the situation in Gaza remained “catastrophic.”
“Of course, we need to see more in order to see real improvement for the people on the ground,” she said.
Saar, speaking at a meeting in Brussels on Monday, was confident Israel would avoid further EU action.
“I’m sure not any of them will be adopted by the EU member states,” said the foreign minister. “There’s no justification whatsoever.”
While the EU appears unable to take further moves against Israel, just getting to this stage has been a considerable step.
The bloc only agreed to review the cooperation deal after Israel relaunched military operations in Gaza following the collapse of a ceasefire in March.
Until then deep divisions between countries backing Israel and those more favorable to the Palestinians had hamstrung any move.
In a sign of that, Hungary looked likely to maintain a block on more sanctions on Israeli settlers in the West Bank despite French minister Jean-Noel Barrot making a fresh plea for action.
The war was sparked by Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, which led to 1,219 deaths, most of them civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures.
Of 251 people taken hostage by Hamas, 49 are still held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead.
Hamas-run Gaza’s health ministry says that at least 58,386 Palestinians, most of them civilians, have been killed in Israel’s retaliatory campaign. The UN considers those figures reliable.