������Ƶ

WASHINGTON/BEIJING: The US and China on Monday extended a tariff truce for another 90 days, staving off triple-digit duties on each other’s goods as US retailers get ready to ramp up inventories ahead of the critical end-of-year holiday season.

US President Donald Trump announced on his Truth Social platform that he had signed an executive order suspending the imposition of higher tariffs until 8:01 a.m. Saudi time on November 10, with all other elements of the truce to remain in place.

China’s Commerce Ministry issued a parallel pause on extra tariffs early on Tuesday, also postponing for 90 days the addition of US firms it had targeted in April to trade and investment restriction lists.

“The United States continues to have discussions with the PRC to address the lack of trade reciprocity in our economic relationship and our resulting national and economic security concerns,” Trump’s executive order stated, using the acronym for the People’s Republic of China.

“Through these discussions, the PRC continues to take significant steps toward remedying non-reciprocal trade arrangements and addressing the concerns of the US relating to economic and national security matters.”

The tariff truce between Beijing and Washington had been due to expire on Tuesday at 7:01 a.m. Saudi time. The extension until early November buys crucial time for the seasonal autumn surge of imports for the Christmas season, including electronics, apparel and toys at lower tariff rates.

The new order prevents US tariffs on Chinese goods from shooting up to 145 percent, while Chinese tariffs on US goods were set to hit 125 percent — rates that would have resulted in a virtual trade embargo between the two countries. It locks in place — at least for now — a 30 percent tariff on Chinese imports, with Chinese duties on US imports at 10 percent.

“We’ll see what happens,” Trump told a news conference earlier on Monday, highlighting what he called his good relationship with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

China said the extension was “a measure to further implement the important consensus reached by the two heads of state during their June 5 call,” and would provide stability to the global economy.

Trump told CNBC last week that the US and China were getting very close to a trade agreement and he would meet with Xi before the end of the year if a deal was struck.

“It’s positive news,” said Wendy Cutler, a former senior US trade official who is now a vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute.

“Combined with some of the de-escalatory steps both the US and China have taken in recent weeks, it demonstrated that both sides are trying to see if they can reach some kind of a deal that would lay the groundwork for a Xi-Trump meeting this fall.”

Trade ‘detente’ continued

The two sides in May announced a truce in their trade dispute after talks in Geneva, Switzerland, agreeing to a 90-day period to allow further talks.

They met again in Stockholm, Sweden, in late July, and US negotiators returned to Washington with a recommendation that Trump extend the deadline.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said repeatedly that the triple-digit import duties both sides slapped on each other’s goods in the spring were untenable and had essentially imposed a trade embargo between the world’s two largest economies.

“It wouldn’t be a Trump-style negotiation if it didn’t go right down to the wire,” said Kelly Ann Shaw, a senior White House trade official during Trump’s first term and now with law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld.

She said Trump had likely pressed China for further concessions before agreeing to the extension. Trump pushed for additional concessions on Sunday, urging China to quadruple its soybean purchases, although analysts questioned the feasibility of any such deal. Trump did not repeat the demand on Monday.

“The whole reason for the 90-day pause in the first place was to lay the groundwork for broader negotiations and there’s been a lot of noise about everything from soybeans to export controls to excess capacity over the weekend,” Shaw said.

Ryan Majerus, a former US trade official now with the King & Spalding law firm, said the news would give both sides more time to work through longstanding trade concerns.

“This will undoubtedly lower anxiety on both sides as talks continue, and as the US and China work toward a framework deal in the fall,” he said.

Imports from China early this year had surged to beat Trump’s tariffs, but dropped steeply in June, Commerce Department data showed last week.

The US trade deficit with China tumbled by roughly a third in June to $9.5 billion, its narrowest since February 2004. Over five consecutive months of declines, the US trade gap with China has narrowed by $22.2 billion — a 70 percent reduction from a year earlier.

Washington has also been pressing Beijing to stop buying Russian oil to pressure Moscow over its war in Ukraine, with Trump threatening to impose secondary tariffs on China.

RIYADH: Bahri, the Saudi National Shipping Co., has categorically denied allegations pertaining to its transportation of shipments to Israel.

In a statement issued on Monday, the company said that the allegations, circulated by some media outlets and social media platforms regarding the transport of shipments destined for Israel, are completely false and baseless.

Bahri called on the media to verify the accuracy of information and publish what they obtain only from official sources.

Bahri reaffirmed that it is fully committed to the Kingdom’s established policies toward the Palestinian cause and to all local and international laws and rules regulating maritime transport operations.

The company stated that it won’t transport and has never transported any goods or shipments to Israel in any form.

Bahri emphasized that all its operational activities are subject to strict oversight and rigorous auditing procedures to ensure full compliance with relevant regulations. The company also stated that it reserves the right to take legal action against any malicious allegations that harm the company's reputation or attempt to undermine its policies and approach.