Ƶ

Most Arab Americans hold conservative views on illegal immigration, abortion: Poll

Special Most Arab Americans hold conservative views on illegal immigration, abortion: Poll
1 / 2
Some 56percent of Arab Americans surveyed think US border controls should be tightened, a surprising twistfor a population of immigrants or descendants of immigrants. (AFP photo)
Special Most Arab Americans hold conservative views on illegal immigration, abortion: Poll
2 / 2
Thirty-eight percent of Arab Americans surveyed38 percentare in favor of abortion being allowed up to the ninth week of pregnancy, 40 percent agree toallowing abortion only under certain circumstances, including rape and threat to life; andonly 14 percent believe abortion should be completely banned. (AFP photos)
Short Url
Updated 24 October 2024

Most Arab Americans hold conservative views on illegal immigration, abortion: Poll

Most Arab Americans hold conservative views on illegal immigration, abortion: Poll
  • An Arab News-YouGov survey found that a majority would like to see US border controls and rules around abortion tightened
  • Immigration policy and abortion rights are among the key fault line issues between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump

LONDON: A survey conducted for Arab News by YouGov reveals that although 62 percent of Arab Americans describe themselves as politically moderate (35 percent), liberal (13 percent) or very liberal (13 percent), a majority express conservative views on two key domestic issues: illegal immigration and abortion.

Perhaps most surprisingly for a population of immigrants or descendants of immigrants, 56 percent of respondents think US border controls should be tightened.

However, 24 percent think border controls should be relaxed — a liberal viewpoint that chimes with the position of neither the Democratic nor Republican candidate. Just 5 percent of over-55s want to see controls relaxed.

Fifty-one percent of respondents believe there are too many illegal immigrants in the US. This view is most common among those over 55 (61 percent) and those with the least education (66 percent).

“Interestingly, immigration seems to rank very highly in the minds of Arab Americans and honestly, as an immigrant myself, I wasn’t completely surprised by this,” Firas Maksad, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute in Washington, told the Arab News podcast “Frankly Speaking.”

Opinion

This section contains relevant reference points, placed in (Opinion field)

He added: “Those who immigrated here legally and went through the process and paid their taxes tend to feel pretty strongly about those who are cutting in line and not paying their fair share.”

This, he said, could partly explain the large percentage of support for Republican candidate Donald Trump among Arab Americans.

As an issue, “illegal immigration often plays in favor of Trump rather than (Democratic candidate Kamala) Harris,” Maksad added.

However, one in three respondents rejected the suggestion that the US has too many illegal immigrants, while 16 percent said they do not know.

On abortion, one of the key fault lines between pro-choice Harris and Trump, who is seen as responsible for the Supreme Court overturning the landmark Roe v Wade decision — which since 1973 had guaranteed the right to pregnancy termination in the US — Arab Americans emerge as broadly conservative in their outlook.

Although only 14 percent (17 percent of men and 11 percent of women) believe abortion should be completely banned, 40 percent agree with the proposition: “Abortion should be allowed only under certain circumstances, including rape and threat to life.” Again, more men (44 percent) than women (37 percent) hold this position.

Read our full coverage here:US Elections 2024: What Arab Americans want

However, almost as many (38 percent) are in favor of abortion being allowed up to the ninth week of pregnancy, which is officially when an embryo turns into a fetus. Women (44 percent) are more supportive of this than men (33 percent).

One issue of concern to many Arab Americans is their experience of racism, harassment or hate attacks related to their ethnicity, religion or origins — 46 percent said they had experienced this and 50 percent said they had not.

Intriguingly, given the support for Trump revealed by the survey (45 percent said they will vote for him, against 43 percent for Harris), 46 percent of respondents said they expect racism and hate attacks against Arab Americans to increase during a Trump presidency, compared with 23 percent if Harris becomes president.

For 39 percent of respondents, Harris is also seen as being more sensitive to the national needs of Arab Americans than Trump (31 percent).


‘Fast and furious’: H-1B workers abroad race to US as Trump order sparks dismay, confusion

‘Fast and furious’: H-1B workers abroad race to US as Trump order sparks dismay, confusion
Updated 9 sec ago

‘Fast and furious’: H-1B workers abroad race to US as Trump order sparks dismay, confusion

‘Fast and furious’: H-1B workers abroad race to US as Trump order sparks dismay, confusion
  • On the popular Chinese social media app Rednote, people on H-1B visas shared their experiences of having to rush back to the US — in some cases just hours after landing in China or another country

SAN FRANCISCO/NEW YORK: Panic, confusion and anger reigned as workers on H-1B visas from India and China were forced to abandon travel plans and rush back to the US after President Donald Trump imposed new visa fees, in line with his wide-ranging immigration crackdown.
Tech companies and banks sent urgent memos to employees, advising them to return before a deadline of 12:01 a.m. EDT on Sunday (0401 GMT), and telling them not to leave the country.
A White House official on Saturday clarified that the order applied only to new applicants and not holders of existing visas or those seeking renewals, addressing some of the confusion over who would be affected by the order.
But Trump’s proclamation a day before had already set off alarm bells in Silicon Valley.

RUSH BACK TO US
Fearing they would not be allowed back once the new rule took effect, several Indian nationals at San Francisco airport said they cut short vacations.
“It is a situation where we had to choose between family and staying here,” said an engineer at a large tech company whose wife had been on an Emirates flight from San Francisco to Dubai that was scheduled to depart at 5:05 p.m. local time on Friday (0005 GMT on Saturday)
The flight was delayed by more than three hours after several Indian passengers who received news of the order or memos from their employers demanded to deplane, said the person who spoke on condition of anonymity. At least five passengers were eventually allowed off, the engineer said.
A video of the incident was circulating on social media, showing a few people leaving the plane. Reuters could not independently verify the veracity of the video.
The engineer’s wife, also an H-1B visa holder, chose to head to India to care for her sick mother.
“It’s quite tragic. We have built a life here,” he told Reuters.
On the popular Chinese social media app Rednote, people on H-1B visas shared their experiences of having to rush back to the US — in some cases just hours after landing in China or another country.
“My feelings are a mix of disappointment, sadness, and frustration,” said one woman in a post with a user handle “Emily’s Life in NY.”
The woman said she had boarded a United Airlines flight from New York to Paris, and it started taxiing, but after some back-and-forth with the airline the captain agreed to return to the gate to let her off the aircraft.
Feeling what she described to Reuters as “shaken,” she canceled her trip to France, abandoning plans with friends, including some who were flying in from China, after she received a letter from her company’s lawyers asking employees abroad to return to the US
Companies including Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet and Goldman Sachs were among those that sent urgent emails to their employees with travel adviseries.
Amazon gave guidance to staff on Saturday, after clarity emerged on who would be impacted, that no action was required for staff currently holding H-1B visas, according to a source who had viewed an internal portal. Amazon did not immediately respond to a request for comment outside business hours.
As of Sunday, some of the panic had dissipated, said IBM Vice Chairman Gary Cohn, on CBS’s “Face the Nation” program.
“I think it caused a panic over the weekend because people weren’t sure what was going on with the existing H-1B visas,” said Cohn. “It’s been cleaned up over the weekend, so at this point, there’s not a panic in the system.”
Cohn praised the move as ultimately good for the economy.
“I actually think this is a good idea, if you understand the H-1B visa program in the United States,” Cohn said. “Historically, it has been a lottery system.”

TRUMP’S U-TURN ON H-1B
Since taking office in January, Trump has kicked off a wide-ranging immigration crackdown, including moves to limit some forms of legal immigration.
This step to reshape the H-1B visa program represents his administration’s most visible effort yet to rework temporary employment visas and underscores what critics have said is a protectionist agenda. It is a U-turn from Trump’s earlier stance when he sided with one-time ally and Tesla CEO Elon Musk in a public dispute over the use of the H-1B visa, saying he fully backed the program for foreign tech workers even though it was opposed by some of his supporters.
Trump administration officials say the visa allows companies to suppress wages, and curbing it opens more jobs for US tech workers. Supporters of the program argue that it brings in highly skilled workers essential to filling talent gaps and keeping firms competitive.
In the hours following Trump’s proclamation, social media was flooded with debate on the scope of the order and dismay at what many saw as a move that dimmed the United States’ allure as a work destination.
An anonymous user on Rednote said that their life was like that of an “H-1B slave.” The person cut short a holiday in Tokyo to rush back to the US, describing it as “a real-life ‘Fast & Furious’ return to the US,” a reference to the hit Hollywood film series about street racing.
Trump’s H-1B proclamation read: “Some employers, using practices now widely adopted by entire sectors, have abused the H-1B statute and its regulations to artificially suppress wages, resulting in a disadvantageous labor market for American citizens.”
The secretary of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem, could exempt petitioners from the fee at her discretion, the proclamation said.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Friday that companies would have to pay $100,000 per year for H-1B worker visas.
However, White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said in a post on X on Saturday that this was not an annual fee, only a one-time fee that applied to each petition.
A Nvidia engineer, who has lived in the US for 10 years, told Reuters at the San Francisco airport that he had been vacationing in Japan with his wife and infant when he rushed to reschedule his return flight after hearing the news.
“It feels surreal,” he said. “Everything is changing in an instant.”


French politicians bicker over Palestinian flags outside town halls

French politicians bicker over Palestinian flags outside town halls
Updated 59 min 54 sec ago

French politicians bicker over Palestinian flags outside town halls

French politicians bicker over Palestinian flags outside town halls
  • Eiffel Tower was to be lit up with a projection of both the Israeli and Palestinian flags, alongside a dove of peace, ahead of recognitizing Palestine

PARIS: French politicians bickered on Sunday over whether it is appropriate to hoist Palestinian flags outside town halls on the eve of the country’s planned recognition of the State of Palestine.
Ahead of the landmark move, set to be finalized at the United Nations General Assembly in New York starting Monday, the government told town halls not to fly the flag and take down any Palestinian banners that they had already put up.
Hard-line Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau argued that the hoisting of Palestinian flags “seriously undermines the principle of neutrality of public services.”
His office has urged local prefects to take the matter to the administrative courts — though they cannot order the police to take the flags down.
But Socialist leader Olivier Faure — whose party’s support France’s new government will likely need to survive — urged President Emmanuel Macron to allow mayors’ offices to fly the flag if they so wished.
“It would not only be a strong gesture toward all those committed to resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but consistent with France’s position internationally,” he said.
Faure argued Retailleau was playing politics to undermine Macron’s push for recognition.
“It is not the flag he (Retailleau) is against... It is the head of state’s decision to recognize a Palestinian state,” Faure told BFMTV Sunday evening.

‘Cheap community politics’

Boris Vallaud, the Socialist Party’s top lawmaker in the National Assembly, the lower house of France’s parliament, also pushed back against what he called Retailleau’s “incorrect” interpretation of neutrality.
He pointed out that town halls had “rightfully raised the Israeli flag” after Hamas’s October, 7 2023 attack that began the war in Gaza, while “there are also Ukrainian flags” on some buildings in the wake of Russia’s invasion.
“A flag on the front of town hall has never killed anyone, while in Gaza the Israeli army kills each day,” Greens leader Marine Tondelier told a Sunday pro-Palestinian rally in Paris.
But Philippe Ballard, a lawmaker with the far-right National Rally party, accused municipalities of practicing “cheap community politics” with the hoists, while his colleague Jean-Philippe Tanguy called the initiative “illegal.”
Even town halls on the left are divided over the issue.
The Socialist mayor of Creteil, outside of Paris, said that he would refuse Faure’s call as he had a responsibility to “preserve social cohesion.”
In the capital proper, the Eiffel Tower was to be lit up with a projection of both the Israeli and Palestinian flags — alongside a dove of peace — ahead of the recognition move, the mayor of Paris said.


Who recognizes the State of Palestine, who doesn’t, and why does it matter?

Who recognizes the State of Palestine, who doesn’t, and why does it matter?
Updated 21 September 2025

Who recognizes the State of Palestine, who doesn’t, and why does it matter?

Who recognizes the State of Palestine, who doesn’t, and why does it matter?
  • At least 144 countries out of 193 UN members already recognize the State of Palestine
  • Algeria became the first country to officially recognize a Palestinian state on November 15, 1988

PARIS: Britain, Australia and Canada on Sunday recognized a Palestinian state after nearly two years of war in the Gaza Strip, with France, Belgium and other countries poised to follow suit at the United Nations General Assembly in New York.
Here is an overview of diplomatic recognition of the state, which was unilaterally proclaimed by the Palestinian leadership in exile in 1988.
Of the territory claimed by the state, Israel currently occupies the West Bank and the Gaza Strip is largely in ruins.

Which countries recognize or will recognize the State of Palestine?

Answer: three-quarters of UN members.
According to an AFP tally, at least 144 countries out of 193 UN members already recognize the State of Palestine.
AFP has not yet obtained recent confirmation from three African countries.
The count includes Britain and Canada — the first G7 countries to do so — and Australia.
Portugal was expected to follow suit soon, and several other countries including France, Belgium, Luxembourg and Malta are expected to do the same during a summit on the future of the two-state solution chaired by France and Ƶ on Monday at UN headquarters.
Russia, alongside all Arab countries, almost all African and Latin American countries, and most Asian countries including India and China are already on the list.
Algeria became the first country to officially recognize a Palestinian state on November 15, 1988, minutes after late Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) leader Yasser Arafat unilaterally proclaimed an independent Palestinian state.
Dozens of other countries followed suit in the following weeks and months, and another wave of recognitions came in late 2010 and early 2011.
The Israeli offensive in Gaza, which was sparked by the Palestinian Islamist organization Hamas’s attack in Israel on October 7, 2023, has already driven another 12 countries to recognize the state.

Who does not?

Answer: at least 46 countries, including Israel, the United States and their allies.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government completely rejects the idea of a Palestinian state.
Japan, South Korea and Singapore are the Asian countries that do not recognize Palestine.
Neither does Cameroon in Africa, Panama in Latin America and most countries in Oceania.
Europe is the most divided continent on the issue, and is split almost 50-50 over Palestinian statehood.
Until the mid-2010s, the only countries recognizing the State of Palestine apart from Turkiye were those of the former Soviet bloc.
Now, some former Eastern-bloc countries such as Hungary and the Czech Republic do not recognize a Palestinian state at a bilateral level.
Western and northern Europe were until now united in non-recognition, with the exception of Sweden, which extended recognition in 2014.
But the war in Gaza has upended things, with Norway, Spain, Ireland and Slovenia following in Sweden’s footsteps to recognize the state in 2024, before the United Kingdom did so on Sunday.
Italy and Germany do not plan on recognizing a Palestinian state.

What does recognition mean?

Romain Le Boeuf, a professor in international law at the University of Aix-Marseille in southern France, described recognition of Palestinian statehood as “one of the most complicated questions” in international law, “a little like a halfway point between the political and juridical.”
He told AFP states were free to choose the timing and form of recognition, with great variations that are either explicit or implicit.
According to Le Boeuf, there is no office to register recognitions.
“The Palestinian Authority in the West Bank puts all they consider to be acts of recognition on its own list, but from a purely subjective point of view. In the same way, other states will say that they have or have not recognized, but without really having to justify themselves,” he said.
However, there is one point on which international law is quite clear: “Recognition does not mean that a state has been created, no more than the lack of recognition prevents the state from existing.”
While recognition carries largely symbolic and political weight, three-quarters of countries say “that Palestine meets all the necessary conditions to be a state,” he said.
“I know for many people this seems only symbolic, but actually in terms of symbolism, it is sort of a game changer,” lawyer and Franco-British law professor Philippe Sands wrote in the New York Times in mid-August 2025.
“Because once you recognize Palestinian statehood... you essentially put Palestine and Israel on level footing in terms of their treatment under international law.”


Ecuador to vote in November on whether to allow foreign military bases, says Electoral Council

Ecuador to vote in November on whether to allow foreign military bases, says Electoral Council
Updated 21 September 2025

Ecuador to vote in November on whether to allow foreign military bases, says Electoral Council

Ecuador to vote in November on whether to allow foreign military bases, says Electoral Council
  • The US has announced that it will maintain strong cooperation with the Ecuadorean government in its fight against criminal organizations
  • Ecuador hosted a US military base for a decade until 2009 in the coastal city of Manta of the Pacific Ocean

QUITO: On Sunday, Ecuador’s Electoral Council approved the holding of a referendum in November for citizens to decide whether to allow foreign military bases in the South American country, part of President Daniel Noboa’s plan to combat drug trafficking.
The referendum will be held November 16 and will include another initiative to eliminate a provision requiring a portion of state funds to be allocated to political parties.
“We approve the call, guidelines, operational plan, budget, risk and contingency matrix, and calendar for the 2025 Referendum,” Diana Atamaint, president of the National Electoral Council (CNE), posted on X.
Noboa has said that drug trafficking gangs operate through international networks, so it is necessary to act jointly with other countries to effectively combat them. The United States has announced that it will maintain strong cooperation with the Ecuadorean government in its fight against criminal organizations.
But Ecuador’s opposition groups say foreign military presence alone will not solve the country’s security problems and that the government needs a clear plan to combat crime.
The coastal city of Manta, on the Pacific Ocean, hosted the US military base for a decade until 2009. Since 2008, Ecuador’s Constitution has prohibited foreign military bases in the country, following a decision by leftist President Rafael Correa not to renew the permits.
Earlier this year, the former president said on his X account the move would be “an insult to our public forces and an assault to our sovereignty.”
“We do not need foreign soldiers. We need government,” he said.


Pope Leo decries ‘forced exile’ of Gaza civilians

Pope Leo XIV speaks as he appears to lead the weekly Angelus prayer, at the Vatican, September 21, 2025. (REUTERS)
Pope Leo XIV speaks as he appears to lead the weekly Angelus prayer, at the Vatican, September 21, 2025. (REUTERS)
Updated 21 September 2025

Pope Leo decries ‘forced exile’ of Gaza civilians

Pope Leo XIV speaks as he appears to lead the weekly Angelus prayer, at the Vatican, September 21, 2025. (REUTERS)
  • Leo's role in advocating for peace in Gaza has become starker since Israel struck the territory's only Catholic church in July

VATICAN CITY: Pope Leo spoke out against the forced displacement of Gaza civilians on Sunday as Israel intensified its military demolition campaign in the Palestinian enclave's main city.
"Together with the pastors of the churches in the Holy Land, I repeat that there is no future based on violence, forced exile, and revenge," the Pope said during his weekly Angelus prayer.
The Holy Land encompasses parts of modern-day Israel, the occupied Palestinian territories, Jordan, and Egypt, which are sacred to Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.
Leo's role in advocating for peace in Gaza has become starker since Israel struck the territory's only Catholic church in July.
"The people need peace. Those who truly love them work for peace," the first pope from the US added.
Meanwhile, Israeli strikes in Gaza City and at a refugee camp killed more than 40 people, including 19 women and children.
Health officials at Shifa Hospital, where most of the bodies were brought, said the dead included 14 people killed in a strike late on Saturday, which hit a residential block in the southern side of the city. 
Health staff said a nurse who worked at the hospital was among the dead, along with his wife and three children.
Another strike that targeted a group of people in front of a clinic in the Bureij refugee camp in central Gaza killed at least eight Palestinians, according to the Al-Awda Hospital. 
The dead include four children and two women, the hospital said. Another 22 people were wounded, it said.