Ƶ

An AI-powered tool aims to combat fake news in the Arab world and beyond

Special An AI-powered tool aims to combat fake news in the Arab world and beyond
Misinformation and disinformation are considered a top short-term global risk that not only mislead the public but also erode trust, deepen societal divisions and threaten fundamental human rights. (Shutterstock illustration)
Short Url
Updated 22 November 2024

An AI-powered tool aims to combat fake news in the Arab world and beyond

An AI-powered tool aims to combat fake news in the Arab world and beyond
  • Developed jointly with EU academic institutions, FRAPPE is the brainchild of Preslav Nakov of Abu Dhabi’s MBZUAI
  • System trained with 23 different linguistic techniques, can identify specific persuasion and propaganda techniques

RIYADH: Rising concern over disinformation’s role in manipulating public opinion has motivated Preslav Nakov, a professor at the UAE’s Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence, to develop an AI-powered tool for detecting propaganda.

FRAPPE, short for Framing, Persuasion and Propaganda Explorer, is designed to assess news framing techniques and identify potential instances of information manipulation.

Nakov, chair of the natural language processing department and professor of natural language processing at the Abu Dhabi-based MBZUAI, said that AI plays a central role in FRAPPE by analyzing, categorizing and detecting complex patterns that influence readers’ opinions and emotions.

The tool offers real-time, on-the-fly analysis of individual articles while enabling a comprehensive comparison of framing and persuasion strategies across a wide range of media outlets, he told Arab News.

The UN defines disinformation as inaccurate information deliberately created and disseminated with the intent to deceive the public and cause serious harm. It can be spread by both state and non-state actors and can affect human rights, fuel armed conflict and undermine public policy responses.

The Global Risks Report 2024 by the World Economic Forum identifies misinformation and disinformation as a top short-term global risk. These forms of deceptive communication not only mislead the public but also erode trust, deepen societal divisions and threaten fundamental human rights.

Nevertheless, the WEF highlighted in an article in June that while AI technologies are being used in the production of both misinformation and disinformation, they can be harnessed to combat this risk by analyzing patterns, language and context.




Prof. Preslav Nakov, developer of an AI-powered tool for detecting propaganda. (Supplied)

Nakov said that FRAPPE, trained with 23 different linguistic techniques, “uses AI to identify specific persuasion and propaganda techniques, such as name-calling, loaded language, appeals to fear, exaggeration and repetition.”

“FRAPPE further uses AI to perform framing analysis,” he said, adding that the tool distinguishes “the main perspectives from which an issue is being discussed: Morality, fairness, equality, political, and cultural identity.”

With a database of in excess of 2.5 million articles from more than 8,000 sources, the multilingual system enables users to explore and compare how different countries and outlets frame and present information.

DID YOUKNOW?

• Disinformation is the intentional spread of false information to sway public opinion.

• Propaganda often employs loaded language to elicit emotional reactions.

• A WEF report identifies disinformation and misinformation as a top short-term risk.

Moreover, to build the training data for the system, more than 40 journalists from several European countries contributed to the manual analysis of news content in 13 languages.

This manual analysis, according to Nakov, allows FRAPPE to discern the underlying frames that shape how stories are told and perceived. By identifying the dominant frames within an article, FRAPPE compares these across media sources, countries and languages, providing valuable insights into how framing varies globally.

FRAPPE is designed for a broad audience, including the general public, journalists, researchers, and even policymakers.




With an extensive database, FRAPPE's multilingual system enables users to explore and compare how different countries and outlets frame and present information. (Supplied)

“For the general user, FRAPPE serves as an educational tool to explore how news content is framed, enabling them to identify propaganda techniques like name-calling, flag-waving, loaded language and appeals to fear,” Nakov said.

“For journalists and policymakers, FRAPPE offers a powerful tool to examine and compare framing and persuasion strategies across different countries, languages and outlets,” he added.

The system relies on annotations from journalists who manually identified persuasion and propaganda techniques across a wide range of articles. This minimizes the risk of overly subjective or one-sided interpretations.

Opinion

This section contains relevant reference points, placed in (Opinion field)

Transparency and unbiased analysis were fundamental in the development of FRAPPE. Nakov said: “Users should be aware that our models use neural networks and, as such, they lack explainability.”

He also warned that “despite our intent, due to potential unintended article selection biases, FRAPPE might be favoring some political or social standpoints.”

On the positive side, however, “FRAPPE has the potential to influence the way news articles are perceived and consumed, and journalists may become more aware of the language they use and its potential impact on readers.”




FRAPPE has the ability to spot persuasive or manipulative techniques in news content. (Supplied)

To spot persuasive or manipulative techniques in news content, Nakov advises readers and viewers to “watch out for emotional language designed to provoke strong reactions like fear or anger, and be mindful of loaded words, such as ‘radical’ and ‘heroic, which carry emotional weight.”

He urged readers to critically assess articles that rely too heavily on a single expert or selective quotes, stressing the importance of considering how different outlets might report the same event in contrasting ways.

To gain a clearer perspective, Nakov advises cross-checking sources and comparing how different media outlets cover the same story. This approach helps reveal varying angles, biases or framing techniques.

He also stressed that oversimplified “us versus them” narratives “often indicate manipulation, as do articles that frame an issue with a particular angle, leaving out important details.




FRAPPE has been featured in numerous EU workshops focused on combating fake news. (Supplied)

“False dilemmas, where only extreme choices are presented and repetitive phrases meant to reinforce a point are also red flags,” he said.

“FRAPPE envisions empowering individuals and institutions to make more informed decisions by revealing the framing and persuasion techniques embedded in media content. Its aim is to enhance transparency in journalism, promote trust in media and contribute to a more informed, media-literate public.”

Developed in collaboration with the European Commission’s Joint Research Center and several academic institutions across Europe, FRAPPE was launched ahead of the 2024 European Parliament election, held in the EU between June 6-9 this year.

The tool, integrated into the Europe Media Monitor, has been featured in numerous EU workshops focused on combating fake news.



‘Act civilized’: US envoy berates Lebanese journalists during press conference

‘Act civilized’: US envoy berates Lebanese journalists during press conference
Updated 26 August 2025

‘Act civilized’: US envoy berates Lebanese journalists during press conference

‘Act civilized’: US envoy berates Lebanese journalists during press conference
  • Barrack asked journalists to ‘be quiet for a moment’ before lashing out, saying: ‘The moment this starts becoming chaotic, like animalistic, we’re gone’
  • Remarks drew backlash from journalists and media unions, who described his comments as ‘humiliating’ and ‘racist’

BEIRUT: US Special Envoy Thomas Barrack sparked outrage Tuesday after telling Lebanese journalists to “act civilized” and avoid behaving in an “animalistic” manner during a press conference at the presidential palace, drawing swift condemnation from media unions and the presidency.

During a press conference at Baabda Palace following his meeting with President Joseph Aoun, Barrack asked journalists to “be quiet for a moment” before lashing out, saying: “The moment this starts becoming chaotic, like animalistic, we’re gone.”

He added: “Act civilized, act kind, act tolerant, because this is the problem with what’s happening in the region.”

Linking their behavior to a broader problem in the Middle East drew backlash from journalists and media unions, who described his comments as “humiliating” and “racist.”

The press conference was held in Beirut to brief the media on Washington’s push to disarm Hezbollah as part of wider efforts to de-escalate tensions along Lebanon’s southern border.

Despite calls for clarification, Barrack, who was joined by Deputy Envoy Morgan Ortagus, refused to apologize following the press conference.

In response, Lebanon’s presidency issued a statement, saying that it “deeply regrets the remark made inadvertently from its podium by one of its guests,” without naming Barrack.

It also affirmed “its utmost respect for human dignity in general,” while extending appreciation to all journalists and media correspondents for their efforts and national role in covering the country’s developments.

The Syndicate of Lebanese Press Editors issued a statement, demanding an apology from the US envoy. Denouncing what it described as “beyond the pale of decency and diplomacy,” the syndicate threatened that it would urge media outlets to boycott his remaining visits to Lebanon if apologies were not made.

It called the remarks “absolutely unacceptable and highly reprehensible,” adding that “what’s even more unfortunate is that it came from an envoy of a major power.”


Spotify introduces new direct messaging feature for users

Spotify introduces new direct messaging feature for users
Updated 26 August 2025

Spotify introduces new direct messaging feature for users

Spotify introduces new direct messaging feature for users
  • New messaging tool will allow users to share music, podcasts, and audiobook recommendations directly with friends

LONDON: Spotify on Tuesday announced it will begin rolling out a new in‑app messaging feature this week, available to both free and premium subscribers.

The feature will allow users to share music, podcasts, and audiobook recommendations directly with friends without leaving the app.

It will initially launch in select markets and be available to users aged 16 and above, the company said.

According to Spotify, the feature can be accessed by tapping the share icon while listening to a track, podcast, or audiobook in the “Now Playing” view, then selecting a friend to send it to.

Shared content will appear in a dedicated Messages inbox, accessible from the profile menu in the top‑left corner of the app.

Messages are one‑to‑one, support text responses and emoji reactions, and are secured with “industry‑standard encryption,” Spotify added.

The rollout comes as Spotify seeks to consolidate its position as a central platform for music discovery and sharing amid ongoing industry debates over royalties and artist rights.

The company has faced challenges in recent years, with some artists withdrawing their catalogs over revenue‑sharing concerns.

Spotify has also moved to make its platform more social and competitive with rivals such as YouTube Music and TikTok.

Last year, it introduced a video feature, and earlier this month it announced price increases for users as a part of wider investments aimed at reaching its target of 1 billion global listeners.

In the Middle East North Africa region, Spotify continues to face tough competition from homegrown platforms such as Anghami.


Leaders, journalist groups condemn Israeli strike on Gaza hospital that killed 5 reporters

Leaders, journalist groups condemn Israeli strike on Gaza hospital that killed 5 reporters
Updated 26 August 2025

Leaders, journalist groups condemn Israeli strike on Gaza hospital that killed 5 reporters

Leaders, journalist groups condemn Israeli strike on Gaza hospital that killed 5 reporters
  • Attack brings toll of journalists, media workers killed since Oct. 7, 2023, to 197
  • ‘Israel’s broadcasted killing of journalists in Gaza continues while the world watches and fails to act,’ says CPJ’s regional director

LONDON: World leaders and journalist organizations have condemned an Israeli strike on Monday that targeted Gaza’s Nasser Hospital and killed at least 21 people, including five journalists working for Reuters, the Associated Press, Al Jazeera, and other outlets.

The attack on the medical complex reportedly involved an Israeli explosive drone strike, followed by an airstrike as wounded civilians were being evacuated.

The assault drew widespread condemnation, fueling international anger over Israel’s repeated targeting of civilians and intensifying frustration at the failure of the international community to hold Israel accountable for attacks on the press.

Sara Qudah, the Committee to Protect Journalists’ regional director, said in a statement: “Israel killed at least five journalists in Nasser Hospital on Monday morning.

“Israel’s broadcasted killing of journalists in Gaza continues while the world watches and fails to act firmly on the most horrific attacks the press has ever faced in recent history. These murders must end now; the perpetrators must no longer be allowed to act with impunity.”

The CPJ has documented the killing of at least 197 journalists and media workers since the war began, including 189 Palestinians killed by Israel in Gaza.

In a statement on social media, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the incident a “tragic mishap,” adding Israel “deeply regrets” the deaths and “values the work of journalists, medical staff, and all civilians.” He added that an investigation had been launched.

The UN insisted on Tuesday that Israel must not only investigate the attack, but also ensure that those probes yielded results.

Reactions from world leaders and media groups are below.

SAUDI MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS:

“The Foreign Ministry expresses the Kingdom of Ƶ’s condemnation of Israeli occupation forces’ targeting of medical, relief, and media personnel at the Nasser Medical Complex in Khan Younis, in the southern Gaza Strip.”

PALESTINIAN JOURNALISTS SYNDICATE:

“The syndicate affirmed that this heinous crime represents a dangerous escalation in the direct and deliberate targeting of Palestinian journalists, and confirms without a shadow of a doubt that the occupation is waging an open war on free media, with the aim of terrorizing journalists and preventing them from carrying out their professional mission of exposing its crimes to the world.”

US PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP:

“When did this happen? I didn’t know that. Well, I’m not happy about it. I don’t want to see it. At the same time, we have to end that whole nightmare.”

FRENCH PRESIDENT EMMANUEL MACRON:

“This is intolerable: civilians and journalists must be protected in all circumstances. The media must be able to carry out their mission freely and independently to cover the reality of the conflict.”

QATARI MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS:

“In a statement on Monday the Ministry of Foreign Affairs stressed that the occupation forces’ targeting of journalists and relief and medical workers requires urgent and decisive international action to provide the necessary protection for civilians and ensure that the perpetrators of these atrocities do not escape punishment.”

UN SPOKESPERSON STEPHANE DUJARRIC:

“The secretary-general strongly condemns the killing of Palestinians today in Israeli strikes that hit Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis. Those killed in addition to civilians included medical personnel and journalists.

“These latest horrific killings highlight the extreme risks that medical personnel and journalists face as they carry out their vital work amid this brutal conflict.

“They must be respected and protected at all times. He calls for a prompt and impartial investigation into these killings.”

US SENATOR JEANNE SHAHEEN, SENATE FOREIGN RELATIONS COMMITTEE

“I personally am appalled by the bombing in Gaza and by the killing of journalists, and think it needs to end now.”

JEROME GRIMAUD, MSF EMERGENCY COORDINATOR IN GAZA:

“For the past 22 months we have watched as healthcare facilities have been leveled, journalists silenced, and healthcare workers buried beneath the rubble by the Israeli forces. As Israel continues to shun international law, the only witnesses of their genocidal campaign are deliberately being targeted. It must stop now.”

RAVINA SHAMDASANI, CHIEF SPOKESPERSON FOR UN HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS VOLKER TURK:

“The killing of journalists in Gaza should shock the world, not into stunned silence but into action, demanding accountability and justice.”

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION DIRECTOR GENERAL TEDROS ADHANOM GHEBREYESUS:

“While people in #Gaza are being starved, their already limited access to healthcare is being further crippled by repeated attacks.”

“We cannot say it loudly enough: Stop attacks on healthcare. Ceasefire now!”

UNRWA CHIEF PHILIPPE LAZZARINI:

“Silencing the last remaining voices reporting about children dying silently and #famine with the world’s indifference & inaction is shocking ... Let us undo this man-made famine by opening the gates without restrictions, protecting journalists & humanitarian + health workers. Time for political will. Not tomorrow, now.”

JERUSALEM-BASED FOREIGN PRESS ASSOCIATION:

“We demand an immediate explanation from the Israel Defense Forces and the Israeli Prime Minister’s Office. We call on Israel once and for all to halt its abhorrent practice of targeting journalists … We appeal to international leaders: Do everything you can to protect our colleagues. We cannot do it ourselves.”

With Reuters

 


The 189 Palestinian journalists killed in the war in Gaza endured hunger and grief

The 189 Palestinian journalists killed in the war in Gaza endured hunger and grief
Updated 26 August 2025

The 189 Palestinian journalists killed in the war in Gaza endured hunger and grief

The 189 Palestinian journalists killed in the war in Gaza endured hunger and grief

Since the war began in Gaza, 189 Palestinian journalists have been killed, according to the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists. They include men and women, freelancers and staffers, veterans with years in the field and young reporters on some of their first assignments. Some were killed with their families at home, others were in vehicles marked “PRESS,” or in tents near hospitals, or out covering the violence. Many endured the same conditions as those they covered — hunger, displacement, and grief.
Among them:
— Mariam Dagga, 33. A visual journalist and a 33-year-old mother, she was known for human-centered reporting from southern Gaza, including at Nasser Hospital, where she was killed in an Israeli strike in August 2025. During the war, she worked for The Associated Press and Independent Arabia. The strike that killed her also claimed the lives of rescuers and four other journalists.
— Anas Al-Sharif, 28. The father of two was killed in an Israeli strike on a tent outside Shifa hospital in August 2025, days after he wept on air while reporting on starvation deaths in Gaza. The strike — which also killed five other journalists — prompted an outpouring of condemnation from press freedom groups and foreign officials.
— Hamza Dahdouh, 27. The son of Al Jazeera’s Gaza City bureau chief, he was killed in a January 2024 drone strike after leaving a reporting assignment at the site of an earlier strike in southern Gaza. He was the fifth member of his family to be killed.
— Ayat Khadoura, 27. The Al Quds University graduate shed light on the hardships families faced in the first weeks of the war. She became known for reporting on bombs striking her northern Gaza neighborhood, including one video in which she said Israeli forces had ordered residents to evacuate moments before a strike hit her home and killed her in November 2023.
— Hossam Shabat, 23. A freelancer from northern Gaza, he was killed while reporting for Al Jazeera in March 2025. Before the war, he told a Beirut-based advocacy group he hoped to start a media company or work in his family’s restaurants.
— Fatima Hassouna, 25. The photojournalist was killed in an April 2025 Israeli airstrike a day after a documentary about her efforts to film daily life amid war in Gaza was accepted at a Cannes Film Festival program promoting independent films.
Israel has accused some of the journalists killed of involvement with militant groups, including Hamas and Islamic Jihad — charges that journalists and their outlets have dismissed as baseless. Israel’s military did not respond to an Associated Press request for comment about the CPJ data.
Figures and methodologies may differ among groups that track journalist deaths. CPJ said it “independently investigates and verifies the circumstances behind each death,” including to verify journalists’ lack of involvement in militant activities.


Reuters, AP demand Israel explain killing journalists, civilians in Gaza hospital strike

Reuters, AP demand Israel explain killing journalists, civilians in Gaza hospital strike
Updated 26 August 2025

Reuters, AP demand Israel explain killing journalists, civilians in Gaza hospital strike

Reuters, AP demand Israel explain killing journalists, civilians in Gaza hospital strike
  • News agencies skeptical of Israel’s promise of independent probe
  • Tel Aviv can be accused of killing witnesses by targeting journalists

LONDON: Reuters and The Associated Press have jointly called on Tel Aviv to conduct a full and transparent investigation into its strike on Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis on Monday that killed five freelance journalists covering Israel’s war on Gaza.

In a letter on Monday addressed to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Israel Katz, and other senior officials, the two leading news agencies demanded a clear explanation.

The attack killed AP freelancer Mariam Dagga, Reuters contributor Moaz Abu Taha and cameraman Hussam Al-Masri. Photographer Hatem Khaled, also contracted by Reuters, was wounded.

Noting the nearly two-year ban on foreign correspondents entering the enclave ravaged by Israel, the media agencies said: “These journalists were present in their professional capacity, doing critical work bearing witness.”

The letter added: “We are outraged that independent journalists were among the victims of this strike on the hospital, a location that is protected under international law.”

Though the media agencies acknowledged Tel Aviv’s pledge to investigate the attack, they raised concerns about the credibility of Israel’s internal probes, citing a lack of transparency and past failures to deliver accountability and action.

This, they said, raises “serious questions including whether Israel is deliberately targeting live feeds in order to suppress information.”

Since Oct. 7, 2023, at least 197 journalists and media workers have been killed, including 189 Palestinians, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists. The toll includes multiple confirmed cases of targeted strikes.

Following Monday’s strike, the Israeli military claimed it “does not target journalists as such.”

But both agencies questioned the statement and raised concerns over whether Israel was fulfilling its obligations under international law to protect journalists and civilians.

“Striking a hospital, followed by a second strike while journalists and rescuers were responding, raises urgent questions about whether these obligations were upheld,” the letter read.

The agencies reiterated their call for Israel to allow safe and unimpeded access to Gaza for independent journalists, urging officials to uphold press freedom and protection.

“We are doing everything we can to keep our journalists in Gaza safe as they continue to deliver crucial eyewitness reporting under extremely dangerous conditions,” the letter stated.

Israeli authorities have not yet responded to the joint request.

Similarly, the Foreign Press Association, which represents international media working in Israel and the occupied Palestinian territory, expressed its outrage on the attack, demanding “an immediate explanation” from the Israeli army and the Israeli PM’s office.

In a statement on Monday, the association called on Israel “once and for all to halt its abhorrent practice of targeting journalists.”

It added: “This must be a watershed moment. We appeal to international leaders: Do everything you can to protect our colleagues. We cannot do it ourselves.”