Ƶ

Norway wealth fund may divest companies that aid Israel in Gaza war, occupied territories

A Palestinian man lifts a national flag and flashes the victory sign as Israeli armoured vehicles including a bulldozer drive on a street during a raid in Tulkarem on September 3, 2024, amid a large-scale military offensive launched a week earlier in the occupied West Bank. (AFP)
1 / 4
A Palestinian man lifts a national flag and flashes the victory sign as Israeli armoured vehicles including a bulldozer drive on a street during a raid in Tulkarem on September 3, 2024, amid a large-scale military offensive launched a week earlier in the occupied West Bank. (AFP)
Norway wealth fund may divest companies that aid Israel in Gaza war, occupied territories
2 / 4
An Israeli soldier takes position next to an army vehicle on a street damaged by bulldozers during a raid in the centre of Jenin in the occupied West Bank on September 3, 2024. (AFP)
Norway wealth fund may divest companies that aid Israel in Gaza war, occupied territories
3 / 4
Men walk through debris in a building that was hit by Israeli bombardment in the Sheikh Radwan neighbourhood in the north of Gaza City on September 3, 2024 amid the ongoing war in the Palestinian territory between Israel and Hamas. (AFP)
Norway wealth fund may divest companies that aid Israel in Gaza war, occupied territories
4 / 4
A Palestinian civil defence member stands near a building on fire that was hit by Israeli bombardment in the Sheikh Radwan neighbourhood in the north of Gaza City on September 3, 2024 amid the ongoing war in the Palestinian territory between Israel and Hamas. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 04 September 2024

Norway wealth fund may divest companies that aid Israel in Gaza war, occupied territories

Norway wealth fund may divest companies that aid Israel in Gaza war, occupied territories
  • According to nongovernmental organizations, they make weapons used by Israel in Gaza, where its military offensive has killed nearly 41,000 Palestinians
  • The new definition of ethical breaches is based on the ICJ finding that “the occupation itself, Israel’s settlement policy and the way Israel uses the natural resources in the areas are in conflict with international law,” the letter said

OSLO: Norway’s $1.7 trillion wealth fund may have to divest shares of companies that violate the fund watchdog’s new, tougher interpretation of ethics standards for businesses that aid Israel’s operations in the occupied Palestinian territories.
The Council on Ethics for the world’s largest sovereign wealth fund sent an Aug. 30 letter to the finance ministry, seen by Reuters, that summarises the recently expanded definition of unethical corporate behavior. The change has not previously been reported.
The letter did not specify how many nor name companies whose stocks might be sold but suggested it would be a small number, should the board of the central bank, which has the final say, follow recommendations that the council makes.

HIGHLIGHTS

• Norway fund is world's largest sovereign wealth fund

• Companies active in occupied West Bank under review

• US arms producers being probed over Gaza war

• Watchdog expects to recommend "a few" companies for divestment

One company has already been identified for disinvestment under the new definition, it said. “The Council on Ethics believes the ethical guidelines provide a basis for excluding a few more companies from the Government Pension Fund Global in addition to those already excluded,” the watchdog wrote, giving the formal name for Norway’s sovereign wealth fund.
The fund has been an international leader in the environmental, social and governance (ESG) investment field. It owns 1.5 percent of the world’s listed shares across 8,800 companies, and its size carries influence.
Since the start of the war in Gaza in October, the fund’s ethics watchdog has been investigating whether more companies fall outside its permitted investment guidelines. The letter said that the scope of exclusions was “expected to increase somewhat” under the new policy.
Among the companies that the watchdog could be looking at are RTX Corp, General Electric and General Dynamics. According to nongovernmental organizations, they make weapons used by Israel in Gaza, where its military offensive has killed nearly 41,000 Palestinians. The companies did not immediately reply to requests for comment.
The fund held investments worth 16 billion crowns ($1.41 billion) in Israel as of June 30, across 77 companies, according to fund data, including companies involved in real estate, banks, energy and telecommunications. They represented 0.1 percent of the fund’s overall investments.

NEW LEGAL OPINION
On Gaza, the council is focusing on weapon producers in countries not participating in the Arms Trade Treaty, a 2014 agreement on conventional weapons trade. “This mainly concerns American companies,” the letter said, without naming any.
It added, “There are very few relevant companies remaining in the fund” partly because many US defense manufacturers were already barred for producing nuclear weapons or cluster munitions.
The fund’s ethical rules are set by Norway’s parliament. The updated ethics definition by the watchdog results partly from a July opinion by the International Court of Justice regarding Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories.
The court took positions on “several new facts and legal issues” that could make “companies with a less direct connection to violations of norms” in breach of the ethics rules, the letter said without providing examples.
The new definition of ethical breaches is based on the ICJ finding that “the occupation itself, Israel’s settlement policy and the way Israel uses the natural resources in the areas are in conflict with international law,” the letter said.
The fund previously divested from nine companies operating in the occupied West Bank under its prior policy. Their operations include building roads and homes in Israeli settlements in East Jerusalem and the West Bank and providing surveillance systems for an Israeli wall around the West Bank.
The Council on Ethics makes recommendations to the board of the central bank, which operates the fund. The bank often follows the watchdog’s advice to exclude firms, but not always.
The bank can also put a company on notice to change its behavior or ask the fund’s management to engage with it directly. Companies designated for disinvestment are not named until the fund has sold the shares.


German minister to Iran: never too late to negotiate

Updated 23 sec ago

German minister to Iran: never too late to negotiate

German minister to Iran: never too late to negotiate
“It is never too late to come to the negotiating table if one comes with sincere intentions,” Johann Wadephul said
Wadephul said Israel’s fear that Iran would develop nuclear weapons was justified

BERLIN: Germany’s foreign minister appealed to Iran’s leaders to make credible assurances that it is not seeking a nuclear weapon and to show it is willing to find a negotiated solution as fears mount of further military escalation between Iran and Israel.

“We are still ready to negotiate a solution. However, Iran must act urgently ... it is never too late to come to the negotiating table if one comes with sincere intentions,” Johann Wadephul said at a news conference with his Jordanian counterpart on Wednesday.

Wadephul said Israel’s fear that Iran would develop nuclear weapons was justified and it had a right to self-defense.

“The Israeli decision to do something against this threat is comprehensible,” he said, adding civilian deaths on both sides were regrettable after air attacks between Iran and Israel.

His ministry was arranging special flights later on Wednesday and on Thursday to each repatriate about 180 German citizens via Amman, he said.

Wadephul also said Germany had agreed to create an economic council with Syria to improve cooperation and boost prosperity and stability there.

Hegseth says the Pentagon has given Trump possible options for Israel-Iran conflict

Hegseth says the Pentagon has given Trump possible options for Israel-Iran conflict
Updated 22 sec ago

Hegseth says the Pentagon has given Trump possible options for Israel-Iran conflict

Hegseth says the Pentagon has given Trump possible options for Israel-Iran conflict
  • Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said ‘maximum force protection’ was being provided for US troops in the Middle East
  • He said that it is Trump’s decision whether to provide Israel a ‘bunker buster’ bomb to strike at the core of Iran’s nuclear program

WASHINGTON: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told lawmakers Wednesday that the Pentagon was providing possible options to President Donald Trump as he decides next steps on Iran but would not say whether the military was planning to assist with Israeli strikes, an action that could risk dragging America into a wider war in the Middle East.
Hegseth was on Capitol Hill for the last of his series of often combative hearings before lawmakers, who have pressed him on everything from a ban on transgender troops to his use of a Signal chat to share sensitive military plans earlier this year.
In questioning before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Hegseth said “maximum force protection” was being provided for US troops in the Middle East and that it is Trump’s decision whether to provide Israel a ”bunker buster” bomb to strike at the core of Iran’s nuclear program, which would require US pilots flying a B-2 stealth bomber. He would not indicate what the US may do next.
“My job — our job, the chairman and I — at all times is to make sure the president has options and is informed of what those options might be and what the ramifications of those options might be,” Hegseth said, referring to Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff who was testifying alongside him.
The US has shifted significant numbers of refueling tanker and fighter aircraft to position them to be able to respond to the escalating conflict, such as supporting possible evacuations, or airstrikes. Hegseth said this week that was done to protect US personnel and air bases.
Hegseth, who is appearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Wednesday, has spent vast amounts of time during his first months in office promoting the social changes he’s making at the Pentagon. He’s been far less visible in the administration’s more critical international security crises and negotiations involving Russia, Ukraine, Israel, Gaza and Iran.


Philippines struggles to evacuate nationals from Iran amid Israeli bombardment

Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos speaks to reporters in Quezon City, June 18, 2025. (Radio Television Malacanang)
Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos speaks to reporters in Quezon City, June 18, 2025. (Radio Television Malacanang)
Updated 18 June 2025

Philippines struggles to evacuate nationals from Iran amid Israeli bombardment

Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos speaks to reporters in Quezon City, June 18, 2025. (Radio Television Malacanang)
  • Some 700 Filipinos live in Iran, most married to Iranian nationals
  • Marcos says the government is looking for a route to ‘get them out’

MANILA: The Philippines is struggling to evacuate its nationals from Iran as exit routes are difficult to secure, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. said on Wednesday, as an increasing number of them are seeking to leave amid growing destruction from Israeli bombardment.

The Philippine embassy in Tehran estimating that some 700 Filipinos live in Iran. Most are married to Iranian nationals and initially were not willing to leave when the attacks started last week.

“But now, some are saying they’re scared, so they’re asking for help to get out. The problem we’re facing in evacuating them is that — because of the war — many airports are closed,” Marcos told reporters in Quezon City.

“We’re looking for a route through which we can get them out.”

Following Israeli attacks, Iran has suspended flights at major airports. Neighboring countries such as Iraq and Jordan have also closed their airspace, making air evacuations nearly impossible

Some countries are evacuating citizens by land via Azerbaijan and Turkiye, but these journeys are long due to distance, heavy traffic, fuel shortages and potential Israeli strikes.

The Philippine government is also planning to pull non-essential personnel out of the embassy in Tehran and raise the alert level for nationals in Iran to “voluntary repatriation phase,” Foreign Affairs Undersecretary Eduardo Jose De Vega told the Philippine News Agency.

“We cannot raise it to mandatory because most of the Filipinos there won’t go home anyway, they have Iranian families there,” he said.

Israeli attacks on Iran began on Friday, when Tel Aviv hit more than a dozen Iranian sites — including key nuclear facilities and the residences of military leaders and scientists — claiming it was aiming to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons.

Daily attacks have been ongoing for the past six days after Iran retaliated with ballistic missile strikes against Israel.

The Israeli military has intensified its bombing of civilian targets, hitting Iran’s state broadcaster in Tehran and a hospital in Kermanshah. On Wednesday alone, it said it had hit 40 sites across the country.

According to the Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education, at least 224 people have been killed and 1,481 wounded in the attacks since Friday; however, various media outlets report casualty numbers could be at least twice that many.


Mediterranean rescuers say saved 175,000 people since 2015

Mediterranean rescuers say saved 175,000 people since 2015
Updated 18 June 2025

Mediterranean rescuers say saved 175,000 people since 2015

Mediterranean rescuers say saved 175,000 people since 2015
  • The majority had died in the central Mediterranean, waters between between Libya, Tunisia, Italy and Malta
  • In that area, the equivalent of five adults and one child lost their lives every day over the past decade

BERLIN: Maritime rescue organizations said Wednesday they had pulled more than 175,000 people from the Mediterranean over the past 10 years, as waves of migrants sought to use the dangerous sea route to reach Europe.

The group of 21 NGOS active in the region estimated that at least 28,932 people had died while trying to cross the sea since 2015.

The majority had died in the central Mediterranean – waters between Libya, Tunisia, Italy and Malta – Mirka Schaefer of German NGO SOS Humanity told a Berlin press conference.

In that area, the equivalent of five adults and one child lost their lives every day over the past decade, she said.

The number of unrecorded cases was likely to be “significantly higher,” she added.

Of the 21 organizations currently engaged in maritime rescue in the region, 10 of them are based in Germany. Between them the groups operate 15 boats, four sail ships and four planes.

The organizations have frequently clashed with authorities over their rescue operations, which were launched as Europe’s migration crisis broke out in 2015, when hundreds of thousands headed to the continent, mostly from the Middle East.

In Italy the current government has vowed to end crossings and attacked NGOs for creating a “pull factor” that encourages departures, something migration observers say is unproven.

Giorgia Meloni’s hard-right government has passed laws requiring rescue ships to return to a designated port, a measure NGOs say is contrary to maritime law.

“The pressure on us is growing,” Schaefer said, criticizing a lack of support from the German government.

The rescue organizations were calling on Berlin to support “an effective, coordinated sea rescue program, fully funded by the EU,” Sea Watch spokeswoman Giulia Messmer said at the press conference.

The proposal, which had been sent to the German government and to the European Commission, called for the EU to spend between €108 million-€240 million ($124 million-$276 million) a year on rescue patrols and arrival centers.


India’s commerce minister heads to UK to fast-track free trade deal

India’s commerce minister heads to UK to fast-track free trade deal
Updated 18 June 2025

India’s commerce minister heads to UK to fast-track free trade deal

India’s commerce minister heads to UK to fast-track free trade deal
  • FTA talks started in 2022 and stalled over tariffs, mobility for services professionals
  • Deal-in-principle was announced by Indian, British PMs last month

New Delhi

India’s Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal has embarked on a two-day visit to the UK to accelerate talks on a long-pending bilateral free trade agreement, his office said on Wednesday.

Launched in January 2022, the FTA negotiations between India and the UK were set to conclude the same year, but despite more than a dozen formal rounds, talks have stalled over issues like tariffs, rules of origin and mobility for services professionals.

A deal-in-principle was announced in May by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his British counterpart, Keir Starmer.

Goyal’s UK visit comes in the “backdrop of the announcement” and “aims to accelerate bilateral engagements and harness emerging opportunities,” the Ministry of Commerce and Industry said in a statement.

The minister is scheduled to meet UK Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds to “review the progress made in the ongoing FTA negotiations and chart out a clear, time-bound road map for its finalization and implementation.”

If Goyal’s visit succeeds in producing an implementation road map with timelines, he would be able to start negotiations on a bilateral investment treaty with the UK, Anupam Manur, professor of economics at the Takshashila Institution in Bangalore, told Arab News.

“A working FTA for India is extremely important, especially in a scenario where global trade uncertainty is at an all-time high due to the trade war and tariffs imposed by President Trump,” Manur said.

“In this scenario, an FTA with the UK delivers greater certainty to India, provides market access to an important large economy, and will also act as a leverage point for trade negotiations with the US.”

India has so far signed 14 free trade agreements with 25 countries, along with several regional and preferential trade pacts covering additional nations. These include agreements with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, Japan, South Korea, Australia and the UAE.

Talks are also ongoing with the Gulf Cooperation Council and the EU — with commitments to conclude talks in 2025.