Ƶ

Mass drone attack kills three, injures at least 30 in Ukraine’s Dnipro, governor says

Mass drone attack kills three, injures at least 30 in Ukraine’s Dnipro, governor says
The wreckage of cars sit at the site of a Russian mass drone attack at a location given as Dnipro, Ukraine, in this handout photo released April 17, 2025. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 17 April 2025

Mass drone attack kills three, injures at least 30 in Ukraine’s Dnipro, governor says

Mass drone attack kills three, injures at least 30 in Ukraine’s Dnipro, governor says
  • Pictures posted online showed a large blaze and firefighters working at the scene well into the night

A Russian mass drone attack killed three people, including a child, and injured many more on Wednesday evening in the southeastern Ukrainian city of Dnipro, the regional governor said.
Serhiy Lysak, governor of Dnipropetrovsk region, wrote on the Telegram messaging app that 30 people had been injured, including five children. Sixteen people were being treated in hospital.
The attack triggered several fires.
Mayor Borys Filatov said one strike came within 100 meters (110 yards) of the municipal offices. He also said at least 15 dwellings had been damaged, as well as a student residence, an educational institution and a food processing plant.
Pictures posted online showed a large blaze and firefighters working at the scene well into the night, as well as gutted vehicles and buildings with smashed windows and damaged facades.
In northeastern Kharkiv region, governor Oleh Syniehubov said a Russian missile attack injured two people in the town of Izium. The town was captured by Russian troops in the early days of the February 2022 invasion, but was retaken by Ukrainian forces later in the year.


US Supreme Court to decide legality of Trump’s tariffs

Updated 4 sec ago

US Supreme Court to decide legality of Trump’s tariffs

US Supreme Court to decide legality of Trump’s tariffs
The court, which begins its next nine-month term on October 6, placed the case on a fast track, scheduling oral arguments for the first week of November
Trump has made tariffs a key foreign policy tool, using them to renegotiate trade deals, extract concessions and exert political pressure on other countries

WASHINGTON: The US Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to decide the legality of Donald Trump’s sweeping global tariffs, setting up a major test of one of the Republican president’s boldest assertions of executive power that has been central to his economic and trade agenda.
The justices took up the Justice Department’s appeal of a lower court’s ruling that Trump overstepped his authority in imposing most of his tariffs under a federal law meant for emergencies. The court swiftly acted after the administration last week asked it to review the case, which implicates trillions of dollars in customs duties over the next decade.
The court, which begins its next nine-month term on October 6, placed the case on a fast track, scheduling oral arguments for the first week of November.
The justices also agreed to hear a separate challenge to Trump’s tariffs brought by a family-owned toy company, Learning Resources.
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington ruled on August 29 that Trump overreached in invoking a 1977 law known as the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA, to impose the tariffs, undercutting a major priority for the president in his second term. The tariffs, however, remain in effect during the appeal to the Supreme Court.
The levies are part of a trade war instigated by Trump since he returned to the presidency in January that has alienated trading partners, increased volatility in financial markets and fueled global economic uncertainty.
Trump has made tariffs a key foreign policy tool, using them to renegotiate trade deals, extract concessions and exert political pressure on other countries.
Trump in April invoked the 1977 law in imposing tariffs on goods imported from individual countries to address trade deficits, as well as separate tariffs announced in February as economic leverage on China, Canada and Mexico to curb the trafficking of fentanyl and illicit drugs into the US
The law gives the president power to deal with “an unusual and extraordinary threat” amid a national emergency. It historically had been used for imposing sanctions on enemies or freezing their assets. Prior to Trump, the law had never been used to impose tariffs.
Trump’s Department of Justice has argued that the law allows tariffs under emergency provisions that authorize a president to “regulate” imports.
“The stakes in this case could not be higher,” the Justice Department said in a filing.
Denying Trump’s tariff power “would expose our nation to trade retaliation without effective defenses and thrust America back to the brink of economic catastrophe,” it added.
Trump has said that if he loses the case the US might have to unwind trade deals, causing the country to “suffer so greatly.”
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office reported in August that the increased duties on imports from foreign countries could reduce the US national deficit by $4 trillion over the next decade.
The appeals court ruling stems from two challenges. One was brought by five small businesses that import goods, including a New York wine and spirits importer and a Pennsylvania-based sport fishing retailer. The other was filed by 12 US states — Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Oregon and Vermont — most of them governed by Democrats.
The US Constitution grants Congress, not the president, the authority to issue taxes and tariffs, and any delegation of that authority must be both explicit and limited, according to the lawsuits.
The Federal Circuit agreed. “It seems unlikely that Congress intended, in enacting IEEPA, to depart from its past practice and grant the president unlimited authority to impose tariffs,” it said in a 7-4 decision.
The appeals court also said that the administration’s expansive view of this law violates the Supreme Court’s “major questions” doctrine, which requires executive branch actions of vast economic and political significance to be clearly authorized by Congress.
The New York-based US Court of International Trade, which has jurisdiction over customs and trade disputes, previously ruled against Trump’s tariff policies on May 28.
Another court in Washington ruled that the law does not authorize Trump’s tariffs, and the administration has appealed that decision as well. At least eight lawsuits have challenged Trump’s tariff policies, including one filed by the state of California.

Rights advocates demand UN press China on abuses in Xinjiang

Rights advocates demand UN press China on abuses in Xinjiang
Updated 11 min 28 sec ago

Rights advocates demand UN press China on abuses in Xinjiang

Rights advocates demand UN press China on abuses in Xinjiang
  • Members of China’s Uyghur minority joined NGOs on the sidelines of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva to urge UN rights chief Volker Turk to step up pressure on Beijing
  • A Chinese diplomat in the room took the floor to insist that ‘claims of arbitrary detention and enforced disappearances are outright lies’

GENEVA: Uyghurs and rights advocates on Tuesday decried lame global action over a damning 2022 UN report detailing torture and sweeping abuses in China’s Xinjiang region.
Members of China’s Uyghur minority joined NGOs on the sidelines of the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva to urge UN rights chief Volker Turk to step up pressure on Beijing.
“The UN rights chief should strengthen his efforts to press the Chinese government to implement UN recommendations,” Yalkun Uluyol, the China researcher at Human Rights Watch, told diplomats gathered for the event.
Turk’s predecessor Michelle Bachelet published a report in August 2022, citing possible “crimes against humanity” in Xinjiang.
The report — harshly criticized by Beijing — outlined violations against Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities in Xinjiang, including “credible” allegations of widespread torture and arbitrary detention.
It urged China to promptly “release all individuals arbitrarily deprived of their liberty” and clarify the whereabouts of the missing.
“The recommendations have not been implemented,” said Uyghur Rizwangul Nurmuhammad, who has been campaigning for the release of her brother, who was arrested in 2017.
“He was a family breadwinner, a father, a husband, a son, a brother, an ordinary and decent citizen,” she said tearfully, holding a picture of her brother.
“Yet he was arrested and sentenced to nine years in prison... with no justification other than his identity as Uyghur,” she said.
“This pattern of arbitrary detention carried out systematically by the Chinese authorities, continues today.”

Uluyol, also a Uyghur, said he had no contact with his father who was serving 16 years in prison. An uncle was serving a life sentence, and another uncle and cousin were both serving 15-year jail terms.
“All of them were convicted without due process,” he said.
A Chinese diplomat in the room took the floor to insist that “claims of arbitrary detention and enforced disappearances are outright lies.”
Sophie Richardson, co-head of the Chinese Human Rights Defenders (CHRD) NGO, said “it is fairly clear that these abuses are widespread, systematic,” urging Turk to urgently brief the council on the situation.
“We are not short of recommendations on how to address these problems,” she said.
“What we are short on is leadership by the High Commissioner and by member states to be courageous ... activists for all of the victims and survivors of Chinese government human rights violations.”
Turk’s office highlighted to AFP that he had repeatedly raised the issue with Beijing and before the council.
Turk told the council on Monday that “the progress we have sought for the protection of the rights of Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities in Xinjiang... have yet to materialize.”
“To be perfectly clear: we stand firmly behind the findings, analysis, conclusions and recommendations of our report,” spokeswoman Ravina Shamdasani said in an email.
“It is absolutely crucial that the victims of these serious human rights violations receive effective remedies, and justice.”


Russian attack kills 24 in Ukraine during pension distribution

Russian attack kills 24 in Ukraine during pension distribution
Updated 38 min 10 sec ago

Russian attack kills 24 in Ukraine during pension distribution

Russian attack kills 24 in Ukraine during pension distribution
  • “A brutally savage Russian airstrike with an aerial bomb on the rural settlement of Yarova in the Donetsk region. Directly on people,” Zelensky wrote online
  • The interior ministry said 24 people were killed, while the army said Moscow had dropped a glide bomb

KYIV: A Russian strike on Tuesday killed 24 people waiting for pension payments in a front-line town of eastern Ukraine where Russian forces are massing forces for a large-scale offensive, officials said.
President Volodymyr Zelensky posted video showing several corpses strewn on the ground alongside a burned-out minivan and playground — images AFP could not independently verify.
“A brutally savage Russian airstrike with an aerial bomb on the rural settlement of Yarova in the Donetsk region. Directly on people. Ordinary civilians. At the very moment when pensions were being disbursed,” Zelensky wrote online.
Moscow has claimed the industrial region as part of Russia despite not having full control over it.
Kyiv says the Kremlin has massed 100,000 troops at a key part of the front line for a fresh offensive.


The interior ministry said 24 people were killed, while the army said Moscow had dropped a glide bomb — weapons fixed with wings to help them fly over dozens of kilometers.
They are part of an arsenal developed by Russia to hit deeper into Ukrainian territory and stretch the front line.
Yarova is about eight kilometers (five miles) from the front line and had a pre-war population of around 1,900 people.
AFP journalists in eastern Ukraine saw mourners weeping outside a morgue where staff had laid out at least 13 corpses in black body bags.
Zelensky urged Ukraine’s allies to issue a response to the attack.
“A response is needed from the United States. A response is needed from Europe. A response is needed from the G20,” he said.

- ‘Strong actions’ -

“Strong actions are needed to make Russia stop bringing death,” Zelensky added, while the prosecutor general said it had opened a war crime investigation.
There was no immediate comment from Moscow or the Kremlin on the strike.
German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius meanwhile announced that Berlin would provide Ukraine with “several thousand long-range drones” to help it repel Russia’s invasion.
Germany was “expanding Ukraine’s capabilities to weaken Russia’s war machinery in the hinterland, providing an effective defense” by boosting support for the procurement of long-range drones, he added.
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent also said Tuesday that the United States is willing to take “strong measures against Russia” over Ukraine, but added that “our European partners must fully join us in this to be successful.”
US President Donald Trump has said he has tried to find a way to end the war in recent weeks, including threatening on Sunday to impose more sanctions on Russia, but has little to show for his efforts.
Following an EU-US meeting hosted by Bessent on Tuesday, Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko urged allies to further tighten sanctions that have cost the Russian economy billions of dollars.
“Only decisive measures can reduce Russia’s capacity to wage war and bring its daily atrocities and terror to an end,” she said on X.
In Ukraine, a spokesman for the postal network, Ukrposhta, confirmed that one of its vehicles was damaged in the attack and that its department head, identified as Yulia, had been hospitalized.
Ukrposhta, which delivers public services in front-line regions, said it would change how it distributes pensions and basic services there.
Russia has been steadily advancing in the eastern Donetsk region for months, concentrating its firepower on the territory and deploying troops from other parts of the front line, Kyiv has said.
Authorities in Donetsk have been appealing to civilians to flee the fighting since the early days of Russia’s invasion in February 2022.
Ukrainian commander-in-chief Oleksandr Syrsky said this week that Russian forces outnumbered Ukrainian troops threefold in some areas of the front, and by six times in regions where Moscow has concentrated its forces.
The strike comes just days after a Russian missile crashed into the Ukrainian government headquarters in central Kyiv, the first time the complex had been hit in the three-and-a-half-year war.
Tens of thousands of people have been killed and millions forced from their homes in Europe’s bloodiest conflict since World War II.

 

 


Streeting demands answers from Herzog as British Green Party leader calls for Israeli president’s arrest during UK visit

Streeting demands answers from Herzog as British Green Party leader calls for Israeli president’s arrest during UK visit
Updated 40 min 53 sec ago

Streeting demands answers from Herzog as British Green Party leader calls for Israeli president’s arrest during UK visit

Streeting demands answers from Herzog as British Green Party leader calls for Israeli president’s arrest during UK visit
  • Health Secretary Streeting appears to contradict former FM Lammy’s claim of no genocide in Gaza
  • Zack Polanski joins calls for ‘potential war criminal’ Herzog to be arrested over alleged war crimes in enclave

LONDON: Senior UK government ministers and MPs have clashed over whether Israel’s actions in Gaza amount to genocide ahead of Israeli President Isaac Herzog’s visit to London this week.

Health Secretary that Herzog “needs to answer the allegations of war crimes, of ethnic cleansing and of genocide that are being leveled at the government of Israel.”

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer will hold talks with Herzog in Downing Street on Wednesday.

Streeting added: “I think he (Herzog) needs to explain how, when we have seen so much evidence of the atrocities being perpetrated by the Israeli Army, how he can possibly claim that the IDF is the most moral army in the world. I think he should explain that, if it is not the intent of the government of Israel to perpetrate genocide or ethnic cleansing, how on Earth does he think his Israeli government is going to achieve its stated aim of clearing Palestinians out of Gaza without the war crimes, without ethnic cleansing, or even without genocide?”

Streeting said he had spoken last week to British doctors who had worked in Gaza, receiving “the most harrowing eyewitness testimony, one saying for weeks no food was allowed into Gaza, not even for babies.”

He added that the Hamas attacks on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, were “barbaric,” “immoral” and “inhumane” and that “not a single one of those atrocities and injustices committed on Oct. 7 can possibly be answered with a level of civilian, innocent loss and suffering that we’re seeing in Gaza, or indeed Israeli settler terrorism being perpetrated in the West Bank.”

The comments appear to contradict a letter from Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy, published on Tuesday, which stated that Israel had not committed genocide in Gaza.

The letter, sent last week before Lammy was replaced as foreign secretary, explained that the Genocide Convention defines genocide as acts committed with the specific “intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic racial or religious group” and added: “The government has not concluded that Israel is acting with that intent.”

Lammy also criticized the “catastrophic humanitarian situation” in Gaza, writing: “The high civilian casualties, including women and children, and the extensive destruction in Gaza, are utterly appalling. Israel must do much more to prevent and alleviate the suffering that this conflict is causing.”

A Downing Street spokesman said the letter “reflects the UK’s position that we’ve not come to any conclusion as to whether genocide has or has not been committed in Gaza” and stressed that it is for the International Court of Justice to make such determinations.

Meanwhile, the new Green Party leader Zack Polanski during his UK visit, accusing him of being part of the “Israeli government engaged in an ongoing genocide.”

Polanski, who is Jewish, said: “Welcoming a potential war criminal to the UK is another demonstration of how this Labour government is implicated in the ongoing genocide in Gaza. It also serves as a brutal insult to those mourning the thousands of innocent lives lost and to hundreds of thousands of Palestinians facing ongoing violence and hunger.”

He added that refusing to detain Herzog “can be seen as a contravention of the Geneva Convention.”

More than 60 MPs wrote to Starmer and new Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper asking whether Herzog’s visa is compatible with UK obligations under the Genocide Convention, noting the ICJ had determined Israel faces a “plausible risk of genocide” in Gaza.

Israel has denied that its actions amount to genocide.

The country struck and destroyed a high-rise building in Gaza City on Monday, claiming it was targeting Hamas observation posts, and maintains a naval blockade on the enclave.

It also confirmed it targeted Hamas leaders in the Qatari capital Doha on Tuesday, an attack widely condemned.

Meanwhile, Spain has banned ships and aircraft carrying weapons to Israel from its ports, describing the measures as antisemitic, though asserting that anyone participating directly in “genocide” in Gaza would be denied entry.

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas visited Downing Street on Monday to discuss Gaza and the pledge by Starmer to recognize a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly later this month if Israel does not change course.

A Downing Street spokesperson said both leaders agreed there would be “absolutely no role” for Hamas in future Palestinian governance.

They also discussed “the intolerable situation in Gaza” and the urgent need for a ceasefire, hostage releases, and humanitarian aid, with Starmer outlining “ongoing work with partners on a long-term solution … the only way to bring about enduring peace and stability for both Palestinians and Israelis.”


Police arrest 13-year-old boy with 23 guns over school shooting threats

Police arrest 13-year-old boy with 23 guns over school shooting threats
Updated 09 September 2025

Police arrest 13-year-old boy with 23 guns over school shooting threats

Police arrest 13-year-old boy with 23 guns over school shooting threats
  • Firearms were mounted on walls and handguns were found unsecured throughout the home, sheriff’s Deputy Carly Cappetto said
  • The boy’s parents said their son had no intention of harming anyone

WASHINGTON: A 13-year-old boy described by police as obsessed with school shooters was arrested on multiple firearms possession charges and causing a threat after they say they found social media posts about intentions to kill and seized 23 guns and ammunition from his home.
The boy pleaded not guilty to a total of five charges, four of them felonies, in juvenile court on Monday. He was arrested over the weekend in Washington’s Pierce County.
The boy’s name has not been released. It was not immediately known if he had a lawyer. Juvenile court records are generally confidential.
Firearms were mounted on walls and handguns were found unsecured throughout the home, sheriff’s Deputy Carly Cappetto said in a news release Monday.
“Several pieces of evidence from the suspect’s bedroom indicated he was obsessed with past school shooters and imitated similar behaviors with photos and inscriptions throughout his room,” she said. Loaded magazines with school shooter writings on them were removed.
“It appeared the suspect had everything ready to go to commit a mass shooting type of incident. It is unknown who or what the intended target was going to be, but it’s clear it was a matter of time before a tragic incident occurred,” Cappetto said.
The boy’s parents said their son had no intention of harming anyone. His mother, who attended the court hearing, suggested in an interview afterward that the social media posts were an attempt to “be cool” among peers, KOMO-TV reported.
Cappetto said the boy was last enrolled in the Franklin Pierce School District in 2021. He was currently unenrolled and was not currently an active student in any school district.