Ƶ

Trial of former President Sarkozy sheds light on France’s back-channel talks with Libya’s Qaddafi

Trial of former President Sarkozy sheds light on France’s back-channel talks with Libya’s Qaddafi
Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi welcomes French President Nicolas Sarkozy at the Bab Azizia Palace in Tripoli, Jul. 25, 2007. (AP/File)
Updated 19 May 2025

Trial of former President Sarkozy sheds light on France’s back-channel talks with Libya’s Qaddafi

Trial of former President Sarkozy sheds light on France’s back-channel talks with Libya’s Qaddafi

French families of victims of a 1989 plane bombing told the court about their shock and sense of betrayal
During the trial, Sarkozy has said he has “never ever betrayed” families of victims

PARIS: The monthslong trial of former French President Nicolas Sarkozy over the alleged illegal financing of his 2007 presidential campaign is shedding light on France’s back-channel talks with the government of then-Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi.
Family members of terrorist attacks sponsored by Qaddafi’s regime have told the court they suspect that Sarkozy was willing to sacrifice the memories of their loved ones in order to normalize ties with Libya almost two decades ago.
French prosecutors on Thursday requested a seven-year prison sentence for the 70-year-old former leader. Sarkozy, who was president from 2007 to 2012, has denied all wrongdoing.
The trial, which started in January, is to continue until April 8, with Sarkozy’s lawyers to plead on the last day. The verdict is expected at a later date.
Some key moments in the trial have focused on talks between France and Libya in the 2000s, when Qaddafi was seeking to restore diplomatic ties with the West. Before that, Libya was considered a pariah state for having sponsored attacks.
French families of victims of a 1989 plane bombing told the court about their shock and sense of betrayal as the trial questioned whether promises possibly made to Qaddafi’s government were part of the alleged corruption deal.
The Lockerbie and UTA flight bombings
In 1988, a bomb planted aboard a Pam Am flight exploded while the plane was over the Scottish town of Lockerbie, killing 270 people from 21 countries, including 190 Americans.
The following year, on Sept. 19, 1989, the bombing of UTA flight 772 over Niger killed 170 people, including 54 French nationals on board, after an in-flight explosion caused by a suitcase bomb.
Both French and US investigations have tied both bombings to Libya, whose government had engaged in long-running hostilities with the US and other Western governments.
Now, families of victims are wondering whether French government officials close to Sarkozy promised to forget about the bombings in exchange for business opportunities with the oil-rich nation and possibly, an alleged corruption deal.
“What did they do with our dead?” Nicoletta Diasio, the daughter of a man who died in the bombing, has told the court, saying she wondered if the memories of the victims “could have been used for bartering” in talks between France and Libya.
During the trial, Sarkozy has said he has “never ever betrayed” families of victims. “I have never traded their fate for any compromise, nor pact of realpolitik,” he said.
Libya’s push to restore ties with the West
Libya was long a pariah state for its involvement in the 1980s bombings.
In 2003, it took responsibility for both the 1988 and 1989 plane bombings and agreed to pay billions in compensation to the victims’ families.
Qaddafi also announced he was dismantling his nuclear weapons program, which led to the lifting of international sanctions against the country.
Britain, France and other Western countries sought to restore a relationship with Libya for security, diplomatic and business purposes.
In 2007, Sarkozy welcomed Qaddafi to Paris with honors for a five-day official visit, allowing him to set up a bedouin tent near the Elysee presidential palace. Many French people still remember that gesture, feeling Sarkozy went too far to please a dictator.
Sarkozy said during the trial he would have preferred to “do without” Qaddafi’s visit at the time but it came as a diplomatic gesture after Libya’s release of Bulgarian nurses who were imprisoned and facing death sentences for a crime they said they did not commit.
Bulgarian nurses
On July 24, 2007, under an accord partially brokered by first lady Cecilia Sarkozy and EU officials, Libya released the five Bulgarian nurses and a Palestinian doctor.
The medics, who had spent over eight years in prison, faced death sentence on charges they deliberately infected hundreds of children with the AIDS virus in the late 1990s — an allegation they denied.
The release of the medics removed the last major obstacle to Libya’s rejoining the international community.
Sarkozy traveled to the capital, Tripoli, for talks with Qaddafi the day after the medics were returned to Bulgaria on a French presidential plane.
In court has spoken of his “pride to have saved those six persons.”
“If you did not discuss with Qaddafi, you’d not get the release of the nurses,” he said.
Libya’s spy chief at heart of questions
Accused of masterminding the attack on UTA Flight 772, Qaddafi’s brother-in-law and intelligence chief Abdullah Al-Senoussi was convicted in absentia to a life sentence by a Paris court in 1999 for the attack.
An international arrest warrant was issued for him and five other suspects.
Financial prosecutors have accused Sarkozy of having promised to lift the arrest warrant targeting Al-Senoussi in exchange for alleged campaign financing.
In 2005, people close to Sarkozy, who was at the time the interior minister, including his chief of staff Claude Guéant and junior minister Brice Hortefeux, traveled to Tripoli, where they met with Al-Senoussi.
Both Guéant and Hortefeux have told the court that it was a “surprise” meeting they were not aware of beforehand.
Al-Senoussi told investigative judges that millions of dollars were provided to support Sarkozy’s campaign. Accused of war crimes, he is now imprisoned in Libya.
Sarkozy has strongly denied that.
Qaddafi’s son accusations
Qaddafi’s son, Seif Al-Islam, told the French news network RFI in January that he was personally involved in giving Sarkozy 5 million dollars in cash.
Seif Al-Islam sent RFI radio a two-page statement on his version of events. It was the first time he talked to the media about the case since 2011.
He said Sarkozy initially “received $2.5 million from Libya to finance his electoral campaign” during the 2007 presidential election, in return for which Sarkozy would “conclude agreements and carry out projects in favor of Libya.”
He said a second payment of $2.5 million in cash was handed over without specifying when it was given.
According to him, Libyan authorities expected that in return, Sarkozy would end a legal case about the 1989 UTA Flight 771 attack — including removing his name from an international warrant notice.
Sarkozy strongly denied those allegations.
“You’ll never find one Libyan euro, one Libyan cent in my campaign,” he said at the opening of the trial in January. “There’s no corruption money because there was no corruption.”
Sarkozy turning his back to Qaddafi
The Libyan civil war started in February 2011, with army units and militiamen loyal to Qaddafi opposing rebels.
Sarkozy was the first Western leader to take a public stance to support the rebellion.
On Feb. 25, 2011, he said the violence by pro-Qaddafi forces was unacceptable and should not go unpunished. “Qaddafi must go,” he said at the time.
On March 10 that year, France was the first country in the world to recognize the National Transitional Council as the legitimate government of Libya.
“That was the Arab Spring,” Sarkozy told the court. “Qaddafi was the only dictator who had sent (military) aircrafts against his people. He had promised rivers of blood, that’s his expression.”
Muammar Qaddafi was killed by opposition fighters in Oct. 2011, ending his four-decade rule of the North African country.


France braces for disruption on day of anti-Macron ‘anger’

France braces for disruption on day of anti-Macron ‘anger’
Updated 6 sec ago

France braces for disruption on day of anti-Macron ‘anger’

France braces for disruption on day of anti-Macron ‘anger’
  • Unions vow mass protests, public transport set to be paralyzed in places due to strikes
  • Officials warn of possible disturbances by extremist elements
PARIS: France was bracing on Thursday for a day of nationwide disruption in a show of anger over President Emmanuel Macron’s budget policies, with unions vowing mass protests, public transport set to be paralyzed in places due to strikes and officials warning of possible disturbances by extremist elements.
Prime Minister Sebastien Lecornu, Macron’s seventh head of government, took office last week, vowing a break from the past against the background of an ongoing political crisis.
But the appointment of the former defense minister has failed to assuage the anger of unions and the left.
They remain incensed about the draft €44 billion ($52 billion) cost-saving budget of his predecessor Francois Bayrou, despite Lecornu’s pledges to abolish both the life-long privileges of prime ministers and a widely detested plan to scrap two public holidays.
Strike action on Thursday will see around a third of teachers walk out, nine out of 10 pharmacies shuttered and severe disruption on the Paris Metro, where only the three driverless automated lines will work normally.
It is expected to be the most widely followed day of union-led protests and strikes since the months-long mobilization in early 2023 against Macron’s controversial pension reform, which the government eventually rammed through parliament without a vote.
“We feel that our colleagues were not fooled by the appointment of Sebastien Lecornu,” which “did not calm the anger,” said Sophie Venetitay, general secretary of Snes-FSU, the leading union for middle and high school teachers.
While the day of protest represents an early test of crisis management for Lecornu, anger is crystallizing against Macron, who has just one-and-a-half years left in power and is enduring his worst-ever popularity levels.
The “obstacle” to revoking the pension reform – still vehemently opposed by the unions – lies “in the Elysee Palace,” said the head of the CGT union Sophie Binet.
‘Very, very strong’ mobilization
Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau said he expected a “very, very strong” mobilization on Thursday, describing it as a “hybrid day,” with the risk of sabotage actions from ultra-left groups from early morning and the mass sanctioned protests in the day.
“We will respond with massive resources and clear orders,” he told BFM-TV, saying more than 80,000 police officers and gendarmes would be deployed, backed by drones, armored vehicles and water cannons.
Between 600,000 and 900,000 people are expected to take to the streets nationwide, according to an interior ministry estimate.
Paris Police Chief Laurent Nunez said on Wednesday that he was “very concerned” about the risk that rioters intent on provoking fights and damage would infiltrate the union march in Paris, urging shops in the center to close for the day and protect their storefronts.
A more informal day of action held on September 10, despite isolated disruption, did not succeed however on its self-declared aim to “block everything.”
Most high-speed trains in France are still expected to run on Thursday while disruption to airlines should be minimal after air-traffic controllers postponed a strike but warned of a three-day action in early October.

US judge orders pro-Palestinian protest leader Khalil deported to Algeria or Syria

US judge orders pro-Palestinian protest leader Khalil deported to Algeria or Syria
Updated 52 min 7 sec ago

US judge orders pro-Palestinian protest leader Khalil deported to Algeria or Syria

US judge orders pro-Palestinian protest leader Khalil deported to Algeria or Syria
  • Court filing: Mahmoud Khalil failed to disclose information on his green card application

WASHINGTON: A judge in the southern US state of Louisiana has ordered prominent pro-Palestinian protest leader Mahmoud Khalil to be deported to Algeria or Syria after failing to disclose information on his green card application, according to court documents filed Wednesday

“It is hereby further ordered that Respondent be Removed from the United States to Algeria, or in the alternative to Syria,” Judge Jamee Comans wrote in a court filing.

The order dated September 12 by the immigration judge asserted the lack of full disclosure on Khalil’s green card application “was not an oversight by an uninformed, uneducated applicant... rather, this Court finds that Respondent willfully misrepresented material fact(s).”

Khalil, in a statement to the American Civil Liberties Union, said in response to the order: “It is no surprise that the Trump administration continues to retaliate against me for my exercise of free speech.”

“Their latest attempt, through a kangaroo immigration court, exposes their true colors once again.”

Khalil, a legal permanent resident in the United States who is married to a US citizen and has a US-born son, was detained by immigration for three months beginning in March and faced potential deportation.

A former Columbia University student who was one of the most visible leaders of nationwide pro-Palestinian campus protests, he was released from custody in June, but faced continued threats of deportation from federal authorities.


Black student’s body found hanging from tree in Mississippi

Black student’s body found hanging from tree in Mississippi
Updated 18 September 2025

Black student’s body found hanging from tree in Mississippi

Black student’s body found hanging from tree in Mississippi
  • Campus police chief Michael Peeler called the death an “isolated incident” and said there was no active threat to students or faculty

WASHINGTON: A Black college student was found dead hanging from a tree on a university campus in Mississippi this week, prompting calls from civil rights advocates for a thorough investigation, as authorities say there was no evidence of foul play.
Demartravion “Trey” Reed, 21, was found dead early on Monday near the pickleball courts on Delta State University’s campus in Cleveland, Mississippi, according to campus police.
Campus police chief Michael Peeler called the death an “isolated incident” and said there was no active threat to students or faculty.
The university said multiple law enforcement agencies were assisting in the probe into the death. The FBI said in a statement that it was prepared to investigate, “if, during the course of the local investigation, information comes to light of a potential federal violation.”
The local coroner’s office said there was no evidence to suggest that Reed was physically attacked or assaulted before his death and that further information would be shared “once the autopsy results are finalized.”
Reed’s body was sent to the Mississippi State Crime Lab for an official autopsy report.
While investigators have said they found no evidence of foul play, Reed’s death prompted calls for transparency among advocates, who noted Mississippi’s history of lynching and racially motivated violence in the 19th and 20th centuries.
Mississippi Democratic US Representative Bennie Thompson called for a federal probe into Reed’s death.
“We must leave no stone unturned in the search for answers. While the details of this case are still emerging, we cannot ignore Mississippi’s painful history of lynching and racial violence against African Americans,” the lawmaker said in a statement.
Civil rights attorney Ben Crump, who has handled some of the highest profile police killings of Black Americans, has been retained by Reed’s family. Crump said on X the family “cannot accept vague conclusions when so many questions remain.”
“I stand with this family, and I will lead a team of civil rights leaders and organizations in pursuing transparency and answers for Trey’s family,” Crump said. The family is seeking an independent autopsy.
Delta State University’s enrollment last year stood at over 2,600 students, more than 40 percent of whom were Black.


Against the tide: Filipinos battle rising sea on sinking island

Against the tide: Filipinos battle rising sea on sinking island
Updated 18 September 2025

Against the tide: Filipinos battle rising sea on sinking island

Against the tide: Filipinos battle rising sea on sinking island
  • Study blames gradual sinking on overextraction of groundwater, exacerbated by rising sea levels due to global warming
  • Says concerted effort by world’s highly industrialized countries in reducing greenhouse gas emissions needed to address the rise of sea levels

BULACAN, Philippines: On the Philippine island of Pugad, street food vendor Maria Tamayo wakes before her grandchildren to begin the backbreaking work of removing seawater from her home scoop by scoop with a plastic dustpan.
The routine has been the same ever since the rising tides of Manila Bay began swallowing the island — a seven-hectare speck of land in danger of sinking completely underwater.
“Scooping water takes a long time. That’s why my feet have started aching,” the 65-year-old said, adding that she can spend up to three hours a day at the task.
“I have to scoop out the water before my grandchildren wake up, or else they’ll slip on the floor. But it’s no use ... there’s still water.”
Tamayo is one of 2,500 people living in Pugad’s only village.
The island is not the only one at risk in coastal Bulacan. Parts of the province are sinking at a rate of almost 11 centimeters (4.3 inches) a year, the fastest in the Philippines, according to a study led by geologist Mahar Lagmay.
The gradual sinking, known as land subsidence, is an “alarming” phenomenon caused by the overextraction of groundwater, and exacerbated by rising sea levels due to global warming, Lagmay said.
“The rates of subsidence (on Pugad Island) are quite high,” he said, adding that while studies specific to the tiny island were lacking, existing data on surrounding areas told the story clearly.

This photo taken on August 21, 2025, shows workers unloading sandbags at a construction site outside a church on a flooded street on Isla Pugad in Hagonoy town, Bulacan province, north of Manila. (AFP)

With high tides flooding the streets at least three times a week, the sea already dictates the rhythm of daily life on Pugad.
Class schedules are adjusted daily based on tide charts to prevent children from contracting flood-borne diseases.
Homes have been raised on stilts to keep floors dry, while small business owners use high tables to keep their wares above murky water that can rise to 1.5 meters (five feet) on heavy flooding days.

‘Back to normal’ impossible

Sea levels across the Philippines are already rising three times faster than the global average of 3.6 millimeters per year, and the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) has said this could accelerate to 13 millimeters annually.
“Sea level rise is being experienced in many parts of the country,” DENR geosciences chief Karlo Queano told AFP, warning coastal areas could disappear without large-scale intervention.
While piecemeal efforts are in place in some areas — groundwater extraction has been banned in parts of Bulacan since 2004 — a broad national strategy has yet to take shape.
A government study on the path forward was not expected until 2028, Queano said.
“I think it’s already impossible for our lives in the village to go back to normal because of climate change,” said Pugad village captain Jaime Gregorio.
Gregorio said roads were being raised every three years to keep the community viable, but leadership changes meant the implementation of long-term flood mitigation projects was rarely consistent.
For Tamayo, who has lived on the island her whole life, the constant adjustment to the tide has drained what little money her family has scraped together.
Since 2022, they have been elevating their house each year, adding more gravel and concrete to stay above water, so far spending 200,000 pesos ($3,500).
“I love this island so much, this was where my mom and dad raised me... but sometimes, I think about leaving because of the high tide,” Tamayo told AFP.

This photo taken on August 21, 2025, shows resident Raymart Tamayo (R) and his son Rodolfo (C) walking in the kitchen of their flooded house on Isla Pugad in Hagonoy town, Bulacan province, north of Manila. (AFP)

Her boatman husband, Rodolfo Tamayo, insists their livelihood depends on staying.
“We can’t go to [other places], we won’t have jobs there. We will go hungry.”
Lagmay, the geologist, said land subsidence could be reversible with effective government policies governing the over-digging of wells.
But addressing the rise of sea levels was impossible without a concerted effort by the world’s highly industrialized countries to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, he said.
A UN climate fund established in 2023 to help countries like the Philippines address damage caused by climate change, meanwhile, remains unimplemented.
“We are talking of climate justice here. We have very little contribution to climate change, but we are very affected by its adverse effects,” said Elenida Basug, the DENR’s climate change service director.
Crouching in the doorway of her flooded home, Tamayo urged the world’s polluters to take responsibility for what she and her neighbors were experiencing.
“We are the ones who are suffering... They are rich, so we cannot do anything. Even if we speak against them, who would listen?” Tamayo said.


Trump says he’ll designate antifa as a terrorist group but offers few details

Trump says he’ll designate antifa as a terrorist group but offers few details
Updated 18 September 2025

Trump says he’ll designate antifa as a terrorist group but offers few details

Trump says he’ll designate antifa as a terrorist group but offers few details
  • Antifa, short for short for “anti-fascists,” is an umbrella term for far-left-leaning militant groups and is not a singular entity

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump said early Thursday that he plans to designate antifa as a “major terrorist organization.”
Antifa, short for short for “anti-fascists,” is an umbrella term for far-left-leaning militant groups and is not a singular entity. They consist of groups that resist fascists and neo-Nazis, especially at demonstrations.
It’s unclear how the administration would label what is effectively a decentralized movement as a terrorist organization, and the White House on Wednesday did not immediately offer more details.
Trump, who is on a state visit to the United Kingdom, made the announcement in a social media post shortly before 1:30 a.m. Thursday local time. He called antifa a “SICK, DANGEROUS, RADICAL LEFT DISASTER.” He also said he will be “strongly recommending” that funders of antifa be investigated.
Antifa is a domestic entity and, as such, is not a candidate for inclusion on the State Department’s list of foreign terror organizations. Dozens of groups, including extremist organizations like the Islamic State and Al-Qaeda, are included on that list. The designation matters in part because it enables the Justice Department to prosecute those who give material support to entities on that list even if that support does not result in violence.
There is no domestic equivalent to that list in part because of broad First Amendment protections enjoyed by organizations operating within the United States. And despite periodic calls, particularly after mass shootings by white supremacists, to establish a domestic terrorism law, no singular statute now exists.
In an exchange with reporters in the Oval Office on Monday, Trump said he would pursue a domestic terrorism designation for antifa if such a move had the support of Attorney General Pam Bondi and others in his Cabinet.
“It’s something I would do, yeah,” Trump said. ”I would do that 100 percent. Antifa is terrible.”
Wednesday night, Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-Louisiana, praised Trump’s announcement, saying: “Antifa seized upon a movement of legitimate grievances to promote violence and anarchy, working against justice for all. The President is right to recognize the destructive role of Antifa by designating them domestic terrorists.” In July 2019, Cassidy and Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, introduced a resolution in the Senate to condemn the violent acts of antifa and to designate the group a domestic terror organization.
In 2020, in the midst of the George Floyd protests, Trump also raised the idea of designating antifa as a terror organization.
Trump’s previous FBI director, Christopher Wray, said in testimony that year that antifa is an ideology, not an organization, lacking the hierarchical structure that would usually allow it to be designated as a terror group by the federal government.