Macron’s message to Trump: ‘You can’t be weak in the face of Putin’
Macron’s message to Trump: ‘You can’t be weak in the face of Putin’/node/2591110/world
Macron’s message to Trump: ‘You can’t be weak in the face of Putin’
French President Emmanuel Macron said that he intends to tell US counterpart Donald Trump that it’s in the joint interest of Americans and Europeans not to “be weak” in the face of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. (AFP)
Short Url
https://arab.news/n2xa5
Updated 22 February 2025
AP
Macron’s message to Trump: ‘You can’t be weak in the face of Putin’
Macron will travel to Washington to meet with Trump on Monday, the White House said
Putin “doesn’t know what he (Trump) is going to do, he thinks (Trump) is capable of anything,” Macron said
Updated 22 February 2025
AP
PARIS: French President Emmanuel Macron said that he intends to tell US counterpart Donald Trump that it’s in the joint interest of Americans and Europeans not to “be weak” in the face of Russian leader Vladimir Putin amid US-led negotiations to end the nearly three-year war in Ukraine.
Macron will travel to Washington to meet with Trump on Monday, the White House said.
In a one-hour question and answer session on social media Thursday, Macron said that he’ll tell Trump: “’You can’t be weak in the face of President Putin. It’s not you, it’s not your trademark, it’s not in your interest. How can you then be credible in the face of China if you’re weak in the face of Putin?’”
Trump’s recent statements that echo Putin’s narrative and plans to have direct negotiations with Moscow have left European allies and Ukrainian officials worried. But Macron suggested Trump’s strategy to create “uncertainty” in talks with Russia could actually make Western allies stronger in these talks.
Putin “doesn’t know what he (Trump) is going to do, he thinks (Trump) is capable of anything,” Macron said. “This uncertainty is good for us and for Ukraine.”
Macron said that he would seek to persuade Trump that US interests and Europeans’ interests are the same, telling him: “If you let Russia take over Ukraine, it would be unstoppable.”
That means any peace deal must be negotiated with Ukrainians and Europeans around the table, Macron said.
“We want peace. But we don’t want a ceasefire that means Ukraine surrendering, because that’s dangerous. And we know that would lead to Russia going further. We’ve already experienced it,” he said.
Macron also appeared ready to answer Trump’s call to boost defense spending. “Us, Europeans, we must increase our war effort,” he said.
Asked about whether he’s considering sending French troops to Ukraine, he said he wouldn’t send soldiers to fight in Ukraine but rather to be part of a security force meant to bring “guarantees” once a peace deal is achieved.
“We don’t rule out, within a framework planned with our allies, the possibility of having forces which, once peace has been negotiated, could contribute to guaranteeing Ukraine’s security,” he said.
Zelensky in London to meet PM ahead of US-Russia summit
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky will meet with ally UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer in London on Thursday ahead of a key US-Russia summit in Alaska
Updated 3 sec ago
AFP
LONDON: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky will meet with ally UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer in London on Thursday ahead of a key US-Russia summit in Alaska. Zelensky was to arrive at 9:30 am (0830 GMT) at Downing Street, the prime minister’s office said, after Starmer on Wednesday maintained there was now a “viable” chance for a Ukraine ceasefire. US President Donald Trump and Russia’s Vladimir Putin will meet Friday at an air base in the far-northern US state, the first time the Russian leader has been permitted on Western soil since his February 2022 invasion of Ukraine which has killed tens of thousands of people. A stepped-up Russian offensive, and the fact Zelensky has not been invited to the Anchorage meeting Friday, have heightened fears that Trump and Putin could strike a deal that forces painful concessions on Ukraine. Near the front line Thursday, Ukraine fired dozens of drones at Russia overnight into the early morning, wounding three people and sparking fires including at an oil refinery in the southern city of Volgograd. Kyiv calls the strikes fair retaliation for Moscow’s daily missile and drone barrages on its own civilians. With such high stakes, all sides were pushing hard in the hours before Friday’s meeting. Zelensky, who has refused to surrender territory to Russia, spoke by telephone Wednesday with Trump, as did European leaders who voiced confidence afterward that the US leader would seek a ceasefire rather than concessions by Kyiv. Trump has sent mixed messages, saying that he could quickly organize a three-way summit afterward with both Zelensky and Putin but also warning of his impatience with Putin. “There may be no second meeting because, if I feel that it’s not appropriate to have it because I didn’t get the answers that we have to have, then we are not going to have a second meeting,” Trump told reporters on Wednesday. But Trump added: “If the first one goes okay, we’ll have a quick second one,” involving both Putin and Zelensky. Zelensky, after being berated by Trump at a February meeting in the White House, has publicly supported US diplomacy but has made clear his deep skepticism. “I have told my colleagues — the US president and our European friends — that Putin definitely does not want peace,” Zelensky said. As the war rages on in eastern Ukraine, Zelensky was in Berlin Wednesday joining Chancellor Friedrich Merz on an online call with other European leaders, and the NATO and EU chiefs, to show a united stance against Russia. Starmer on Wednesday said Ukraine’s military backers, the so-called Coalition of the Willing, had drawn up workable military plans in case of a ceasefire but were also ready to add pressure on Russia through sanctions. “For three and a bit years this conflict has been going, we haven’t got anywhere near... a viable way of bringing it to a ceasefire,” Starmer told Wednesday’s meeting of European leaders. “Now we do have that chance, because of the work that the (US) president has put in,” he said. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte declared: “The ball is now in Putin’s court.”
Despite risks, residents fight to protect Russian national park/node/2611781/world
Despite risks, residents fight to protect Russian national park
With dissident voices in Russia almost totally silenced and as the country presses on with its massive military offensive in Ukraine, environmental activism has become highly risky
In the outskirts of Moscow, the issue has become particularly acute as developers continue to build new homes and residents commuting to the capital find themselves stuck in traffic jams for hours
Updated 14 August 2025
AFP
KOROLYOV: After getting fined for her environmental protest against a road being built through a national park near Moscow, Irina Kuriseva is back to check on the construction.
“We only want to defend nature,” the 62-year-old told AFP at the Losiny Ostrov (Elk Island) park, a 129-square-kilometer nature reserve with hundreds of species of wildlife including endangered birds.
With dissident voices in Russia almost totally silenced and as the country presses on with its massive military offensive in Ukraine, environmental activism has become highly risky.
“The authorities have become completely indifferent” and laws have been “softened” in favor of polluters and property developers, said one activist, speaking on condition of anonymity.
In the outskirts of Moscow, the issue has become particularly acute as developers continue to build new homes and residents commuting to the capital find themselves stuck in traffic jams for hours.
In Korolyov, a town of 200,000 people, the authorities decided to build a highway that passes through the national park to ease congestion and give access to a new housing development.
In July, Kuriseva and five other activists blocked machinery spreading asphalt in the forest.
They were arrested by police and fined, after spending a night at the police station.
“We were interrogated like criminals who had killed someone,” said Kuriseva, a local resident.
Russian law prohibits construction in national parks but local authorities got around it by arguing that the project consisted of “repairs” to an existing road.
Dmitry Trunin, an environmental defense lawyer with more than 25 years of experience, said this argument amounted to “falsification and fraud.”
“There was never a road there,” he said, explaining that there had only been an unpaved track used by forest rangers which then became just a path through the forest.
Kuriseva said that “asphalt powder” was placed on the path in an attempt to classify it as a road.
The highway is due to be completed by March 2026 at a cost of 5.4 million euros ($6.3 million), according to the regional transport ministry.
Mikhail Rogov, a 36-year-old engineer who also took part in the protest with Kuriseva, said the judge was “smiling” to the defendants in court.
“She told us: ‘If you don’t want any problems, sign these papers, pay your fines and you’re free’,” he said.
The judge, Maria Loktionova, had in 2023 sentenced another environmental activist, Alexander Bakhtin, to six years in prison for three posts on social media criticizing the Russian offensive in Ukraine.
Despite the crackdown on dissent, activists opposed to the highway have sought to appeal to President Vladimir Putin to help their cause.
In June, around a thousand people queued outside the presidential administration building in Moscow to submit their complaints.
Putin visited the national park in 2010 and fed a baby elk with a bottle, telling reporters that nature was “a gift from God” that must be “protected.”
The tone from the Kremlin is very different in 2025.
“This is a question for the regional authorities. Don’t get the president involved,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said in July when asked about the project by AFP.
Environmental protection “should not be a barrier to development and the comfort of the lives of citizens,” he said.
Trunin said it has become “harder and harder to defend the truth in court.”
“The power vertical takes decisions and law enforcement and monitoring bodies obey,” he said.
Miguel Uribe was shot in June while campaigning in the capital, Bogota, and died this week of his injuries
Uribe’s wife vowed at the funeral that his death at the hands of a suspected 15-year-old hitman would not be in vain, and that his young son and stepdaughters would live a life filled with love
Updated 14 August 2025
AFP
BOGOTA: Colombia buried murdered presidential candidate Miguel Uribe on Wednesday, with his widow tearfully warning that the country must shake its dark and long history of political violence.
The 39-year-old conservative senator was shot in June while campaigning in the capital, Bogota, and died this week of his injuries.
“Our country is going through the darkest, saddest, and most painful days,” Maria Claudia Tarazona told a packed cathedral funeral service as she prepared to bury her husband.
Police have blamed Uribe’s murder on left-wing guerrillas who shunned 2016 peace accords. Six people have been arrested in connection with the alleged plot.
For most Colombians, the assassination represented a shocking spasm of political violence after years of relative peace.
Four presidential candidates were assassinated during the 1980s and 1990s, as drug cartels and various armed groups terrorized the country.
Uribe’s own mother, journalist Diana Turbay, was killed in a botched 1991 police operation to free her from cocaine kingpin Pablo Escobar’s Medellin cartel.
On Wednesday Uribe’s father, Miguel Uribe Londono, remembered the day 34 years ago when she was killed.
“With all the pain in my soul, I had to tell a little boy of barely four years old the horrendous news of his mother’s murder,” he said at the service.
“In this same holy cathedral, I carried Miguel in one arm and the coffin of his mother, Diana, in the other.”
“Today, 34 years later, this senseless violence also takes from me that same little boy,” he said.
As Colombia reels from the assassination, conservative lawmaker Julio Cesar Triana, a vocal critic of the government, escaped unharmed after his vehicle came under fire in the southern Huila region where dissident members of the defunct FARC guerrilla group are operating.
Uribe’s wife vowed at the funeral that his death at the hands of a suspected 15-year-old hitman would not be in vain, and that his young son and stepdaughters would live a life filled with love.
“Miguel, I will love you every day of my life until my time comes to meet you in heaven,” she said.
“I promise to give Alejandro and the girls a life full of love and happiness, without hatred and without resentment.”
Colombia will hold elections in 2026 to replace incumbent leftist leader Gustavo Petro, who is constitutionally barred from running again.
President Petro, himself a former guerrilla, said he chose not to attend Wednesday’s funeral at the family’s request.
“We’re not going, not because we didn’t want to,” he posted on social media. “We simply respect the family and we avoid the funeral of Senator Miguel Uribe from being taken over by supporters of hate.”
It was expected that some of those marking their respects may have booed the president, who has taken a conciliatory approach to armed groups.
That stance has been strongly criticized by those on the right wing of Colombian politics.
Former presidents Juan Manuel Santos, Ernesto Samper, and Cesar Gaviria attended the funeral.
Okinawa a reluctant host for US troops 80 years after WWII
The United States has around 54,000 military personnel stationed in Japan, mostly on Okinawa, and a string of incidents over the years, including sexual assault cases, have angered residents
Updated 14 August 2025
AFP
HENOKO: Okinawa resident Hiromasa Iha can still recall the screams of his classmates and teachers after a US military jet crashed into his elementary school, killing 18 people more than six decades ago.
As people globally commemorate the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II, the 72-year-old retired businessman is among many residents who oppose the American troops stationed on their island ever since.
He joins dozens of islanders in near-daily protests against the US forces.
The United States has around 54,000 military personnel stationed in Japan, mostly on Okinawa, and a string of incidents over the years, including sexual assault cases, have angered residents.
“For us, these crimes and accidents are not someone else’s business, and we feel a pressing unease that we can’t predict when these things may happen again,” he told AFP, recalling the 1959 school incident.
“We want the bases to go.”
The island region, a subtropical paradise with a huge tourism industry, hosts 70 percent of all American bases in Japan and serves as a key US outpost to monitor China, the Taiwan Strait and the Korean peninsula.
The bloody Battle of Okinawa near the end of the war led to the US occupation of the island until 1972, during which troops seized private land in Okinawa to expand their presence in what is locally known as a “bayonet and bulldozer” campaign.
During the Cold War, US troops in Okinawa were seen by Washington as a deterrent against the spread of communism.
Now, both Tokyo and Washington stress the strategic importance of Okinawa in the face of China’s territorial ambitions.
But residents have for years voiced their fury over a spate of crimes and accidents involving American soldiers and base personnel.
In 2024 alone, Okinawa police detained 80 people connected to the base — such as US soldiers or military contractors — including seven for severely violent crimes.
Okinawa erupted in anger after a 1995 gang rape of a 12-year-old girl by three US Marines.
In August 2004, a Marine helicopter crashed at a university in Okinawa, causing no injuries but amplifying fears of accidents.
In April 2016, a former Marine, who was working as a military contractor in Okinawa, raped and killed a 20-year-old woman.
And as recently as last month, a senior Marine officer visited the Okinawa government to apologize after a Marine was convicted of sexually assaulting a woman.
Opinion polls in Okinawa have historically shown that the majority of residents believe the rest of Japan must carry its fair share of the load when it comes to hosting the US military.
Okinawa Governor Denny Tamaki routinely points out the island’s “excessive burden,” impacting the daily lives of residents.
But repeated calls on authorities to prevent crimes by US soldiers have fallen largely on deaf ears, said Junko Iraha, the chairwoman of a coalition of women’s groups in Okinawa.
“It’s not that we don’t like American people. We are saying, please do something about the bases,” she said.
When Okinawa was returned to Japan in 1972, residents expected that US bases would be spread across Japan — a vision that never came true, she added.
Recent polls suggest growing resignation among the Okinawan public.
In a 2023 survey, nearly 40 percent of Okinawan survey participants said the anti-US base movement was powerless to change Tokyo’s policy.
But many Okinawan residents say they live in fear of crimes by American soldiers, with victims still trying to process their grief.
Takemasa Kinjo, 68, was a high school student when his mother was killed by a Marine in 1974 with a brick at their home where she operated a small bar.
“It is truly scary if you think crimes can happen in your neighborhood,” Kinjo said.
He also joined a recent protest at a Marine base that is being expanded into a secluded bay where dugongs and other protected species live.
He believes Okinawa — where base-related income accounts for just over five percent of its economy — can thrive thanks to tourism alone, with an increasing number of holidaymakers drawn to the area’s turquoise bays and coral reefs.
“There should be no base on Okinawa,” he said. “We don’t need new military facilities.”
Iha, whose elementary school was destroyed by a US jet, feels the need to explain to future generations what happened — and warn them it could happen again.
At the time of the crash, which also left more than 200 people injured, “everyone thought another war was starting,” he recalled.
Now, “every day, military jets fly over our houses, and we see helicopters making emergency landings,” said Iha.
“This is not something that only belongs in the past. This can happen again anytime.”
Washington, D.C. residents protest as White House says federal agents will be on patrol 24/7
Trump has said crime in the city was at emergency levels that only such federal intervention could fix, even though DC leaders pointed to statistics showing violent crime at a 30-year low after a sharp rise two years ago
Updated 14 August 2025
AP
WASHINGTON: Residents in one Washington, D.C., neighborhood lined up Wednesday to protest the increased police presence after the White House said the number of National Guard troops in the nation’s capital would ramp up and federal officers would be the streets around the clock.
After law enforcement set up a vehicle checkpoint along the busy 14th Street Northwest corridor, hecklers shouted, “Go home, fascists” and other insults. Some protesters stood at the intersection before the checkpoint and urged drivers to turn away from it.
The action intensified a few days after President Donald Trump’s unprecedented announcement that his administration would take over the city’s police department for at least a month.
The city’s Democratic mayor walked a political tightrope, referring to the takeover as an “authoritarian push” at one point and later framing the infusion of officers as boost to public safety, though one with few specific barometers for success. The Republican president has said crime in the city was at emergency levels that only such federal intervention could fix — even as District of Columbia leaders pointed to statistics showing violent crime at a 30-year low after a sharp rise two years ago.
For two days, small groups of federal officers have been visible in scattered areas of the city. But a significant increase was expected Wednesday at the Guard’s armory and troops were expected to start doing more missions in Washington on Thursday, according to a Guard spokesman who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe the planning process.
On Wednesday, agents from Homeland Security Investigations patrolled the popular U Street corridor. Drug Enforcement Administration officers were seen on the National Mall, while National Guard members were parked nearby. DEA agents also joined Metropolitan Police Department officers on patrol in the Navy Yard neighborhood, while FBI agents stood along the heavily trafficked Massachusetts Avenue.
Residents of the area yell at agents of the Department of Homeland Security Investigations as they join Washington Metropolitan Police Department officers to conduct traffic checks in northwest Washington on ug. 13, 2025. (AP)
Hundreds of federal law enforcement and city police officers who patrolled the streets Tuesday night made 43 arrests, compared with about two dozen the night before.
D.C. Councilmember Christina Henderson downplayed the arrest reports as “a bunch of traffic stops” and said the administration was seeking to disguise how unnecessary this federal intervention is.
“I’m looking at this list of arrests and they sound like a normal Saturday night in any big city,” said Henderson.
Unlike in other US states and cities, the law gives Trump the power to take over Washington’s police for up to 30 days. Extending his power over the city for longer would require approval from Congress, and that could be tough in the face of Democratic resistance.
Trump suggested that he could seek a longer period of control or decide to call on Congress to exercise authority over city laws his administration sees as lax on crime. “We’re gonna do this very quickly. But we’re gonna want extensions. I don’t want to call a national emergency. If I have to, I will,” he said.
Later, on his Truth Social site, Trump reiterated his claims about the city, writing, “D.C. has been under siege from thugs and killers, but now, D.C. is back under Federal Control where it belongs.”
Henderson, who worked for Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York before running for the D.C. Council, said she was already in touch with “friends on the Hill” to rally opposition for any Trump extension request. She added, “It’s Day Three and he’s already saying he’s going to need more time?”
Targeting a variety of infractions
The arrests made by 1,450 federal and local officers across the city included those for suspicion of driving under the influence and unlawful entry, as well as a warrant for assault with a deadly weapon, according to the White House. Seven illegal firearms were seized.
There have now been more than 100 arrests since Trump began beefing up the federal law enforcement presence in Washington last week, White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers said. “President Trump is delivering on his campaign promise to clean up this city and restore American Greatness to our cherished capital,” she said.
The president has full command of the National Guard and has activated up to 800 troops to support law enforcement, though exactly what form remains to be determined.
Neither Army nor District of Columbia National Guard officials have been able to describe the training backgrounds of the troops who have so far reported for duty.
While some members are military police, others likely hold jobs that would have offered them little training in dealing with civilians or law enforcement.
The federalization push also includes clearing out encampments for people who are homeless, Trump has said. US Park Police have removed dozens of tents since March, and plan to take out two more this week, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has said. People are offered the chance to go to shelters and get addiction treatment, if needed, but those who refuse could be fined or jailed, she said.
City officials said they are making more shelter space available and increasing their outreach.
Violent crime has dropped in the district
The federal effort comes even after a drop in violent crime in the nation’s capital, a trend that experts have seen in cities across the US since an increase during the coronavirus pandemic.
Caption
On average, the level of violence Washington remains mostly higher than averages in three dozen cities analyzed by the nonprofit Council on Criminal Justice, said the group’s president and CEO, Adam Gelb.
Police Chief Pamela Smith said during an interview with the local Fox affiliate that the city’s Metro Police Department has been down nearly 800 officers. She said the increased number of federal agents on the streets would help fill that gap, at least for now.
Mayor Muriel Bowser said city officials did not get any specific goals for the surge during a meeting with Trump’s attorney general, Pam Bondi, and other top federal law enforcement officials Tuesday. But, she said, “I think they regard it as a success to have more presence and take more guns off the street, and we do too.”
She had previously called Trump’s moves “unsettling and unprecedented” while pointing out he was within a president’s legal rights regarding the district, which is the seat of American government but is not a state.
For some residents, the increased presence of law enforcement and National Guard troops is nerve-racking.
“I’ve seen them right here at the subway ... they had my street where I live at blocked off yesterday, actually,” Washington native Sheina Taylor said. “It’s more fearful now because even though you’re a law-abiding citizen, here in D.C., you don’t know, especially because I’m African American.”
___
Associated Press writers Alanna Durkin Richer, Konstantin Toropin and Will Weissert, photographer Jacquelyn Martin and video journalist River Zhang contributed to this report.