Ƶ

AP sues Trump aides for restricting access over Gulf of Mexico name

AP sues Trump aides for restricting access over Gulf of Mexico name
A poster depicting the Gulf of Mexico as the newly renamed "Gulf of America" is visible at the White House in Washington, DC, during a swearing in ceremony for Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence on February 12, 2025. (Getty Images via AFP)
Short Url
Updated 22 February 2025

AP sues Trump aides for restricting access over Gulf of Mexico name

AP sues Trump aides for restricting access over Gulf of Mexico name
  • Lawsuit claims the White House’s decision retaliated against the AP over coverage decisions, which are protected under the Constitution
  • White House Communications Director Steven Cheung called the lawsuit “a blatant PR stunt masquerading as a first amendment case”

WASHINGTON: The Associated Press on Friday sued senior aides to President Donald Trump over a decision by the White House to restrict the news outlet’s access to the president and other officials for continuing to refer to the Gulf of Mexico in its coverage.
The lawsuit, filed in US District Court in Washington D.C., alleges that the White House’s decision to bar AP reporters from the Oval Office and Air Force One violates the US Constitution, including First Amendment protections for free speech, by trying to control the language that it uses to report the news.
“The press and all people in the United States have the right to choose their own words and not be retaliated against by the government,” the complaint states.
Responding to questions about the lawsuit posed by conservative commentator Mercedes Schlapp, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, speaking during an appearance at the Conservative Political Action Conference, said: “We feel we are in the right in this position. We are going to ensure that truth and accuracy is present at that White House every single day.”
White House Communications Director Steven Cheung, in a statement, called the lawsuit “a blatant PR stunt masquerading as a first amendment case.”




To avoid getting caught in the crossfire, Google now uses both Gulf of Mexicio and Gulf of America on its online map.

Trump signed an executive order last month directing the Interior Department to change the name of the body of water long known as the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America.
The AP, citing editorial standards, said it would continue to use the gulf’s established name, while acknowledging Trump’s move to change it.
The AP says in its stylebook that the Gulf of Mexico has carried that name for more than 400 years and that it must use identifiers that are easily recognizable for global audiences.
The White House in response barred AP reporters from the Oval Office, where Trump has held several press events since returning to the presidency, and the presidential plane, Air Force One.
Trump’s ban prevents the AP’s journalists from seeing and hearing him and other top White House officials as they take newsworthy actions or respond in real time to news events.
The move has been criticized by several press freedom groups and the White House Correspondents’ Association. Reuters released a statement in support of the AP.
The lawsuit claims the White House’s decision retaliated against the AP over coverage decisions, which are protected under the Constitution. It also alleges the AP did not have an opportunity to challenge the White House’s decision to bar its access.
The lawsuit names Leavitt, chief of staff Susie Wiles and deputy chief of staff Taylor Budowich as defendants.
Wiles and Budowich did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The AP is seeking a temporary restraining order declaring the restrictions unlawful and immediately restoring its access to all areas available to the White House press pool. (Reporting by Andrew Goudsward; Additional reporting by Jasper Ward; Editing by Scott Malone and Rosalba O’Brien)


US denounces French inquiry into social media platform X, vows to defend free speech

US denounces French inquiry into social media platform X, vows to defend free speech
Updated 26 July 2025

US denounces French inquiry into social media platform X, vows to defend free speech

US denounces French inquiry into social media platform X, vows to defend free speech
  • Paris cybercrime prosecutors called for the police into billionaire Elon Musk's social network X on suspicion of foreign interference
  • “Democratic governments should allow all voices to be heard, not silence speech they dislike," US State Department responds

WASHINGTON: US officials issued a harsh condemnation Friday of France’s criminal investigation into the social network X, owned by billionaire Elon Musk, on suspicion of foreign interference.
“As part of a criminal investigation, an activist French prosecutor is requesting information on X’s proprietary algorithm and has classified X as an ‘organized crime group,’” the US State Department’s Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor wrote on their X account.
“Democratic governments should allow all voices to be heard, not silence speech they dislike. The United States will defend the free speech of all Americans against acts of foreign censorship.”
Paris cybercrime prosecutors called for the police probe July 11 to investigate suspected crimes — including manipulating and extracting data from automated systems “as part of a criminal gang.”
The social media company last week denied the allegations, calling them “politically motivated.”
X also said it had refused to comply with the prosecutor’s request to access its recommendation algorithm and real-time data.
The investigation follows two January complaints that alleged the X algorithm had been used for foreign interference in French politics.
One of the complaints came from Eric Bothorel, an MP from President Emmanuel Macron’s centrist party, who complained of “reduced diversity of voices and options” and Musk’s “personal interventions” in the platform’s management since he took it over.
X said it “categorically denies” all allegations and that the probe “is distorting French law in order to serve a political agenda and, ultimately, restrict free speech.”
Tesla and SpaceX chief Musk has raised hackles with his forays into European politics, including vocal backing for the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party ahead of February legislative elections.
“Democracy is too fragile to let digital platform owners tell us what to think, who to vote for or even who to hate,” Bothorel said after the investigation was announced.
 


Pregnant Palestinian journalist killed in Israeli strike

Pregnant Palestinian journalist killed in Israeli strike
Updated 24 July 2025

Pregnant Palestinian journalist killed in Israeli strike

Pregnant Palestinian journalist killed in Israeli strike
  • Walaa Al-Jaabari was killed along with her husband, 4 children and unborn child during a bombing on her house in southwest Gaza City
  • According to local reports not independently verifiable, the explosion was so powerful it reportedly ejected the fetus from her womb

LONDON: Palestinian journalist Walaa Al-Jaabari, who was reportedly pregnant, was killed along with her immediate family in an Israeli airstrike on Wednesday.

Al-Jaabari, a newspaper editor for several local media outlets, died when her home in the Tal Al-Hawa neighborhood in southwest Gaza City was bombed. The strike also killed her husband, Amjad Al-Shaer, their four children, and her unborn baby.

According to local reports, the explosion was so powerful it reportedly ejected the fetus from her womb. Arab News could not independently verify this claim or the authenticity of photos circulating online that appear to show a fetus wrapped in a shroud.

Her death is the latest in what human rights and press freedom organizations have described as the systematic targeting of journalists in Gaza.

On Wednesday, the International Federation of Journalists renewed its call for Israel to stop killing media workers and to allow international reporters access to the territory, which has been under an Israeli-imposed blockade for 21 months.

More than 180 journalists — almost all Palestinians — have been killed in Gaza since the start of the Israeli offensive, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists. Other organizations estimate the toll to be as high as 231.

In at least a dozen cases, rights groups say there is evidence that Israeli forces deliberately targeted journalists, which they warn may constitute war crimes.

No independent reporters have been permitted entry into Gaza throughout the war, apart from a handful of tightly controlled, brief “embed” visits with Israeli troops.

Israeli authorities have repeatedly refused to lift the ban, citing security concerns and the risks of allowing journalists to operate freely in the conflict zone.

The blockade has placed immense pressure on local reporters, who face extreme working conditions, including limited access to electricity, food, and Internet connectivity.

On Thursday, the Associated Press, Agence France-Presse, Reuters and the BBC issued a joint statement urging Israel to allow journalists access to Gaza and permit the entry of humanitarian supplies.

“We are desperately concerned for our journalists in Gaza, who are increasingly unable to feed themselves and their families,” the statement said. “For many months, these independent journalists have been the world’s eyes and ears on the ground in Gaza. They are now facing the same dire circumstances as those they are covering.”


Gaza staff face starvation: Joint statement from AFP, AP, BBC, Reuters

Gaza staff face starvation: Joint statement from AFP, AP, BBC, Reuters
Updated 24 July 2025

Gaza staff face starvation: Joint statement from AFP, AP, BBC, Reuters

Gaza staff face starvation: Joint statement from AFP, AP, BBC, Reuters
  • Statement calls on Israel to allow journalists in and out of Gaza, permit adequate food supplies into territory
  • Over 100 charity and human rights groups say Israel’s blockade pushing Palestinians in Gaza toward starvation

Four leading news organizations said Thursday their journalists in Gaza are facing the threat of starvation as the Israeli assault on Gaza grinds on, while top US envoy Steve Witkoff was to meet with key negotiators from the Middle East for talks on the latest ceasefire proposal and the release of hostages.

“We are desperately concerned for our journalists in Gaza, who are increasingly unable to feed themselves and their families,” said a joint statement by The Associated Press, Agence France-Presse, Reuters and the BBC. “For many months, these independent journalists have been the world’s eyes and ears on the ground in Gaza. They are now facing the same dire circumstances as those they are covering.”

The statement called on Israel to allow journalists in and out of Gaza and allow adequate food supplies into the territory.

The statement came a day after more than 100 charity and human rights groups said that Israel’s blockade and ongoing military offensive are pushing Palestinians in the Gaza Strip toward starvation.

Also Thursday, Hamas confirmed it had sent its latest ceasefire proposal to Israel, with an Israeli official calling it “workable,” although no details were provided. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak on record.

Israel’s war in Gaza, launched in response to Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, attack, has killed more than 59,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry. Its count doesn’t distinguish between militants and civilians, but the ministry says that more than half of the dead are women and children.


Major media say Gaza staff face starvation as US envoy prepares to host ceasefire talks

Major media say Gaza staff face starvation as US envoy prepares to host ceasefire talks
Israel has barred international media from entering Gaza independently throughout the 21-month war. (FILE/AFP)
Updated 24 July 2025

Major media say Gaza staff face starvation as US envoy prepares to host ceasefire talks

Major media say Gaza staff face starvation as US envoy prepares to host ceasefire talks
  • Four leading news organizations said Thursday their journalists in Gaza are facing the threat of starvation as the Israeli assault on Gaza grinds on

Four leading news organizations said Thursday their journalists in Gaza are facing the threat of starvation as the Israeli assault on Gaza grinds on, while top US envoy Steve Witkoff was to meet with key negotiators from the Middle East for talks on the latest ceasefire proposal and the release of hostages.
“We are desperately concerned for our journalists in Gaza, who are increasingly unable to feed themselves and their families,” said a joint statement by The Associated Press, Agence France-Presse, Reuters and the BBC. “For many months, these independent journalists have been the world’s eyes and ears on the ground in Gaza. They are now facing the same dire circumstances as those they are covering.”
The statement called on Israel to allow journalists in and out of Gaza and allow adequate food supplies into the territory.
The statement came a day after more than 100 charity and human rights groups said that Israel’s blockade and ongoing military offensive are pushing Palestinians in the Gaza Strip toward starvation.
Also Thursday, Hamas confirmed it had sent its latest ceasefire proposal to Israel, with an Israeli official calling it “workable,” although no details were provided. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak on record.
Israel’s war in Gaza, launched in response to Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, attack, has killed more than 59,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry. Its count doesn’t distinguish between militants and civilians, but the ministry says that more than half of the dead are women and children.


Magazine editor criticizes arrest of protester holding cartoon satirizing Palestine Action ban

Magazine editor criticizes arrest of protester holding cartoon satirizing Palestine Action ban
Updated 23 July 2025

Magazine editor criticizes arrest of protester holding cartoon satirizing Palestine Action ban

Magazine editor criticizes arrest of protester holding cartoon satirizing Palestine Action ban
  • Retired teacher, 67, held under terrorism laws

LONDON: Ian Hislop, the editor of the UK’s satirical magazine Private Eye, has condemned the arrest of 67‑year‑old protester Jon Farley, who was detained under terrorism laws for displaying a cartoon that joked about the government’s proscription of Palestine Action.

Farley, a retired teacher, was held under Section 12 of the Terrorism Act after holding a placard displaying the cartoon from Private Eye at a silent Gaza demonstration in Leeds. 

Hislop slammed the arrest as “mind boggling” and a “blatant misunderstanding of satire,” noting that the cartoon was “an example of freedom of speech” against a government policy, according to a report by The Guardian.

Hislop added: “So, it’s not difficult to understand. It’s critical, but it is quite clearly a joke. (It) seems to me absolutely extraordinary that someone could be arrested for holding it (the cartoon) up.”

Farley, a regular demonstrator, said he took the cartoon to a protest in Leeds after hearing that 32 Palestinians seeking aid had been killed by Israeli forces that day.

“I saw it in Private Eye and thought, ‘That’s really well thought-out — it has nuance.’ But I don’t think the police do nuance,” he told The Guardian, referring to the cartoon styled as a mock guide titled “Palestine Action Explained”, which contrasts UK’s harsh response to protest actions with its tolerance of deadly force against Palestinians.

Farley added that officers handcuffed him and escorted him into a police van before he could explain the placard’s satirical origin.

He was released six hours later without charge but under bail conditions barring him from rallies supporting Palestine Action, a group that the UK government classified as a terrorist group after it broke into a military base and vandalized military aircraft.

Farley is among dozens who have been arrested since the ban for holding placards purportedly supporting the group.

The retired teacher called for an apology and expressed concern over the “murky lack of clarity” in the police’s actions.

West Yorkshire Police said it would review the incident, and acknowledged confusion following Palestine Action’s designation as a proscribed organization earlier this month.