Ƶ

Trump says ‘Golden Dome’ free for Canada — if it joins US

US President Donald Trump speaks about the Golden Dome missile defense shield, in the Oval Office of the White House on May 20, 2025, in Washington, DC. (AFP)
US President Donald Trump speaks about the Golden Dome missile defense shield, in the Oval Office of the White House on May 20, 2025, in Washington, DC. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 28 May 2025

Trump says ‘Golden Dome’ free for Canada — if it joins US

Trump says ‘Golden Dome’ free for Canada — if it joins US
  • “I told Canada, which very much wants to be part of our fabulous Golden Dome System, that it will cost $61 Billion Dollars if they remain a separate, but unequal, Nation,” Trump posted on his Truth Social network

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump said Tuesday that Canada could join his proposed “Golden Dome” missile defense system for free — but only if it becomes part of the United States.
Otherwise it would cost Canada $61 billion to be part of the system, said Trump, who has repeatedly called for the United States’ northern neighbor to become the 51st state.
Canada has expressed interest in joining the missile system — plans for which Trump unveiled last week to defend against a wide array of enemy weapons — but has firmly rejected any loss of sovereignty.
“I told Canada, which very much wants to be part of our fabulous Golden Dome System, that it will cost $61 Billion Dollars if they remain a separate, but unequal, Nation,” Trump posted on his Truth Social network.
“But (it) will cost ZERO DOLLARS if they become our cherished 51st State. They are considering the offer!“
There was no immediate response from Canada to Trump’s claims.
Trump announced plans for the “Golden Dome” system a week ago, saying it would eventually cost around $175 billion and would be operational by the end of his term in 2029.
Experts say the scheme faces huge technical and political challenges, and could cost far more than he has estimated to achieve its goals.
Trump also said at the time that Canada was interested in joining the missile system. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney then confirmed that his country had held “high level” talks on the issue.
NATO members Canada and the United States are partners in continental defense through the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD).
But the scheme now seems set to add to the tensions that Trump has sparked with Canada.
Carney politely but firmly dismissed Trump’s calls for Canada to become part of the United States when he visited the White House earlier this month, saying his country was “never for sale.”
The Canadian premier and Trump did however appear to smooth over some of the strains over the tariffs that the US president has slapped on Ottawa.


More African nations are receiving third-country immigrants deported by US. Here’s what to know

More African nations are receiving third-country immigrants deported by US. Here’s what to know
Updated 18 sec ago

More African nations are receiving third-country immigrants deported by US. Here’s what to know

More African nations are receiving third-country immigrants deported by US. Here’s what to know
  • Ghanaian authorities said on Monday that the 14 deportees received last week have been returned to their home countries

DAKAR, Senegal: The West African nation of Ghana is the latest in a growing list of African countries that have received third-country nationals deported by the US or agreed to receive them, a controversial approach whose legality lawyers for the deportees have questioned.
Other African nations that have received such deportees from the US include Eswatini, Rwanda and South Sudan. Uganda has agreed to a deal with the US to take certain deported immigrants, although it is yet to receive any.
Experts have said some African countries may seek to facilitate the deportation programs in order to earn goodwill in negotiations with the Trump administration on policies such as trade, migration and aid.
Ghanaian authorities said on Monday that the 14 deportees received last week have been returned to their home countries. They defended the decision on humanitarian grounds, although lawyers for the migrants say the deportation violated international human rights law and rights of the deportees.
Deportees were sent to Ghana at short notice
The immigrants the US government deported to Ghana included 13 Nigerians and one Gambian. None of them were originally from Ghana.
It was not immediately clear when they arrived in Ghana. Court documents show they were awoken in the middle of the night on Sept. 5 and not told where they were going until hours into the flight on a US military cargo plane.
Some of the deportees had no ties with the country, nor did they designate it as a potential country of removal, according to the lawsuit they filed in US through their lawyers.
Ghana says it can only receive fellow West Africans
Ghana’s Foreign Minister Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa said his country accepted the deportees “purely on humanitarian principle” and because they were fellow West Africans.
“We just could not continue to take the suffering of our fellow West Africans,” Ablakwa said. “So we thought that since there was a vacuum in West Africa, we should step in as part of our Pan-African credentials to take care of West Africans,” he said, suggesting that Ghana agreed to the request because some other West African nations had rejected the request to receive third-country deportees.
The current status of the deportees
Ghana’s Minister for Government Communications Felix Kwakye Ofosu told the AP on Monday that the 14 migrants “have since left for their home countries,” without providing further details.
As of last week, the arrangement was for a bus to transport the Nigerians back home, a journey that typically takes seven to eight hours, Ghanaian President John Mahama, told reporters at the time.
Nigerian officials said they were not briefed by either Ghana or US about the deportations, and expressed shock that the Nigerians were sent to other countries when some citizens have been deported directly from US to Nigeria.
“What we have only rejected is deportation of other nationals into Nigeria,” Kimebi Imomotimi Ebienfa, a spokesperson for Nigeria’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, told AP.
Latin American countries have also taken deported immigrants
Many of the countries that have agreed to such deportation deals are in Latin America and Africa.
The US has sent hundreds of Venezuelans to a notorious prison in El Salvador. Venezuelans and immigrants from Afghanistan, Russia, Iran, China and other countries have also been sent to Costa Rica and Panama.
Last month, Paraguay signed a third-country agreement with the Trump administration. Mexico has not signed such an agreement, but has accepted deportees from Central America and other Western Hemisphere countries, including Cuba, Haiti and Venezuela.
Human rights concerns
The Trump administration’s deportation program has faced widespread criticism from human rights experts who cite international protections for asylum-seekers and question whether immigrants will be appropriately screened before being deported.
A lawyer representing the Gambian sent to Ghana told the AP the deportee and several others had an order prohibiting their return for fear of torture in their countries.
Rights groups have also argued that most of the African countries that have received such deportees have one thing in common: A poor human rights record, with government critics often targeted.
The immigrants deported to Ghana were detained there in “abysmal and deplorable” conditions after being held in “straitjackets” for 16 hours on the flight, according to the US lawsuit filed by lawyers for some of them.
Ghanaian authorities denied the claim about detention conditions and said they had no knowledge of the situation of the deportees as they flew to Ghana.
Sending the deportees to their countries despite the legal orders prohibiting such over fear of their safety is “a clear violation of the duties both countries have” to protect the migrants amid such risks, said Maureen A. Sweeney, immigration lawyer and professor of law at the University of Maryland Carey School of Law.
“This is part of a pattern by the US government of extreme indifference (at least) to the government’s obligations and to the human consequences of its mass deportation campaign,” Sweeney said.

 


Kyrgyzstan opens first Islamic academy to counter ‘extremism’

Kyrgyzstan opens first Islamic academy to counter ‘extremism’
Updated 6 min 55 sec ago

Kyrgyzstan opens first Islamic academy to counter ‘extremism’

Kyrgyzstan opens first Islamic academy to counter ‘extremism’
  • Authorities in the region stepped up efforts to counter radicalization after thousands of their citizens joined terrorist groups in the Middle East during the rise of Daesh in 2013-2015

BISHKEK, Kyrgyzstan: Kyrgyzstan on Monday opened its first state Islamic academy, the latest measure by the secular majority-Muslim country in its attempts to control the influence of religion and combat extremism.
Former Soviet republics across Central Asia are trying to manage a resurgence in Islam that has taken off since the break-up of the Soviet Union, which had imposed state atheism.
Authorities in Kyrgyzstan said the new academy, which can accommodate 400 students in the northern city of Tokmok, meets the “growing need for objective religious education.”
Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov said that the growing threat of religious extremism both worldwide and in Central Asia “directly undermines national security and contributes to the spread of ideologies based on violence.”
Authorities in the region stepped up efforts to counter radicalization after thousands of their citizens joined terrorist groups in the Middle East during the rise of Daesh in 2013-2015.
Kyrgyzstan, like other states in Central Asia, has banned the wearing of the niqab, the Islamic full-face veil, and allows men to sport only short beards.
Earlier this year, Bishkek announced plans to limit the construction of mosques after closing dozens of them, mainly in the more religious south of the country.

 


Brazilian officials yet to receive US visas for UN assembly

Brazilian officials yet to receive US visas for UN assembly
Updated 35 min 10 sec ago

Brazilian officials yet to receive US visas for UN assembly

Brazilian officials yet to receive US visas for UN assembly
  • Foreign ministry official Marcelo Marotta said a refusal to grant the visas would be a “legal violation” by the US

BRASILIA: Brazilian officials have yet to receive visas to attend the UN General Assembly in New York next week, the foreign ministry said Monday, as trade and diplomatic ties with Washington remain strained.
The trial and conviction of Brazil’s far-right former president Jair Bolsonaro angered his ally Donald Trump, the US president who has already slapped a 50-percent tariff on Brazilian imports.
“We have received information from the US government that the visas have not yet been granted. They are being processed,” foreign ministry official Marcelo Marotta Viegas told a press conference.
He said a refusal to grant the visas would be a “legal violation” by the United States.
Viegas did not say how many visas were pending approval.
“It’s concerning,” Stephane Dujarric, spokesman for United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, said of the visa delay.
Bolsonaro was sentenced last week to 27 years in prison for a botched coup attempt.
Aside from the tariffs, Washington has also revoked the visas of several Brazilian Supreme Court judges and a government minister.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Monday that further US action could be expected to pressure Brazil over Bolsonaro’s conviction.
“We’ll have some announcements in the next week or so about what additional steps we intend to take,” Rubio told Fox News from Jerusalem on Monday.


Nepal picks three with reformist credentials for interim Cabinet

Nepal picks three with reformist credentials for interim Cabinet
Updated 15 September 2025

Nepal picks three with reformist credentials for interim Cabinet

Nepal picks three with reformist credentials for interim Cabinet
  • Karki, 73, who formally took office on Sunday, tasked with holding national elections on March 5, has asked officials to start rebuilding public structures destroyed in the protests

KATMANDU: Nepal’s interim Prime Minister Sushila Karki unveiled Cabinet roles on Monday for three figures with reformist and anti-graft credentials to lead the Himalayan nation after deadly violence led to parliament’s dissolution.

A former chief justice, Karki became the first woman to lead the country last week, after nationwide anti-graft protests killed at least 72 people, and forced the resignation of Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli.

The Finance Ministry will be headed by Rameshwore Prasad Khanal, the president’s office said in a statement, adding that he had been sworn in by President Ramchandra Paudel.

A former finance secretary, Khanal led a panel that recently recommended key economic reforms.

The Energy Ministry goes to former state power utility chief Kulman Ghising, the office said. When in office, the engineer had combated the scourge of load-shedding in the mountainous nation.

The home (interior) minister will be Om Prakash Aryal, a human rights lawyer and adviser to the mayor of Katmandu, the capital, who launched legal battles on various issues of public interest.

Nepal’s worst protests in decades were led by the “Gen Z” group opposing widespread corruption. The unrest and acts of arson and vandalism that followed injured more than 2,100.

Karki, 73, who formally took office on Sunday, tasked with holding national elections on March 5, has asked officials to start rebuilding public structures destroyed in the protests.

These included the complex housing the prime minister’s office and other ministries, along with the supreme court and the parliament building. The homes of political party leaders, such as Paudel and Oli, were also targeted. Also set on fire were shopping malls, hotels and other businesses.


South Sudan opposition calls for mobilization of forces for ‘regime change’

South Sudan opposition calls for mobilization of forces for ‘regime change’
Updated 36 min 23 sec ago

South Sudan opposition calls for mobilization of forces for ‘regime change’

South Sudan opposition calls for mobilization of forces for ‘regime change’
  • South Sudan gained independence from Sudan in 2011 but was quickly plunged into a devastating conflict between Kiir and Machar

JUBA: South Sudan’s opposition on  Monday called for an armed mobilization to carry out “regime change” in response to plans to put its leader on trial for treason and crimes against humanity.
A fragile power-sharing deal between President Salva Kiir and his long-time rival, Riek Machar, has been unraveling for months, threatening to return the young nation to a civil war that left 400,000 dead in the 2010s.
On Thursday, Machar was charged with murder, treason and crimes against humanity and stripped of his position as first vice president in the unity government, having already spent months under house arrest.

BACKGROUND

A fragile power-sharing deal between President Salva Kiir and his long-time rival, Riek Machar, has been unraveling for months.

He was accused of ordering an ethnic militia’s attack on a military base in March that the government said killed more than 250 soldiers.
Machar’s faction denies the charges and says they are part of Kiir’s efforts to sideline the opposition and consolidate power.
“The current regime ... is a setup of dictatorship, peace spoilers and state capture that is holding power illegally and by violence,” his party said in a statement, signed by acting chairman Oyet Nathaniel Pierino and shared on social media.
The party and its armed forces “shall work to effect in the Republic of South Sudan a regime change,” the statement said, calling on all supporters “to report for National Service in defense of the citizens and the country.”
South Sudan gained independence from Sudan in 2011 but was quickly plunged into a devastating conflict between Kiir and Machar.
The five-year war ended with a peace deal in 2018 but attempts by the international community to ensure a democratic transition have failed.
Elections due to have taken place in December 2024 were again postponed to 2026 and the two sides have not merged their armed forces.
Daniel Akech, a senior analyst on South Sudan for the International Crisis Group, said Monday’s mobilization call was not a major event in itself since Machar’s supporters were already mobilized.
“It’s more of a political statement,” he said, adding that Machar’s faction also lacked the “capacity” to seriously challenge the government.
But it serves as a “red warning” to global partners who thought the power-sharing deal could still be salvaged, he said.
The attack on the military base in March took place in Upper Nile State, one of Machar’s strongholds, by a loose band of fighters from his ethnic Nuer community known as the White Army.
But Machar’s supporters dismiss the charges against him and blame the government for destroying the peace deal.
The government “has been arresting senior members of the (opposition). It has been waging war against us,” Pal Mai Deng, a spokesman for Machar’s faction, told AFP.
With Machar “being forced to appear before a kangaroo court and imposing charges against him, (it) is a clear indication that the SPLM-IG has chosen instability over peace,” he added.
The United Nations Mission in South Sudan called in a statement on “the parties to work together to resolve political deadlocks, reduce violence and recommit to the full implementation of the” power-sharing agreement.