ÂÜÀòÊÓÆ”

Newly elected Reform UK councillors face scrutiny over Islamophobic social media posts

British MP and Reform UK party leader Nigel Farage arrives at Westminster Abbey to attend the Service of Thanksgiving as part of commemorations for the 80th anniversary of Victory in Europe (VE) Day in London, Britain, May 8, 2025. (Reuters)
British MP and Reform UK party leader Nigel Farage arrives at Westminster Abbey to attend the Service of Thanksgiving as part of commemorations for the 80th anniversary of Victory in Europe (VE) Day in London, Britain, May 8, 2025. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 10 May 2025

Newly elected Reform UK councillors face scrutiny over Islamophobic social media posts

Newly elected Reform UK councillors face scrutiny over Islamophobic social media posts
  • Party made major breakthrough at last week’s local elections
  • Campaign group: ‘They have yet to drop any of the candidates that have been exposed’

LONDON: Up to a dozen newly elected councillors from Reform UK have been accused of posting Islamophobic and far-right content on social media, .

It comes a week after the party made a major breakthrough in local elections across the country, winning 677 of the more than 1,600 contested seats.

Reform UK councillors at three country councils have shared social media content from Britain First, a far-right party known for its anti-Islam views.

Paul Harrison, who was elected to Leicestershire’s county council, retweeted and voted “yes” to an X poll asking if the UK should conduct mass deportations.

The post was accompanied by an image, generated by artificial intelligence, of Muslim men holding Pakistani flags.

Reform UK officials are facing greater scrutiny in the wake of the local elections, with many of the social media posts being revealed by counter-extremism campaign group Hope Not Hate.

Its director of campaigns, Georgie Laming, said: “(Party leader) Nigel Farage has claimed that Reform UK have the ‘most in-depth vetting procedure’ of any party. Our investigation shows that their processes leave much to be desired.

“Not only have they admitted using ‘AI techniques and other things’ to do the vetting, but Reform UK continue to shirk responsibility for their candidates’ online behaviour. They have yet to drop any of the candidates that have been exposed.”

The campaign group previously uncovered Islamophobic content posted by Reform candidates on social media, as well as far-right conspiracies and support for extremist figures including Tommy Robinson and David Irving.


S.Sudan opposition says misidentified prisoner as leader’s bodyguard

S.Sudan opposition says misidentified prisoner as leader’s bodyguard
Updated 22 September 2025

S.Sudan opposition says misidentified prisoner as leader’s bodyguard

S.Sudan opposition says misidentified prisoner as leader’s bodyguard
  • The opposition says Kiir is seeking to consolidate power and has effectively destroyed a 2018 power-sharing deal that ended a devastating five-year civil war in which some 400,000 people died

NAIROBI: South Sudan’s opposition said Saturday it had misidentified a prisoner in a photograph as a bodyguard of its leader who died in custody amid widespread arrests of their supporters.
In a statement, the opposition said the leader’s office had been given an old photo and wrongly believed it showed the death in custody of Luka Gathok Nyuon.
The opposition had previously identified Nyuon as a bodyguard to the opposition leader and ex-vice president Riek Machar.
“It has come to my attention that this photo was in fact taken few years back in Rumbek prison and does not... (show) our fallen comrade,” opposition SPLA-IO party spokesman Lam Paul Gabriel said in a statement, without giving details on the bodyguard’s current circumstances.
The statement on X said Nyuon “passed on in detention in Juba.”
The government of President Salva Kiir has locked up dozens of opposition members in recent months, accusing them of fomenting violence.
The opposition says Kiir is seeking to consolidate power and has effectively destroyed a 2018 power-sharing deal that ended a devastating five-year civil war in which some 400,000 people died.
Machar, Kiir’s long-time rival, has been stripped of his position as vice president in the unity government and will appear in court from Monday on charges of treason and crimes against humanity.
He is accused of coordinating an attack on a military base by the White Army, a militia group from his ethnic Nuer community, which his party denies.
His supporters accused the government of locking up more than 100 “officials and officers” from Machar’s entourage “under very harsh conditions including torture, starvation and denial of medical care.”
South Sudan, one of the poorest countries in the world, has suffered chronic instability since it became independent from Sudan in 2011.

 


Russian official says Ukrainian drones kill three, injure 16 in Crimea resort area

Russian official says Ukrainian drones kill three, injure 16 in Crimea resort area
Updated 10 min 38 sec ago

Russian official says Ukrainian drones kill three, injure 16 in Crimea resort area

Russian official says Ukrainian drones kill three, injure 16 in Crimea resort area
  • The Moscow-appointed head of Crimea said that a school in the town was also damaged and falling drone debris sparked fire
  • Russia annexed Crimea in 2014 in the aftermath of a popular uprising in Kyiv that prompted a Moscow-friendly president to flee 

A Ukrainian drone attack on a resort area of the Crimea peninsula killed three people and injured 16, the area’s top official said, in an attack denounced by Moscow.
Sergei Aksyonov, the Moscow-appointed head of Crimea, seized and annexed from Ukraine by Russia in 2014, gave the toll from the town of Faros in a Telegram post.
The Russian Defense Ministry said: “At about 19:30 Moscow time (1630 GMT) in the resort area of Crimea where there are no military targets whatsoever, the Ukrainian armed forces launched a terrorist strike using strike drones equipped with high-explosive payloads.”
The ministry described the incident as a “premeditated terrorist attack on a civilian target.”
Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova denounced the incident as “yet another act of terrorism by the Kyiv regime.
“And NATO and the European Union, when seeking the aggressor on the European continent, need to look into the mirror to see this,” she told the TASS news agency.
“They are the ones driving destabilization and the spread of terrorism in Europe by virtue of their sponsorship of the Kyiv regime and as supplier of arms to it.”
Ukrainian officials issued no comment on the incident and Reuters could not independently verify the report.
Aksyonov had earlier said that a school in the town was also damaged and falling drone debris sparked fires on open ground near Yalta along Crimea’s southern shore.
Mikhail Rozvozhayev, governor of Sevastopol, the home port of Russia’s Black Sea Fleet, wrote on Telegram that anti-aircraft units had downed three drones in the area.
Russia annexed and incorporated Crimea into its territory in 2014 in the aftermath of a popular uprising in Kyiv that prompted a Russia-friendly president to flee Ukraine.
Subtropical Crimea has been a popular holiday area since Soviet times for both tourists and the Soviet and the elite.
Krymsky Veter, an independent website devoted to Crimean affairs, said senior officials were likely staying in the region’s guest houses.
Foros gained international notoriety in 1991 when Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev was briefly detained at a government dacha, or country house, during a shortlived attempt by hard-liners to unseat him. 

 


‘Fast and furious’: H-1B workers abroad race to US as Trump order sparks dismay, confusion

‘Fast and furious’: H-1B workers abroad race to US as Trump order sparks dismay, confusion
Updated 22 September 2025

‘Fast and furious’: H-1B workers abroad race to US as Trump order sparks dismay, confusion

‘Fast and furious’: H-1B workers abroad race to US as Trump order sparks dismay, confusion
  • On the popular Chinese social media app Rednote, people on H-1B visas shared their experiences of having to rush back to the US — in some cases just hours after landing in China or another country

SAN FRANCISCO/NEW YORK: Panic, confusion and anger reigned as workers on H-1B visas from India and China were forced to abandon travel plans and rush back to the US after President Donald Trump imposed new visa fees, in line with his wide-ranging immigration crackdown.
Tech companies and banks sent urgent memos to employees, advising them to return before a deadline of 12:01 a.m. EDT on Sunday (0401 GMT), and telling them not to leave the country.
A White House official on Saturday clarified that the order applied only to new applicants and not holders of existing visas or those seeking renewals, addressing some of the confusion over who would be affected by the order.
But Trump’s proclamation a day before had already set off alarm bells in Silicon Valley.

RUSH BACK TO US
Fearing they would not be allowed back once the new rule took effect, several Indian nationals at San Francisco airport said they cut short vacations.
“It is a situation where we had to choose between family and staying here,” said an engineer at a large tech company whose wife had been on an Emirates flight from San Francisco to Dubai that was scheduled to depart at 5:05 p.m. local time on Friday (0005 GMT on Saturday)
The flight was delayed by more than three hours after several Indian passengers who received news of the order or memos from their employers demanded to deplane, said the person who spoke on condition of anonymity. At least five passengers were eventually allowed off, the engineer said.
A video of the incident was circulating on social media, showing a few people leaving the plane. Reuters could not independently verify the veracity of the video.
The engineer’s wife, also an H-1B visa holder, chose to head to India to care for her sick mother.
“It’s quite tragic. We have built a life here,” he told Reuters.
On the popular Chinese social media app Rednote, people on H-1B visas shared their experiences of having to rush back to the US — in some cases just hours after landing in China or another country.
“My feelings are a mix of disappointment, sadness, and frustration,” said one woman in a post with a user handle “Emily’s Life in NY.”
The woman said she had boarded a United Airlines flight from New York to Paris, and it started taxiing, but after some back-and-forth with the airline the captain agreed to return to the gate to let her off the aircraft.
Feeling what she described to Reuters as “shaken,” she canceled her trip to France, abandoning plans with friends, including some who were flying in from China, after she received a letter from her company’s lawyers asking employees abroad to return to the US
Companies including Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet and Goldman Sachs were among those that sent urgent emails to their employees with travel adviseries.
Amazon gave guidance to staff on Saturday, after clarity emerged on who would be impacted, that no action was required for staff currently holding H-1B visas, according to a source who had viewed an internal portal. Amazon did not immediately respond to a request for comment outside business hours.
As of Sunday, some of the panic had dissipated, said IBM Vice Chairman Gary Cohn, on CBS’s “Face the Nation” program.
“I think it caused a panic over the weekend because people weren’t sure what was going on with the existing H-1B visas,” said Cohn. “It’s been cleaned up over the weekend, so at this point, there’s not a panic in the system.”
Cohn praised the move as ultimately good for the economy.
“I actually think this is a good idea, if you understand the H-1B visa program in the United States,” Cohn said. “Historically, it has been a lottery system.”

TRUMP’S U-TURN ON H-1B
Since taking office in January, Trump has kicked off a wide-ranging immigration crackdown, including moves to limit some forms of legal immigration.
This step to reshape the H-1B visa program represents his administration’s most visible effort yet to rework temporary employment visas and underscores what critics have said is a protectionist agenda. It is a U-turn from Trump’s earlier stance when he sided with one-time ally and Tesla CEO Elon Musk in a public dispute over the use of the H-1B visa, saying he fully backed the program for foreign tech workers even though it was opposed by some of his supporters.
Trump administration officials say the visa allows companies to suppress wages, and curbing it opens more jobs for US tech workers. Supporters of the program argue that it brings in highly skilled workers essential to filling talent gaps and keeping firms competitive.
In the hours following Trump’s proclamation, social media was flooded with debate on the scope of the order and dismay at what many saw as a move that dimmed the United States’ allure as a work destination.
An anonymous user on Rednote said that their life was like that of an “H-1B slave.” The person cut short a holiday in Tokyo to rush back to the US, describing it as “a real-life ‘Fast & Furious’ return to the US,” a reference to the hit Hollywood film series about street racing.
Trump’s H-1B proclamation read: “Some employers, using practices now widely adopted by entire sectors, have abused the H-1B statute and its regulations to artificially suppress wages, resulting in a disadvantageous labor market for American citizens.”
The secretary of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem, could exempt petitioners from the fee at her discretion, the proclamation said.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Friday that companies would have to pay $100,000 per year for H-1B worker visas.
However, White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said in a post on X on Saturday that this was not an annual fee, only a one-time fee that applied to each petition.
A Nvidia engineer, who has lived in the US for 10 years, told Reuters at the San Francisco airport that he had been vacationing in Japan with his wife and infant when he rushed to reschedule his return flight after hearing the news.
“It feels surreal,” he said. “Everything is changing in an instant.”


French politicians bicker over Palestinian flags outside town halls

French politicians bicker over Palestinian flags outside town halls
Updated 21 September 2025

French politicians bicker over Palestinian flags outside town halls

French politicians bicker over Palestinian flags outside town halls
  • Eiffel Tower was to be lit up with a projection of both the Israeli and Palestinian flags, alongside a dove of peace, ahead of recognitizing Palestine

PARIS: French politicians bickered on Sunday over whether it is appropriate to hoist Palestinian flags outside town halls on the eve of the country’s planned recognition of the State of Palestine.
Ahead of the landmark move, set to be finalized at the United Nations General Assembly in New York starting Monday, the government told town halls not to fly the flag and take down any Palestinian banners that they had already put up.
Hard-line Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau argued that the hoisting of Palestinian flags “seriously undermines the principle of neutrality of public services.”
His office has urged local prefects to take the matter to the administrative courts — though they cannot order the police to take the flags down.
But Socialist leader Olivier Faure — whose party’s support France’s new government will likely need to survive — urged President Emmanuel Macron to allow mayors’ offices to fly the flag if they so wished.
“It would not only be a strong gesture toward all those committed to resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but consistent with France’s position internationally,” he said.
Faure argued Retailleau was playing politics to undermine Macron’s push for recognition.
“It is not the flag he (Retailleau) is against... It is the head of state’s decision to recognize a Palestinian state,” Faure told BFMTV Sunday evening.

‘Cheap community politics’

Boris Vallaud, the Socialist Party’s top lawmaker in the National Assembly, the lower house of France’s parliament, also pushed back against what he called Retailleau’s “incorrect” interpretation of neutrality.
He pointed out that town halls had “rightfully raised the Israeli flag” after Hamas’s October, 7 2023 attack that began the war in Gaza, while “there are also Ukrainian flags” on some buildings in the wake of Russia’s invasion.
“A flag on the front of town hall has never killed anyone, while in Gaza the Israeli army kills each day,” Greens leader Marine Tondelier told a Sunday pro-Palestinian rally in Paris.
But Philippe Ballard, a lawmaker with the far-right National Rally party, accused municipalities of practicing “cheap community politics” with the hoists, while his colleague Jean-Philippe Tanguy called the initiative “illegal.”
Even town halls on the left are divided over the issue.
The Socialist mayor of Creteil, outside of Paris, said that he would refuse Faure’s call as he had a responsibility to “preserve social cohesion.”
In the capital proper, the Eiffel Tower was to be lit up with a projection of both the Israeli and Palestinian flags — alongside a dove of peace — ahead of the recognition move, the mayor of Paris said.


Who recognizes the State of Palestine, who doesn’t, and why does it matter?

Who recognizes the State of Palestine, who doesn’t, and why does it matter?
Updated 21 September 2025

Who recognizes the State of Palestine, who doesn’t, and why does it matter?

Who recognizes the State of Palestine, who doesn’t, and why does it matter?
  • At least 144 countries out of 193 UN members already recognize the State of Palestine
  • Algeria became the first country to officially recognize a Palestinian state on November 15, 1988

PARIS: Britain, Australia and Canada on Sunday recognized a Palestinian state after nearly two years of war in the Gaza Strip, with France, Belgium and other countries poised to follow suit at the United Nations General Assembly in New York.
Here is an overview of diplomatic recognition of the state, which was unilaterally proclaimed by the Palestinian leadership in exile in 1988.
Of the territory claimed by the state, Israel currently occupies the West Bank and the Gaza Strip is largely in ruins.

Which countries recognize or will recognize the State of Palestine?

Answer: three-quarters of UN members.
According to an AFP tally, at least 144 countries out of 193 UN members already recognize the State of Palestine.
AFP has not yet obtained recent confirmation from three African countries.
The count includes Britain and Canada — the first G7 countries to do so — and Australia.
Portugal was expected to follow suit soon, and several other countries including France, Belgium, Luxembourg and Malta are expected to do the same during a summit on the future of the two-state solution chaired by France and ÂÜÀòÊÓÆ” on Monday at UN headquarters.
Russia, alongside all Arab countries, almost all African and Latin American countries, and most Asian countries including India and China are already on the list.
Algeria became the first country to officially recognize a Palestinian state on November 15, 1988, minutes after late Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) leader Yasser Arafat unilaterally proclaimed an independent Palestinian state.
Dozens of other countries followed suit in the following weeks and months, and another wave of recognitions came in late 2010 and early 2011.
The Israeli offensive in Gaza, which was sparked by the Palestinian Islamist organization Hamas’s attack in Israel on October 7, 2023, has already driven another 12 countries to recognize the state.

Who does not?

Answer: at least 46 countries, including Israel, the United States and their allies.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government completely rejects the idea of a Palestinian state.
Japan, South Korea and Singapore are the Asian countries that do not recognize Palestine.
Neither does Cameroon in Africa, Panama in Latin America and most countries in Oceania.
Europe is the most divided continent on the issue, and is split almost 50-50 over Palestinian statehood.
Until the mid-2010s, the only countries recognizing the State of Palestine apart from Turkiye were those of the former Soviet bloc.
Now, some former Eastern-bloc countries such as Hungary and the Czech Republic do not recognize a Palestinian state at a bilateral level.
Western and northern Europe were until now united in non-recognition, with the exception of Sweden, which extended recognition in 2014.
But the war in Gaza has upended things, with Norway, Spain, Ireland and Slovenia following in Sweden’s footsteps to recognize the state in 2024, before the United Kingdom did so on Sunday.
Italy and Germany do not plan on recognizing a Palestinian state.

What does recognition mean?

Romain Le Boeuf, a professor in international law at the University of Aix-Marseille in southern France, described recognition of Palestinian statehood as “one of the most complicated questions” in international law, “a little like a halfway point between the political and juridical.”
He told AFP states were free to choose the timing and form of recognition, with great variations that are either explicit or implicit.
According to Le Boeuf, there is no office to register recognitions.
“The Palestinian Authority in the West Bank puts all they consider to be acts of recognition on its own list, but from a purely subjective point of view. In the same way, other states will say that they have or have not recognized, but without really having to justify themselves,” he said.
However, there is one point on which international law is quite clear: “Recognition does not mean that a state has been created, no more than the lack of recognition prevents the state from existing.”
While recognition carries largely symbolic and political weight, three-quarters of countries say “that Palestine meets all the necessary conditions to be a state,” he said.
“I know for many people this seems only symbolic, but actually in terms of symbolism, it is sort of a game changer,” lawyer and Franco-British law professor Philippe Sands wrote in the New York Times in mid-August 2025.
“Because once you recognize Palestinian statehood... you essentially put Palestine and Israel on level footing in terms of their treatment under international law.”