Ƶ

US proposes Ukraine UN text omitting mention of occupied territory: diplomats

US proposes Ukraine UN text omitting mention of occupied territory: diplomats
A woman stands in front of a house burning after being shelled in the city of Irpin, outside Kyiv. More than 1.2 million people have fled Ukraine into neighboring countries since Russia launched its full-scale invasion. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 22 February 2025

US proposes Ukraine UN text omitting mention of occupied territory: diplomats

US proposes Ukraine UN text omitting mention of occupied territory: diplomats
  • US Secretary of State Marco Rubio urges UN members to approve the ‘simple, historic’ resolution
  • Washington’s proposal comes amid an intensifying feud between Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelensky

UNITED NATIONS, United States: The United States proposed Friday a United Nations resolution on the Ukraine conflict that omitted any mention of Kyiv’s territory occupied by Russia, diplomatic sources said.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio urged UN members to approve the “simple, historic” resolution.
Washington’s proposal comes amid an intensifying feud between President Donald Trump and President Volodymyr Zelensky which has seen Trump claim it was “not important” for his Ukrainian counterpart to be involved in peace talks.
It also appeared to rival a separate draft resolution produced by Kyiv and its European allies, countries that Trump has also sought to sideline from talks on the future of the three-year-old war.
The Ukrainian-European text stresses the need to redouble diplomatic efforts to end the war this year, noting several initiatives to that end, while also blaming Russia for the invasion and committing to Kyiv’s “territorial integrity.”
The text also repeats the UN General Assembly’s previous demands for an immediate and unconditional withdrawal of Russian troops from Ukraine.
Those votes had wide support, with around 140 of the 193 member states voting in favor.
Washington’s text, seen by AFP, calls for a “swift end to the conflict” without mentioning Kyiv’s territorial integrity, and was welcomed by Moscow’s ambassador to the UN Vassily Nebenzia as “a good move” — but stressed that it did not address the “roots” of the conflict.
“The United States has proposed a simple, historic resolution in the United Nations that we urge all member states to support in order to chart a path to peace,” Rubio said in a statement Friday, without commenting in detail on the contents of the proposed resolution.
In a break with past resolutions proposed and supported by Washington, the latest draft, produced ahead of a General Assembly meeting Monday to coincide with the third anniversary of the war, does not criticize Moscow.
Instead the 65-word text begins by “mourning the tragic loss of life throughout the Russia-Ukraine conflict.”
It then continued by “reiterating” that the United Nation’s purpose is the maintenance of “international peace and security” — without singling out Moscow as the source of the conflict.
France’s ambassador to the UN, Nicolas De Riviere, the EU’s only permanent member of the council, said he had no comment “for the moment.”
“A stripped-down text of this type that does not condemn Russian aggression or explicitly reference Ukraine’s territorial integrity looks like a betrayal of Kyiv and a jab at the EU, but also a show of disdain for core principles of international law,” said Richard Gowan of the International Crisis Group.
“I think even a lot of states that favor an early end to the war will worry that the US is ignoring core elements of the UN Charter.”


No peace: Trump’s smoldering Nobel obsession

No peace: Trump’s smoldering Nobel obsession
Updated 19 sec ago

No peace: Trump’s smoldering Nobel obsession

No peace: Trump’s smoldering Nobel obsession
  • Since the beginning of his presidential ambitions 10 years ago, “he has put himself in opposition to Barack Obama, who famously won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009,” Garret Martin, a professor of international relations at American University, told AFP

WASHINGTON: Donald Trump has made no secret of the fact that he is obsessed with winning the Nobel Peace Prize. But so far the award has eluded him throughout his two US presidencies.
Trump’s push for the prize, whose 2025 winner will be named on Friday, is fueled by a potent mix of a desire for prestige and a long rivalry with former president Barack Obama.
Sometimes Trump, who is often better known for his divisive rhetoric, anti-migration drive and embrace of foreign authoritarians, has appeared to acknowledge that he is an unlikely candidate.
“Will you get the Nobel Prize? Absolutely not. They’ll give it to some guy that didn’t do a damn thing,” Trump said during a speech to hundreds of the US military’s top officers in September.
But in the same breath Trump revealed his true feelings.
“It’d be a big insult to our country, I will tell you that. I don’t want it, I want the country to get it. It should get it because there’s never been anything like it,” he said at the same gathering.

- ‘Seven wars’ -

As the Norwegian committee’s announcement has drawn nearer, the steady drumbeat of Trump’s campaigning for the peace prize has intensified to unprecedented levels.
In recent weeks, barely a public event has gone by without Trump bragging about what he says is his role in ending seven wars.
Trump’s administration recently listed them as being between Cambodia and Thailand; Kosovo and Serbia; the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda; Pakistan and India; Israel and Iran; Egypt and Ethiopia; and Armenia and Azerbaijan.
But while Trump has been quick to claim credit for some — for example announcing a ceasefire between nuclear-armed Delhi and Islamabad in May — many of the claims are partial or inaccurate.
Trump has even bombed one of the countries he mentions. He ordered US military strikes on Iran’s nuclear program in June.
But perhaps the biggest issue is that the two main wars that Trump promised to end within days of his inauguration — in Gaza and Ukraine — are still raging.
His push for a deal between US ally Israel and Hamas to end the brutal two-year war in Gaza has reached a climax just days before the Nobel announcement — but is almost certainly too late to sway the committee.
Foreign leaders seeking to curry favor with Trump have been quick to talk up Trump’s chances.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu nominated Trump for the prize, as did an Israeli advocacy group campaigning for the release of hostages in Gaza.
Pakistan also nominated Trump while the leaders of several African countries paid tribute to his supposed peacemaking efforts in a visit earlier this year.

- Obama rivalry -

But while Trump wants international recognition as “peacemaker-in-chief,” there is another driving factor.
Since the beginning of his presidential ambitions 10 years ago, “he has put himself in opposition to Barack Obama, who famously won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009,” Garret Martin, a professor of international relations at American University, told AFP.
The prize awarded to the Democratic former president, barely nine months after he took office, sparked heated debate — and continues to annoy Republican Trump.
“If I were named Obama I would have had the Nobel Prize given to me in 10 seconds,” Trump complained in October 2024, during the final stretch of the presidential campaign.
Three other US presidents have also won the award: Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and Jimmy Carter, although Carter won his decades after his presidency for his subsequent peace efforts.

 


Britain not seeking visa deal with India, Starmer says

Britain not seeking visa deal with India, Starmer says
Updated 08 October 2025

Britain not seeking visa deal with India, Starmer says

Britain not seeking visa deal with India, Starmer says
  • Starmer begins a two-day trip to India on Wednesday, bringing a trade mission of businesses to promote the trade deal

MUMBAI: Britain will not pursue a visa deal with India, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said, as he aims to deepen economic ties with the country following this year’s trade agreement.
Starmer begins a two-day trip to India on Wednesday, bringing a trade mission of businesses to promote the trade deal, which was agreed in May, signed in July and due to come into effect next year.
Starmer said that visas had blocked up previous efforts to seal a trade deal, and that, having reached an agreement which had no visa implications, he didn’t wish to revisit the issue when he meets Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi for talks on Thursday.
“That isn’t part of the plans,” he told reporters en route to India when asked about visas, adding the visit was “to take advantage of the free trade agreement that we’ve already struck.”
“Businesses are taking advantage of that. But the issue is not about visas.”
Starmer is trying to take a more restrictive stance on both immigration amid high public concern about the issue, as his Labour Party trails the populist Reform UK party in polls.
He said visas would not be on the table in order to attract tech sector professionals from India, after US President Donald Trump hiked fees on H-1B visas, though he said more broadly he wanted to have “top talent” in Britain.
Asked if he would stop issuing visas to arrivals from countries who won’t take back foreign criminals or people wanted to deport, Starmer said it was a “non-issue” with India as there is a returns agreement, but it was something he would look at more broadly.
“We are looking at whether there should be a link between visas and returns agreements,” he said.


Government shutdown drags on as health care compromise remains elusive

Government shutdown drags on as health care compromise remains elusive
Updated 08 October 2025

Government shutdown drags on as health care compromise remains elusive

Government shutdown drags on as health care compromise remains elusive

WASHINGTON: To hear party leaders talk, the seventh day of the government shutdown sounded a lot like the first. Democrats are seeking negotiations on expiring health care subsidies while Republicans say they won’t discuss it, or any other policy, until the government reopens.
The two sides are also offering starkly different visions of the Affordable Care Act and how to deal with the expanded premium assistance that will soon expire for millions of people — Democrats want the aid extended, while Republicans insist the subsidized health care system is broken and must be cut back.
“Democrats’ position has not changed,” said Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer. “We want the same thing that a majority, an overwhelming majority, of Americans want, which is to end this shutdown and halt the health care crisis that will send premiums spiking for tens of millions of people.”
House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, met with Senate Republicans on Tuesday and said the party is “100 percent united,” which he said is “a good place to be in.”
It’s unclear how the impasse will end, even as hundreds of thousands of federal workers are going unpaid and many government services are slowed or suspended. Democrats believe the public is on their side as they fight to keep the COVID-era subsidies, but health care is also one of the most intractable issues in Congress — and a real compromise is unlikely to be easy, or quick.
There are some Republicans in Congress who want to extend the aid as millions of people who receive their insurance through the ACA marketplaces are set to receive notices that their premiums will increase at the beginning of the year. But many GOP lawmakers are strongly opposed to any extension — and see the debate as a new opportunity to try to reform the program.
“If Republicans govern by poll and fail to grab this moment, they will own it,” wrote Texas Rep. Chip Roy, a Republican, in a letter published in The Wall Street Journal over the weekend. He encouraged senators not to go “wobbly” on the issue.
“The jig is up, the pandemic is over and my colleagues shouldn’t blink in any other direction,” Roy wrote.
A long history of health care fights
Republicans have been railing against the Affordable Care Act, former President Barack Obama’s signature health care law, since it was enacted 15 years ago. But while they have been able to chip away at it, they have not been able to substantially alter it as a record 24 million people are now signed up for insurance coverage through the ACA, in large part because billions of dollars in subsidies have made the plans more affordable for many people.
Now, some of them see the Democrats’ fight as their chance to revisit the issue — putting Republican congressional leaders and President Donald Trump in a complicated position.
“I am happy to work with Democrats on their Failed Healthcare Policies, or anything else, but first they must allow our Government to reopen,” Trump wrote on social media Monday night, walking back earlier comments saying there were ongoing negotiations with Democrats.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., told reporters Monday that “there may be a path forward” on ACA subsidies, but stressed, “I think a lot of it would come down to where the White House lands on that.”
Some GOP senators argue, though, that the only path forward is to overhaul the law. “The whole problem with all of this is Obamacare,” said Florida Sen. Rick Scott.
Johnson said there were ongoing talks about “pretty dramatic changes” to the law that Congress might consider once the government reopens.
Bipartisan talks face difficulties
The Senate has now rejected a House-passed bill to extend government funding until mid-November five times, with Democrats denying Republicans the votes to pass it unless they win concessions on health care.
With leaders at odds, some rank-and-file senators in both parties have been in private talks to try to find a way out of the shutdown. Republican Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota has suggested extending the subsidies for a year and then phasing them out. Senate Appropriations Committee Chairwoman Susan Collins, R-Maine, has suggested pushing ahead with a group of bipartisan spending bills that are pending and then securing a commitment to discuss the health care issue.
But many Democrats say a commitment isn’t good enough, and Republicans say they need deeper reforms — leaving the talks, and the US government, at a standstill.
Maine Sen. Angus King, an Independent who caucuses with Democrats, voted with Republicans to keep the government open. But he said Monday that he might switch his vote to “no” if Republicans do not “offer some real solid evidence that they are going to help us with this crisis” on health care.
Republican Sen. Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma said his party is “not budging,” however.
“First and foremost, before we can talk about anything, they need to reopen the government,” Mullin said.
Some Republicans urge action on health care
Still, some Republicans say they are open to extending the subsidies — even if they don’t like them — as it becomes clear that their constituents will face rising costs.
“I’m willing to consider various reforms, but I think we have to do something,” said Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri. He said Congress should address the issue “sooner rather than later” before open enrollment begins Nov. 1.
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., said she is “not a fan” of Obamacare but indicated she might vote to extend it.
“I’m going to go against everyone on this issue because when the tax credits expire this year my own adult children’s insurance premiums for 2026 are going to DOUBLE, along with all the wonderful families and hard-working people in my district,” she posted on social media Monday evening.
High stakes for federal workers
With both sides digging in, the shutdown could go on for some time, leaving federal workers without their regular paychecks. And the White House is now suggesting that Trump may block back pay if the government reopens.
Trump signed legislation into law in 2019 that ensures back pay for federal workers during any government funding lapse. But a White House memo with the rationale for no back pay is under consideration.
Johnson told reporters Tuesday that he doesn’t know the details of the memo, but “if that is true, that should turn up the urgency and the necessity of the Democrats doing the right thing here.”
Democrats pushed back on the White House rationale. “Federal workers, including furloughed workers, are entitled to their back pay following a shutdown,” said Washington Sen. Patty Murray, the top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee.
The White House also said Tuesday that it will use tariff revenue to bolster the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children, which is facing funding shortages because of the shutdown.
Press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a post on X that Trump has “identified a creative solution to transfer resources” from tariffs the administration has imposed on US trading partners. She did not provide details of how such funding transfers might work.


US Homeland Security chief visits Chicago area ICE facility as agents arrest 13, raid city neighborhoods

US Homeland Security chief visits Chicago area ICE facility as agents arrest 13, raid city neighborhoods
Updated 08 October 2025

US Homeland Security chief visits Chicago area ICE facility as agents arrest 13, raid city neighborhoods

US Homeland Security chief visits Chicago area ICE facility as agents arrest 13, raid city neighborhoods

BROADVIEW, Illinois: Federal officials reported the arrests of 13 people Friday protesting near an immigration facility outside Chicago that has been frequently targeted during President Donald Trump’s administration’s surge of immigration enforcement this fall.
As Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem met with employees inside the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement processing facility in Broadview, a crowd grew over several hours, some riled by newly installed barricades to separate them from law enforcement officers stationed outside.
Noem also accompanied agents Friday on a raid near a local Walmart store and later engaged in a tit-for-tat over unannounced visits — and even bathroom use — with the Broadview mayor.
Immigrants’ rights advocates and residents separately reported that federal agents had used tear gas near grocery or hardware stores they had targeted for enforcement elsewhere in Chicago on Friday and detained a city council member as she questioned the attempted arrest of a man. The federal government has restricted airspace over Broadview, officials said Friday, and Gov. JB Pritzker called for an investigation into an immigration raid on the city’s South Side early Tuesday morning.
Objections to barricades, local police step up
At the ICE facility, some protesters have aimed to block vehicles from going in or out of the area in recent weeks, part of growing pushback to a surge of immigration enforcement that began in early September. Called “Midway Blitz,” the US Department of Homeland Security announced Friday that it has resulted in more than 1,000 immigration arrests.
Federal agents have repeatedly fired tear gas, pepper balls and other projectiles toward crowds in response and at least five people have faced federal charges after being arrested in those clashes.
While Friday’s demonstration was quieter at Broadview, about 12 miles  west of Chicago, Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin reported 13 protesters were arrested. Charges were not released but McLaughlin said they included alleged assaults on federal officers.
The Illinois State Police, whose officers patrolled the grounds wearing riot helmets and holding batons, set up concrete barriers Thursday night to segregate protesters and designate spaces to demonstrate, with several adjacent streets being closed. Many demonstrators ignored the zones to protest on the other side of the building, saying the corrals prevented free speech rights.
Others were angered by local and state officers standing shoulder-to-shoulder with federal agents, including Homeland Security Investigations, ICE, the Bureau of Prisons and others. At one point, Illinois State Police joined Border Patrol in pushing back a crowd.
Jonny Bishop, a 28-year-old former teacher from Palatine, Illinois, and from a Mexican immigrant family, said the cooperation concerned him.
“ICE acts with impunity,” said Bishop, who’s previously encountered tear gas and pepper balls. “They know that they can shoot at us. They can tear gas us. And Broadview Police Department is not going to do anything.”
The Federal Aviation Administration confirmed it has restricted Chicago airspace, with Border Patrol citing “a credible threat” against law enforcement amid ongoing clashes with protesters at the Broadview site. The restriction, which is in effect from Oct. 1-12 and targets drones, extends in a radius of 15 nautical miles  and includes Broadview. Critics question the length of time and the geographic breadth of the prohibition, worried about oversight of ICE operations.
Tear gas used on quiet street; city council member handcuffed at hospital
In a Chicago neighborhood, Andrew Denton, 39, stopped at a grocery store for lunch and heard honking from an SUV stopped behind a motorcycle parked in the middle of the street. He realized ICE agents were in the SUV and started shooting video just before the agents threw canisters of gas near passersby.
“There was no reason to use tear gas on the crowd,” he said. “No one was threatening them in any way.”
Denton said he immediately began tearing up. His nose began running, and he felt like he was choking. He said the 20 or so people in the area included seniors, families with children and children outside at recess at an adjacent elementary school.
“Every week, ICE escalates its violence against us,” said Demi Palecek, a military veteran and candidate for state representative. “With this level of escalation, it’s only a matter of time before someone is killed.”
In a near West Side neighborhood a few miles away, Chicago Alderperson Jessie Fuentes shared video appearing to show her being handcuffed as she confronted federal agents at a hospital. She said a resident had fallen and broken his leg while chased by ICE agents who then transported him to the emergency room.
Fuentes arrived after an emergency room staff member called to say there were ICE agents in the room with him. In the video, none of them answers when she asks if they have a signed warrant. One agent then says, “You need to leave,” and handcuffs her from behind as she repeats her question about a warrant and then says, “You’re hurting me.” Fuentes said agents escorted her outside and released her.
Noem participates in raid, engages in restroom dispute
Noem, alongside Gregory Bovino, chief patrol agent of the US Border Patrol’s El Centro Sector, appeared on the Broadview building’s roof, surrounded by armed agents and a camera crew while standing beside a sniper’s post, according to footage shared online by conservative media personality Benny Johnson.
Johnson also posted video outside a Walmart store where he said agents, accompanied by Noem, had conducted a raid. Another video showed detainees in a parking lot where Noem noted “consequences for breaking the law and jeopardizing our law enforcement.”
Noem attempted to visit Broadview Mayor Katrina Thompson at the village hall, but she was not there, and Noem was turned away when she asked to use the facilities.
“The city police wouldn’t even let us use the restroom,” she said in a video.
Broadview village spokesperson David Ormsby said Thompson later “returned her visit” at the ICE facility, where she too was refused access.
“We are distressed to hear that the bathrooms are unavailable at the ICE facility,” Ormsby said in a statement.
Governor decries anonymous, ‘inhumane’ tactics
Pritzker, the governor, lashed out at the Trump administration for the way federal agents, many of them masked to hide their faces, have treated protesters over the past month. He castigated officers’ “inhumane” tactics including slamming protesters to the ground, arresting a reporter and firing chemical agents into the crowds.
“It is clear federal agents cannot be trusted to act to protect the safety and constitutional rights of the public,” the Democrat said.
Pritzker also ordered state agencies to coordinate possible action to “hold federal agents accountable” for a raid on an apartment building in the city’s South Shore neighborhood early this week in which residents, regardless of status and including children, were detained for hours, some handcuffed. Children were separated from their parents, while officers smashed windows and tore through apartments, leaving piles of debris in the hallways.
Homeland Security officials said 37 undocumented immigrants were arrested, some with criminal histories and two allegedly members of a criminal Venezuelan gang.


Trump promises trade fairness for Canada, noncommittal on USMCA deal

Trump promises trade fairness for Canada, noncommittal on USMCA deal
Updated 08 October 2025

Trump promises trade fairness for Canada, noncommittal on USMCA deal

Trump promises trade fairness for Canada, noncommittal on USMCA deal
  • Trump suggests United States could ditch USMCA trade agreement
  • Canadian government plays down chances of imminent trade deal

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump on Tuesday promised to treat Canada fairly in talks over painful US tariffs on Canadian goods, but was less committed about a continental trade deal that also includes Mexico.
“I think they’re going to walk away very happy,” Trump said, referring to Canada, in Oval Office remarks ahead of a meeting with Prime Minister Mark Carney. “We’re going to treat people fairly. We’re going to especially treat Canada fairly.”
The Canadian minister in charge of bilateral trade later said the two sides had made progress during what he called a successful, positive, and substantive conversation with Trump, while making clear any potential deals were not close.
“I’m happy and content because I think we have a momentum now that we did not have when we woke up this morning ... but we have not yet finished our work,” Dominic LeBlanc told reporters.
LeBlanc said officials could meet again as soon as Tuesday evening.
Carney, who made his second visit to the White House in five months, this time at Trump’s request, faces increasing pressure to address US tariffs on steel, autos, and other goods.
“ left us very much with the sense that there is a desire to see how we can, starting with the steel and aluminum sectors, structure something that would be in the economic and security interests of both countries,” said LeBlanc, who had said beforehand that a breakthrough was unlikely.
Trump, complaining “we’re the king of being screwed” by trading partners, said Washington would continue to target some Canadian exports.
Carney initially responded to tariffs by pushing for a separate trade and security deal with the United States, but as talks stalled, he focused on a review of the US-Canada-Mexico free trade deal scheduled for 2026.
“We can renegotiate it, and that would be good, or we could just do different deals,” said Trump. “We might make deals that are better for the individual countries.”
Asked for his preference, he replied: “I don’t care. I want to make whatever the best deal is for this country, and also very much with Canada in mind.”
In March, Carney took over as prime minister from Justin Trudeau, who had famously bad relations with Trump.
Carney and Trump have since underlined how well they get on.
“From the beginning, I liked him, and we’ve had a good relationship,” Trump said.
“We have natural conflict. We also have mutual love ... you know we have great love for each other,” he added.
In response, Carney called Trump a transformative president. Trump interrupted Carney as he listed the president’s accomplishments to add: “the merger of Canada and the United States,” drawing laughter from reporters before adding, “I’m only kidding.” Carney, also laughing, responded: “That wasn’t where I was going.”
Canada sends 75 percent of all exports to the United States and is vulnerable to US trade action. Trump said the two countries had agreed to work together on a missile defense shield dubbed Golden Dome.
“There are areas where we compete, and it’s in those areas where we have to come to an agreement that works. But there are more areas where we are stronger together, and that’s what we’re focused on,” said Carney. The prime minister last visited the Oval Office in May, when he bluntly said Canada would never be for sale in response to Trump’s repeated threat to purchase or annex Canada. Since then, he has made numerous concessions, including dropping some counter-tariffs and scrapping a digital services tax aimed at US tech companies.

While most Canadian exports enter the United States duty-free under the USMCA, tariffs have pummeled the steel, aluminum, and auto sectors and a number of small businesses.
Doug Ford, premier of the Canadian industrial province of Ontario, reiterated calls for Carney to be prepared to be tougher with Trump.
“We seem to be weakening our case by continuously pulling off tariffs. I’d take a different approach — try to get a deal. If you can’t, we got to hit him back hard and never stop hitting him back hard,” he told reporters.
Canada’s main opposition leader, Pierre Poilievre, criticizes Carney’s approach, noting the prime minister’s earlier pledge to “negotiate a win” by July 21. He said on Monday it did not look like Carney would accomplish much.
The trade war is straining bilateral ties. Ford in March threatened to cut off electricity exports to New York state and has ordered provincial liquor stores to boycott US alcohol.
Canadians are also shunning travel to the United States. Trump, though, seemed unconcerned.
“I think the people of Canada, they will love us again. Most of them still do,” he said.