Ƶ

Israel launches strikes on military targets in Iran

Update Israel launches strikes on military targets in Iran
1 / 3
A general view of Tehran after several explosions were heard on October 26, 2024, amid retaliatory airstrikes by the Israeli military. (West Asia News Agency/WANA via REUTERS)
Update Israel launches strikes on military targets in Iran
2 / 3
Rear Admiral Daniel Hagari, chief spokesman of the Israel Defense Forces, announcing Israel's attack on Iran on the X social media platform on Saturday. (X: @IDF)
Update Israel launches strikes on military targets in Iran
3 / 3
This picture posted on X shows Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his generals monitoring the IDF air strikes on Iran early Saturday. (X: @MOSSADil)
Short Url
Updated 26 October 2024

Israel launches strikes on military targets in Iran

Israel launches strikes on military targets in Iran
  • Iran’s state TV said Tehran’s airports including Imam Khomeini International airport were “normal,” after it reported several explosions around the capital
  • Syrian state media said Israeli air strikes also targeted some military sites in central and southern Syria

RIYADH: Israel carried out strikes against Iran early Saturday, saying it was responding to missile attacks conducted by Tehran earlier in the month.

The military announced the action on the social media platform X: "Right now the Israel Defense Forces is conducting precise strikes on military targets in Iran”.

Air defense systems in Tehran could be seen shooting down projectiles over the east of the city, prompting authorities to shut down Iranian air space.

Hours later, Israel said that it had completed military actions against Iranian military targets and said its planes had returned home safely.

The attacks had been expected for weeks, after Iran struck mainland Israel on Oct. 1, and US officials said they had received advanced notice of the Israeli actions.

The Iranians confirmed that military sites in the provinces of Ilam, Khuzestan and Tehran had been struck.

In its statement, the IDF said: "The regime in Iran and its proxies in the region have been relentlessly attacking Israel since October 7th—on seven fronts—including direct attacks from Iranian soil. Like every other sovereign country in the world, the State of Israel has the right and the duty to respond.

"Our defensive and offensive capabilities are fully mobilized. We will do whatever necessary to defend the State of Israel and the people of Israel," said the statement read byRear Admiral Daniel Hagari, chief spokesman of the Israel Defense Forces.

In Tehran, the Iranian capital, the sound of explosions could be heard, with state-run media there initially acknowledging at least six blasts were heard around Tehran and saying some of the sounds came from air defense systems around the city.

A Tehran resident told The Associated Press that at least seven explosions could be heard, which rattled the surrounding area. The resident spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals.

Iran’s state TV later said that operations at Tehran’s airports including Imam Khomeini International airport were “normal.”

“Operations at Imam Khomeini International Airport and Mehrabad Airport are normal and they continue to operate according to the schedule,” the state TV presenter said, citing the chiefs of Mehrabad and Imam Khomeini airports.

Israel's strikes on Iran did not include attacking Iranian nuclear facilities or oil fields, and focused on military targets, NBC News and ABC News reported, citing an Israeli official.

In Washington, White House National Security Council spokesman Sean Savett said the “targeted strikes on military targets” are “an exercise of self-defense and in response to Iran’s ballistic missile attack against Israel on October 1.”

The United States was “informed beforehand and there is no US involvement,” a US defense official told AFP, under the condition of anonymity.

The official did not say how far in advance the United States had been informed or what had been shared by Israel.

Meanwhile, Syrian state media said Israeli air strikes also targeted some military sites in central and southern Syria.

Iran has launched two ballistic missile attacks on Israel in recent months amid the ongoing Israel-Hamas war in the Gaza Strip that began with the Hamas attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Israel also has launched a ground invasion of Lebanon.
The strike happened just as US Secretary of State Antony Blinken was arriving back in the US after a tour of the Middle East where he and other US officials had warned Israel to tender a response that would not further escalate the conflict in the region and exclude nuclear sites in Iran.
Israel had vowed to hit Iran hard following a massive Iranian missile barrage on Oct. 1. Iran said its barrage was in response to deadly Israeli attacks against its proxy in Lebanon, Hezbollah, and it has promised to respond to any retaliatory strikes.
Israel and Iran have been bitter foes since the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Israel considers Iran to be its greatest threat, citing its leaders’ calls for Israel’s destruction, their support for anti-Israel militant groups and the country’s nuclear program.
Israel and Iran have been locked in a yearslong shadow war. A suspected Israeli assassination campaign has killed top Iranian nuclear scientists. Iranian nuclear installations have been hacked or sabotaged, all in mysterious attacks blamed on Israel. Meanwhile, Iran has been blamed for a series of attacks on shipping in the Middle East in recent years, which later grew into the attacks by Yemen’s Houthi rebels on shipping through the Red Sea corridor.
But since Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack, the battle has increasingly moved into the open. Israel has recently turned its attention to Hezbollah, which has been firing rockets into Israel since the war in Gaza began. Throughout the year, a number of top Iranian military figures have been killed in Israeli strikes in Syria and Lebanon.
Iran fired a wave of missiles and drones at Israel last April after two Iranian generals were killed in an apparent Israeli airstrike in Syria on an Iranian diplomatic post. The missiles and drones caused minimum damage, and Israel — under pressure from Western countries to show restraint — responded with a limited strike.
But after Iran’s early October missile strike, Israel promised a tougher response.

(With Agencies)


International summit on 2-state solution ‘deepens the illusion’ of peace, says Israeli envoy to UN

International summit on 2-state solution ‘deepens the illusion’ of peace, says Israeli envoy to UN
Updated 9 sec ago

International summit on 2-state solution ‘deepens the illusion’ of peace, says Israeli envoy to UN

International summit on 2-state solution ‘deepens the illusion’ of peace, says Israeli envoy to UN
  • Participants are engaging in discussions ‘disconnected from reality’ instead of ‘demanding the release of the hostages and working to dismantle Hamas’ reign of terror,’ he says
  • Israel and the US boycott the 2-day conference, co-chaired by Ƶ and France, which began on Monday at the UN’s HQ in New York

NEW YORK/LONDON: Ahead of an international conference on a two-state solution to the conflict between Israel and Palestine, Israel’s ambassador to the UN, Danny Danon, told reporters on Monday that the summit “does not promote a solution, but rather deepens the illusion.”

Formally titled the High-Level International Conference for the Peaceful Settlement of the Question of Palestine and the Implementation of the Two-State Solution, the two-day event began on Monday at the UN headquarters in New York, co-chaired by Ƶ and France. With humanitarian experts warning that Gaza is on the brink of famine, the summit has been described as urgent and long overdue.

But Danon said: “Instead of demanding the release of the hostages and working to dismantle Hamas’ reign of terror, the conference organizers are engaging in discussions and plenaries that are disconnected from reality.”

Jonathan Harounoff, the international spokesperson for Israel’s mission at the UN, confirmed that his country would not participate in any conference that “doesn’t first urgently address the issue of condemning Hamas and returning all of the remaining hostages.” The US also boycotted the event.

Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, for whom the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant in November in connection with its investigation into war crimes during Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza, said the international conference “rewards terrorism” and accused France of helping to legitimize what could become “an Iranian proxy state.”

The UN’s humanitarian chief, Tom Fletcher, on Sunday warned that the situation in Gaza was dire, with widespread hunger, children wasting away and people risking their lives in their attempts simply to obtain food.

While recent moves by Israeli authorities to ease restrictions and allow more aid into the territory represented a step forward, he said, it was not enough. Vast quantities of aid, safe access routes, consistent supplies of fuel, efforts to protect civilians, and an immediate ceasefire are urgently needed to prevent further catastrophe, he added.


US dismisses UN Israel-Palestinian conference as ‘publicity stunt’

US dismisses UN Israel-Palestinian conference as ‘publicity stunt’
Updated 18 min 24 sec ago

US dismisses UN Israel-Palestinian conference as ‘publicity stunt’

US dismisses UN Israel-Palestinian conference as ‘publicity stunt’
  • US State Department labeled three-day event “unproductive and ill-timed”

NEW YORK: The US on Monday dismissed a French-Saudi-sponsored conference at the United Nations on promoting a two-state solution to the conflict between Palestinians and Israelis as a “stunt.”

The US State Department labeled the three-day event “unproductive and ill-timed,” as well as a “publicity stunt” that would make finding peace harder.

The diplomatic push is a “reward for terrorism,” the statement said, also calling the promise to recognize a Palestinian state by French President Emmanuel Macron “counterproductive.”

In the statement from spokesperson Tammy Bruce, the State Department added that the conference “far from promoting peace,” would “prolong the war, embolden Hamas, and reward its obstruction and undermine real-world efforts to achieve peace.”

Bruce continued: “As Secretary Rubio has made clear, this effort is a slap in the face to the victims of October 7th and a reward for terrorism. It keeps hostages trapped in tunnels.  

“The United States will not participate in this insult but will continue to lead real-world efforts to end the fighting and deliver a permanent peace. Our focus remains on serious diplomacy, not stage-managed conferences designed to manufacture the appearance of relevance.”

The statement said President Macron’s announcement about recognizing a Palestinian state was “welcomed by Hamas,” while encouraging its “obstruction of a ceasefire,” and greatly undercut US diplomatic efforts to “end the suffering in Gaza, free the hostages, and move the whole Middle East towards a brighter and more prosperous future.”

* With AFP


UN outlines humanitarian response plan during potential Gaza ceasefire, and conditions required

UN outlines humanitarian response plan during potential Gaza ceasefire, and conditions required
Updated 28 July 2025

UN outlines humanitarian response plan during potential Gaza ceasefire, and conditions required

UN outlines humanitarian response plan during potential Gaza ceasefire, and conditions required
  • It emphasizes urgent need to address life-saving needs across the territory, where experts say the population continues to face the looming threat of famine
  • It identifies 11 major barriers to effective delivery of aid that must be addressed, including threats to aid workers, logistical delays, red tape and damage to roads

NEW YORK CITY: The UN has outlined a comprehensive plan to scale up humanitarian aid for Gaza should a ceasefire or pause in hostilities be agreed. However, it warned that the current conditions on the ground pose major obstacles that must be addressed to make such a response feasible.

The plan, designed for an initial 30-day period but extendable depending on conditions, emphasizes the urgent need to address life-saving needs across the territory, in which the population continues to suffer the effects of what aid organizations describe as a looming famine.

The document identifies 11 major barriers to the effective delivery of aid, ranging from threats to aid workers and logistical delays to bureaucratic restrictions and damage to roads.

Among the most urgent concerns is the threat to the safety of humanitarian staff and facilities. Escalating hostilities near humanitarian routes and designated convoy areas have severely constrained movement and delivery capacities.

At the same time, the collapse of the civilian police force has contributed to widespread insecurity, particularly at border crossings and along aid routes, which are increasingly vulnerable to looting and interference by armed gangs.

Aid convoys face significant delays as they regularly have to await approval from the Israeli army, only to be denied access after hours of waiting. This wastes time that is critical to the aid response, and ties up resources that could be used elsewhere. In southern Gaza, a single round trip to deliver supplies can take up to 20 hours.

The poor state of telecommunications compounds these issues, with local networks frequently down, satellite phones jammed, and outdated radio systems hindering coordination.

Efforts to deliver aid are undermined by the large, desperate crowds of people that intercept trucks and seize supplies before they can reach distribution points. Many of the routes approved by Israeli authorities are deemed unsafe or impractical, as they pass through heavily congested or gang-controlled areas.

Additionally, the UN reports severe shortages of warehouse space and logistical equipment such as armored vehicles, protective gear and spare parts, items that are often denied entry by Israeli authorities.

The state of the transport network poses challenges, with nearly 70 percent of roads damaged, and overcrowding in southern governorates further impedes movement.

Supply lines remain unpredictable, with crossing points from Israel, Egypt, the West Bank and Jordan frequently closed or operating on inconsistent schedules. The absence of a centralized UN-run logistics hub at key crossings complicates the management of customs and cargo.

Fuel shipments are funneled almost exclusively through Kerem Shalom in Israel, leaving northern Gaza dependent on unreliable coordinated transfers, and the latest Israeli regulations require all humanitarian deliveries of fuel to be managed by a single private company.

Meanwhile, the closure of the border-crossing at Rafah has left international aid workers with limited options to rotate in and out of Gaza, and Israeli authorities are increasingly denying entry altogether.

The UN said these constraints must be resolved if a scaled-up humanitarian operation is to proceed, and proposed a series of actions to be taken before and during any ceasefire agreement. These include efforts to ensure the safety of aid workers and their facilities, the clarification of buffer zones to avoid any accidental targeting of humanitarians, and the reactivation of civilian police in some areas.

To address the threat of looting, humanitarian organizations might request security escorts in accordance with humanitarian principles. In addition, UN monitors need to be granted access to all border crossings and distribution points to ensure effective tracking and oversight.

The UN also called on Israeli authorities to expedite the deployment of essential equipment in Gaza, including satellite-communication devices, armored vehicles, power generators and prefabricated housing for staff. The resumption of telecommunications services across Gaza would be necessary for the coordination of operations, and approval for the use of tools to clear unexploded ordnance is required to ensure the safety of aid convoys.

Civilians must be allowed to move freely throughout the territory without fear of harassment, detention or violence. Israeli army checkpoints, particularly on Salah Al-Din road, need to be removed or rendered nonobstructive, and any agreed troop-withdrawal zones must be clearly marked with visible barriers to protect civilians.

In addition, humanitarian operations would require all relevant border crossings to operate at full capacity, including at weekends. The UN requested that authorities in Egypt and Jordan be allowed to send trucks directly into Gaza to offload goods, and a reduction in interference by Israeli army personnel while determining the contents of aid convoys, to speed up deliveries.

Within Gaza, key roads such as the coastal route and Salah Al-Din must be repaired and remain open from dawn to dusk. Heavy machinery and materials need to be brought in to support the reconstruction of roads, and any unexploded ordnance along main routes must be cleared.

Efforts to revive the private sector in Gaza are also considered essential, as humanitarian aid alone cannot sustain the population. Of the 600 trucks a day needed to meet basic needs, the UN estimates that 350 should carry commercial goods, 150 would contain supplies from the UN and nongovernmental organizations, and 100 would be allocated to bilateral or Red Crescent donations.

The UN stressed that aid must be able to reach all areas of Gaza, based on population size, and that fuel deliveries to the north, which are frequently denied, must be approved consistently. A larger share of deliveries will be monitored by safeguarding and protection teams to ensure equitable and safe distribution, particularly to the most vulnerable populations.

Furthermore, restrictions on key humanitarian items must be lifted. These include assistive devices, vehicle parts, medical supplies, sanitation tools and solar energy systems for health facilities and water infrastructure.

To meet the needs of hospitals, water systems and other critical infrastructure, at least 265,000 liters of diesel and 13,000 liters of benzene would be required each day. Electricity feeder lines should be reactivated immediately, and repairs to Gaza’s power plant and grid infrastructure need to be supported. Deliveries of cooking gas must also be allowed to both the north and south of the territory.

Meanwhile, dozens of UN and NGO employees who are awaiting visas so that they can provide support for operations in Gaza from Jerusalem must be granted entry, along with international medical and humanitarian personnel.

If these conditions are met, the UN plans to implement a broad humanitarian response, starting with the scaling-up of food assistance across the territory. This would include daily shipments of food and fresh ingredients, support for bakeries and kitchens preparing hot meals, and

specialized food aid for children, pregnant women and the elderly. Humanitarian partners would also work to reestablish the commercial food trade to supplement UN deliveries.

Health services would be expanded, with six hospitals, two field hospitals, and eight primary health centers resupplied and reopened. At least 150 patients a week would be referred to facilities outside of Gaza for urgent treatment, and new emergency medical teams would be deployed. Mental health and trauma services would also be strengthened.

Water and sanitation services, which currently reach only 20 percent of the population, would be scaled up to serve at least 80 percent. The UN plan includes the delivery of hygiene kits, fuel, chlorine and equipment to improve WASH (water, sanitation and hygiene) services in communities and at displacement centers.

Malnutrition, particularly among children under the age of 5 and pregnant or lactating women, has reached alarming levels. The UN said it intends to launch emergency nutrition protocols, including the establishment of stabilization centers and targeted food distribution. With predictable access and sufficient partner capacities, the UN estimates that 98 percent of the target population could be reached within a month.

Finally, shelter assistance would be expanded to cover 200,000 displaced individuals through the distribution of tents, sealing kits, winter items and household essentials, prioritizing those who are living in makeshift or self-settled camps.

UN officials stressed that while their plan is technically feasible, success will depend entirely on the creation of a secure, cooperative and enabling environment. Without that, they warned, the humanitarian situation in Gaza is likely to deteriorate further, putting millions of lives at risk.


Two-state solution ‘key to regional stability,’ Saudi FM tells UN conference

Two-state solution ‘key to regional stability,’ Saudi FM tells UN conference
Updated 46 min 41 sec ago

Two-state solution ‘key to regional stability,’ Saudi FM tells UN conference

Two-state solution ‘key to regional stability,’ Saudi FM tells UN conference
  • Prince Faisal said regional peace must begin with securing legitimate rights of Palestinian people
  • Affirmed no relations would be established with Israel before creation of Palestinian state
  • Added USPresident Trump couldplay major role in regional conflict resolution

NEW YORK: Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan said on Monday the implementation of a two-state solution in the Israel-Palestine crisis was “the key to regional stability.”

He was speaking at the opening of a high-level international conference on the peaceful settlement of the Palestinian issue and the implementation of the two-state solution, which opened at the UN on Monday.

“The Kingdom believes that the two-state solution is the key to regional stability,” he said. “The New York conference is a pivotal milestone toward implementing the two-state solution,” he added.

Prince Faisal reiterated that peace in the region must begin with securing the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people, welcoming French President Emmanuel Macron’s intention to formally recognize a state of Palestine in September.

“Achieving security, stability, and prosperity for all the peoples of the region begins with justice for the Palestinian people and enabling them to obtain their legitimate rights, foremost among them the establishment of their independent state along the June 4, 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital,” he said.

He described the Arab Peace Initiative as the framework for any just and comprehensive solution.

He also called for an immediate end to the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza and confirmed that Ƶ and France had facilitated the transfer of $300 million from the World Bank to Palestine.

Prince Faisal said the Kingdom was engaging with several countries to secure recognition of a Palestinian state.

He further rejected the idea of linking such recognition to an Israeli veto and affirmed that no relations would be established with Israel before a Palestinian state was created.

The minister voiced support for the Palestinian Authority’s reform efforts and noted that US President Donald Trump could play a key role in regional conflict resolution.

Prince Faisal added that several memoranda of understanding would be signed on Tuesday with Palestinian sectors to empower them.

He concluded by highlighting the importance of sustaining diplomatic momentum and international coordination to achieve a viable, peaceful two-state solution.

Conference co-chair, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot, echoed those sentiments, telling reporters that more countries could follow suit in recognizing Palestine in the coming months.

“France affirms the Palestinian people’s right to sovereignty over their lands,” he said.

He added: “Other countries may recognize the State of Palestine in September. The two-state solution conference is a decisive step toward implementing the solution; historic commitments will be made. The targeting of civilians in Gaza is unacceptable; the war in the Strip has lasted too long and must stop.”

He went on to highlight the international community’s role in translating the two-state framework into action.

“We must work to make the two-state solution a tangible reality,” he said. “(It) meets the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinians. We have launched an unstoppable momentum toward a political solution in the Middle East.”

Also speaking during the first session on Monday, Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Mustafa welcomed the conference, calling it a crucial opportunity for peace.

“The two-state solution is a historic opportunity for everyone,” he said. “We are grateful to Ƶ and France for leading this historic conference.”

He added that the conference sent a clear message of international support to the Palestinian people.

“The two-state solution conference confirms to the Palestinian people that the world stands with them.”

Mustafa also called for political unity between the West Bank and Gaza, urging Hamas to disarm in favour of Palestinian Authority control.

“We must work to unify the West Bank and Gaza Strip. We call on Hamas to surrender its weapons to the Palestinian Authority,” he said.

The long road to Palestinian statehood
An Arab News Deep Dive
Enter
keywords

UN Syria envoy warns of national fragmentation following violence in Sweida, Israeli airstrikes

UN Syria envoy warns of national fragmentation following violence in Sweida, Israeli airstrikes
Updated 28 July 2025

UN Syria envoy warns of national fragmentation following violence in Sweida, Israeli airstrikes

UN Syria envoy warns of national fragmentation following violence in Sweida, Israeli airstrikes
  • ‘This past month has rocked Syria’s transition,’ Geir Pedersen tells Security Council
  • ‘Mass casualties, foreign intervention and a surge in violations have drained public trust’

NEW YORK: The Syrian Arab Republic’s political transition is under acute strain following a month of spiraling violence, Israeli attacks, mounting civilian casualties, and growing fears of national fragmentation, the UN special envoy for the country warned on Monday.

Briefing the UN Security Council on the latest developments, Geir O. Pedersen condemned the outbreak of intercommunal fighting in Sweida and called Israel’s airstrikes “dangerous” and “unacceptable,” urging all parties to respect Syria’s sovereignty and international law.

“This past month has rocked Syria’s transition,” he said. “Mass casualties, foreign intervention and a surge in violations have drained public trust and created new dangers of fragmentation.”

Violence erupted on July 12 in Sweida following a cycle of mutual kidnappings that escalated into armed clashes between Druze groups and Bedouin tribes.

The deployment of Syrian government forces aimed to restore order but rapidly unraveled amid accusations of serious abuses, including extrajudicial killings and destruction of property.

“Footage of extrajudicial executions, degrading treatment and sectarian incitement circulated widely,” Pedersen said.

“The toll was devastating — hundreds wounded and killed, many of them civilians, particularly from the Druze community.”

Amid the chaos, Israel launched a series of airstrikes targeting Syrian security forces and Bedouin fighters in Sweida, and later struck near the presidential palace in Damascus.

Pedersen denounced the strikes, saying they caused civilian casualties and further inflamed tensions.

A second ceasefire was brokered on July 19, bringing a tenuous calm to the region, but Pedersen warned that the situation remains volatile.

Approximately 175,000 people have been displaced and humanitarian needs are acute. The UN is seeking unrestricted access to deliver aid and conduct protection work.

Pedersen also highlighted reports of widespread abuses during the clashes, allegedly committed by both government-affiliated forces and local armed groups. Violations include arbitrary killings, kidnappings and looting.

“The Ministry of Defense claims the perpetrators were an ‘unknown group in uniform,’ but accountability is essential,” he said, welcoming recent statements from the Syrian presidency pledging investigations.

Pedersen voiced alarm at reports of abductions and disappearances of Druze women during security operations, raising fears of a broader pattern similar to earlier incidents involving Alawite women.

He also stressed the need for clear disarmament and security sector reform, warning that the current patchwork of militias and irregular forces is unsustainable.

“The state must act with discipline and professionalism,” he said. “Syrians need to see state forces as protectors, not threats.”

Turning to the broader political process, Pedersen acknowledged that while many Syrians still support the government’s transition roadmap, concerns over centralization, lack of transparency and exclusion remain.

He said the formation of a new People’s Assembly in September could mark a turning point if handled inclusively.

“It is absolutely vital that all Syrian communities and women are fully included, both as electors and candidates,” he stressed, noting concerns that some groups still face marginalization or intimidation.

In Idlib, women who protested the violence in Sweida reportedly faced threats of prosecution, online harassment and physical attacks.

Efforts to implement a landmark deal between the government and the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces also remain fraught, Pedersen said.

The March 10 agreement aimed to integrate the SDF into state institutions, guarantee constitutional rights for all groups and establishing a nationwide ceasefire.

A recent meeting between transitional authorities and the SDF, attended by US and French diplomats, failed to overcome core disagreements. Another round is tentatively planned in Paris.

Pedersen concluded with a call for “flexibility and wisdom” from all Syrian stakeholders. “If the state is seen as a threat by key constituencies, positions harden,” he warned.

“Likewise, if local leaders reject integration, unity becomes impossible. The Syrian political transition simply cannot fail.”

The UN, he affirmed, remains ready to support a Syrian-led, inclusive process that rebuilds trust, ensures accountability and restores the country’s sovereignty.