������Ƶ

ROME: Hard-right commentators, politicians and activists in Europe have uncovered a secret to expanding their influence: engaging with Elon Musk.
Take the German politician from a party whose own domestic intelligence agency has designated as extremist. Her daily audience on X surged from 230,000 to 2.2 million on days Musk interacted with her posts. She went on to lead her party to its best-ever electoral showing.
Or the anti-immigration activist in Britain, who was banned from Twitter and sentenced to 18 months in prison for contempt of court. Since Musk let him back on the platform in late 2023, he’s mentioned, reposted or replied to the billionaire more than 120 times on X — and gained nearly a million followers.
Even a little-known social-media influencer turned politician from Cyprus has benefited from the Musk effect. Before winning a surprise seat in the European Parliament, where he’s advocated for Musk, the influencer seemed to have one ambition: to hug the world’s richest man. He got his hug — and political endorsements. On days Musk has interacted with his account on X, the man’s audience exploded from just over 300,000 to nearly 10 million views.
Elon Musk may have tumbled from political grace in Washington — he stepped down as an adviser to President Donald Trump in May and has since traded insults with the president — but as he works to build his own political party, his power on X his power remains unchecked.
Musk’s influence on the platform he bought for $44 billion has made him a kingmaker at home and abroad. Among those he has chosen to cultivate are hard-right politicians and insurgent influencers across Europe, according to an Associated Press analysis of public data. His dominance, which has real-world financial and political impacts, is fueling concerns in Europe about foreign meddling — not from Russia or China this time, but from the United States.
“Every alarm bell needs to ring,” said Christel Schaldemose, a vice president of the European Parliament who works on electoral interference and digital regulation. “We need to make sure that power is not unbalanced.”
In seeking to quantify Musk’s effect on European politics, The Associated Press analyzed more than 20,000 posts over a three-year period from 11 far-right European figures across six countries who frequently promote a hard-right political or social agenda and had significant interactions with Elon Musk since he purchased Twitter. Tens of thousands of posts by Musk on Twitter, now known as X, were also collected.
The AP used the records, obtained from data provider Bright Data, to analyze how Musk’s account interacted with the European influencers, and vice versa, and the extent to which Musk’s engagement boosted their reach.
These case studies are not meant to be representative of a broad universe; rather, they showcase the ways in which Musk’s engagement can have an impact on local influencers who share his views.
Due to limitations on data collection, the dataset is not a complete record of all posts made by these accounts. Even so, it captured at least 920 instances in which one of the European accounts tagged, replied or otherwise attempted to interact with Musk’s account, and at nearly 190 instances where Musk’s own posts interacted with the Europeans.
The AP also analyzed records of daily follower counts, using data from Social Blade, to measure any growth in the European accounts’ audience that occurred in the wake of Musk’s online interactions. This kind of analysis is no longer possible. In March, Social Blade removed X from its analytics, saying that X had increased its data access fees to prohibitive levels, making the platform harder to research.
Among those included in AP’s analysis are several people who have run into legal trouble in their own countries. An anti-immigrant agitator in the UK, for example, was sentenced in October to 18 months in prison for violating a court order blocking him from making libelous allegations against a Syrian refugee. A German politician was convicted last year of knowingly using a Nazi slogan in a speech. An Italian vice premier was acquitted in December of illegally detaining 100 migrants aboard a humanitarian rescue ship.
Others examined by AP were an influencer known as the “shieldmaiden of the far-right;” a German activist dubbed the “anti-Greta Thunberg” now living in what amounts to political exile in Washington, D.C.; and two politicians who have advocated for the interests of Musk’s companies as those firms seek to expand in Europe.
AP’s analysis shows how Musk is helping unite nationalists across borders in common cause to halt migration, overturn progressive policies and promote an absolutist vision of free speech. While his efforts have sparked backlash in some countries, Musk’s promotion of a growing alliance of hard-right parties and individuals has helped rattle the foundation of a transatlantic bond that has guided US and European relations for over eight decades.
Engagement from Musk does not guarantee a surge in followers or page views. But AP found it can have a huge impact, especially on up-and-coming influencers. One account that began with around 120,000 followers when Musk took over Twitter in October 2022 topped 1.2 million by January of this year. Seven other European accounts saw six-figure increases in their follower counts over the same period.
Most of the 11 accounts examined saw triple-digit percentage increases in their followers. Even some that grew more steadily on their own before Musk interacted with them saw their follower counts rise sharply after he began engaging with their posts. Similarly, on days Musk interacted with a post, its account saw its views soar — in most cases, accruing two to four times as many views, with a few seeing boosts 30 or 40 times their normal daily viewership.
Musk is not the only factor influencing the growth of these accounts, of course, but their rising fortunes are a measure of how the platform has evolved under his leadership. When Musk acquired X, he pledged to turn it into a haven for free speech, declaring himself a “free speech absolutist.” AP’s analysis adds to growing evidence that instead of serving as a neutral forum for free speech, X amplifies Musk’s speech.
This shift has given him sweeping power to direct people’s attention.
“There’s an extreme asymmetry in the way Musk is able to leverage and shape the platform,” said Timothy Graham, an associate professor in digital media at the Queensland University of Technology in Brisbane, Australia, who has studied data anomalies on X. “There’s an unequivocal sense when you go onto the site that you’re entering Musk’s kingdom.”
Musk’s megaphone: Bigger than Trump and Taylor Swift
Since he acquired Twitter in 2022, Musk has come to dominate the platform. His followers have more than doubled, to more than 220 million — growth so tremendous that it easily outpaced the other Top 10 accounts. Not even Taylor Swift has been able to keep up.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, whose followers grew by 21 million — or 25 percent — from October 2022 through January, clocked a distant second. Donald Trump’s followers grew by 14 percent, or around 12 million, while Taylor Swift mustered a mere 3 percent growth, or 3 million new followers.
None of the other Top 10 accounts have shown such consistent follower growth, month after month, AP found. The result is a further concentration of power for the world’s richest man, who now commands the most popular account on a social media platform used by hundreds of millions of people around the world.
Given the opacity of the algorithms that power X, it’s hard to determine with certainty what array of factors might be driving such unusual — and unusually consistent — growth in Musk’s account. But researchers who have analyzed data patterns on X argue that the platform’s algorithm has, at times, been altered to amplify Musk’s voice.
How X promotes content is a growing point of contention in Europe. In January, the European Union expanded its investigation of X to assess how the platform pushes content to users and why some material goes viral. In February, French prosecutors opened a separate investigation into X over allegations that Musk changed the platform’s algorithms to promote biased content.
Musk’s public attacks on left-leaning politicians, support for hard-right policies and loose handling of facts have prompted rebukes from British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, former German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, French President Emmanuel Macron, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, Italian President Sergio Mattarella, and Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre.
X did not respond to requests for comment.
Musk is X’s kingmaker
Musk’s dominance creates a strong incentive for people seeking to increase their clout — or their revenues, through the platform’s monetization options — to exploit these network effects and try to get Musk to engage with their content.
“People know that he’s gearing everything toward him,” said Graham, the digital media scholar in Australia. “They’re doing everything they can to get close to this person because he is the moneymaker.”
Germany’s Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, for example, has benefited from the Musk effect. AfD coleader Alice Weidel helped lead the party, which advocates for nationalist and anti-immigrant policies, to second place in German parliamentary elections in February.
When Musk interacted with her account in the run-up to those elections, the average number of daily views she got rose from about 230,000 to 2.2 million.
Germany’s domestic intelligence agency in May classified Weidel’s party as a right-wing extremist organization, which would subject the AfD to greater surveillance. The party, which maintains that it’s a victim of politically motivated defamation, promptly filed a lawsuit against the move, which Musk, along with top US officials blasted as an attack on free speech. The designation has been suspended pending judicial review.
The AfD denies any association with Germany’s Nazi past — though, in a chat with Musk livestreamed on X in January, Weidel falsely described Hitler as a “communist, socialist guy.”
The chat has gotten 16 million views. Musk also appeared at AfD rallies and endorsed the party in a German newspaper.
AfD officials did not respond to requests for comment.
Naomi Seibt, a German climate skeptic, pinged Musk nearly 600 times between October 2022 and Jan. 2025. Musk finally engaged in June 2024, when he asked her to explain why the AfD is so controversial in Germany.
Since then, Musk has replied to, quoted or tagged Seibt more than 50 times, and her followers have grown by more than 320,000 since Musk took over the platform. On days Musk interacted with Seibt, her posts, on average, got 2.6 times as many views.
“I didn’t intentionally ‘invade’ Elon’s algorithm,” Seibt told AP. “Obviously Elon has a lot of influence and can help share a message even with those who are usually glued to the legacy media, particularly in Germany.”
Seibt said she’s now living in the United States because she fears political persecution in Europe. “Washington DC is the political heart of America and thus also the safest place for me to be,” she said. “I fear the German state wants me locked up.”
Musk has also boosted the influence of political insurgents in the UK Days before British national elections last July, Musk took to X to ask Nigel Farage, the leader of the populist Reform UK party: “Why does the media keep calling you far-right? What are your policies?”
Farage replied eagerly: “Because we believe in family, country and strong borders. Call me!”
Such interactions from Musk helped Farage more than triple his daily audience. Farage did not reply to requests for comment.
In Spain, Rubén Pulido, a columnist for a newspaper published by the populist Vox party’s think tank, hit the jackpot in August, when Musk responded to two posts in which he argued that rescue boats operated by nongovernmental organizations effectively help smugglers move migrants to Europe. Pulido’s visibility soared. On days Musk engaged with him, his account got nearly 300,000 views — roughly three times more than usual.
When Musk didn’t interact with Pulido’s account, the results were just as clear. In January, he again inveighed against migrant rescues and sought to get Musk’s attention.
“Hi @elonmusk! Speak up,” he urged.
Three weeks later, he tweeted: “Perhaps @elonmusk might find this interesting.”
That post garnered just 5,128 views.
Pulido did not respond to requests for comment.
While Musk helped boost the accounts of such fringe parties and rising influencers, his interactions did not provide as stark a benefit to more established politicians, AP found. That was true for both Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, whose ruling Brothers of Italy party has neo-fascist roots, and Dutch politician Geert Wilders, an anti-Islamic firebrand who has been called the Dutch Donald Trump.
What happens on X doesn’t always stay on X
Musk’s interactions online have spilled into political endorsements, policy advocacy — and money.
X helps users monetize their accounts, through ad revenue sharing and paid subscription programs as well as direct fundraising links. That means a surge in attention on X can bring a surge in revenue.
Tommy Robinson, a British anti-immigration agitator who was released from prison in May, after serving a reduced sentence of seven months for contempt of court, has a link to his fundraising page on his X profile. Interactions from Musk more than doubled Robinson’s daily views, from around 380,000 to nearly 850,000. Robinson — whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon — could not be reached for comment
Radio Genoa, an account reportedly investigated by Italian authorities last year for allegedly spreading hate speech about migrants, used X to publicize a call for a GoFundMe campaign to raise money for legal defense. Radio Genoa has pinged Musk dozens of times over the last three years, and for good reason: On days Musk engaged with him, the views on his account doubled. Radio Genoa’s followers surged from less than 200,000 before Musk’s engagement to over 1.2 million. Radio Genoa could not be reached for comment.
Eva Vlaardingerbroek — a conservative Dutch political commentator dubbed the “shieldmaiden of the far-right” whose account Musk has engaged with three dozen times — uses X to solicit tips and has creator status, which allows her to charge subscription fees. So does Seibt, the German activist — though she told AP her earnings from X aren’t enough to sustain herself. Vlaardingerbroek did not respond to requests for comment.
Musk has also advocated for Matteo Salvini, vice premier of Italy and the leader of the hard-right, anti-migrant League party. On X, Musk’s interactions boosted Salvini’s daily visibility more than fourfold. Offline, Salvini has urged Italy to move ahead with controversial contracts for Starlink and pushed back against EU efforts to regulate content on X.
Before Fidias Panayiotou — a 25-year-old social media influencer from Cyprus with no political experience — won a surprise seat as an independent in the European Parliament last year, he spent weeks camped outside Twitter and Space X headquarters in a highly publicized quest to hug the world’s richest man. In January 2023, his wish came true. Their embrace went viral.
Soon, Musk was interacting with Panayiotou’s posts on a variety of subjects, expanding his typical audience on X by more than 3,000 percent.
Since taking his seat, Panayiotou — whose positions often also reflect the views of Cyprus’ traditional leftist establishment — has praised X on the floor of the European Parliament, pushed back against regulations that impact the platform, and credited Musk with sparking his call to fire 80 percent of EU bureaucrats.
Musk, evidently, was pleased. “Vote for Fidias,” he posted on X, an endorsement that was viewed more than 11.5 million times. “He is smart, super high energy and genuinely cares about you!”
In July, after AP asked for comment, Panayiotou posted a video to dispel any impression that he was Musk’s puppet. “I don’t have any relationship with Elon Musk,” he said. “We haven’t spoken at all since we hugged, neither through messages, nor by phone, and I’ve never invited him anywhere.”
He said that Musk, unprompted, began reposting his content after he was elected to the European Parliament.
“I don’t think it’s a danger to democracy honestly that Elon Musk supports me,” Panayiotou explained in another video. “I think this is the beauty of democracy.”

SAN FRANCISCO: A federal judge ruled on Thursday against the Trump administration’s plans and extended Temporary Protected Status for 60,000 people from Central America and Asia, including people from Nepal, Honduras and Nicaragua.
Temporary Protected Status is a protection that can be granted by the Homeland Security secretary to people of various nationalities who are in the United States, preventing from being deported and allowing them to work. The Trump administration has aggressively been seeking to remove the protection, thus making more people eligible for removal. It’s part of a wider effort by the administration to carry out mass deportations of immigrants.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem can extend Temporary Protected Status to immigrants in the US if conditions in their homelands are deemed unsafe to return due to a natural disaster, political instability or other dangerous conditions. Noem had ruled to end protections for tens of thousands of Hondurans and Nicaraguans after determining that conditions in their homelands no longer warranted them.
The secretary said the two countries had made “significant progress” in recovering from 1998’s Hurricane Mitch, one of the deadliest Atlantic storms in history.
The designation for an estimated 7,000 from Nepal was scheduled to end Aug. 5 while protections allowing 51,000 Hondurans and nearly 3,000 Nicaraguans who have been in the US for more than 25 years were set to expire Sept. 8.
US District Judge Trina L. Thompson in San Francisco did not set an expiration date but rather ruled to keep the protections in place while the case proceeds. The next hearing is Nov. 18.
In a sharply written order, Thompson said the administration ended the migrant status protections without an “objective review of the country conditions” such as political violence in Honduras and the impact of recent hurricanes and storms in Nicaragua.
If the protections were not extended, immigrants could suffer from loss of employment, health insurance, be separated from their families, and risk being deported to other countries where they have no ties, she wrote, adding that the termination of Temporary Protection Status for people from Nepal, Honduras, and Nicaragua would result in a $1.4 billion loss to the economy.
“The freedom to live fearlessly, the opportunity of liberty, and the American dream. That is all Plaintiffs seek. Instead, they are told to atone for their race, leave because of their names, and purify their blood,” Thompson said.
Lawyers for the National TPS Alliance argued that Noem’s decisions were predetermined by President Donald Trump’s campaign promises and motivated by racial animus.
Thompson agreed, saying that statements Noem and Trump have made perpetuated the “discriminatory belief that certain immigrant populations will replace the white population.”
“Color is neither a poison nor a crime,” she wrote.
The advocacy group that filed the lawsuit said designees usually have a year to leave the country, but in this case, they got far less.
“They gave them two months to leave the country. It’s awful,” said Ahilan Arulanantham, an attorney for plaintiffs at a hearing Tuesday.
Honduras Foreign Minister Javier Bu Soto said via the social platform X that the ruling was “good news.”
“The decision recognizes that the petitioners are looking to exercise their right to live in freedom and without fear while the litigation plays out,” the country’s top diplomat wrote. He said the government would continue supporting Hondurans in the United States through its consular network.
Meanwhile in Nicaragua, hundreds of thousands have fled into exile as the government shuttered thousands of nongovernmental organizations and imprisoned political opponents. Nicaragua President Daniel Ortega and his wife and co-President Rosario Murillo have consolidated complete control in Nicaragua since Ortega returned to power two decades ago.
In February, a panel of UN experts warned the Nicaraguan government had dismantled the last remaining checks and balances and was “systematically executing a strategy to cement total control of the country through severe human rights violations.”
The broad effort by the Republican administration ‘s crackdown on immigration has been going after people who are in the country illegally but also by removing protections that have allowed people to live and work in the US on a temporary basis.
The Trump administration has already terminated protections for about 350,000 Venezuelans, 500,000 Haitians, more than 160,000 Ukrainians and thousands of people from Afghanistan and Cameroon. Some have pending lawsuits at federal courts.
The government argued that Noem has clear authority over the program and that her decisions reflect the administration’s objectives in the areas of immigration and foreign policy.
“It is not meant to be permanent,” Justice Department attorney William Weiland said.
___
Ding reported from Los Angeles. Marlon González contributed from Tegucigalpa, Honduras.