Ƶ

Trump threatens to impose sweeping new tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China on first day in office

Trump threatens to impose sweeping new tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China on first day in office
US President-elect Donald Trump. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 26 November 2024

Trump threatens to impose sweeping new tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China on first day in office

Trump threatens to impose sweeping new tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China on first day in office

NEW YORK: President-elect Donald Trump is threatening to impose sweeping new tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China as soon as he takes office as part of his efforts to crack down on illegal immigration and drugs.
The tariffs, if implemented, could dramatically raise prices on everything from gas to automobiles. The US is the largest importer of goods in the world, with Mexico, China and Canada its top three suppliers, according to the most recent Census data.
Trump made the threats in a pair of posts on his Truth Social site Monday evening in which he railed against an influx of illegal migrants, even though southern border crossings have been hovering at a four-year low.
“On January 20th, as one of my many first Executive Orders, I will sign all necessary documents to charge Mexico and Canada a 25 percent Tariff on ALL products coming into the United States, and its ridiculous Open Borders,” he wrote, complaining that “thousands of people are pouring through Mexico and Canada, bringing Crime and Drugs at levels never seen before,” even though violent crime is down from pandemic highs.
He said the new tariffs would remain in place “until such time as Drugs, in particular Fentanyl, and all Illegal Aliens stop this Invasion of our Country! ”
Trump also turned his ire to China, saying he has “had many talks with China about the massive amounts of drugs, in particular Fentanyl, being sent into the United States – But to no avail.”
“Until such time as they stop, we will be charging China an additional 10 percent Tariff, above any additional Tariffs, on all of their many products coming into the United States of America,” he wrote.
It is unclear whether Trump will actually go through with the threats or if he is using them as a negotiating tactic before he takes office in the new year.
Arrests for illegally crossing the border from Mexico have been falling and remained around four-year lows in October, according to the most recent US numbers
The Border Patrol made 56,530 arrests in October, less than one third of the tally from last October.
Much of America’s fentanyl is smuggled from Mexico. Border seizures of the drug rose sharply under President Joe Biden, and US officials tallied about 21,900 pounds (12,247 kilograms) of fentanyl seized in the 2024 government budget year, compared with 2,545 pounds (1,154 kilograms) in 2019, when Trump was president.
Trump’s nominee for treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, if confirmed, would be one of several officials responsible for imposing tariffs on other nations. He has on several occasions said tariffs are a means of negotiation with other countries.
He wrote in a Fox News op-ed last week, before his nomination, that tariffs are “a useful tool for achieving the president’s foreign policy objectives. Whether it is getting allies to spend more on their own defense, opening foreign markets to US exports, securing cooperation on ending illegal immigration and interdicting fentanyl trafficking, or deterring military aggression, tariffs can play a central role.”
If Trump were to move forward with the threatened tariffs, the new taxes would pose an enormous challenge for the economies of Canada and Mexico, in particular.
They would also throw into doubt the reliability of the 2020 trade deal brokered in large part by Trump, which is up for review in 2026.
Spokespeople for Canada’s ambassador to Washington and its deputy prime minister, Chrystia Freeland, who chairs a special Cabinet committee on Canada-US relations to address concerns about another Trump presidency, did not immediately provide comment.
Trump’s promise to launch a mass deportation effort is a top focus for the Cabinet committee, Freeland has said.
A senior Canadian official had said before Trump’s posts that Canadian officials are expecting Trump to issue executive orders on trade and the border as soon as he assumes office. The official was not authorized to speak publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.
Mexico’s Foreign Relations Department and Economy Department also had no immediate reaction to Trump’s statements. Normally such weighty issues are handled by the president at her morning press briefings.


US judge temporarily blocks Trump administration from deploying troops in Portland, Oregon

US judge temporarily blocks Trump administration from deploying troops in Portland, Oregon
Updated 7 sec ago

US judge temporarily blocks Trump administration from deploying troops in Portland, Oregon

US judge temporarily blocks Trump administration from deploying troops in Portland, Oregon
  • US District Judge Karin Immergut issued the order pending further arguments in a lawsuit brought by the state and city 
  • Trump has deployed or threatened to deploy troops in several US cities, particularly ones led by Democrats, including Los Angeles, Washington, Chicago and Memphis

PORTLAND, Oregon: A federal judge in Oregon temporarily blocked President Donald Trump’s administration from deploying the National Guard in Portland, ruling in a lawsuit brought by the state and city.
US District Judge Karin Immergut issued the order pending further arguments in the suit. The plaintiffs say a deployment would violate the US Constitution as well as a federal law that generally prohibits the military from being used to enforce domestic laws.
Immergut wrote that the case involves the intersection of three fundamental democratic principles: “the relationship between the federal government and the states, between the military and domestic law enforcement, and the balance of powers between the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government.
“Whether we choose to follow what the Constitution mandates with respect to these three relationships goes to the heart of what it means to live under the rule of law in the United States,” she wrote.
Generally speaking the president is allowed “a great level of deference” to federalize National Guard troops in situations where regular law enforcement forces are not able to execute the laws of the United States, the judge said, but that has not been the case in Portland.
Plaintiffs were able to show that the demonstrations at the Portland immigration facility were not significantly violent or disruptive in the days or weeks leading up to the president’s order, the judge wrote, and “overall, the protests were small and uneventful.”
“The President’s determination was simply untethered to the facts.”
The Defense Department had said it was placing 200 members of Oregon’s National Guard under federal control for 60 days to protect federal property at locations where protests are occurring or likely to occur after Trump called the city “war-ravaged.”
Oregon officials said that description was ludicrous. The US Immigration and Customs Enforcement building in the city has recently been the site of nightly protests, which typically drew a couple dozen people in recent weeks before the deployment was announced.
Trump The Republican president has deployed or threatened to deploy troops in several US cities, particularly ones led by Democrats, including Los Angeles, Washington, Chicago and Memphis. Speaking Tuesday to US military leaders in Virginia, the president proposed using cities as training grounds for the armed forces.
Last month a federal judge ruled that Trump’s deployment of some 4,700 National Guard soldiers and Marines in Los Angeles earlier this year was illegal, but he allowed the 300 who remain in the city to stay as long as they do not enforce civilian laws.
As for Portland, the Defense Department announced that it was placing 200 members of Oregon’s National Guard under federal control for 60 days to protect federal property at locations where protests are occurring or likely to occur.
That announcement came after Trump called “war-ravaged” in late September, a characterization that Oregon officials called ludicrous while saying they do not need or want federal troops there.
The US Immigration and Customs Enforcement building in Portland has been the site of nightly protests, and the demonstrations and occasional clashes with law enforcement have been limited to a one-block area in a city that covers about 145 square miles (375 square km) and has about 636,000 residents.
A handful of immigration and legal advocates often gather at the building during the day. At night, recent protests have typically drawn a couple dozen people.
A larger crowd demonstrated Sept. 28 following the announcement of the guard deployment. The Portland Police Bureau, which has said it does not participate in immigration enforcement and only intervenes in the protests if there is vandalism or criminal activity, arrested two people on assault charges.
A peaceful march earlier that day drew thousands to downtown and saw no arrests, police said.
Trump sent federal officers to Portland over the objections of local and state leaders in 2020 during long-running racial justice protests following George Floyd’s killing by Minneapolis police. The administration sent hundreds of agents for the stated purpose of protecting the federal courthouse and other federal property from vandalism.
That deployment antagonized demonstrators and prompted nightly clashes. Federal officers fired rubber bulled and used tear gas.
Viral videos captured federal officers arresting people and hustling them into unmarked vehicles. A report by the Department of Homeland Security’s inspector general found that while the federal government had legal authority to deploy the officers, many of them lacked the training and equipment necessary for the mission.
The government agreed this year to settle an excessive force lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union by paying compensating several plaintiffs for their injuries.


One killed in Ireland as Storm Amy hits northern Europe

One killed in Ireland as Storm Amy hits northern Europe
Updated 04 October 2025

One killed in Ireland as Storm Amy hits northern Europe

One killed in Ireland as Storm Amy hits northern Europe
  • More than 200,000 properties in Ireland and Northern Ireland were left without power

LONDON: London’s famed Royal Parks shut their gates on Saturday and road, rail and sea travel faced major disruption as a storm walloped the UK, Ireland and Scandinavia with heavy rain and high winds.

More than 200,000 properties in Ireland and Northern Ireland were left without power, and a man died in Letterkenny, northwest Ireland, on Friday in what police called a weather-related incident, without giving details.

Britain’s Met Office weather agency said a gust of 154 kph was recorded on Friday on the island of Tiree off Scotland’s west coast. In Scotland, many ferry services were suspended and roads and railway lines blocked by fallen trees.

Fraser Wilson of Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks said engineers were working to restore power to about 62,000 customers.

“We expect because of the extent of damage to the network and conditions we are still going to be facing today that this will take some time,” he told the BBC. “This storm is not over by any means.”

In London, Hyde Park, Regent’s Park, Richmond Park and several other green spaces that are a magnet for locals and tourists were shut all day Saturday because of “severe wind gusts.”


UN rights chief hails chance to stop carnage

An Israeli army soldier behind a mounted machine gun in the vicinity of the Jordanian Field Hospital in Gaza City. (AFP)
An Israeli army soldier behind a mounted machine gun in the vicinity of the Jordanian Field Hospital in Gaza City. (AFP)
Updated 04 October 2025

UN rights chief hails chance to stop carnage

An Israeli army soldier behind a mounted machine gun in the vicinity of the Jordanian Field Hospital in Gaza City. (AFP)
  • Israel said Saturday its troops were still operating in Gaza City and warned residents not to return, despite calls from the families of Israeli hostages and Trump for an immediate halt to the fighting

GENEVA: UN rights chief Volker Turk on Saturday said US President Donald Trump’s Gaza peace plan was a “vital opportunity” to stop bloodshed in the Palestinian territory, once and for all.”
Trump has called on Israel to stop the fighting in the Gaza Strip as Hamas said it was ready to release all hostages and start talks surrounding the plan to end the nearly two-year war.

Volker Turk, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. (AFP)

Turk hopes the momentum from the US president’s peace plan will “pave the way for a permanent cessation of hostilities, followed by recovery and reconstruction,” his office said on X as it urged a resolution “in line with international human rights and humanitarian laws, and the much-needed two-state solution.”
He called the plan a “vital opportunity for all parties and influential states to pursue in good faith and stop — once and for all — the carnage and the suffering in Gaza, to flood the strip with humanitarian aid, and to ensure the release of the hostages and numerous detained Palestinians.”
The proposal details a gradual Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and the disarmament of Hamas.
The World Health Organization also welcomed the plan, particularly the prospect of reconstructing hospitals.
“The best medicine is peace,” the UN health agency’s chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus posted on X on Saturday.
Israel said Saturday its troops were still operating in Gaza City and warned residents not to return, despite calls from the families of Israeli hostages and Trump for an immediate halt to the fighting.
President Trump said that Hamas must move quickly on his plan for ending the war in Gaza, “or else all bets will be off.”
“I will not tolerate delay, which many think will happen, or any outcome where Gaza poses a threat again. Let’s get this done, FAST,” the president said in a post on Truth Social. 
Israel’s army said Saturday that it would advance preparations for the first phase of Trump’s plan.

 


Mutharika sworn in for second term as Malawi’s president

Mutharika sworn in for second term as Malawi’s president
Updated 04 October 2025

Mutharika sworn in for second term as Malawi’s president

Mutharika sworn in for second term as Malawi’s president
  • Malawi is facing acute food shortages, cost-of-living pressures, and a lack of foreign exchange that has crippled businesses and led to persistent fuel shortages, he said

BLANTYRE: Malawi’s Peter Mutharika vowed to root out government corruption and rebuild an ailing economy after he was sworn in on Saturday for a second term as president of the southern African nation.
Mutharika, 85, secured more than 56 percent of the votes last month, defeating outgoing President Lazarus Chakwera, 70, who received 33 percent. Voters rejected Chakwera after five years of worsening economic crisis in one of the world’s poorest countries.
The Sept. 16 vote marked the fourth presidential contest between Mutharika and Chakwera.
Mutharika took the oath of office in a stadium in the commercial city of Blantire packed with supporters dressed in the Democratic Progressive Party’s blue and white colors, as well as government officials and African heads of state.
In his inaugural address, he said his administration was inheriting a country in economic crisis.
Malawi is facing acute food shortages, cost-of-living pressures, and a lack of foreign exchange that has crippled businesses and led to persistent fuel shortages, he said.
“There is no money in government. Borrowing is extremely high, and nobody knows where the borrowed money has gone,” he said.
But he pledged improvements, saying: “We will fix this country.”
“I don’t promise you milk and honey. I promise you hard work, tough and painful decisions,” he said. “The honeymoon of looting government is over!“
Mutharika appealed to the international community to invest in Malawi, saying the country seeks partnerships, not handouts. 
He said he would soon send a delegation to America to discuss his country’s prospects, particularly in light of recent cuts in US foreign aid.
Mutharika said US President Donald Trump sent him a message of congratulations.
Mutharika praised the US, the UK and the EU for their support in fighting corruption,
Chakwera’s Malawi Congress Party stated in a press release that although the outgoing president was absent from the inauguration, he extended his best wishes to Mutharika, hoping for his success and good health.

 


UK home secretary criticized after saying ‘as a Muslim, I’ve never heard someone being called Jihad’

UK home secretary criticized after saying ‘as a Muslim, I’ve never heard someone being called Jihad’
Updated 04 October 2025

UK home secretary criticized after saying ‘as a Muslim, I’ve never heard someone being called Jihad’

UK home secretary criticized after saying ‘as a Muslim, I’ve never heard someone being called Jihad’
  • Shabana Mahmood was referring to Manchester synagogue attacker Jihad Al-Shamie
  • Council for Arab-British Understanding: Her comments have ‘escalated the risk to British Arabs’ with that name, both Muslim and Christian

LONDON: The UK’s home secretary has been asked to clarify her comments about the name Jihad, after British Arabs with the name warned that they face hate attacks after Thursday’s attack in Manchester.

Shabana Mahmood said in the wake of the synagogue attack: “As a Muslim, I’ve never heard someone being called Jihad.”

She was referring to the 35-year-old attacker Jihad Al-Shamie, a British national of Syrian descent who was killed at the scene.

Chris Doyle, director of the Council for Arab-British Understanding, called on Mahmood to issue an immediate clarification about her comments, which were widely reported in the media.

The name Jihad, which means to strive or to struggle, is a common Arabic name among both Christians and Muslims, Doyle said.

Mahmood’s comments have “escalated the risk to British Arabs called Jihad, who may suffer from hate attacks and abuse; several have reached out to CAABU about this,” a press release from the organization warned.

In his letter to her, Doyle highlighted prominent examples of the name: Jihad Azour, a Lebanese Christian former finance minister and current director of the International Monetary Fund’s Middle East and Central Asia Department; Hollywood actor Jihad Abdo; actor Jihad Saad; Syrian Christian economist Jihad Yazighi; businessman Jihad Salkini; and Syrian Christian former diplomat Jihad Makdisi.

“There are many, many others. The name of course, as you know, does not indicate any notion of war but the duty to strive to improve,” Doyle wrote, adding that some Arabs with the name, such as Abdo and Salkini, have adopted the anglicized nickname Jay due to hostility while living in the West.

British Arabs “working in all sectors of life” in the UK also have the name, Doyle said, warning that Mahmood’s comments have “very serious” implications on their lives.

“Several have reached out to me fearful of the impact of your words … What you said has inadvertently put them at risk from retaliatory attacks and abuse,” he added.

“These are names given to them at birth and have zero bearing as to what their political and religious beliefs may be.”

Doyle called on Mahmood to “put out an immediate clarification as soon as possible. I am sure you will agree the last thing we need is any further hate attacks or abuse.”