Ƶ

Poland on a knife’s edge as exit poll shows a near tie in presidential runoff

Poland on a knife’s edge as exit poll shows a near tie in presidential runoff
Liberal pro-EU politician Rafał Trzaskowski, left, and conservative historian Karol Nawrock. (Reuters/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 02 June 2025

Poland on a knife’s edge as exit poll shows a near tie in presidential runoff

Poland on a knife’s edge as exit poll shows a near tie in presidential runoff
  • Runoff pitted Trzaskowski, a liberal pro-EU politician, against Karol Nawrock, a conservative historian backed by the right-wing Law and Justice party and aligned with US conservatives

WARSAW, Poland: Exit polls in Poland’s presidential runoff on Sunday showed the two candidates in a statistical tie with the race still too close to call in the deeply divided nation. The results could set the course for the nation’s political future and its relations with the European Union.
A first exit poll showed liberal Warsaw mayor Rafał Trzaskowski with a slight lead over conservative historian Karol Nawrocki, but two hours later an updated “late poll” showed Nawrocki winning 50.7 percent, more than Trzaskowski with 49.3 percent.

The polls have a margin of error and it was still not clear who the winner was.
Claims of victory amid uncertainty
Though the final result was still unclear with the two locked in a near dead heat, both men claimed to have won in meetings with their supporters in Warsaw.
“We won,” Trzaskowski told his supporters to chants of “Rafał, Rafał.”
“This is truly a special moment in Poland’s history. I am convinced that it will allow us to move forward and focus on the future,” Trzaskowski said. “I will be your president.”
Nawrocki, speaking to his supporters at a separate event in Warsaw, said he believed he was on track to win. “We will win and save Poland,” he said. “We must win tonight.”

The final results were expected Monday.
A divided country
The decisive presidential runoff pitted Trzaskowski, a liberal pro-EU politician, against Nawrocki, a conservative historian backed by the right-wing Law and Justice party and aligned with US conservatives, including President Donald Trump.
The fact that it was so close underlined how deep the social divisions have become in Poland.




Warsaw Mayor Rafal Trzaskowski, Civic Coalition presidential candidate, reacts as exit polls are announced on June 1, 2025. (REUTERS)

The outcome will determine whether Poland takes a more nationalist path or pivots more decisively toward liberal democratic norms. With conservative President Andrzej Duda completing his second and final term, the new president will have significant influence over whether Prime Minister Donald Tusk’s centrist government can fulfill its agenda, given the presidential power to veto laws.
“We will not allow Donald Tusk’s grip on power to be completed,” Nawrocki said.
The runoff follows a tightly contested first round of voting on May 18, in which Trzaskowski won just over 31 percent and Nawrocki nearly 30 percent, eliminating 11 other candidates.
Katarzyna Malek, a 29-year-old voter in Warsaw, cast her ballot in the first round for a left-wing candidate but went for Trzaskowski on Sunday, viewing him as more competent and more likely to pursue stronger ties with foreign partners and lower social tensions.
“I hope there will be less division, that maybe there will be more dialogue,” she said.
The campaign has highlighted stark ideological divides. Trzaskowski, 53, has promised to restore judicial independence, ease abortion restrictions and promote constructive ties with European partners. Nawrocki, 42, has positioned himself as a defender of traditional Polish values and skeptical of the EU.
Allegations against Nawrocki
Nawrocki’s candidacy has been clouded by allegations of past connections to criminal figures and participation in a violent street battle. He denies the criminal links but acknowledges having taken part in “noble” fights. The revelations have not appeared to dent his support among right-wing voters, many of whom see the allegations as politically motivated.




Conservative historian Karol Nawrocki reacts to the exit polls of the second round of Poland’s presidential election on June 1, 2025. (REUTERS)

“We managed to unite the entire patriotic camp in Poland, the entire camp of people who want a normal Poland, want a Poland without illegal migrants, a safe Poland. We managed to unite all those who want social, community security,” Nawrocki said. It was an apparent reference to those who supported far-right candidates in the first round and who supported him on Sunday.
Some of those voting for Nawrocki in Warsaw dismissed the allegations against him, saying he shouldn’t be punished for his past and that Trzaskowski has also made mistakes as mayor.
Władysława Wąsowska, an 82-year-old former history teacher, recalled instilling patriotism in her students during the communist era, when Poland was under Moscow’s influence.
“I’m a right-wing conservative. I love God, the church and the homeland,” she said, explaining that Nawrocki for her is the only patriotic choice now, and accusing Trzaskowski of serving foreign interests.
“He’s controlled by Germany,” she said. “I want a sovereign, independent, democratic Poland — and a Catholic one.”
International echoes
Amid rising security fears over Russia’s war in neighboring Ukraine, both candidates support aid to Kyiv, though Nawrocki opposes NATO membership for Ukraine, while Trzaskowski supports it in the future.
Nawrocki’s campaign has echoed themes popular on the American right, including an emphasis on traditional values. His supporters feel that Trzaskowski, with his pro-EU views, would hand over control of key Polish affairs to larger European powers like France and Germany.
Many European centrists rooted for Trzaskowski, seeing in him someone who would defend democratic values under pressure from authoritarian forces across the globe.


Many leaders back a UN call to address challenges together but Trump says `America First’

Updated 2 sec ago

Many leaders back a UN call to address challenges together but Trump says `America First’

Many leaders back a UN call to address challenges together but Trump says `America First’
UNITED NATIONS: From France to South Korea, South Africa to Suriname, leaders gave strong support Tuesday to the UN chief’s call to work together to address global challenges – war, poverty and climate chaos. But US President Donald Trump had other ideas and touted his “America First” agenda.
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres opened the annual meeting of presidents, prime ministers and monarchs at the General Assembly with a plea to choose peace over war, law over lawlessness, and a future where nations come together rather than scramble for self-interests.
France’s President Emmanuel Macron warned that 80 years after the UN was founded on the ashes of World War II, “we’re isolating ourselves.”
“There’s more and more divisions, and that’s plagued the global order,” he said. “The world is breaking down, and that’s halting our collective capacity to resolve the major conflicts of our time and stopping us from addressing global challenges.”
But Macron said a complex world isn’t reason “to throw in the towel” on supporting the UN’s key principles of peace, justice, human rights and nations working together. Only respectful relations and cooperation among peers make it possible to fight against military proliferation, address climate change and have “a successful digital transformation,” he said.
A call for collaboration
Speaker after speaker made similar appeals to support multilateralism.
Suriname’s President Jennifer Geerlings-Simons called multilateralism “one of humanity’s most important achievements, which needs our protection at this time of change.”
South Africa’s President Cyril Ramaphosa said “our collective membership of the United Nations is our shared humanity in action,” and the UN at 80 compels members to build “an organization that is able to address our common challenges.”
As South Korea’s President Lee Jae Myung put it, “The more difficult the times are, the more we must return to the basic spirit of the UN” He added, “We today must cooperate more, trust more, and join hands more firmly, in order to build a better future, a better world for future generations.”
The General Assembly meeting continues Wednesday with the leaders of Ukraine, Iran and Syria among the speakers.
Guterres in his remarks noted the world is becoming increasingly multipolar — certainly a nod to rising economic powers China and India but a slap to the US insistence on superpower status. The UN chief said a world of many powers can be more diverse and dynamic, but warned that without international cooperation and effective global institutions there can be “chaos.”
But Trump, making the first address to the General Assembly since he was elected to a second term last November, ceded no ground and gave an “America First” speech.
The United States has the strongest borders, military, friendships “and the strongest spirit of any nation on the face of the earth,” he boasted. “This is indeed the golden age of America.”
He portrayed the United Nations as ineffectual and “not even coming close to living up” to its potential, blaming the organization for an escalator that stopped en route to the assembly chamber and for a broken teleprompter. The UN cited a safety function for the escalator incident and the White House for the teleprompter.
Trump met with Guterres
While Trump told the assembly the UN delivers “empty words — and empty words don’t solve war,” his tone shifted at a later meeting with Guterres.
“Our country is behind the United Nations 100 percent,” the president told Guterres at the start of their first meeting since his reelection. “I may disagree with it sometimes, but I am so behind it because the potential for peace at this institution is great.”
UN humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher said in an interview with The Associated Press late Tuesday that their subsequent private meeting was “very good.”
The UN and US leaders talked about ending conflicts around the world, about efficiency, about bringing in the private sector in a bigger way, and humanitarian efforts, Fletcher said. “At least we’ve got a conversation going. This is dialogue. This is diplomacy. And it’s technicolor — and it’s glorious.”
The UN is facing financial cuts as the US, its largest source of revenue, and some other nations have pulled back funding. Guterres said aid cuts are “wreaking havoc,” calling them “a death sentence for many.”
Fletcher said this year’s UN appeal for $29 billion to help 114 million people around the world is only 19 percent funded. He said he has been talking with Saudis, Europeans, Americans and others about the funding crisis, calling it “a work in progress.”
UN talks about the wars in Ukraine and Gaza
Elsewhere at the UN, the Security Council held emergency back-to-back meetings Tuesday on the two major wars – the more than three-year conflict in Ukraine sparked by Russia’s invasion on Feb. 24, 2022, and the nearly two-year war in Gaza that followed Hamas’ surprise attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023.
In a dramatic shift, Trump posted on social media soon after meeting Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky that he believes Ukraine can win back all the territory it lost to Russia. The US leader previously called on Ukraine to make territorial concessions to end the war.
The emergency meeting on Gaza highlighted the isolation of the Trump administration, Israel’s closest ally.
A day after France led other nations in adding significantly to the list of countries recognizing Palestinian statehood, the UN Security Council once again witnessed the deep divide between the veto-wielding United States and most of the rest of the world over how to end the war in the Gaza Strip and resolve the nearly eight-decade Mideast conflict.
Most nations called for an immediate ceasefire and an influx of humanitarian aid, but the new US ambassador, Mike Waltz, called the meeting a disappointing “charade” and expressed regret it was held on Rosh Hashana, the Jewish New Year, preventing Israel from attending.
Speaking at the assembly earlier, Jordan’s King Abdullah II said it’s an illusion that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government “is a willing partner for peace,” pointing to its “hostile rhetoric: and violations of the sovereignty of Lebanon, Iran, Syria, Tunisia and most recently Qatar.”
“How long before we recognize the Palestinians as people who aspire to the same things you and I do — and we act on that recognition?,” Abdullah asked. “How long before we recognize that statehood is not something Palestinians need to earn? It is not a reward — it is an indisputable right.”

Japan PM Shigeru Ishiba: Palestine state recognition ‘when not if’

Japan PM Shigeru Ishiba: Palestine state recognition ‘when not if’
Updated 4 min 9 sec ago

Japan PM Shigeru Ishiba: Palestine state recognition ‘when not if’

Japan PM Shigeru Ishiba: Palestine state recognition ‘when not if’
  • Nearly 80 percent of UN members recognize the State of Palestine
  • ‘For our country, the question is not whether to recognize a Palestinian state, but when’

UNITED NATIONS, United States: Japan’s prime minister told the United Nations on Tuesday that Tokyo’s recognition of the State of Palestine was only a question of time, saying he was “indignant” at recent comments by Israeli officials.
Nearly 80 percent of UN members recognize the State of Palestine, with a string of countries including Britain, Canada and France adding their names this week after nearly two years of war in Gaza.
“I feel strongly indignant at the statements made by senior Israeli government officials that appear to categorically reject the very notion of Palestinian state-building,” Shigeru Ishiba said.
“For our country, the question is not whether to recognize a Palestinian state, but when. The continued unilateral actions by the government of Israel can never be accepted,” he said.
“I must state clearly that if further actions are taken that obstruct the realization of a two-state solution, Japan will be compelled to take new measures in response,” he added.
The latest moves to recognize Palestine follows the Israeli offensive in Gaza, which was sparked by the Palestinian militant group Hamas’s unprecedented attack in Israel on October 7, 2023.
Under President Donald Trump, Washington has argued that recognition is effectively rewarding Hamas for the attack, which resulted in the deaths of 1,219 Israelis, mostly civilians, according to official data.
Over nearly two years since then, Israeli military operations have killed 65,382 Palestinians, mostly civilians, says the health ministry in the Hamas-run territory, figures the UN considers reliable.
Japan, a member of the G7, is a close ally of the United States and hosts some 54,000 US military personnel.
Elsewhere in Asia, South Korea and Singapore have also stopped short of recognizing Palestine as a state.
Ishiba said that the “terror inflicted by Hamas and the devastation in Gaza we are witnessing today have left many feeling deeply saddened.”
“What matters the most is that Palestine can exist in a sustainable manner, living side by side in peace with Israel,” Ishiba said.
“As we invite Palestine to assume its role as a responsible member of the international community. The Palestinian side must establish a system of governance that ensures accountability,” he added.


Emotional Jimmy Kimmel says in late-night return he never intended to make light of Kirk’s killing

Emotional Jimmy Kimmel says in late-night return he never intended to make light of Kirk’s killing
Updated 52 min 30 sec ago

Emotional Jimmy Kimmel says in late-night return he never intended to make light of Kirk’s killing

Emotional Jimmy Kimmel says in late-night return he never intended to make light of Kirk’s killing
  • Kimmel criticized the ABC affiliates who took his show off the air
  • He thanked the people who supported him, and even people who doesn’t like him who stood up for his right to speak

NEW YORK : Jimmy Kimmel returned to late-night television Tuesday after a nearly weeklong suspension and nearly broke down in tears, saying he wasn’t trying joke about the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.
“I have no illusions about changing anyone’s mind, but I do want to make something clear, because it’s important to me as a human and that is, you understand that it was never my intention to make light of the murder of a young man,” Kimmel said, his voice breaking. “I don’t think there’s anything funny about it.”
Kimmel added: “Nor was it my intention to blame any specific group for the actions of what it was obviously a deeply disturbed individual. That was really the opposite of the point I was trying to make.” He said he understood his remarks last week to some “felt either ill-timed or unclear or maybe both.”
Kimmel criticized the ABC affiliates who took his show off the air. “That’s not legal. That’s not American. It’s unAmerican.”
He thanked the people who supported him, and even people who doesn’t like him who stood up for his right to speak, including Texas Sen. Ted Cruz. “It takes courage for them to speak out against this administration. They did and they deserve credit for it.”
ABC, which suspended Kimmel’s show last Wednesday following criticism of his comments about the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, announced Monday that “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” would return after the network had “thoughtful conversations” with the host.
Kimmel’s viewership was more limited than usual. Two companies that owned ABC affiliates said they would not put Kimmel’s show on, leaving audiences in such cities as St. Louis, Nashville, Tennessee, and Richmond, Virginia to watch something else. The Sinclair and Nexstar corporations collectively control about a quarter of ABC affiliates.
“Our long national late nightmare is over,” Stephen Colbert joked on his CBS show in response to Kimmel’s reinstatement.
Kimmel, who has been publicly silent since his suspension, posted Tuesday on his Instagram account a picture of himself with the late television producer and free speech advocate Norman Lear. “Missing this guy today,” he wrote.
ABC suspended Kimmel “indefinitely” after comments he made in a monologue last week. Kimmel, who has been a relentless Trump critic in his comedy, suggested that many Trump supporters were trying to capitalize on Kirk’s death and were “desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them.”
FCC chair accuses host of misleading the public
Trump-appointed Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr last week said it appeared that Kimmel was trying to “directly mislead the American public” with his remarks about Tyler Robinson, the 22-year-old Utah man charged with Kirk’s killing, and his motives. Those motives remain unclear. Authorities say Robinson grew up in a conservative family, but his mother told investigators his son had turned left politically in the last year.
“We can do this the easy way or the hard way,” Carr said before ABC announced the suspension. “These companies can find ways to change conduct, to take action, frankly, on Kimmel, or there is going to be additional work for the FCC ahead.”
Those remarks set a backlash in motion, with Republican Sen. Ted Cruz saying that Carr acted like “a mafioso.” Hundreds of entertainment luminaries, including Tom Hanks, Barbra Streisand and Jennifer Aniston, signed a letter circulated by the American Civil Liberties Union that called ABC’s move “a dark moment for freedom of speech in our nation.”
Podcaster Joe Rogan weighed in Tuesday on Kimmel’s side. “I definitely don’t think that the government should be involved — ever — in dictating what a comedian can or can’t say in a monologue,” Rogan said. “You are crazy for supporting this because this will be used on you.”
Some consumers punished ABC parent Disney by canceling subscriptions to its streaming services.
Trump had hailed Kimmel’s suspension and criticized his return, writing on his Truth Social platform: “I can’t believe ABC Fake News gave Jimmy Kimmel his job back ... Why would they want someone back who does so poorly, who’s not funny, and who puts the Network in jeopardy by playing 99 percent positive Democrat GARBAGE.”
Trump’s administration has used threats, lawsuits and federal government pressure to try to exert more control over the media industry. Trump sued ABC and CBS over news coverage, which the companies settled. Trump has also filed defamation lawsuits against The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times, and successfully urged Congress to strip federal funding from NPR and PBS.
Show lineup will include at least one friendly guest
He will have at least one friendly guest. After pulling out of her planned performance at the premiere of Hulu’s Lilith Fair documentary in protest over Kimmel’s suspension, singer-songwriter Sarah McLachlan will appear on Kimmel’s show as the musical guest. McLachlan had been booked on the show prior to the preemption, a representative told The Associated Press.
The other guest, according to an ABC lineup released Tuesday afternoon, will be actor Glen Powell, who was listed as a guest for this week on the “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” ticket site even before Kimmel’s suspension. Like McLachlan, he’s promoting a Hulu release, “Chad Powers,” as is former NFL star Peyton Manning, a Thursday guest.
Disney and ABC executives reportedly negotiated Kimmel’s return for several days before announcing the resolution. The ABC statement said the suspension happened because some of Kimmel’s comments were “ill-timed and thus insensitive,” but it did not call them misleading.
Andrew Kolvet, a spokesperson for Turning Point USA, the organization founded by Kirk and now headed by his widow, posted on X that “Disney and ABC caving and allowing Kimmel back on the air is not surprising, but it’s their mistake to make.”
The suspension happened at a time when the late-night landscape is shifting. Shows are losing viewers, in part because many watch highlights the next day online. CBS announced the cancelation of Colbert’s show over the summer. Kimmel’s contract with ABC reportedly lasts through May.
Colbert, in his opening monologue Monday, grabbed his recently won Emmy Award for outstanding talk series, saying, “Once more, I am the only martyr on late night!”
___


As Western nations recognize Palestinian statehood, Palestinians doubt its impact

As Western nations recognize Palestinian statehood, Palestinians doubt its impact
Updated 24 September 2025

As Western nations recognize Palestinian statehood, Palestinians doubt its impact

As Western nations recognize Palestinian statehood, Palestinians doubt its impact
  • Around three-fourths of the 193-member United Nations now recognize a Palestinian state, but major Western nations had until recently declined to, saying one could only come about through negotiations with Israel

DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza Strip: Palestinians across the Gaza Strip and the Israeli-occupied West Bank welcomed news that a flurry of Western countries have recognized a Palestinian state, while expressing doubt the move will improve their dire circumstances.
On Monday, France, Andorra, Belgium, Luxembourg, Malta, and Monaco announced or confirmed their recognition of a Palestinian state at the start of a high-profile meeting at the United Nations aimed at galvanizing support for a two-state solution to the Mideast conflict. Their announcements came a day after the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and Portugal did the same. More nations are expected to follow, in defiance of Israel and the United States.
The recognitions “have strengthened the Palestinian legitimacy by recognizing the rights of the Palestinian people,” said Saeed Abu Elaish, a medic from the Jabaliya refugee camp in northern Gaza who has lost more than two dozen family members, including his wife and their two daughters.

Displaced Palestinians move with their belongings southwards on a road in the Nuseirat refugee camp area in the central Gaza Strip on September 23, 2025, as Israel presses its ground offensive to capture Gaza City amidst the war against Hamas. (AFP)

“It’s also a call to stop the genocide and massacres in Gaza, as well as to stop the settlers’ encroachment on the West Bank,” he told The Associated Press.
Others downplayed the impact of the recognitions.
Huda Masawabi called them “worthless” as she joined a long line of fellow displaced people and overstuffed trucks heading south from Gaza City Sunday.
“We just hope to God that someone outside would acknowledge us or even deal with us as mere human beings,” she said.
The recent shift among nations is unlikely to have much if any short-term impact on the ground, where Israel is waging a major offensive in famine-stricken Gaza City and expanding settlements in the West Bank.

Displaced Palestinians return to Rafah, Gaza Strip, Jan. 20, 2025, a day after a ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas went into effect. (AP)

Longer-term, the creation of a Palestinian state alongside Israel in the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem — territories seized by Israel in the 1967 Mideast war — is widely seen internationally as the only way to resolve the conflict, which began more than a century before Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, attack.
In Gaza, Palestinians hope statehood recognition is followed by action

Israel’s government was opposed to Palestinian statehood even before the outbreak of the war in Gaza, and now says it would reward Hamas. Israelis have long feared that groups like Hamas — which does not accept Israel’s existence — would use an independent state to attack it. Many also view the West Bank as the biblical and historical heartland of the Jewish people.
While Palestinians in Gaza told the AP that they hoped statehood recognition might lead to eventual independence, it comes as cold comfort in the midst of Israel’s devastating 23-month war.
“What matters to us is that the war stops,” Adeeb Abu Khalid, a displaced Palestinian from Gaza City, said as he walked in a Deir Al-Balah market Tuesday. “Today we are living in a famine. People are in misery.”
The war has left the territory in ruins, displaced nearly all Palestinians, and killed at least 65,000 people, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry. The ministry is part of the Hamas-run government and staffed by medical professionals. It doesn’t say how many were civilians or combatants, but says women and children make up around half.
In that context, demonstrations of support from abroad do provide a measure of solace to some, like Naser Asaliya, a displaced Palestinian from Gaza City, who are eager for any ray of hope.
“It will, God willing, have a positive impact on us, no matter the circumstances,” he said. “We are a stricken people, and we hope for anything that makes us happy, no matter how simple, anything that supports us, strengthens our resolve in light of this unjust blockade.”
Around three-fourths of the 193-member United Nations now recognize a Palestinian state, but major Western nations had until recently declined to, saying one could only come about through negotiations with Israel.
Murad Banat, a Palestinian man displaced from Gaza’s central Bureij camp, said the most recent recognitions are “just talk.”
“Everyone is watching us like a play. Like a TV series, every day a TV series,” he said as children strode between tents in a packed displacement camp.
West Bank Palestinians see statehood recognition as conflicting with reality
Since the war began, Israeli settlers have expanded their hold over vast swaths of the Israeli-occupied West Bank, pushing the prospect of a contiguous Palestinian state out of reach.
The West Bank is the hoped-for heartland of a future Palestinian state. Palestinians say now-common Israeli military raids on Palestinian cities and towns ramped up settler violence, and state-backed settlement expansion has eaten away at their land, pushing the practical possibility of a contiguous Palestinian state from reach.
Nur Al-Din Mansour, from Jenin, is one of tens of thousands of West Bank Palestinians displaced from their homes since Israel launched a major operation across four northern camps early this year. He said recognition was a “step in the right direction.”
”But what we want,” he added. “is not just a symbolic or nominal state — we want a fully sovereign state that preserves its borders. We demand a Palestinian state based on the borders of June 5, 1967.”
Mohammad Hammad, also displaced from Jenin Camp, said, ”All of this recognition, in the end, is meaningless. You’re talking nonsense about recognition while we’re still under occupation.”
“In the end, everything that’s happening is just ink on paper.”

 


Who stopped the UN escalator? Likely Trump’s videographer, says UN

Who stopped the UN escalator? Likely Trump’s videographer, says UN
Updated 24 September 2025

Who stopped the UN escalator? Likely Trump’s videographer, says UN

Who stopped the UN escalator? Likely Trump’s videographer, says UN
  • UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric said a readout of the escalator’s central processing unit indicated it “had stopped after a built-in safety mechanism on the comb step was triggered at the top of the escalator”

UNITED NATIONS: The United Nations believes it has solved the mystery of why an escalator abruptly stopped shortly after US President Donald Trump stepped onto it on Tuesday — his videographer may have accidentally triggered a safety mechanism.
Trump jokingly complained about the incident during his speech to world leaders earlier on Tuesday after the teleprompter also didn’t work.
“These are the two things I got from the United Nations — a bad escalator and a bad teleprompter,” he told the 193-member assembly, to some laughter.
However, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt wasn’t so lighthearted about it.
“If someone at the UN intentionally stopped the escalator as the President and First Lady were stepping on, they need to be fired and investigated immediately,” she posted on X after the incident.
UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric said a readout of the escalator’s central processing unit indicated it “had stopped after a built-in safety mechanism on the comb step was triggered at the top of the escalator.”
He said Trump’s videographer had been traveling backwards up the escalator to capture his arrival with First Lady Melania Trump.
“The videographer may have inadvertently triggered the safety function,” Dujarric said in a statement. “The safety mechanism is designed to prevent people or objects accidentally being caught and stuck in or pulled into the gearing.”
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the UN findings.
On the teleprompter, Trump told the General Assembly on Tuesday: “I can only say that whoever’s operating this teleprompter is in big trouble.”
However, a UN official said the White House had operated its own teleprompter.
After Trump finished speaking, UN General Assembly President Annalena Baerbock said: “The UN teleprompters are working perfectly.”