Ƶ

Arab Americans’ vote will matter in this election, Middle East Institute panel hears

Short Url
Updated 29 October 2024

Arab Americans’ vote will matter in this election, Middle East Institute panel hears

Arab Americans’ vote will matter in this election, Middle East Institute panel hears

LONDON: Just days before Americans head to the polls to decide who will be the next US president, Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Kamala Harris find themselves neck and neck in the race for the White House. With the contest balanced on a razor’s edge, any minor development at this point could be enough to decisively swing the vote.

Although they make up just 1 percent of the total electorate, Arab Americans represent a significant constituency in several swing states, where even a handful of votes could influence the election outcome. As such, neither of the main candidates can afford to take their votes for granted.

That is why Arab News teamed up with polling agency YouGov to survey the attitudes of Arab Americans across all geographies, age ranges, genders and income brackets to see which way the community was leaning, and what issues mattered to them most.

What became abundantly clear from the survey was that Arab Americans are not a monolith motivated by any single issue. Domestic matters, such as the economy and the cost of living, loomed large, while border security and abortion rights were also key considerations.

However, it was the plight of the Palestinians that emerged as the biggest issue for Arab Americans of all generations; namely the ongoing Israeli offensive against Hamas in Gaza and the perceived failure of President Joe Biden’s administration to rein in Israel.




Asked which candidate they were most likely to vote for, 45 percent said Trump while 43 percent opted for Harris. (AFP/File)

Brian Katulis, a senior fellow for US foreign policy at Middle East Institute, who moderated a special panel discussion on Monday to examine the poll findings, said the prominence of the Palestinian issue in this election showed there was still a role for the US to play in the region.

“Within the political discussion we’re having in this country, it does imply that there’s actually a strong interest in the US engaging more deeply in the Middle East — just doing it in the right way,” said Katulis.

“There’s a serious difference over who and which candidate is the right way. But for those who’ve said that we should just pull back from the region, restrain ourselves, there’s some who say that, but I think there’s a general impulse here that we need to actually delve more deeply into trying to solve — or not solve, but engage — these questions in a proper way in the region itself, but then politically here at home.”

Asked to place six key issues in order of priority, 26 percent of Arab Americans polled by YouGov said the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is their chief concern. The economy and the cost of living were not far behind, representing the chief concerns for 19 percent of respondents.

“The highest priority, in terms of issues that Arab Americans face, the Palestinian-Israeli conflict came at 26 percent — the highest — then followed by the economy and cost of living,” Lara Barazi, a freelance data consultant and former research director at YouGov, told the MEI panel.

Palestine appeared to be of most concern to Arab Americans in lower income brackets: 37 percent of those earning under $40,000, falling to 22 percent among those paid $80,000 or more.

“These are their issues that kind of mirror what’s going on right now in the US, not only for Arab Americans, when we look at income,” said Barazi.




If Harris does beat Trump to the presidency, it remains unclear whether she will shift the Democratic Party’s stance on Israel. (AFP/File)

“The highest priority goes to the Palestinian conflict. It’s 41 percent of the lowest earners who support the Palestinian-Israeli conflict versus the highest earners. Basically, they’re interested in the economy, cost of living and the Palestinian conflict, but they do put a lot of weight on the economy and cost of living.”

What was also interesting about the findings was how much of a priority the Middle East conflict was for respondents identifying as Republican, Democrat and independent.

“We see that the highest (ranking) for the Palestinian-Israeli conflict comes from independents and the lowest comes from Republicans,” said Barazi. “Only 17 percent of Republicans said that the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is a top priority for us, while cost of living comes the highest for Republicans.”

Despite Trump being perceived as more supportive of the Israeli government than Harris, many Arab Americans indicated in the poll that they would still vote for him, which suggested they are penalizing the Democrats over the Biden administration’s perceived failure to rein in Israel.

Asked which candidate they were most likely to vote for, 45 percent said Trump while 43 percent opted for Harris, although this gap could easily be narrowed — or slightly widened — by the survey’s 5.93 percent margin of error.

The slightly higher support for Trump than for Harris comes despite the fact that 40 percent of those polled described themselves as Democrats, 28 percent as Republicans and 23 percent as independents.

The findings were somewhat puzzling, especially as Trump has announced his intention to expand his 2017 travel ban on people from seven majority-Muslim countries (Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen) and has said if elected he would bar Palestinian refugees from entering the US, policies that few Arab Americans would support.

Nevertheless, it appears Biden’s record on the Middle East over the past year has been the deciding factor for many.

Also taking part in Monday’s MEI panel discussion, Yasmeen Abu Taleb, a White House reporter at The Washington Post, said the Democrats never expected the issue of Palestine to hang over the campaign in the way that it has.




Despite Trump being perceived as more supportive of the Israeli government than Harris, many Arab Americans indicated in the poll that they would still vote for him. (AFP/File)


“We’ve never seen the issue of Palestine be this big of a political issue for this long,” she said. “I think in the Biden administration, there was a sense that people would be really angry and protest for a month or two. They hoped the war would be over by January.

“They were always wildly optimistic that this was not going to hang over them as an election issue. And here we are, more than a year later, and it’s still a key driver of the election. I think that’s an important signal of how much the politics have shifted on this.

“I don’t think we’ve seen this in US politics, where the debate has been this intense and sustained.”

If Harris does beat Trump to the presidency, it remains unclear whether she will shift the Democratic Party’s stance on Israel or if the policy of the Biden administration, of which she is part, will remain broadly unchanged.

“Obviously it depends on who wins but I do think if you saw a Harris presidency, it’s not going to be the dramatic change that people are pushing for,” said Abu Taleb. “But I do think there are signs that the Democratic Party is shifting on Israel, and in subtle but important ways.”

Although the Arab News-YouGov poll focused on Arab American opinion, the panel discussion naturally expanded to the prevailing attitudes among the Arab populations and leaderships in the Middle East. Tarek Ali Ahmad, head of research and studies at Arab News, said that many in the Middle East are holding their breath.

“People are essentially just waiting for the election day to come,” he added. “That’s when everyone’s going to be like, OK, now we can finally stop this election game, campaigning, and we can actually get to solid, concrete policy that will affect what’s going to happen, whether or not we’re going to see an actual end to the conflict, or we’re going to see even further.

“We haven’t heard anything in terms of preference to whichever candidate comes through. But at the same time, we cannot dismiss the fact that any incoming president will have a lot to clean up with regards to everything that’s happening on the ground.”




“So there’s so many different aspects that come to shift public opinion on the ground with regards to who’s going to be president,” Ali Ahmad said. (AFP/File)

On whether or not the Arab world has any preference for the US presidency, Ali Ahmad said many in the region have remained tight-lipped, preferring to wait and see the outcome of this closely fought race.

“There’s a lot of different points of view and there’s no real proper preference for either candidate because of the fact that it’s just such a razor-thin difference,” he said.

“Now you have people on the ground talking about how, essentially, every single event that occurs causes a shift in opinion, from (Israel) entering into Lebanon, from the bombing of Iran, to even Biden’s resignation from the nomination.

“So there’s so many different aspects that come to shift public opinion on the ground with regards to who’s going to be president.”

Reflecting on the significance of the role of the Arab American constituency in the election, Ali Ahmad said many seem to recognize their vote can make a significant difference.

“The reason why there’s a big turnout, as we said, nine out of 10 Americans are set to go vote, is that 80 percent of those who responded found that their vote actually counts and will matter in this year's election,” he said.

“They really feel that they could actually change it and make that difference, whether it is to punish the Democrats or whether it is to actually vote for an independent.”


UK to launch digital ID scheme to curb illegal migration

UK to launch digital ID scheme to curb illegal migration
Updated 7 sec ago

UK to launch digital ID scheme to curb illegal migration

UK to launch digital ID scheme to curb illegal migration
  • The government said the drive will also make it simpler to apply for services like driving licenses, childcare and welfare, while streamlining access to tax records
LONDON: UK Prime Minister Keith Starmer on Friday announced plans to introduce free digital ID for both nationals and those residing in the country in a bid to curb illegal migration.
The government said the drive will also make it simpler to apply for services like driving licenses, childcare and welfare, while streamlining access to tax records.
The new digital ID will be held on people’s phones and there will be no requirement for individuals to carry their ID or be asked to produce it, said the government.
However, it will be “mandatory as a means of proving your right to work,” a statement said.
“This will stop those with no right to be here from being able to find work, curbing their prospect of earning money, one of the key ‘pull factors’ for people who come to the UK illegally,” it added.
The announcement comes as Labour, the party in government, prepares to hold its annual conference, with Starmer under intense pressure, particularly over immigration.
“Digital ID is an enormous opportunity for the UK... it will also offer ordinary citizens countless benefits,” Starmer said.
“We are doing the hard graft to deliver a fairer Britain for those who want to see change, not division,” he added.
The UK has traditionally resisted the idea of identity cards, but more recent polling suggests support for the move.

Poland cools on Ukrainians despite their economic success

Poland cools on Ukrainians despite their economic success
Updated 19 min 31 sec ago

Poland cools on Ukrainians despite their economic success

Poland cools on Ukrainians despite their economic success

WARSAW: Warsaw’s central business district is booming alongside Poland’s economy, but those teaching yoga and taking coffee orders in bustling premises under glass and steel office towers are often Ukrainian.
Economists and entrepreneurs agree: Refugees from the Russian invasion of Ukraine have proven a huge boost to Poland’s economy — but now their contribution may be at risk.
A law governing Ukrainians’ protected status expires at the end of the month and President Karol Nawrocki has yet to sign off on a bill to renew it, threatening a million people with legal limbo.
At the ElFlex yoga and fitness center, the young women stretching and balancing in complicated poses under the colored lights maintain their poise, but concern is rippling through the community.
Gym owner Lisa Kolesnikova, 28, grew up in the Ukrainian city Zaporizhzhia, but she built her business in Poland.
She now owns two yoga studios and has franchised two more. Two years ago most of the customers and all of her staff were from Ukraine or Belarus. Now, that’s changing.
“Polish clients come to us, and the girls now conduct training in Polish. They like us and, in fact, I have never encountered any negativity,” she told AFP.

- Economic success story -

For Kolesnikova, who employs eight people, the idea that Poland might call into question the residency rights of hundreds of thousands of hard-working Ukrainians is absurd — but not for nationalist politicians like Nawrocki.
In March 2022, in the immediate aftermath of Russia’s full-scale invasion, Poland’s parliament passed a law granting protected status to Ukrainians. It has since been amended and extended.
Last month the newly-elected nationalist president refused to approve the latest version, demanding it be changed to prevent Ukrainians from receiving Poland’s 800-zloty (190-euro) per child monthly benefit.
A new draft is ready, but Nawrocki is still keeping the Ukrainians and their employers guessing. If he doesn’t sign off by September 30, Ukrainians will see their legal residency expire.
On Thursday the president said he was still studying the amended bill. “If it hasn’t been changed, I’ll reject it again,” he said, in an interview with the new site Fakt.
At the parliament in Warsaw, lawmaker Michal Wawer of the right-wing Confederation party, which sits in the opposition in parliament, told AFP his movement hopes the president will indeed stop the bill.
“I don’t think it would be a social catastrophe,” he said. “Each of these Ukrainian citizens will be entitled to apply for legal residence as an immigrant or as a refugee.
“They will be just treated in the way that every other foreigner in Poland is treated.”
Entrepreneur Oleg Yarovi, a 37-year-old Ukrainian who owns a chain of coffee shops, does not agree.
“As someone who understands how much the Ukrainian community spends investing in the Polish market, these are very illogical steps being taken. It is simply something political, populist,” he said.
“The Ukrainians who came here invested millions in Poland. We are currently selling one of our premises and every day if I take seven calls from people who are interested, six are Ukrainians.”

- ‘Real concern’ -

In June, consultants Deloitte estimated in a report to the UN refugee agency that the work of Ukrainian refugees now accounts for 2.7 percent of Poland’s GDP.
Ukrainians are more likely to be employed than Poles, and native workers are moving into higher-paid roles.
Since Russia’s 2022 invasion, Poland’s Ukrainian population has topped one million. Yet Poland’s total population is shrinking and unemployment in July was just 3.1 percent, the fourth lowest in the European Union.
“They integrated into the labor market in Poland very quickly. They managed, found work,” said Nadia Winiarska, an employment expert from the Lewiatan Confederation business association.
“It is not true that Ukrainian citizens in Poland primarily rely on welfare,” she told AFP, complaining that the political debate in Poland does not take into account the scale of Ukrainians’ input.
But anti-refugee politicians say they are speaking up for ordinary Polish opinion.
“I don’t agree that they are well integrated,” Wawer told AFP. “There is a problem of building entire companies, an entire society that does not require its citizens to use Polish language or to accept Polish cultural norms.”
Some business leaders accuse Russia’s online propaganda networks of boosting anti-refugee sentiment.
“I hope the Polish people won’t buy it,” said Andrzej Korkus, CEO of the EWL Group, a major employment agency. Referring to the law, he said “we’re coming to the end of September and still it’s not signed. There’s real concern.”


Donor nations provide emergency financial aid to Palestinian Authority, Norway says

Donor nations provide emergency financial aid to Palestinian Authority, Norway says
Updated 26 min 39 sec ago

Donor nations provide emergency financial aid to Palestinian Authority, Norway says

Donor nations provide emergency financial aid to Palestinian Authority, Norway says
  • A group of nations providing financial assistance to the Palestinian Authority has agreed to an emergency package increasing the support, Norway’s foreign ministry said on Friday

OSLO: A group of nations providing financial assistance to the Palestinian Authority has agreed to an emergency package increasing the support, Norway’s foreign ministry said on Friday.
Ƶ, Spain, Britain, Japan and France were among the nations supporting the initiative dubbed the Emergency Coalition for the Financial Sustainability of the Palestinian Authority.
It was not immediately clear how much funding the initiative would raise.
The Norwegian government said its contribution was for 40 million Norwegian crowns ($4.0 million).
“This coalition was established in response to the urgent and unprecedented financial crisis confronting the Palestinian Authority (PA),” the foreign ministry said in a statement.
The immediate purpose was to stabilize the PA’s finances and preserve its ability to govern, provide essential services and maintain security, it added.
The countries participating in the scheme also called on Israel to release funds they said belong to the PA. Norway has for decades chaired the international donor group to the Palestinians known as the Ad Hoc Liaison Committee (AHLC).


Danish airport closes again after suspected new drone sighting

Danish airport closes again after suspected new drone sighting
Updated 26 September 2025

Danish airport closes again after suspected new drone sighting

Danish airport closes again after suspected new drone sighting
  • A suspected drone sighting briefly shuttered a Danish airport on Friday for the second time in a few hours, after the country’s prime minister said the flights were part of “hybrid attacks“

COPENHAGEN: A suspected drone sighting briefly shuttered a Danish airport on Friday for the second time in a few hours, after the country’s prime minister said the flights were part of “hybrid attacks” that may be linked to Russia.
Drones have been seen flying over several Danish airports since Wednesday, causing one of them to close for hours, after a sighting earlier this week prompted Copenhagen airport to shut down.
That followed a similar incident in Norway, drone incursions in Polish and Romanian territory and the violation of Estonian airspace by Russian fighter jets, which raised tensions in light of Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine.
“Over recent days, Denmark has been the victim of hybrid attacks,” Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said in a video message on social media on Thursday — referring to a form of unconventional warfare.
She warned that such drone flights “could multiply.”
Investigators said they had so far failed to identify those responsible, but Frederiksen stressed: “There is one main country that poses a threat to Europe’s security, and it is Russia.”
Moscow said Thursday it “firmly rejects” any suggestion that it was involved in the Danish incidents. Its embassy in Copenhagen called them “a staged provocation,” in a post on social media.
Denmark’s Justice Minister Peter Hummelgaard earlier said the aim of the attack was “to spread fear, create division and frighten us.”
He added that Copenhagen would acquire new enhanced capabilities to “detect” and “neutralize drones.”
Denmark will on Friday join other EU countries, mostly along the eastern border with Russia, in the first talks on proposals to build a “wall” of anti-drone defenses in the face of the tensions with Moscow.
Russia sabotage warning
Drones were spotted on Wednesday and early Thursday at airports in Aalborg, Esbjerg, Sonderborg and at the Skrydstrup air base before leaving on their own, police said.
Aalborg airport, located in northern Denmark, was initially shut down for several hours, and closed again for about an hour from late Thursday into early Friday morning due to another suspected sighting.
“It was not possible to take down the drones, which flew over a very large area over a couple of hours,” North Jutland chief police inspector Jesper Bojgaard Madsen said about the initial Aalborg incident.
The head of Denmark’s military intelligence, Thomas Ahrenkiel, told a news conference the service had not been able to identify who was behind the drones.
But intelligence chief Finn Borch said: “The risk of Russian sabotage in Denmark is high.”
Danish Defense Minister Troels Lund Poulsen told a news conference the flights appeared to be “the work of a professional actor... such a systematic operation in so many locations at virtually the same time.”
He said it had posed “no direct military threat” to Denmark.
Frederiksen said Thursday that she had spoken with NATO chief Mark Rutte about the incidents.
Lund Poulsen said the government had yet to decide whether to invoke NATO’s Article 4, under which any member state can call urgent talks when it feels its “territorial integrity, political independence or security” are at risk.
French President Emmanuel Macron said his country stood ready “to contribute to the security of Danish airspace.”
Copenhagen is set to host a summit of European Union leaders next week.
’Feel rather insecure’
Police said investigations were under way with the Danish intelligence service and the armed forces.
The drone activity shook some in Denmark, including 85-year-old Birgit Larsen.
“I feel rather insecure. I live in a country where there has been peace since 1945. I am not really used to thinking about war,” she told AFP in central Copenhagen.
Others were less concerned.
“It’s probably Russia, you know, testing the borders of Europe. They fly close to the borders and stuff and try to provoke, but not threaten,” said 48-year-old Torsten Froling.
The drone flights came after Denmark announced it would acquire long-range precision weapons for the first time, as Russia would pose a threat “for years to come.”


Trump meets with Pakistani PM, army chief as Islamabad seeks reset with US, greater regional role

Trump meets with Pakistani PM, army chief as Islamabad seeks reset with US, greater regional role
Updated 26 September 2025

Trump meets with Pakistani PM, army chief as Islamabad seeks reset with US, greater regional role

Trump meets with Pakistani PM, army chief as Islamabad seeks reset with US, greater regional role
  • High-level engagement aimed at resetting relations between the two countries and expanding cooperation on security, trade and regional peace

ISLAMABAD: Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir met US President Donald J. Trump at the White House on Thursday in a high-level engagement aimed at resetting relations between the two countries and expanding cooperation on security, trade and regional peace.

The Oval Office talks marked Sharif’s first meeting with Trump since the latter’s return to power earlier this year and the first joint appearance by Pakistan’s top civilian and military leadership before a US president in years. The meeting followed a precedent-setting White House lunch between Trump and Field Marshal Munir earlier this year — conducted without civilian officials present — and which came amid shifting geopolitical dynamics, including Washington’s increasingly strained ties with New Delhi.

By pairing civilian and military leadership in the same room with the US president, Pakistan is widely seen to be signaling a more coordinated foreign policy posture aimed at strengthening its influence in wider Middle Eastern and Asian security discussions.

During what the Pakistani prime minister’s office described as a “warm and cordial” meeting, Sharif said he was confident the talks would usher in a new phase in bilateral relations.

“Under President Trump’s leadership, the Pakistan-US partnership will be further strengthened to the mutual benefit of both countries,” Sharif was quoted as saying in a statement released by his office after the meeting.

Sharif and Munir arrived at the White House shortly before 5p.m. on Thursday as Trump was signing executive orders and talking with reporters. The meeting between the two leaders was closed to the media, with Pakistan’s delegation leaving the White House at 6:18 p.m.

Ties have improved between the US and Pakistan as Trump’s relationship with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, one of the Republican president’s closest with a world leader during his first term, has become strained over India’s increased purchases of discounted Russian oil after Moscow invaded Ukraine in February 2022. India and Pakistan are neighbors and fierce rivals.

Trump has dramatically raised tariffs on India for those oil purchases in an effort to put indirect economic pressure on Moscow.

Meanwhile, the US and Pakistan reached a landmark trade agreement in July that is expected to allow Washington to help develop Pakistan’s largely untapped oil reserves and lower tariffs for Islamabad.

During Thursday’s meeting, Sharif invited American firms to invest in Pakistan’s agriculture, IT, minerals and energy sectors.

He also praised Trump as a “man of peace” whose “bold, courageous and decisive leadership” helped facilitate a ceasefire between Pakistan and India in May, averting what Islamabad said could have been a “major catastrophe in South Asia.”

The truce, brokered with US involvement, followed a four-day war in which the two nuclear-armed neighbors shared artillery, missile and drone strikes.

Security and counterterrorism cooperation featured prominently in the talks, with Sharif thanking Trump for his public endorsement of Pakistan’s counterterrorism role and calling for expanded intelligence collaboration.

Sharif has gained favor with Trump since publicly endorsing the American leader for a Nobel Peace Prize over his role in brokering the ceasefire with India. Unlike Sharif, Modi has declined to indulge Trump’s attempt to claim credit for arranging the truce.

Pakistan did split with Trump on his decision to carry out US strikes in June on three Iranian nuclear facilities.

Pakistan said the attack “constituted a serious violation of international law” as well as on the stature of the International Atomic Energy Agency.

• with inputs from AP