Ƶ

Russian forces thwart attempted cross-border assault from Ukraine, official says

Russian forces thwart attempted cross-border assault from Ukraine, official says
Ukrainian servicemen prepare 122mm artillery cannon before firing towards Russian positions in Kherson region, Ukraine, Sunday Oct. 27, 2024. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 27 October 2024

Russian forces thwart attempted cross-border assault from Ukraine, official says

Russian forces thwart attempted cross-border assault from Ukraine, official says
  • Russian officials and state media have sought to downplay the significance of Kyiv’s thunderous run in Kursk, but the country’s forces have so far been unable to dislodge Ukrainian troops from the province

KYIV, Ukraine: Russian forces thwarted an attempt at another cross-border incursion by Ukraine into southwestern Russia, a local official reported Sunday, months after Kyiv staged a bold assault on its nuclear-armed enemy that Moscow is still struggling to halt.
An “armed group” sought Sunday to breach the border between Ukraine and Russia’s Bryansk region, its governor, Aleksandr Bogomaz, said but was beaten back. Bogomaz did not clarify whether Ukrainian soldiers carried out the alleged attack, but claimed on Sunday evening that the situation was “stable and under control” by the Russian military.
There was no immediate acknowledgement or response from Ukrainian officials.
The region neighbors Kursk province, where Ukraine launched a surprise push on Aug. 6 that rattled the Kremlin and constituted the largest attack on Russia since World War II. Hundreds of Russian prisoners were blindfolded and ferried away in trucks in the opening moments of the lightning advance, and Ukraine’s battle-hardened units swiftly pressed on across hundreds of square miles (square kilometers) of territory.
Responsibility for previous incursions into Russia’s Belgorod and Bryansk regions has been claimed by two murky groups: the Russian Volunteer Corps and the Freedom of Russia Legion.
Russian officials and state media have sought to downplay the significance of Kyiv’s thunderous run in Kursk, but the country’s forces have so far been unable to dislodge Ukrainian troops from the province. Western officials have speculated that Moscow may send troops from North Korea to bolster its effort to do so, stoking the almost three-year war and bringing geopolitical consequences as far away as the Indo-Pacific region.
Russian lawmakers Thursday ratified a pact with Pyongyang envisioning mutual military assistance, a move that comes as the US confirmed the deployment of 3,000 North Korean troops to Russia.
North Korean units were detected Wednesday in Kursk, according to Ukraine’s Main Intelligence Directorate, known by its acronym GUR. The soldiers had undergone several weeks of training at bases in eastern Russia and had been equipped with clothes for the upcoming winter, GUR said in a statement late Thursday. It did not provide evidence for its claims.
Moscow warns West against approving long-range strikes against Russia
Also on Sunday, Russian President Vladimir Putin said Moscow is working on ways to respond if the US and its NATO allies allow Ukraine to strike deep inside Russia with long-range Western missiles.
Putin told Russian state TV that it was too early to say exactly how Moscow might react, but the defense ministry has been mulling a range of options.
Russia has repeatedly signaled that it would view any such strikes as a major escalation. The Kremlin leader warned on Sept. 12 that Moscow would be “at war” with the US and NATO states if they approve them, claiming military infrastructure and personnel from the bloc would have to be involved in targeting and firing the missiles.
He reinforced the message by announcing a new version of the nuclear doctrine that considers a conventional attack on Russia by a nonnuclear nation that is supported by a nuclear power to be a joint attack on his country — a clear warning to the US and other allies of Kyiv.
Putin also declared the revised document envisages possible nuclear weapons use in case of a massive air attack, opening the door to a potential nuclear response to any aerial assault — an ambiguity intended to deter the West.
Ukrainian leaders have repeatedly said they need permission to strike weapons depots, airfields and military bases far from the border to motivate Russia to seek peace. In response, US defense officials have argued that the missiles are limited in number, and that Ukraine is already using its own long-range drones to hit targets farther into Russia.
That capability was evidenced by a Ukrainian drone strike in mid-September that hit a large Russian military depot in a town 500 kilometers (300 miles) from the border.
The US allows Kyiv to use American-provided weapons in more limited, cross-border strikes to counter attacks by Russian forces.
Civilian deaths reported in Kherson as warring sides trade drone strikes
In a separate update, Bryansk Gov. Bogomaz claimed that over a dozen Ukrainian drones were shot down over the region on Sunday. Separately, a total of at least 16 drones were downed over other Russian regions, including the Tambov province some 450 kilometers (290 miles) north from the border, officials reported. There were no reports of casualties from any of the alleged attacks.
In Ukraine’s southern city of Kherson, Russian shelling killed three civilians on Sunday, local Gov. Oleksandr Prokudin claimed. Another Kherson resident died in a blaze sparked by shells hitting a high-rise, according to Ukraine’s Emergency Service.
Air raid sirens wailed for over three hours in Kyiv overnight into Sunday, and city authorities later reported that “around 10” drones had been shot down. They said no one had been hurt. Ukraine’s air force on Sunday reported that it had shot down 41 drones launched by Russia across Ukrainian territory.


Indian authorities impose security restrictions in remote Ladakh after deadly clashes

Indian authorities impose security restrictions in remote Ladakh after deadly clashes
Updated 3 sec ago

Indian authorities impose security restrictions in remote Ladakh after deadly clashes

Indian authorities impose security restrictions in remote Ladakh after deadly clashes
  • Officials banned assembly of more than five people in Ladakh’s Leh and Kargil districts following the violent clashes Wednesday
  • Hundreds of police and paramilitary soldiers patrolled streets Thursday and enforced a curfew in Leh
SRINAGAR, India: Authorities in India enforced security restrictions in two main districts in the remote Ladakh region on Thursday. The restrictions came a day after four people were killed and dozens injured when police clashed with hundreds of protesters demanding greater autonomy from the Indian government for the Himalayan territory.
Officials banned assembly of more than five people in Ladakh’s Leh and Kargil districts following the violent clashes Wednesday. Hundreds of police and paramilitary soldiers patrolled streets Thursday and enforced a curfew in Leh. Police detained at least 40 people overnight in Leh following the clashes, officials said.
Shops and businesses shut in Kargil as a local group called for a strike against Wednesday’s killings.
Sajjad Kargili, a local leader, urged the government to “act with wisdom, resume dialogue at the earliest and address people’s aspirations.”
Lt. Gov. Kavinder Gupta, New Delhi’s top administrator in Ladakh, called Wednesday’s violence “heart-wrenching.”
“Curfew has been imposed as a precautionary measure to prevent more casualties,” Gupta said, according to the Press Trust of India news agency.
Wednesday’s clashes erupted after protesters threw stones at officers trying to stop them from marching in the high-altitude town of Leh. Others set ablaze police and paramilitary vehicles and the local office of India’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party and some other government buildings, police said.
Police fired bullets and tear gas and swung batons at demonstrators, killing four people and injuring dozens more, police and residents said.
Nestled between India, Pakistan and China, Ladakh was split from Indian-controlled Kashmir after New Delhi removed the disputed region’s statehood and semiautonomy in 2019. While Kashmir has largely been silenced through a crackdown on dissent and a slew of new laws, demands for political rights in Ladakh have intensified in recent years.
The protests are part of a larger movement in the federally governed region seeking statehood and constitutional provisions from the Indian government to gain autonomy over land and agriculture decisions.
The protests Wednesday were sparked by a local group’s call for a strike after two residents collapsed while participating in a hunger strike with more than a dozen residents who were making statehood demands.
India’s Home Ministry said in a statement late Wednesday that police fired in “self-defense” and blamed the violence on “provocative speeches” by a top climate activist, Sonam Wangchuk, who had led the hunger strike since Sept. 10. Wangchuk called off the strike after the clashes.
Shortly after the clashes, Wangchuk appealed for calm. He told reporters that their movement was peaceful and that they did not want instability in Ladakh.
“We held hunger strikes on five occasions and walked from Leh to Delhi, but today we are seeing our message of peace failing because of the incidents of violence and arson,” Wangchuk said.
Wednesday’s violence was the deadliest civil unrest in the Ladakh region in decades and signaled residents’ growing frustration with Indian authorities over the self-rule issue. Residents initially welcomed New Delhi’s 2019 changes, but their joy soon gave way to fears of land grabs, a loss of trade and damage to the fragile ecosystem of the region’s high-altitude deserts.
Ladakh representatives have held several unsuccessful rounds of talks with Indian officials. Another meeting is scheduled Oct. 6.
Roughly half of Ladakh’s residents are Muslim who are mainly concentrated in the Kargil district while around 40 percent are Buddhist, predominantly residing in the Leh district.
Ladakh’s sparsely populated villages have faced territorial disputes and suffered from the effects of climate change, including floods, landslides and droughts.
The rugged region’s thousands of glaciers have receded at an alarming rate, threatening the water supply of millions of people. Pollution contributing to the melting has worsened due to the region’s militarization, which has intensified since 2020 in a deadly military standoff between India and China.

Ukraine’s Zelensky says he is ready to leave office after war

Ukraine’s Zelensky says he is ready to leave office after war
Updated 25 September 2025

Ukraine’s Zelensky says he is ready to leave office after war

Ukraine’s Zelensky says he is ready to leave office after war

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky told Axios news website that he would be ready to step down after the war with Russia is over.
“My goal is to finish the war,” not to continue running for office, Axios quoted Zelenksiy as saying.


Kremlin says it assumes Trump is still committed to work on Ukraine peace

Kremlin says it assumes Trump is still committed to work on Ukraine peace
Updated 25 September 2025

Kremlin says it assumes Trump is still committed to work on Ukraine peace

Kremlin says it assumes Trump is still committed to work on Ukraine peace
  • US President Donald Trump said he believed that Kyiv could recapture all of its land taken by Russia and that it should act now

MOSCOW: The Kremlin said on Thursday that it assumed US President Donald Trump was still committed to work toward achieving peace in Ukraine, after the US leader abruptly shifted his rhetoric in Kyiv’s favor earlier this week.
Trump said on Tuesday after meeting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that he believed that Kyiv could recapture all of its land taken by Russia – which controls around one-fifth of the country – and that it should act now, with Moscow facing economic problems.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Moscow assumed the Trump administration maintained the political will to find a solution to the war, and that Russia was ready to engage in peace negotiations.


Kyrgyzstan to stage snap election as president tightens grip

Kyrgyzstan to stage snap election as president tightens grip
Updated 25 September 2025

Kyrgyzstan to stage snap election as president tightens grip

Kyrgyzstan to stage snap election as president tightens grip
  • The mountainous former Soviet republic bordering China was long considered the most democratic in Central Asia but has seen a decline in civil liberties in recent years

BISHKEK: Kyrgyzstan’s parliament voted on Thursday to dissolve, paving the way for snap elections in November that critics say are aimed at consolidating President Sadyr Japarov’s power.
The mountainous former Soviet republic bordering China was long considered the most democratic in Central Asia but has seen a decline in civil liberties in recent years.
Japarov’s administration has taken steps to control Internet access since he was swept to power on the back of pro-democracy protests in 2020, while authorities have arrested politicians and journalists for what the president says are attempted coups.
Eighty-four of the 90 MPs in Kyrgyzstan’s Supreme Council voted for the dissolution, which would bring forward by one year parliamentary elections initially scheduled for November 2026.
Lawmaker Ulan Primov said the move was necessary to “strengthen the political system and stability in the country” and to avoid clashing with the run-up to the presidential election scheduled for early 2027.
Critics say the move will tighten Japarov’s control of parliament ahead of his re-election bid.
Kyrgyzstan adopted sweeping electoral reforms in June that abolished proportional party lists in favor of a winner-takes-all system and made it more expensive for smaller parties to field candidates.
Japarov rejects charges of eroding democracy and has accused his critics — including rights groups — of spreading false information.


Former French President Sarkozy found guilty on key charge, acquitted of others in Libya case

Former French President Sarkozy found guilty on key charge, acquitted of others in Libya case
Updated 25 September 2025

Former French President Sarkozy found guilty on key charge, acquitted of others in Libya case

Former French President Sarkozy found guilty on key charge, acquitted of others in Libya case
  • The court is still detailing its ruling and has not immediately sentenced the former French president
  • Sarkozy denied all wrongdoing during a three-month trial that also involved 11 co-defendants

PARIS: A Paris court found former French President Nicolas Sarkozy guilty on one charge but acquitted him on others Thursday in his trial for the alleged illegal financing of his 2007 presidential campaign with money from the government of then-Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi.
The court is still detailing its ruling and hasn’t immediately sentenced the 70-year-old Sarkozy. That step would come later in the court proceedings Thursday. Sarkozy can appeal the guilty verdict, which would suspend any sentence pending the appeal.
The court found Sarkozy guilty of criminal association in a scheme from 2005 to 2007 to finance his campaign with funds from Libya in exchange for diplomatic favors. But it cleared him of three other charges – including passive corruption, illegal campaign financing and concealment of the embezzlement of public funds.
Sarkozy, accompanied by his wife, the singer and model Carla Bruni-Sarkozy, was present in the courtroom, which was also filled with reporters and members of the public. Sarkozy sat in the front row of the defendant’s seats. His three adult sons were also in the room.
Sarkozy, who was elected in 2007 but lost his bid for reelection in 2012, denied all wrongdoing during a three-month trial that also involved 11 co-defendants, including three former ministers.
Despite multiple legal scandals that have clouded his presidential legacy, Sarkozy remains an influential figure in right-wing politics in France and in entertainment circles, by virtue of his marriage to Bruni-Sarkozy.
Alleged Libya financing
The accusations trace their roots to 2011, when a Libyan news agency and Qaddafi himself said the Libyan state had secretly funneled millions of euros into Sarkozy’s 2007 campaign.
In 2012, the French investigative outlet Mediapart published what it said was a Libyan intelligence memo referencing a €50 million funding agreement. Sarkozy denounced the document as a forgery and sued for defamation.
French magistrates later said that the memo appeared to be authentic, though no conclusive evidence of a completed transaction was presented at the three-month Paris trial.
Investigators also looked into a series of trips to Libya made by people close to Sarkozy when he served as interior minister from 2005 and 2007, including his chief of staff.
In 2016, Franco-Lebanese businessman Ziad Takieddine told Mediapart that he had delivered suitcases filled with cash from Tripoli to the French Interior Ministry under Sarkozy. He later retracted his statement.
That reversal is now the focus of a separate investigation into possible witness tampering. Both Sarkozy and his wife were handed preliminary charges for involvement in alleged efforts to pressure Takieddine. That case has not gone to trial yet.
Takieddine, who was one of the co-defendants, died on Tuesday in Beirut, his lawyer Elize Arfi said. He was 75. He had fled to Lebanon in 2020 and did not attend the trial.
Sarkozy was tried on charges of passive corruption, illegal campaign financing, concealment of the embezzlement of public funds and criminal association. Prosecutors alleged that Sarkozy had knowingly benefited from what they described as a “corruption pact” with Qaddafi’s government.
Libya’s longtime dictator was toppled and killed in an uprising in 2011, ending his four-decade rule of the North African country.
Sarkozy denounced a ‘plot’
The trial shed light on France’s back-channel talks with Libya in the 2000s, when Qaddafi was seeking to restore diplomatic ties with the West. Before that, Libya was considered a pariah state.
Sarkozy has dismissed the allegations as politically motivated and reliant on forged evidence. During the trial, he denounced a “plot” he said was staged by “liars and crooks” including the “Qaddafi clan.”
He suggested that the allegations of campaign financing were retaliation for his call – as France’s president – for Qaddafi’s removal.
Sarkozy was one of the first Western leaders to push for military intervention in Libya in 2011, when Arab Spring pro-democracy protests swept the Arab world.
“What credibility can be given to such statements marked by the seal of vengeance?” Sarkozy asked in comments during the trial.
Stripped of the Legion of Honor
In June, Sarkozy was stripped of his Legion of Honor medal – France’s highest award – after his conviction in a separate case.
Earlier, he was found guilty of corruption and influence peddling for trying to bribe a magistrate in 2014 in exchange for information about a legal case in which he was implicated.
Sarkozy was sentenced to wear an electronic monitoring bracelet for one year. He was granted a conditional release in May due to his age, which allowed him to remove the electronic tag after he wore it for just over three months.
In another case, Sarkozy was convicted last year of illegal campaign financing in his failed 2012 reelection bid. He was accused of having spent almost twice the maximum legal amount and was sentenced to a year in prison, of which six months were suspended.
Sarkozy has denied the allegations. He has appealed that verdict to the highest Court of Cassation, and that appeal is pending.