Ƶ

Artificial intelligence should be used ‘with intelligence,’ says Arab News deputy editor-in-chief

Special Artificial intelligence should be used ‘with intelligence,’ says Arab News deputy editor-in-chief
Arab News Deputy Editor-in-Chief Noor Nugali at the Saudi Media Forum in Riyadh. (AN Photo/Loai El-Kellawi)
Short Url
Updated 20 February 2025

Artificial intelligence should be used ‘with intelligence,’ says Arab News deputy editor-in-chief

Artificial intelligence should be used ‘with intelligence,’ says Arab News deputy editor-in-chief
  • Noor Nugali: AI ‘will never replace a human journalist in writing a fully developed article backed by evidence and facts’
  • Nugali said that it was unfortunate that some children were using AI to write essays or research papers and emphasized it should never be used for actual intelligence

RIYADH: Artificial intelligence should be applied “intelligently,” Arab News Deputy Editor-in-Chief Noor Nugali told the Saudi Media Forum in Riyadh on Wednesday.

“In this era, AI must be used wisely — after all, artificial intelligence should be applied intelligently,” he said.

“We’re currently living in the age of the AI revolution, where artificial intelligence is being used across all fields, institutions, and even education.”

In a session tackling how new technologies and AI were shaping the news industry, Nugali underlined the importance of utilizing AI in a way that supported and encouraged human learning “rather than relying on it for simple copy-pasting.”

“This also applies to media,” she said. “Many people have concerns about AI tools like ChatGPT or other programs being used to write articles.”

Nugali stressed that while AI could help by providing background information or research, “it will never replace a human journalist in writing a fully developed article backed by evidence and facts.”

In education, Nugali said it was unfortunate that some children were using AI to write essays or research papers and emphasized it should never be used for actual intelligence.

Speaking alongside Nugali were Rashid Al-Hamer, editor of Bahrain’s leading newspaper Al-Ayam, and Hatem Abu Nassif, chairman of the Radio & Television Authority.

Afterwards, Essam Bukhary, CEO of Manga Productions, spoke on a panel tacking manga and Saudi-led content creation.

He said Saudis were not here to simply watch: “We are here to participate, compete, and excel with our content and culture.”

He added that some 2.88 billion people, around 36 percent of the world’s population, watched anime.

“For years, people assumed that Ƶ was merely a consumer (of anime content). But that has changed,” he said. 

“We no longer see manga and anime as something imported from Japan — we see them as an art form through which we create content, share our culture and tell our own stories to the world.”

Bukhary pointed out that Saudi anime series “Future’s Folktales” was broadcast in the Arab world, Japan, North America, Europe and India on eight platforms across five continents, garnering over 85 million views in just three months. An associated mobile game reached half a million downloads in three languages.

He said Ƶ was taking the lead in anime content creation by producing animations, developing video games, and creating comics that shared Saudi stories with the world.

Also speaking on the panel were Yves Blehaut, business development manager for the Middle East and North Africa region at Media-Participations, and Kazuko Ishikawa, president of the Japanese production association that produced the “Sally” series.

The fourth Saudi Media Forum has the theme “Media in an Evolving World” and brings together 200 speakers including media professionals, academics, experts and specialists from local and international arenas.

Taking place from Feb. 19-21 it will feature 80 sessions comprising 40 panel discussions and 40 knowledge exchange sessions, serving as an international platform for forecasting and developing the future of media and exploring the latest technologies.


Trump says his negative media coverage is ‘illegal’

Trump says his negative media coverage is ‘illegal’
Updated 20 September 2025

Trump says his negative media coverage is ‘illegal’

Trump says his negative media coverage is ‘illegal’
  • “They’ll take a great story and they’ll make it bad. See I think it’s really illegal, personally,” he said
  • Trump has sued multiple major news organizations this year for being critical of his governance

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump on Friday bashed US media coverage that he claimed was unduly negative and therefore “illegal,” stoking a debate over free speech following the suspension of comedian Jimmy Kimmel’s TV show by ABC.

“They’ll take a great story and they’ll make it bad. See I think it’s really illegal, personally,” Trump, who has sued multiple major news organizations this year, told reporters gathered in the Oval Office.
The 79-year-old Republican, an avid television watcher, chiefly focused his diatribe on US television networks, reiterating a claim that coverage of him and his administration is “97 percent bad.”
He also defended the head of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Brendan Carr, whose threats against broadcasters have sparked a national debate over free speech and caused some unease even among Republicans.
Carr on Wednesday criticized Kimmel’s remarks on the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk and threatened broadcasters who carry his show with possible sanctions.
Hours later, ABC announced Kimmel’s show was suspended indefinitely.
On Friday, Trump called Carr “an incredible American patriot with courage.”
Texas Senator Ted Cruz, a close Trump ally, meanwhile said he believes it’s dangerous for a government to put itself in a position to say what speech it may or may not like.
Commenting on Carr’s threat to fine broadcasters or pull their licenses over the content of their shows, Cruz referenced a Martin Scorsese gangster movie.
“I got to say that’s right out of ‘Goodfellas’,” Cruz said. “That’s right out of a mafioso coming into a bar going, ‘Nice bar you have here. It would be a shame if something happened to it.’“
Trump himself faced a setback in his personal anti-media crusade, with a federal judge issuing a scathing ruling and tossing out his $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times.


Killing of 31 Yemeni journalists by Israel is ‘deadliest global attack in 16 years,’ says media watchdog

Killing of 31 Yemeni journalists by Israel is ‘deadliest global attack in 16 years,’ says media watchdog
Updated 20 September 2025

Killing of 31 Yemeni journalists by Israel is ‘deadliest global attack in 16 years,’ says media watchdog

Killing of 31 Yemeni journalists by Israel is ‘deadliest global attack in 16 years,’ says media watchdog
  • They were killed by Israeli strikes that targeted a media complex in Yemen’s capital, Sanaa, on Sept. 10
  • Incident confirms pattern of Israeli authorities in labeling media workers as terrorists, says Committee to Protect Journalists

DUBAI: An Israeli attack on media offices in Yemen’s capital, Sanaa, on Sept. 10 that killed 31 journalists and media workers was the deadliest strike of its kind anywhere in the world in 16 years, according to media watchdog the Committee to Protect Journalists.

Thirty of those who died worked for one of two newspapers, 26 September and Yemen. The offices for both were in the headquarters of the Moral Guidance Directorate, the media arm of the Houthi-controlled government, the CPJ said.

The Houthi health ministry said 35 people in all were killed in the attack, and 131 injured.

Nasser Al-Khadri, the editor-in-chief of 26 September, the Yemeni army’s official media outlet, told the watchdog: “It is a brutal and unjustified attack that targeted innocent people whose only crime was working in the media field, armed with nothing but their pens and words.”

A child who had accompanied a journalist to work was among the dead, and 22 media workers were among the injured, he added.

The strikes occurred at around 4:45 p.m. as staff were finalizing publication of the weekly newspaper, Al-Khadri said. The attack destroyed its “facilities, printing presses and archives,” he added, resulting in “deeply painful” losses.

The CPJ described the incident as the “second-deadliest single attack on the press” it had ever recorded, after the 2009 Maguindanao massacre in the Philippines in which 32 journalists were among 58 people killed. It added that the attack on Sanaa “marks deadliest global attack in 16 years.”

Abdulrahman Mohammed Mutahar, a journalist who lives in the neighborhood where the strikes took place, told the CPJ that the assault caused “massive explosions unlike anything Sanaa had seen since 2015.”

About eight missiles reduced the headquarters of the Moral Guidance Directorate to rubble, underneath which the bodies of some of the journalists were buried, he added.

On Sept 16., the funerals of those killed on Sept. 10 were interrupted by additional Israeli strikes.

Yemeni journalists say they live in fear of both international and domestic aggressors. Yousef Hazeb, head of the National Organization of Yemeni Reporters, told the CPJ they were “paying a double price for their work,” at the mercy of “deadly Israeli airstrikes targeting journalists and media outlets,” as well as local forces, including the Houthis, “who use the war as a pretext to expand repression.”

Within hours of the Israeli strikes on Sept. 10, Yemen’s public prosecutor issued a ban on the publication of photos or videos taken at the scene of the attack.

In a message posted on social media platform X, the Israeli army said the strikes on Sanaa, and others in the northern province of Al-Jawf, were in “response to repeated attacks by the Iranian-backed Houthis.”

It added that the targets included the “Houthi Public Relations Department, responsible for distributing propaganda messages in the media, and psychological terror.”

The CPJ has classified the killing of the 31 media workers in Yemen as “murders” arising from the “deliberate targeting of journalists for their work.” The watchdog said Israel has been responsible for the killings of one in six journalists globally since 2016. It has documented the murders of 227 journalists globally in the past decade, and found Israel to be responsible for more than 16 percent of them through attacks on Gaza, Lebanon, Iran and Yemen.

The latest strikes confirms the long-standing pattern of Israeli authorities in “labeling journalists as terrorists or propagandists to justify their killings,” said Sara Qudah, the CBJ’s regional program director.

It also marks “an alarming escalation, extending Israel’s war on journalism far beyond the genocide in Gaza,” she added.

Qudah, like representatives of other press groups and human rights advocates, said strikes on news outlets and media workers violate the principles of international law.

Radio and television facilities are civilian objects and cannot be targeted, Human Rights Watch said. They cannot be considered military targets “simply because they are pro-Houthi or anti-Israel” because this does not directly contribute to military operations, it added.

The CPJ said that journalists, as civilians, are protected under the rule of international law, including those who work for state-run outlets or are affiliated with armed groups, unless they play a direct part in hostilities.

The strikes on Yemen show the continuous and repeated failure of Israeli authorities to “distinguish between military targets and journalists, justifying its assassinations by smearing journalists as terrorists or propagandists, without credible evidence,” the CPJ added.


Taliban blocks fiber-optic internet ‘to prevent immoral activities’

Taliban blocks fiber-optic internet ‘to prevent immoral activities’
Updated 19 September 2025

Taliban blocks fiber-optic internet ‘to prevent immoral activities’

Taliban blocks fiber-optic internet ‘to prevent immoral activities’
  • Government offices, businesses, public institutions, and homes have been left without internet access
  • Rights groups warn of catastrophic, far-reaching consequences for Afghan society, economic crisis

LONDON: Taliban authorities have blocked fiber-optic internet across northern provinces of Afghanistan, claiming the move was necessary “to prevent immoral activities.”

Local media report that as many as 10 provinces — including Kunduz, Badakhshan, Baghlan, Takhar, and Balkh — have been affected, leaving government offices, businesses, public institutions, and homes without fiber-optic access.

The ban applies only to connections via fiber-optic cable, while mobile internet remains available, according to officials.

“The measure was taken to prevent immorality, and an alternative will be developed inside the country for essential needs,” said Haji Attaullah Zaid, a Taliban provincial spokesman.

He added that the ban was ordered by Afghanistan’s Supreme Leader Hibatullah Akhundzada.

No explanation was given for why Balkh was among the first provinces targeted, or for how long the restrictions would remain in place.

Local news outlet Afghanistan International reports that the fiber-optic ban could be extended nationwide, with further provinces such as Kandahar, Uruzgan, Helmand, and Nimroz already experiencing disruptions.

Rights groups have expressed alarm, urging the Taliban to reverse the block due to far-reaching consequences for Afghan society.

Many nongovernmental organizations say the measure has especially affected women and girls, who rely on online education following Taliban bans on school and university attendance.

Fiber-optic internet is a vital resource for companies, banks, and government agencies, and its loss risks deepening the country’s existing economic crisis.

Beh Lih Yi, regional director at the Committee to Protect Journalists, called the blockade “an unprecedented escalation of censorship that will undermine journalists’ work and the public’s right to information.”


Trump applauds Jimmy Kimmel’s suspension and seeks to punish critical broadcasters

Trump applauds Jimmy Kimmel’s suspension and seeks to punish critical broadcasters
Updated 19 September 2025

Trump applauds Jimmy Kimmel’s suspension and seeks to punish critical broadcasters

Trump applauds Jimmy Kimmel’s suspension and seeks to punish critical broadcasters
  • ABC pulls ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live’ amid regulatory threats
  • Trump says Kimmel has no talent, poor ratings
  • Writer, actor unions say suspension attacks free-speech rights

LOS ANGELES: US President Donald Trump on Thursday celebrated the suspension of talk-show host Jimmy Kimmel from the airwaves and said TV broadcasters should lose their licenses over negative coverage of his administration, adding fuel to a national debate over free speech.
Kimmel has been embroiled in the effort by Trump and his supporters to punish critics of assassinated right-wing activist Charlie Kirk, who was shot while speaking to a crowd at a Utah university on September 10. Since then, allies of Trump and Kirk have warned Americans to properly mourn the divisive figure or face the consequences.
The Walt Disney-owned broadcaster ABC announced on Wednesday that it was yanking the late-night comedy show “Jimmy Kimmel Live” indefinitely following conservative uproar over his Monday monologue. Writers, performers, former US President Barack Obama and others condemned Kimmel’s suspension, calling it capitulation to unconstitutional government pressure.
About 150 demonstrators gathered on Thursday outside the Hollywood studio where “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” is recorded to protest the decision to suspend the show. Some raised signs saying, “Don’t Bend a Knee to Trump,” “Resist fascism,” “Douse the mouse” and “Cancel Disney+.”
The debate followed Trump on his state visit to Britain on Thursday.
While standing alongside British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Trump called Kimmel untalented and denounced him for saying a “horrible thing about a great gentleman known as Charlie Kirk.”

Kimmel, a comedian who frequently lampoons Trump, said during his nine-minute opening monologue on Monday that allies of Kirk were using his assassination to “score political points.” He also poked fun at Trump after the president turned a question about his personal mourning of Kirk into promotion for his new White House ballroom.
“This is not how an adult grieves the murder of someone he called a friend. This is how a four-year-old mourns a goldfish,” Kimmel said.

A 22-year-old technical college student from Utah was charged with Kirk’s murder on Tuesday.
Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has used his office and the courts to attack unflattering speech about him that he has called defamatory or false.
Throughout both his terms, Trump has threatened to rescind licenses for local broadcast affiliates of the national networks — licenses that are approved by the Federal Communications Commission, a nominally independent regulatory body.
Kimmel’s suspension came after FCC Chair Brendan Carr threatened to investigate Kimmel’s commentary about Kirk, and owners of local TV stations had said they would stop broadcasting his celebrity-filled late-night show.
Trump, speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One as he returned to the US, complained about receiving bad publicity from broadcasters, saying, “That’s something that should be talked about for licensing. ... All they do is hit Trump.”
“I would think maybe their license should be taken away,” Trump said. “It will be up to Brendan Carr.”

 

Federal law prohibits the FCC from revoking a broadcaster’s license for negative coverage or other speech disliked by the government.
In the week since Kirk’s murder, Kimmel is the most famous American to face professional blowback for comments condemned by conservatives as disrespectful of Kirk, alongside media figures, academic workers, teachers and corporate employees.
Prominent Democrats said Trump was mounting an assault on free speech rights guaranteed in the US Constitution’s First Amendment. Republicans have said they are fighting against “hate speech” that can spiral into violence, and accuse some Kirk critics of trying to justify his murder.

Obama joins chorus of critics
Obama urged media companies not to capitulate to government coercion.
“After years of complaining about cancel culture, the current administration has taken it to a new and dangerous level by routinely threatening regulatory action against media companies unless they muzzle or fire reporters and commentators it doesn’t like,” Obama said in a statement.

 

Writers’ and actors’ labor unions called the targeting of Kimmel an unconstitutional attack on the right to disagree. The American Civil Liberties Union called it an unconstitutional attempt by the Trump administration to “silence its critics and control what the American people watch and read.”

At the Hollywood demonstration, motorists honked their horns in support as protesters spilled out from the busy sidewalk and into the streets.
“This country is going in a really wrong direction,” protester Laura Brenner said. “When people can’t make fun of the administration, you know that we’re really going down a dark road.”
Kirk’s death spurred an outpouring of grief among fans who saw him as a staunch advocate for public debate and conservative values. Others have challenged or derided Kirk’s support for right-wing politics and Christian nationalism and his derogatory comments about immigrants, African Americans and transgender people.

 

Hours before Kimmel’s suspension, Carr, while speaking on the Benny Johnson podcast, urged local broadcasters to stop airing the show.
Two of the largest owners of local broadcasters — Nexstar and Sinclair Broadcast Group, both of which have merger deals pending before the FCC — responded by announcing they would stop airing Kimmel’s show.
ABC said it was suspending Kimmel’s show indefinitely. ABC owns eight local TV channels subject to FCC licensing, including broadcasters in the major markets of New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston and Philadelphia.
Disney CEO Bob Iger and Disney Entertainment Co-Chair Dana Walden made the decision to suspend Kimmel’s show, a source with knowledge of the matter said.


Foreign disinformation about Charlie Kirk’s killing seeks to widen US divisions

Foreign disinformation about Charlie Kirk’s killing seeks to widen US divisions
Updated 18 September 2025

Foreign disinformation about Charlie Kirk’s killing seeks to widen US divisions

Foreign disinformation about Charlie Kirk’s killing seeks to widen US divisions
  • Russian voices have tried to tie Kirk’s death to US support for Ukraine, spreading a conspiracy theory that the Ukrainian government killed Kirk 
  • Pro-Iranian groups took a different tack, claiming Israel was behind Kirk’s death and that the suspect was set up to take the fall
  • Bots linked to Beijing claimed that Kirk’s death shows that the US is violent, polarized and dysfunctional

WASHINGTON: Russia moved to amplify online conspiracy theories about Charlie Kirk’s killing just hours after it happened, seeding social media with the frightening claim that America is slipping into civil war.
Chinese and pro-Iranian groups also spread disinformation about the shooting, with those loyal to Iran’s interests backing antisemitic conspiracy theories while bots linked to Beijing claimed that Kirk’s death shows that the United States is violent, polarized and dysfunctional.
America’s adversaries have long used fake social media accounts, online bots and disinformation to depict the US as a dangerous country beset with extremism and gun violence. Kirk’s killing has provided another opportunity for those overseas eager to shape public understanding while inflaming political polarization.
“Charlie Kirk’s Death and the Coming Civil War,” tweeted Russian ultranationalist Alexander Dugin, whose influence earned him the moniker ” Putin’s brain,” referring to Russia’s president.

Pro-Russian bots blamed Democrats and predicted more violence. Russian state media published English-language articles with headlines claiming a conspiracy orchestrated by shadowy forces: “Was Charlie Kirk’s Killer a Pro?”
Foreign disinformation makes up a tiny fraction of the overall online discussion about Kirk’s death, but it could undermine any efforts to heal political divisions or even spur further violence.
“We’ve seen multiple Russian campaigns attempting to exploit” Kirk’s killing, said Joseph Bodnar, senior research manager at the Institute for Strategic Dialogue. In many cases, the campaigns aren’t adding new claims but are recycling ones that emerged from American users. “They’re picking up domestic actors and amplifying them.”
Adversaries tailor disinformation
In each case, those spreading the disinformation have tailored it for their own ends. Chinese propaganda has focused on the violent nature of Kirk’s death, painting the US as a nation of violent gun owners and political extremists.
Russian voices have tried to tie Kirk’s death to US support for Ukraine, even spreading a conspiracy theory that the Ukrainian government killed Kirk because of his criticism of that aid.
Pro-Iranian groups took a different tack, claiming Israel was behind Kirk’s death and that the suspect was set up to take the fall. This conspiracy theory caught on with white supremacist groups in the US, showing how corrosive claims can easily spread online despite oceans and linguistic and cultural barriers.
The influence campaigns come as the US has rolled back government efforts to expose foreign disinformation.
On Wednesday the State Department announced it was ending its remaining efforts to counter foreign disinformation, following a decision earlier this year to shutter the Global Engagement Center, an office that had called out Russian, Chinese and Iranian disinformation in the past. Republicans had targeted the center and its mission because of what they said was its censorship of conservative ideas.
False and misleading claims can spread quickly following big news events as people go online to look for information. Artificial intelligence programs that can create lifelike video and audio can make it even harder to find the truth, as can AI chatbots that routinely offer up false information.
It happened again following Kirk’s killing, when misinformation about the shooting and the suspect quickly spread online.
In recent years, groups looking to spread confusion or distrust have seized on hurricanes, wars, the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol, the COVID-19 pandemic and other disasters, as well as the attempted assassinations of President Donald Trump.
The details vary, but the conspiracy theories pushed by foreign adversaries all suggest American institutions — the government, the media, law enforcement, health care — are failing and can no longer be trusted, and that more violence is likely.
Calls for social media companies to crack down
Regardless of the source of the information, social media companies should do more to stop both foreign disinformation and domestic calls for violence, said Imran Ahmed, CEO of the Center for Countering Digital Hate, which tracks online disinformation.
Posts calling for retaliatory violence following Kirk’s death have been seen 43 million times on X alone, according to the center’s research, though it can’t say which posts came from foreign sources.
Platforms like X “are failing catastrophically to limit the reach of posts that celebrate murder and mayhem,” Ahmed said.
Russia, China and Iran have all denied targeting Americans with disinformation. Officials in China have pushed back on claims that Chinese social media bots are being used to amplify false claims about the Kirk shooting.
“China condemns all unlawful and violent acts. That said, we firmly oppose some US politicians accusing China of ‘instilling disinformation and encouraging violence,’” a spokesperson for the Chinese Foreign Ministry posted on X.
Russia likewise rejected the accusations of spreading misinformation about Kirk’s death. A.V. Bondarev, a spokesperson for Russia’s embassy in Washington, wrote in an email to The Associated Press that “Russia does not interfere and does not intend to interfere in the internal affairs of other states, including the United States.”
“We consider it unacceptable that this tragedy is being used as a pretext to fuel anti-Russian hysteria,” Bondarev wrote.
For authorities trying to keep the public informed, the false claims about Kirk’s death are a potentially dangerous effort to hijack American discourse.
“There is a tremendous amount of disinformation we are tracking,” Utah Gov. Spencer Cox, a Republican, said at a recent press conference about Kirk’s killing. “What we are seeing is our adversaries want violence. We have bots from Russia, China, all over the world that are trying to instill disinformation and encourage violence.”
Cox urged people to ignore bogus claims that seem designed to elicit fear — and suggested that Americans log off social media and spend time with family instead.