Ƶ

Trump says his intel chief was ‘wrong’ to believe Iran was not building a nuclear weapon

Trump says his intel chief was ‘wrong’ to believe Iran was not building a nuclear weapon
This photo taken on February 12, 2025, shows President Donald Trump with Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard at the White House in Washington, D.C. (REUTERS/File Photo)
Short Url
Updated 21 June 2025

Trump says his intel chief was ‘wrong’ to believe Iran was not building a nuclear weapon

Trump says his intel chief was ‘wrong’ to believe Iran was not building a nuclear weapon
  • Also says Israeli strikes could be ‘very hard to stop’ now that they are “winning”
  • After Trump's remark, Tulsi Gabbard says her statement was taken out of context

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump said Friday that his director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, was “wrong” when she previously said that the US believed Iran wasn’t building a nuclear weapon, and he suggested that it would be “very hard to stop” Israel’s strikes on Iran in order to negotiate a possible ceasefire.

Trump has recently taken a more aggressive public stance toward Tehran as he’s sought more time to weigh whether to attack Iran by striking its well-defended Fordo uranium enrichment facility. Buried under a mountain, the facility is believed to be out of the reach of all but America’s “bunker-buster” bombs.

After landing in New Jersey for an evening fundraiser for his super political action committee, Trump was asked about Gabbard’s comments to Congress in March that US spy agencies believed that Iran wasn’t working on nuclear warheads. The president responded, “Well then, my intelligence community is wrong. Who in the intelligence community said that?”

Informed that it had been Gabbard, Trump said, “She’s wrong.”

In a subsequent post on X, Gabbard said her testimony was taken out of context “as a way to manufacture division.”

“America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly,” she wrote. “President Trump has been clear that can’t happen, and I agree.”

Still, disavowing Gabbard’s previous assessment came a day after the White House said Trump would decide within two weeks whether the US military would get directly involved in the conflict between Israel and Iran. It said seeking additional time was “based on the fact that there’s a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future.”

But on Friday, Trump himself seemed to cast doubts on the possibility of talks leading to a pause in fighting between Israel and Iran. He said that, while he might support a ceasefire, Israel’s strikes on Iran could be “very hard to stop.”

Asked about Iran suggesting that, if the US was serious about furthering negotiations, it could call on Israel to stop its strikes, Trump responded, “I think it’s very hard to make that request right now.”

“If somebody is winning, it’s a little bit harder to do than if somebody is losing,” Trump said. “But we’re ready, willing and able, and we’ve been speaking to Iran, and we’ll see what happens.”

The president later added, “It’s very hard to stop when you look at it.”

“Israel’s doing well in terms of war. And, I think, you would say that Iran is doing less well. It’s a little bit hard to get somebody to stop,” Trump said.

Trump campaigned on decrying “endless wars” and has vowed to be an international peacemaker. That’s led some, even among conservatives, to point to Trump’s past criticism of the US invasion of Iraq beginning in 2003 as being at odds with his more aggressive stance toward Iran now.

Trump suggested the two situations were very different, though.

“There were no weapons of mass destruction. I never thought there were. And that was somewhat pre-nuclear. You know, it was, it was a nuclear age, but nothing like it is today,” Trump said of his past criticism of the administration of President George W. Bush.

He added of Iran’s current nuclear program, “It looked like I’m right about the material that they’ve gathered already. It’s a tremendous amount of material.”

Trump also cast doubts on Iran’s developing nuclear capabilities for civilian pursuits, like power generation.

“You’re sitting on one of the largest oil piles anywhere in the world,” he said. “It’s a little bit hard to see why you’d need that.”


UK energy tycoon to keep flying Palestine flag in defiance of ‘shadowy’ legal threats

UK energy tycoon to keep flying Palestine flag in defiance of ‘shadowy’ legal threats
Updated 5 sec ago

UK energy tycoon to keep flying Palestine flag in defiance of ‘shadowy’ legal threats

UK energy tycoon to keep flying Palestine flag in defiance of ‘shadowy’ legal threats
  • Dale Vince told by local council to remove flag as Palestine not recognized by Britain
  • Ecotricity boss: UK Lawyers for Israel engaged in ‘pernicious stifling of free speech on behalf of a foreign power’

LONDON: Green energy tycoon Dale Vince plans to keep flying the Palestinian flag at his company’s headquarters, saying a “shadowy” group of pro-Israel lawyers is forcing local authorities to remove them across the UK.

Vince said he would fly the flag at the Ecotricity headquarters in defiance of Stroud district council, which told him he needs to seek permission as Palestine is not recognized by the UK.

He said as Palestine is recognized by 147 countries, the flag counts as a national one — which can be flown without permission — rather than an advert, as Stroud council suggested. 

Vince added that a group called UK Lawyers for Israel may have complained to the council, prompting the request for him to remove it.

“There’s a shadowy group called UK Lawyers for Israel that do complain to councils about flags and to hospitals about pin badges and all kinds of trivia that they don’t like because it’s in support of Palestine and they consider to be racism, which is just an incredible thing to say,” Vince said in the Stroud Times.

“I think what they do is in the shadows, that’s why I say shadowy. They send threatening letters to people that do innocent things like fly a flag, wear a pin badge and that kind of stuff.”

In the local paper, Vince wrote earlier this week: “Nobody ever got asked to take down a Ukrainian flag. With Palestine it’s different and much of this is due to a shadowy group of lawyers acting for Israel.

“They’ve bullied several councils into forcing the removal of flags and into event cancellations — it’s a pernicious stifling of free speech on behalf of a foreign power.”

Vince said no one should feel threatened by the flag, which is being flown “in solidarity” with the Palestinian people.

“What’s been happening these last two years has been exceptional,” he said. “It is genocide, it is ethnic cleansing, it’s daily acts of barbarity against civilians, mass starvation of millions of people.

“I mean it’s off the scale in terms of human abuse and there’s not enough by far being done about it by western nations who have punished Russia incredibly for their invasion and occupation of Ukraine in a recent timescale.

“Half the G7 will recognise Palestine in September and it’s absolutely important that we show our solidarity with the Palestinian people and we show Israel that we can see what they’re doing and we don’t accept it, we don’t condone it. They won’t get away with it, they will be judged for it in the future. It’s an absolute atrocity.”

Vince added: “Obviously what Hamas did on October 7th (2023) was an atrocity but the atrocity visited on Palestine in return in the last two years is off the charts.

“It’s unimaginably bad and this is from a democratic country that we call an ally, not from a terrorist organisation known as Hamas.

“So they’re not comparable and I don’t think anybody that’s Israeli should look at the Palestinian flag and feel threatened. I don’t understand that.

“This is not the flag of Hamas and these are the shadows that UK Lawyers for Israel operate within, conflating the flag of a country with the flag of a terrorist organisation.”

UKLFI calls itself a “voluntary association of lawyers which seeks the application of rules and laws to counter boycotts and other actions targeting Israelis.”

Last year, it succeeded in forcing the London Borough of Tower Hamlets to remove Palestinian flags from local authority buildings, after suggesting that flying them broke the law.

A spokesperson for the group denied it had contacted Stroud council because officials had already contacted Vince to remove the flag when they learned of its presence.

Stroud council said it received complaints from members of the public about the flag, so was “obliged to take (legal) advice on the matter.”

Prime Minister Keir Starmer has said the UK will recognize Palestine at the UN next month unless a ceasefire is reached in Gaza before then with commitments to plans for a two-state solution.


Riot police block protesters from approaching Israeli cruise ship in Greece

Riot police block protesters from approaching Israeli cruise ship in Greece
Updated 14 August 2025

Riot police block protesters from approaching Israeli cruise ship in Greece

Riot police block protesters from approaching Israeli cruise ship in Greece

PIRAEUS: Riot police at Greece’s largest port cordoned off an area around an Israeli cruise ship that arrived early Thursday to prevent several hundred protesters from approaching the vessel.
Protests have been held at Greek islands and mainland ports along the route of the Crown Iris, several of which have led to clashes with police.
At the port of Piraeus, near Athens, on Thursday demonstrators held flares and waved Palestinian flags behind a cordon formed with riot police buses.
Protest organizers, citing online posts from travelers, said off-duty Israeli soldiers were among the passengers.
“They are unwanted here and have no business being here,” protest organizer Markos Bekris said. “The blood of innocent people is on their hands, and we should not welcome them.”
Greece is a popular holiday destination for Israelis. But the ongoing war in Gaza — and global attention on the widespread destruction and severe food shortages — has triggered hundreds of anti-Israel protests in Athens and other Greek cities, as well as a political confrontation.
Left-wing opposition parties are calling on the conservative government to halt commercial and broad military cooperation with Israel.


Poland foiled cyberattack on big city’s water supply, deputy PM says

Poland foiled cyberattack on big city’s water supply, deputy PM says
Updated 14 August 2025

Poland foiled cyberattack on big city’s water supply, deputy PM says

Poland foiled cyberattack on big city’s water supply, deputy PM says
  • Poland has said that its role as a hub for aid to Ukraine makes it a target for Russian cyberattacks and acts of sabotage
  • Deputy Prime Minister Krzysztof Gawkowski said Poland manages to thwart 99 percent of cyberattacks

WARSAW: A large Polish city could have had its water supply cut off on Wednesday as a result of a cyberattack, a deputy prime minister said after the intrusion was foiled.
In an interview with news portal Onet on Thursday, Deputy Prime Minister Krzysztof Gawkowski, who is also digital affairs minister, did not specify who was behind the attack or which city was targeted.
Poland has said that its role as a hub for aid to Ukraine makes it a target for Russian cyberattacks and acts of sabotage. Gawkowski has described Poland in the past as the “main target” for Russia among NATO countries.
Gawkowski told Onet that the cyberattack could have meant there would be no water in one of Poland’s big cities.
“At the last moment we managed to see to it that when the attack began, our services had found out about it and we shut everything down. We managed to prevent the attack.”
He said Poland manages to thwart 99 percent of cyberattacks.
Gawkowski last year that Poland would spend over 3 billion zlotys ($800 million) to boost cybersecurity after the state news agency PAP was hit by what authorities said was likely to have been a Russian cyberattack.
The digital affairs ministry did not immediately respond to an email requesting further details.
On Wednesday Prime Minister Donald Tusk, who has warned that Russia is trying to drive a wedge between Warsaw and Kyiv, said that a young Ukrainian man had been detained for acts of sabotage on behalf of foreign intelligence services, including writing graffiti insulting Poles.
PAP reported on Thursday that a 17-year-old Ukrainian man detained, among other things, for desecrating a monument to Poles killed by Ukrainian nationalists in World War Two has been charged with participating in an organized criminal group aimed at committing crimes against Poland.


WhatsApp accuses Moscow of trying to block secure communication for millions of Russians

WhatsApp accuses Moscow of trying to block secure communication for millions of Russians
Updated 14 August 2025

WhatsApp accuses Moscow of trying to block secure communication for millions of Russians

WhatsApp accuses Moscow of trying to block secure communication for millions of Russians
  • Russia banning WhatsApp and Telegram users from making calls comes as the government is actively promoting a new state-controlled messaging app, MAX, that will be integrated with government services and which critics fear could track its users’ activities

MOSCOW: WhatsApp accused Moscow of trying to block millions of Russians from accessing secure communication after calls on the messaging app were restricted, as Russia promotes home-grown social media platforms and seeks greater control over the country’s Internet space. Russia said on Wednesday that it had started restricting some WhatsApp, owned by Meta Platforms, and Telegram calls, accusing the foreign-owned platforms of failing to share information with law enforcement in fraud and terrorism cases.
Text messaging services and voice notes are currently unaffected.
A simmering dispute with foreign tech providers intensified after Moscow’s February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, with Russia blocking Meta’s Facebook and Instagram, slowing the speed of Alphabet’s YouTube and issuing hundreds of fines to platforms that failed to comply with Russian rules on online content and data storage.
“WhatsApp is private, end-to-end encrypted, and defies government attempts to violate people’s right to secure communication, which is why Russia is trying to block it from over 100 million Russian people,” WhatsApp said late on Wednesday.
“We will keep doing all we can to make end-to-end encrypted communication available to people everywhere, including in Russia.”
Telegram said its moderators were using AI tools to monitor public parts of the platform to remove millions of malicious messages every day.
“Telegram actively combats harmful use of its platform including calls for sabotage or violence and fraud,” Telegram said.
In July 2025, WhatsApp’s monthly reach in Russia was 97.3 million people, compared to 90.8 million for Telegram, according to Mediascope data. Third-placed VK Messenger, an offering from state-controlled tech company VK, reached 17.9 million people.
Russia has a population of more than 140 million people.

STEADY DEGRADATION
Russia banning WhatsApp and Telegram users from making calls comes as the government is actively promoting a new state-controlled messaging app, MAX, that will be integrated with government services and which critics fear could track its users’ activities.
Senior politicians are migrating to MAX, urging their followers to come with them. Anton Gorelkin, a leading regulator of Russia’s IT sector in parliament, said he would post to his MAX followers first and said many other lawmakers would soon follow suit. WhatsApp’s other services remain available for now, but the steady degradation of a service is a tactic Russia has employed before, notably with YouTube, where slower download speeds have made it harder for people to access content. Human Rights Watch said in a report last month that Russia has been “meticulously expanding legal and technological tools to carve out Russia’s section of the Internet into a tightly controlled and isolated forum.” Lawmakers have approved a new law that tightens censorship and could have sweeping ramifications for digital privacy, with Russians facing fines if they search online for content Moscow considers “extremist,” including via virtual private networks that millions use to bypass Internet blocks.


Bolsonaro’s lawyers call for acquittal in alleged coup trial

Bolsonaro’s lawyers call for acquittal in alleged coup trial
Updated 14 August 2025

Bolsonaro’s lawyers call for acquittal in alleged coup trial

Bolsonaro’s lawyers call for acquittal in alleged coup trial
  • Bolsonaro’s lawyers argued in a 197-page document submitted to the court that the far-right former leader is “innocent of all charges” and that an “absolute lack” of evidence was presented during the trial, which began in May
  • The prosecutor’s office maintains that Bolsonaro led an “armed criminal organization” that orchestrated the coup attempt and was its main beneficiary

BRASILIA: Defense lawyers for former president Jair Bolsonaro asked Brazil’s Supreme Court for an acquittal during Wednesday’s closing arguments in a trial in which he is accused of attempting a coup.
Bolsonaro’s lawyers argued in a 197-page document submitted to the court that the far-right former leader is “innocent of all charges” and that an “absolute lack” of evidence was presented during the trial, which began in May.
Bolsonaro and seven collaborators are accused of attempting to hold power despite his 2022 electoral defeat by Brazil’s current leftist leader, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.
Thousands of Bolsonaro supporters stormed government buildings in Brasilia on January 8, 2023, a week after Lula’s inauguration, alleging election fraud and calling on the military to intervene.
Bolsonaro, who led the Latin American country from 2019 to 2022, has maintained his innocence for months, calling any coup “abhorrent.”
He faces up to 40 years in prison if found guilty.
Bolsonaro was placed under house arrest in Brasilia this month for violating a ban on using social media to plead his case to the public.
The prosecutor’s office maintains that Bolsonaro led an “armed criminal organization” that orchestrated the coup attempt and was its main beneficiary.
The case file also focuses on meetings where draft decrees were allegedly presented, including those involving the possible imprisonment of officials such as Supreme Court judges.
However, the defense has stressed that “there is no way to convict” Bolsonaro based on the evidence presented in the case file, which they argued adequately demonstrated that he ordered the transition of power to Lula.
His lawyers have questioned the validity of the plea bargain handed to Lt. Col. Mauro Cid, Bolsonaro’s former aide, on whose testimony many of the accusations are based.
Bolsonaro’s legal wranglings are at the center of fizzing diplomatic tensions between Brazil and the United States.
US President Donald Trump has called the trial a “witch hunt” and the US Treasury Department has sanctioned Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who is overseeing Bolsonaro’s trial, in response.
Trump has also signed an executive order slapping 50 percent tariffs on many Brazilian imports, citing Bolsonaro’s “politically motivated persecution.”