Ƶ

US shows lack of leverage as Israel pounds Lebanon

US President Joe Biden (R) shakes hand with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during an event at the Knesset in Jerusalem, on January 13, 2014. (AFP file photo)
US President Joe Biden (R) shakes hand with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during an event at the Knesset in Jerusalem, on January 13, 2014. (AFP file photo)
Short Url
Updated 24 September 2024

US shows lack of leverage as Israel pounds Lebanon

US shows lack of leverage as Israel pounds Lebanon
  • Biden has repeatedly voiced concern to Netanyahu over the plight of civilians in Gaza but has mostly held off on using the ultimate US leverage — withholding the billions of dollars in US military aid to Israel
  • Complicating matters is the US political calendar, with Biden’s heir Kamala Harris locked in a tough race against Donald Trump in November 5 elections

UNITED NATIONS, United States: For nearly a year, one of President Joe Biden’s top priorities has been to prevent the Gaza war from spiraling into an all-out regional conflict.
Weeks ahead of an election — and just as Biden begins his farewell visit to the UN General Assembly — Israel is pounding Lebanon, highlighting the powerlessness of his warnings.
Biden, meeting the leader of the United Arab Emirates on Monday, insisted that his administration was still “working to de-escalate” in coordination with counterparts.
But events have quickly moved out of US control. Last week, when pagers exploded across Lebanon targeting the Iranian-backed Hezbollah militia, the United States said it had no foreknowledge of the operation widely attributed to Israel and appealed for calm.
Israel instead quickly stepped up its attacks, saying it has hit 1,000 Hezbollah sites over the past 24 hours. Lebanese authorities said 492 people died, including 35 children, on Monday.
Nearly a year after a Hamas attack traumatized Israel and prompted a relentless intervention into Gaza, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu brushed aside warnings of dangers and said Israel’s goal was to change the “security balance” in its northern neighbor by preempting threats.
The operation came after weeks of painstaking US-led diplomacy to reach a Gaza ceasefire failed to seal a deal, with Netanyahu insisting on an Israeli troop presence on the Gaza-Egypt border, and a dispute with Hamas on the release of prisoners.
Michael Hanna, director of the US program at the International Crisis Group, which promotes conflict resolution, said that US diplomats had based efforts for calm in Lebanon on reaching a Gaza ceasefire.
The Gaza truce effort “looks like it’s at a dead-end, and efforts to decouple the two — to reach an agreement between Hezbollah and Israel while the war in Gaza continues, has also proven to be a dead-end,” he said.

Complicating matters is the US political calendar, with Biden’s heir Kamala Harris locked in a tough race against Donald Trump in November 5 elections.
While Biden and Harris would be eager to avoid all-out war and the impression of chaos, few believe that the US administration would take major steps against Israel, with the political risks involved, so close to the election.
“It is not particularly far-fetched to imagine that the US political calendar may have played into Israeli decision-making on when to expand” into Lebanon, Hanna said.
James Jeffrey, a former US ambassador to Iraq and Turkiye who takes a hard line on Iran, said that US policymakers instinctively promoted ceasefires but that Netanyahu, like Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, was more concerned about his country’s security.
“We are already in a regional war and have been for the past 20 years,” said Jeffrey, now at the Wilson Center in Washington.
“Iran is now being pushed back and has lost one of its major proxies at least for the moment — Hamas — and another, Hezbollah, is under stress,” he said.
Netanyahu “has prioritized restoring deterrence and regaining military superiority over anything like pleasing Washington and the international community,” he said.

Biden has repeatedly voiced concern to Netanyahu over the plight of civilians in Gaza but has mostly held off on using the ultimate US leverage — withholding the billions of dollars in US military aid to Israel.
The Pentagon on Monday said that the United States would send additional troops to the Middle East, a move taken by Israel as a sign of US commitment to its ally if the conflict escalates further.
Also potentially emboldening Israel has been Washington’s muted responses to actions attributed to Israel including the assassination of the Hamas political chief as he visited Tehran in July for the inauguration of the new president, Masoud Pezeshkian.
Pezeshkian, visiting the United Nations, accused Israel of seeking a wider conflict and said Iran had shown restraint due to Western confidence a truce could be secured in Gaza.
“They kept telling us we are within reach of peace, perhaps in a week or so,” Pezeshkian, considered a reformist within the theocracy, told reporters in New York.
“But we never reached that elusive peace.”


Four days left to square the circle on global plastic pollution treaty

Updated 22 sec ago

Four days left to square the circle on global plastic pollution treaty

Four days left to square the circle on global plastic pollution treaty
GENEVA: Countries remained at loggerheads Monday over how to tackle plastic pollution, with only four days left to craft a landmark global treaty on reining in the ever-growing scourge.
While plastic has transformed modern life, plastic pollution poses an increasing threat to the environment and the human body — and every day the garbage accumulates on land and in the oceans.
The 184 countries meeting at the United Nations to sculpt a first international accord setting out the way forward return to the negotiating table after a day off Sunday to reflect on their differences.
The first week of talks in Geneva fell behind schedule and failed to produce a clear text, with states still deeply divided at square one: the purpose and scope of the treaty they started negotiating two and a half years ago.
Last week, working groups met on technical topics ranging from the design of plastic to waste management, production, financing for recycling, plastic reuse, and funding waste collection in developing countries.
They also discussed molecules and chemical additives that pose environmental and health risks.


A nebulous cluster of mostly oil-producing states calling themselves the Like-Minded Group want the treaty to focus primarily on waste management.
The United States and India are also close to this club.
At the other end of the spectrum, a growing faction calling themselves the “ambitious” group want radical action written into the treaty, including measures to curb the damage caused by plastic garbage, such as phasing out the most dangerous chemicals.
Plastic pollution is so ubiquitous that microplastics have been found on the highest mountain peaks, in the deepest ocean trench and scattered throughout almost every part of the human body.
The ambitious group wants a clause reining in plastic production, which is set to triple by 2060.
The club brings together the European Union, many African and Latin American countries, Australia, Britain, Switzerland and Canada.
It also includes island micro-nations drowning in plastic trash they did little to produce and have little capacity to deal with.
Palau, speaking for 39 small island developing states (SIDS), said the treaty had to deal with removing the plastic garbage “already choking our oceans.”
“SIDS will not stand by while our future is bartered away in a stalemate,” and “this brinkmanship has a real price: a dying ocean,” the Micronesian archipelago said.


The treaty is set to be settled by universal consensus; but with countries far apart, the lowest-ambition countries are quite comfortable not budging, observers said.
“We risk having a meaningless treaty without any binding global rules like bans and phase-outs. This is unacceptable,” Eirik Lindebjerg, global plastics adviser for the World Wide Fund for Nature, told AFP.
“Expecting any meaningful outcome to this process through consensus is a delusion. With the time remaining, the ambitious governments must come together as a majority to finalize the treaty text and prepare to agree it through a vote.”
Without touching on whether ambitious countries would ultimately abandon consensus and go for a vote, the EU’s environment commissioner Jessika Roswall, due in Geneva on Monday, urged countries to speed up negotiations and not “miss this historic opportunity.”
The draft treaty has ballooned from 22 to 35 pages — with the number of brackets in the text going up near five-fold to almost 1,500 as countries insert a blizzard of conflicting wishes and ideas.
“With four more days to go, we have more square brackets in the text than plastic in the sea. It’s time to get results,” Roswall said.
In total, 70 ministers and around 30 senior government officials are expected in Geneva from Tuesday onwards and could perhaps help break the deadlock.

Massive mudslide kills 7 volunteers repairing flood damage in northern Pakistan

Massive mudslide kills 7 volunteers repairing flood damage in northern Pakistan
Updated 33 min 52 sec ago

Massive mudslide kills 7 volunteers repairing flood damage in northern Pakistan

Massive mudslide kills 7 volunteers repairing flood damage in northern Pakistan
  • A massive mudslide has killed seven volunteers in northern Pakistan as they repaired a drainage channel damaged by flash floods
  • The incident happened early Monday in the town of Danyor in Gilgit-Baltistan. Rescuers recovered the bodies and transported three injured to a hospital

GILGIT: A massive mudslide early Monday killed seven volunteers as they repaired a drainage channel damaged by flash floods in northern Pakistan, officials said, leaving three others injured.
Rescuers recovered the bodies after the mudslide hit the town of Danyor in Gilgit-Baltistan at dawn and transported the injured to a hospital, said Faizullah Faraq, a regional government spokesperson.
This came a day after a flash flood triggered by a glacial lake outburst damaged the key Karakoram Highway, which passes through Danyor, disrupting traffic and trade between Pakistan and China. Engineers and workers were deployed along with heavy machinery to start repairs, Faraq said Monday.
Meanwhile, several landslides near the damaged mountainous highway left homes damaged in Danyor and nearby areas as first responders evacuated those affected by the floods to safer areas, said Hassan Ali, a local police chief, adding that essential foods were being provided to those displaced.
Sunday’s glacial lake outburst was huge, Ali said, swelling the Hunza river and triggering flash flooding that battered crops. Authorities were still assessing the damage, he said.
The region’s Chief Minister Gulbar Khan called the seven who died “heroes who sacrificed their lives for the community” in a statement Monday.
Gilgit-Baltistan is known for its scenic glaciers that provide 75 percent of the country’s stored water supply, according to the region’s official website. Last month, it was hit by landslides, killing 18 tourists when flash floods swept away their vehicles.
Experts say glacial lake outburst floods occur when water dammed by a glacier is suddenly released, often because ice or debris barriers collapse. Scientists say rising temperatures linked to climate change are accelerating glacier melt in Pakistan’s northern mountains, increasing both the size and number of these lakes.
A study released last week by World Weather Attribution, a network of international scientists, found rainfall from June 24 to July 23 was 10 percent to 15 percent heavier because of global warming. Pakistan produces less than 1 percent of the world’s greenhouse gases, but research shows it suffers disproportionately from extreme weather.
In 2022, its worst monsoon season on record killed more than 1,700 people and caused an estimated $40 billion in damage.
Rains and floods since June 26 have killed more than 300 people across Pakistan.


In India, Trump’s tariffs spark calls to boycott American goods

In India, Trump’s tariffs spark calls to boycott American goods
Updated 49 min 13 sec ago

In India, Trump’s tariffs spark calls to boycott American goods

In India, Trump’s tariffs spark calls to boycott American goods
  • Trump recently imposed a 50 percent tariff on goods from India, rattling exporters and damaging ties with New Delhi
  • India is a key market for American brands that have rapidly expanded to target growing base of affluent consumers

NEW DELHI: From McDonald’s and Coca-Cola to Amazon and Apple, US-based multinationals are facing calls for a boycott in India as business executives and Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s supporters stoke anti-American sentiment to protest against US tariffs.

India, the world’s most populous nation, is a key market for American brands that have rapidly expanded to target a growing base of affluent consumers, many of whom remain infatuated with international labels seen as symbols of moving up in life. India, for example, is the biggest market by users for Meta’s WhatsApp and Domino’s has more restaurants than any other brand in the country.

Beverages like Pepsi and Coca-Cola often dominate store shelves, and people still queue up when a new Apple store opens or a Starbucks cafe doles out discounts. Although there was no immediate indication of sales being hit, there’s a growing chorus both on social media and offline to buy local and ditch American products after Donald Trump imposed a 50 percent tariff on goods from India, rattling exporters and damaging ties between New Delhi and Washington.

McDonald’s, Coca-Cola, Amazon and Apple did not immediately respond to Reuters queries.

Manish Chowdhary, co-founder of India’s Wow Skin Science, took to LinkedIn with a video message urging support for farmers and startups to make “Made in India” a “global obsession,” and to learn from South Korea whose food and beauty products are famous worldwide.

“We have lined up for products from thousands of miles away. We have proudly spent on brands that we don’t own, while our own makers fight for attention in their own country,” he said.

Rahm Shastry, CEO of India’s DriveU, which provides a car driver on call service, wrote on LinkedIn: “India should have its own home-grown Twitter/Google/YouTube/WhatsApp/FB — like China has.”

To be fair, Indian retail companies give foreign brands like Starbucks stiff competition in the domestic market, but going global has been a challenge. Indian IT services firms, however, have become deeply entrenched in the global economy, with the likes of TCS and Infosys providing software solutions to clients world over.

On Sunday, Modi made a “special appeal” for becoming self-reliant, telling a gathering in Bengaluru that Indian technology companies made products for the world but “now is the time for us to give more priority to India’s needs.”

He did not name any company.

DON’T DRAG MY MCPUFF INTO IT

Even as anti-American protests simmer, Tesla launched its second showroom in India in New Delhi, with Monday’s opening attended by Indian commerce ministry officials and US embassy officials.

The Swadeshi Jagran Manch group, which is linked to Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party, took out small public rallies across India on Sunday, urging people to boycott American brands.

“People are now looking at Indian products. It will take some time to fructify,” Ashwani MaHajjan, the group’s co-convenor, told Reuters. “This is a call for nationalism, patriotism.”
He also shared with Reuters a table his group is circulating on WhatsApp, listing Indian brands of bath soaps, toothpaste and cold drinks that people could choose over foreign ones.

On social media, one of the group’s campaigns is a graphic titled “Boycott foreign food chains,” with logos of McDonald’s and many other restaurant brands.
In Uttar Pradesh, Rajat Gupta, 37, who was dining at a McDonald’s in Lucknow on Monday, said he wasn’t concerned about the tariff protests and simply enjoyed the 49-rupee ($0.55) coffee he considered good value for money.

“Tariffs are a matter of diplomacy and my McPuff, coffee should not be dragged into it,” he said. 


In India, Trump’s tariffs spark calls to boycott American goods

In India, Trump’s tariffs spark calls to boycott American goods
Updated 55 min 33 sec ago

In India, Trump’s tariffs spark calls to boycott American goods

In India, Trump’s tariffs spark calls to boycott American goods
  • From McDonald’s and Coca-Cola to Amazon and Apple, US-based multinationals are facing calls for a boycott in India as business executives and Modi’s supporters call for boycotts

NEW DELHI: From McDonald’s and Coca-Cola to Amazon and Apple, US-based multinationals are facing calls for a boycott in India as business executives and Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s supporters stoke anti-American sentiment to protest against US tariffs.
India, the world’s most populous nation, is a key market for American brands that have rapidly expanded to target a growing base of affluent consumers, many of whom remain infatuated with international labels seen as symbols of moving up in life. India, for example, is the biggest market by users for Meta’s WhatsApp and Domino’s has more restaurants than any other brand in the country.

Beverages like Pepsi and Coca-Cola often dominate store shelves, and people still queue up when a new Apple store opens or a Starbucks cafe doles out discounts. Although there was no immediate indication of sales being hit, there’s a growing chorus both on social media and offline to buy local and ditch American products after Donald Trump imposed a 50 percent tariff on goods from India, rattling exporters and damaging ties between New Delhi and Washington.
McDonald’s, Coca-Cola, Amazon and Apple did not immediately respond to Reuters queries.
Manish Chowdhary, co-founder of India’s Wow Skin Science, took to LinkedIn with a video message urging support for farmers and startups to make “Made in India” a “global obsession,” and to learn from South Korea whose food and beauty products are famous worldwide.
“We have lined up for products from thousands of miles away. We have proudly spent on brands that we don’t own, while our own makers fight for attention in their own country,” he said.
Rahm Shastry, CEO of India’s DriveU, which provides a car driver on call service, wrote on LinkedIn: “India should have its own home-grown Twitter/Google/YouTube/WhatsApp/FB — like China has.” To be fair, Indian retail companies give foreign brands like Starbucks stiff competition in the domestic market, but going global has been a challenge. Indian IT services firms, however, have become deeply entrenched in the global economy, with the likes of TCS and Infosys providing software solutions to clients world over.
On Sunday, Modi made a “special appeal” for becoming self-reliant, telling a gathering in Bengaluru that Indian technology companies made products for the world but “now is the time for us to give more priority to India’s needs.” He did not name any company.
Even as anti-American protests simmer, Tesla launched its second showroom in India in New Delhi, with Monday’s opening attended by Indian commerce ministry officials and US embassy officials.
The Swadeshi Jagran Manch group, which is linked to Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party, took out small public rallies across India on Sunday, urging people to boycott American brands.
“People are now looking at Indian products. It will take some time to fructify,” Ashwani MaHajjan, the group’s co-convenor, told Reuters. “This is a call for nationalism, patriotism.”
He also shared with Reuters a table his group is circulating on WhatsApp, listing Indian brands of bath soaps, toothpaste and cold drinks that people could choose over foreign ones.
On social media, one of the group’s campaigns is a graphic titled “Boycott foreign food chains,” with logos of McDonald’s and many other restaurant brands.
In Uttar Pradesh, Rajat Gupta, 37, who was dining at a McDonald’s in Lucknow on Monday, said he wasn’t concerned about the tariff protests and simply enjoyed the 49-rupee ($0.55) coffee he considered good value for money.
“Tariffs are a matter of diplomacy and my McPuff, coffee should not be dragged into it,” he said.


Aid cuts fuel fears on militant-hit Lake Chad’s shores

Aid cuts fuel fears on militant-hit Lake Chad’s shores
Updated 11 August 2025

Aid cuts fuel fears on militant-hit Lake Chad’s shores

Aid cuts fuel fears on militant-hit Lake Chad’s shores
  • Chad’s Lac region is one of many around the world to be hit by cuts in the United States’s foreign aid budget ordered by President Donald Trump

BAGA SOLA: Militants surrounded Ahmat Moussa’s isolated village on Lake Chad’s shores in the dead of night and then attacked – with devastating consequences for the fisherman and many of his neighbors.

Boko Haram militants have sowed terror among those living around Lake Chad for some 15 years, disrupting the fishing, farming and herding on which millions depend.

“I heard the first blasts and I left without looking back,” 42-year-old Moussa said, of the raid on Balangoura nine months ago.

He has a scar where a Kalashnikov’s bullet hit him in the right leg. And while he escaped, his 16-year-old son was abducted in the raid.

Neighbor Baya Ali Moussa also suffered horror and loss that night.

While she also escaped Balangoura, the body of her 23-year-old son was discovered three days later, floating in the lake.

Both villagers found refuge elsewhere on the lake, but they depend on dwindling help from NGOs and aid organizations battling massive foreign cuts to humanitarian budgets.

Surrounded by Cameroon, Chad, Niger and Nigeria, Lake Chad’s countless islets serve as hideouts for the Islamist militants, whose violent campaign began in Nigeria’s northeast before spilling into its neighbors.

Militant attacks have surged in the wider Sahel region, though Boko Haram has lost ground to the army in the Lake Chad area.

The insurgents have nevertheless remained a constant threat, carrying out frequent kidnappings, executions, rapes and lootings.

In Chad’s Lac province alone, more than 250,000 people have been forced to flee their homes, says the United Nations.

Tipping people further into poverty in one of the world’s most impoverished nations only helps turn the area into a recruiting ground for the militants.

Like 2,000 others, Baya Ali Moussa and Ahmat Moussa have taken refuge in Yakoua, some 20 kilometers (12 miles) from the Lac region’s capital, Bol, on the banks of a branch of the lake.

“Here we’ve nothing to eat or drink, we survive only thanks to community togetherness and to humanitarian workers,” said Baya Ali Moussa.

For three months, the ACTED humanitarian organization has distributed emergency aid to the displaced people in Yakoua.

“Attacks continue, kidnappings continue, camps for displaced people turn into villages, but the humanitarian momentum we saw from 2015 to 2019 has waned,” said Togoum Atikang, who heads ACTED’s rapid response projects.

“Some donors are pulling out their funding,” he added.

“Wherever we pull out, the population will suffer even more,” he warned.

Chad’s Lac region is one of many around the world to be hit by cuts in the United States’s foreign aid budget ordered by President Donald Trump.

Having accounted for half of the World Food Programme’s funding, the United States was the UN food agency’s top bankroller followed by Europe.

“With funds declining, we have to cut back,” said Alexandre Le Cuziat, WFP deputy director in Chad.

At the beginning of July, the WFP suspended its flight service between the Chadian capital N’Djamena and Bol.

So where previously it took less than an hour to fly in goods and people, now the journey will have to be made by road — a whole day along an unsafe route.

The WFP and the UN refugee agency are also shuttering several offices in the Lac region.

“The US financing freeze has hit some seven percent of the humanitarian aid here in Chad since January,” said Francois Batalingaya, the UN’s humanitarian coordinator in the country.

“But the problem is that we have no idea of what the rest of the year will bring.”

He worried that aid groups would leave “from the month of October onwards.”

Funding for the humanitarian response plan for Chad is “only at 11 percent” of the 1.45 billion dollars required, he said.

At the same time last year, it was 34-percent funded, he added.

As the international climate for humanitarian funding has gone cold, at the national level Chad has also prioritized sending emergency aid to its eastern border with war-torn Sudan.

More than a million Sudanese have fled to Chad since the civil war began in April 2023.

“As a result, Lake Chad no longer captures the world’s attention,” Batalingaya said.

“If we forget the people of the region, there will be more people displaced and more people will join these armed groups.”