Ƶ

Denmark to push for Ukraine’s EU membership during presidency

Denmark to push for Ukraine’s EU membership during presidency
Denmark will continue preparing Ukraine for EU membership in the face of Hungary blocking negotiations, when the Nordic country takes over the presidency of the European Council from July 1, its European affairs minister said on Thursday. (Reuters/File)
Short Url
Updated 19 June 2025

Denmark to push for Ukraine’s EU membership during presidency

Denmark to push for Ukraine’s EU membership during presidency
  • Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has strongly opposed providing NATO military and EU aid to Ukraine
  • Ukraine had already initiated the necessary reforms

COPENHAGEN: Denmark will continue preparing Ukraine for EU membership in the face of Hungary blocking negotiations, when the Nordic country takes over the presidency of the European Council from July 1, its European affairs minister said on Thursday.

“Unfortunately, Hungary is blocking and we are trying to put as much pressure there as we can and also do everything we can to make Ukraine continue with the necessary reform work,” European affairs minister Marie Bjerre told a press conference in Copenhagen.

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has strongly opposed providing NATO military and EU aid to Ukraine, saying the country’s EU membership would destroy Hungarian farmers and the wider economy.

Ukraine had already initiated the necessary reforms and is ready to speed up the negotiations.

“When we get to the point where we can actually open the specific negotiation chapters, we can be ready to close them very quickly,” Bjerre said.

Denmark will also seek to reach agreement among EU nations on the bloc’s planned 2040 climate goals.

The European Commission plans to propose in July a legally binding target to cut EU countries’ emissions by 90 percent by 2040, from 1990 levels.

Faced with pushback from governments, however, Brussels is assessing options including setting a lower target for domestic industries, and using international carbon credits to make up the gap to 90 percent.


Heatwave scorches parts of Europe and fans wildfire threat in France

Heatwave scorches parts of Europe and fans wildfire threat in France
Updated 12 August 2025

Heatwave scorches parts of Europe and fans wildfire threat in France

Heatwave scorches parts of Europe and fans wildfire threat in France
  • Scientists say Europe is becoming the world’s fastest-warming continent

PARIS: A heat wave gripped parts of Europe on Monday, sending temperatures up to 43 degrees Celsius in southern France and increasing risks of wildfires in wine country, while Bulgaria suffered blazes along its southern borders and Hungary saw record-breaking weekend temperatures.

Scientists say Europe is becoming the world’s fastest-warming continent.

According to the UK-based Carbon Brief, 2025 is predicted to be the second- or third-warmest year on record. Europe’s land temperatures have risen about 2.3 C above

pre-industrial levels, nearly twice the global rate, intensifying heatwaves, the EU’s Copernicus climate service reports. EU data show burned area across the continent is already far above the long-term average this summer, with major outbreaks in Spain, Portugal and deadly blazes in Greece since late June.

The UK’s Met Office expects a heatwave, the fourth this summer, to peak around 33C in London on Tuesday. The UK Health Security Agency issued a yellow health alert for older adults and those with medical conditions.

In France’s Aude department, a patchwork of vineyards and Mediterranean scrubland, hundreds of firefighters remained in the rolling wine country guarding the edges of a massive, deadly blaze that scorched 16,000 hectares last week. Officials say the fire is under control but warn it will not be fully extinguished for weeks, with hot spots still smoldering and at risk of reigniting.

On Monday, the French national weather authority, Météo-France, placed 12 departments on red alert, the country’s highest heat warning, anticipating exceptional heat stretching from the Atlantic coast to the Mediterranean plains. Forty-one other departments were under lower-level orange alerts, as was the neighboring microstate of Andorra, between France and Spain.

“Don’t be fooled — this isn’t ‘normal, it’s summer.’ It’s not normal, it’s a nightmare,” agricultural climatologist Serge Zaka, told BFMTV from Montauban in France’s Tarn-et-Garonne department, where the blistering heat pressed relentlessly throughout the day.

Social media images showed shuttered streets in Valence, residents shielding windows with foil to reflect the light, and tourists huddling under umbrellas along the Garonne in Toulouse. Across the south, cafe terraces stood empty as people sought cooler corners indoors.

The red alert in France has been issued only eight times since it was created in 2004 after a deadly summer the year

before. It is reserved for extreme, prolonged heat with major health risks and the potential to disrupt daily life. The designation gives local officials powers to cancel outdoor events, close public venues and alter school or summer camp schedules.


Trump takes over DC police in extraordinary move, deploys National Guard in capital

Trump takes over DC police in extraordinary move, deploys National Guard in capital
Updated 11 August 2025

Trump takes over DC police in extraordinary move, deploys National Guard in capital

Trump takes over DC police in extraordinary move, deploys National Guard in capital
  • Donald Trump: ‘Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals’
  • Trump: ‘If we need to, we’re going to do the same thing in Chicago, which is a disaster’

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said on Monday he was deploying 800 National Guard troops to Washington and temporarily taking over the city’s police department, an extraordinary assertion of presidential power in the nation’s capital.
Trump’s move, which bypassed the city’s elected leaders, was emblematic of his second-term approach, which has seen him wield executive authority in ways with little precedent in modern US history and in defiance of political norms.
The president cast his actions as necessary to “rescue” Washington from a purported wave of lawlessness. Statistics show that violent crime shot up in 2023 but has been rapidly declining since.
“Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals,” Trump told a news conference at the White House.
It is the second time this summer that the Republican president has deployed troops to a Democratically governed city. A federal trial began on Monday in San Francisco on whether Trump violated US law by deploying National Guard troops to Los Angeles in June without the approval of California Governor Gavin Newsom.
And Trump signaled that other major US cities with Democratic leadership could be next, including Chicago, a city that has long been beset by violent crime, although it was down significantly in the first half of the year.
“If we need to, we’re going to do the same thing in Chicago, which is a disaster,” Trump said at the White House, adding, “Hopefully L.A. is watching.”
During Trump’s election campaign his law and order platform often had racial undertones. He singled out majority Democratic cities like Baltimore, Chicago and Washington — all cities with large Black populations — when he spoke about rampant crime in urban areas.
Hundreds of officers and agents from more than a dozen federal agencies have fanned out across Washington in recent days. Attorney General Pam Bondi will oversee the police force, Trump said.
The US Army said the National Guard troops would carry out a number of tasks, including “administrative, logistics and physical presence in support of law enforcement.” Between 100 and 200 of the troops would be supporting law enforcement at any given time.
The Democratic mayor of Washington, Muriel Bowser, has pushed back on Trump’s claims of unchecked violence, noting that violent crime hit its lowest level in more than three decades last year.
Violent crime, including murders, soared in 2023, turning Washington into one of the nation’s deadliest cities. However, violent crime dropped 35 percent in 2024, according to federal data, and it has fallen an additional 26 percent in the first seven months of 2025, according to city police.
Bowser struck a diplomatic tone at a news conference, saying she and other members of her administration would work with the federal government, even as she again rejected Trump’s claim of widespread crime.
While Bowser said the law appeared to give the president broad power to take temporary control of the police force, the city’s attorney general, Brian Schwalb, earlier called Trump’s actions “unlawful” and said his office was “considering all of our options.”

Over the past week, Trump has intensified his messaging, suggesting he might attempt to strip the city of its local autonomy and implement a full federal takeover.
The District of Columbia operates under the Home Rule Act, which gives Congress ultimate authority but allows residents to elect a mayor and city council.
Trump on Monday invoked a section of the act that allows the president to take over the police force for 30 days when “emergency” conditions exist. Trump said he was declaring a “public safety emergency” in the city.
Trump’s own Federal Emergency Management Agency is cutting security funding for the National Capital Region, an area that includes D.C. and parts of Maryland and Virginia. The region will receive $20 million less this year from the federal urban security fund, amounting to a 44 percent year-on-year cut.
Trump also vowed to remove homeless encampments, without providing details on how or where homeless people would be moved.
The federal government owns much of Washington’s parkland, so the Trump administration has legal authority to clear homeless encampments in those areas, as President Joe Biden did while in office. But the federal government cannot force people to move out of the city because they lack shelter, advocates for the homeless said.
The president has broad authority over the 2,700 members of the D.C. National Guard, unlike in states where governors typically hold the power to activate troops.
Guard troops have been dispatched to Washington many times, including in response to the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol by Trump supporters, and during 2020 protests over police brutality.


Saved from militants, Timbuktu’s famed manuscripts return home after 13 years in Mali’s capital

Saved from militants, Timbuktu’s famed manuscripts return home after 13 years in Mali’s capital
Updated 11 August 2025

Saved from militants, Timbuktu’s famed manuscripts return home after 13 years in Mali’s capital

Saved from militants, Timbuktu’s famed manuscripts return home after 13 years in Mali’s capital
  • Militants destroyed more than 4,000 manuscripts after they seized Timbuktu in 2012
  • Mali has long battled an insurgency by armed militants, including allies of Al-Qaeda and Daesh group

BAMAKO: The Malian military government on Monday started returning home the historic manuscripts of Timbuktu, which were spirited out of their fabled northern city when it was occupied by Al-Qaeda-linked militants more than a decade ago.
Islamic radicals destroyed more than 4,000 manuscripts, some dating back to the 13th century, after they seized Timbuktu in 2012, according to the findings of a United Nations expert mission. They also destroyed nine mausoleums and a mosque’s door — all but one of the buildings on the UNESCO World Heritage list.
The majority of the documents dating back to the 13th century — more than 27,000 — were saved by the devotion of the Timbuktu library’s Malian custodians, who carried them out of the occupied city in rice sacks, on donkey carts, by motorcycle, by boat and four-wheel drive vehicles.
The first batch of the manuscripts were brought to Timbuktu by plane from the capital of Bamako, authorities said, adding that the return was necessary to protect them from the threats of Bamako’s humidity.
The shipment consisted of more than 200 crates and weighed some 5.5 tons. The rest would be shipped in the coming days, officials said.
About 706 kilometers (439 miles) from Bamako, Timbuktu sits on the edge of the Sahara desert and has a dry climate. For years, the local municipal and religious authorities have asked for the return of the manuscripts.
Diahara Touré, Timbuktu’s deputy mayor, said the famous documents are important to the local people as they “reflect our civilization and spiritual and intellectual heritage.”
“This is the first stage” of the return, said Bilal Mahamane Traoré, a local official.
In February, the military government made a commitment to return the manuscripts, according to Bouréma Kansaye, the Malian Minister of Higher Education. He described them as as a “legacy that bears witness to the intellectual greatness and crossroads of civilization” of the city of Timbuktu — “a bridge between the past and the future.”
“We now have a responsibility to protect, digitize, study, and promote these treasures so that they continue to enlighten Mali, Africa, and the world,” Kansaye said during Monday’s return ceremony.
The manuscripts, which UNESCO has designated as part of the World Cultural Heritage, cover a myriad subjects, from Islamic theology and jurisprudence, astronomy, medicine, mathematics, history, and geography. They are a testimony to the rich cultural heritage of the Mali and Songhai empires in West Africa.
Mali, along with neighboring Burkina Faso and Niger, has long battled an insurgency by armed militants, including some allied with Al-Qaeda and the Daesh group. Following two military coups, the ruling junta expelled French troops and instead turned to Russia for security assistance.
Still, 13 years after the occupation of Timbuktu, the security situation in Mali remains precarious and analysts say it has worsened in recent months. Although the city is back under government control, militants continue attacking its surroundings, including as recently as last month.


EU condemns Israel’s killing of journalists in Gaza

EU condemns Israel’s killing of journalists in Gaza
Updated 11 August 2025

EU condemns Israel’s killing of journalists in Gaza

EU condemns Israel’s killing of journalists in Gaza
  • EU foreign policy chief also called on Israel to allow more aid into the Gaza Strip

BRUSSELS: The European Union condemned the killing of five Al Jazeera journalists in an Israeli strike in the Gaza Strip, the bloc’s foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said on Monday.
“The EU condemns the killing of five Al Jazeera journalists in an (Israeli military) airstrike outside Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City, including the Al Jazeera correspondent Anas Al-Sharif,” she said after EU foreign ministers discussed the war in virtual talks.
An Israeli military statement accused Sharif of heading a Hamas “terrorist cell” and being “responsible for advancing rocket attacks” against Israelis.
The EU took note of Israel’s allegation, Kallas said, “but there is a need in these cases to provide clear evidence, in the respect of rule of law, to avoid targeting of journalists.”
The 27-country bloc has struggled to take action over the conflict in Gaza as it is divided between staunch supporters of Israel and those who defend the Palestinians.
The EU struck a deal last month to increase aid access to Gaza, but senior officials have said the agreement has been only partially implemented.
Kallas called on Israel to allow more aid into the territory.
“Whereas there is more aid coming in, the needs are still much greater. We urge Israel to allow more trucks and a better distribution of aid,” she said.


UK PM under pressure after more than 500 arrests at Palestine Action protests in London

UK PM under pressure after more than 500 arrests at Palestine Action protests in London
Updated 11 August 2025

UK PM under pressure after more than 500 arrests at Palestine Action protests in London

UK PM under pressure after more than 500 arrests at Palestine Action protests in London
  • 532 people were arrested during Saturday’s demonstration in Parliament Square, 522 of them for displaying support for the proscribed group, and 348 of them were age 50 or over
  • Palestine Action was designated a terrorist organization last month but critics say ‘inappropriate use of terror laws’ exacerbates social divisions and is ‘conflating protest with terrorism’
  • Protesters ‘were not inciting violence and it is entirely disproportionate, to the point of absurdity, to be treating them as terrorists,’ says Amnesty International chief

LONDON: British prime minister Keir Starmer faces mounting criticism after hundreds of people were detained during a demonstration in Parliament Square in London at the weekend against the government’s decision to ban Palestine Action.

The Metropolitan Police said officers arrested 532 people on Saturday, 522 of them for displaying items in support of the proscribed group. A breakdown of the arrest figures released on Sunday revealed that 348 of those apprehended were age 50 or over, .

The protest, organized by Defend Our Juries, an organization that “supports collective action to expose this corruption of democracy and the rule of law,” took place after ministers warned they would take action against anyone who showed public support for Palestine Action, which was designated a terrorist organization last month.

Victims minister Alex Davies-Jones defended the crackdown, saying: “The right to peacefully protest in this country is a cornerstone of our democracy, and of course we respect that. But with regards to Palestine Action, they are a proscribed terrorist organization and their actions have not been peaceful.

“They have violently carried out criminal damage to RAF aircraft. We have credible reports of them targeting Jewish-owned businesses here in the United Kingdom, and there are other reasons which we can’t disclose because of national security.

“But they are a proscribed terrorist organization and anyone showing support for that terrorist organization will feel the full force of the law.”

The prime minister’s office also defended the proscription, saying it followed “strong security advice” and citing attacks said to be linked to the group involving violence, injury and criminal damage.

Officials said the UK’s Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre had linked the group to three separate acts of terrorism.

However, the move drew sharp criticism from across the political spectrum.

Baroness Shami Chakrabarti, a member of Starmer’s ruling Labour Party and of the House of Lords, warned that the ban risked deepening social divisions.

“The proscription of Palestine Action is in danger of becoming a mistake of poll tax proportions,” she told The Independent, referring to a highly unpopular taxation policy of former prime minister Margaret Thatcher’s government that led to violent protests in the early 1990s across the UK.

“The courts have already found an arguable case that it breaches fundamental rights and more, not less, people are coming out to protest against both atrocities in Gaza and inappropriate use of terror laws at home.

“The notable presence of so many older people highlights the strength of genuine feeling. Criminal damage at air force bases can be prosecuted, but sweeping guilt by association only exacerbates community tensions and creates a bigger headache for the police.”

Former Labour cabinet minister Peter Hain described the arrests as “madness,” and said Palestine Action was “not equivalent” to terrorist groups such as Al-Qaeda or Daesh, adding that this was why he had voted against its ban.

Independent MP Diane Abbott said: “The government is in danger of making itself look both draconian and foolish.”

Left-wing Labour MP Nadia Whittome, who also opposed the ban, accused ministers of “conflating protest with terrorism.” In a message posted on social media platform X, she said: “Last month, I warned that proscribing Palestine Action would result in the mass criminalization of people who are not even members of the group. Now, more than 500 people have been arrested. I voted against the proscription; we shouldn’t be conflating protest with terrorism.”

Former chief prosecutor Nazir Afzal warned that the mass arrests would clog the justice system: “These would probably be jury trials as each of them would be advised to plead not guilty and expect a trial in 2027 at the earliest. I also suspect that no jury would convict anyhow.”

Amnesty International described the level of policing as “disproportionate to the point of absurdity.”

Its chief executive, Sacha Deshmukh, said: “Peaceful protest is a fundamental right. People are understandably outraged by the ongoing genocide being committed in Gaza and are entitled under international human rights law to express their horror.

“The protesters in Parliament Square were not inciting violence and it is entirely disproportionate, to the point of absurdity, to be treating them as terrorists. We have long criticized UK terrorism law for being excessively broad and vaguely worded, and a threat to freedom of expression. These arrests demonstrate that our concerns were justified.”

Palestine Action co-founder Huda Ammori said the protest would “go down in our country’s history as a momentous act of collective defiance of an unprecedented attack on our fundamental freedoms.”

She argued that the large number of people granted street bail showed the law was “unenforceable.” Street bail is a process under which arrested individuals can be granted bail before they are taken to a police station.

Under the UK’s Terrorism Act 2000, membership of or support for a proscribed organization carries a maximum prison term of 14 years. In some cases, prosecutions require approval from both the Crown Prosecution Service and the Attorney General.