Ƶ

UK Foreign Office under pressure over unreleased Gaza genocide risk assessment

Pro-Palestinian supporters wave Palestinian flags as they march across Waterloo Bridge in central London, on May 17, 2025. (AFP/File Photo)
Pro-Palestinian supporters wave Palestinian flags as they march across Waterloo Bridge in central London, on May 17, 2025. (AFP/File Photo)
Short Url
Updated 18 sec ago

UK Foreign Office under pressure over unreleased Gaza genocide risk assessment

UK Foreign Office under pressure over unreleased Gaza genocide risk assessment
  • British authorities fail to respond to freedom of information request from Amnesty International for a copy of the 2024 assessment, which reportedly found no serious risk of genocide
  • Government criticized for contradictions; ministers say only international courts can rule on genocide but recent court case heard UK officials decided Israel’s actions ‘did not create such a risk’

LONDON: The UK’s Foreign Office is under growing pressure after it emerged it failed to publish a 2024 internal assessment that reportedly found no serious risk of genocide in Gaza, and refused to say whether a new assessment has since been carried out.

Amnesty International filed a freedom of information request in June to obtain a copy the document and ask whether any reassessment has taken place amid the escalating violence in the territory.

After receiving no response within the specified time frame for such requests, Amnesty lodged a formal complaint with the Information Commissioner’s Office, .

The government has come under fire for what critics describe as a contradictory stance, and calls for transparency are mounting. While ministers have insisted that only international courts can determine whether or not genocide is taking place, they told a domestic court, during a recent case brought by human rights group Al-Haq, that officials had reviewed the issue and found “Israel’s actions and statements did not create such a risk.”

Extracts from the unpublished 2024 assessment were disclosed in court. One part stated: “No evidence has been seen that Israel is deliberately targeting civilian women or children. There is also evidence of Israel making efforts to limit incidental harm to civilians.”

Another said: “There is no evidence of a high-level strategic decision, passed down through military chains of command, like that which was in evidence for the massacre and deportations at Srebrenica that were found in the Bosnian genocide case to constitute genocide (the ICJ’s only finding of genocide to date),” referring to the International Court of Justice.

The document reportedly concluded that Israel’s conduct could be “reasonably explained as a legitimate military campaign waged as part of an intensive armed conflict in a densely populated urban area,” and also cited the use of human shields by Hamas.

However, Amnesty argued that parts of the assessment appear to be outdated, and said the government might have updated its conclusions without disclosing them.

Kristyan Benedict of Amnesty said: “The government’s refusal to engage with us on this raises the suspicion that the government has made a further genocide assessment, and it is likely to be different from the 2024 claim that there was no serious risk of a genocide.”

More than 60 MPs wrote to the Foreign Office in May urging it to publish any updated assessments regarding the risk of genocide in Gaza.

The debate comes amid growing international concern about developments in the territory, with some legal experts and Israeli nongovernmental organizations accusing Israeli authorities of showing genocidal intent.

On Friday, Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey described Israel’s latest plan, to occupy Gaza City and displace tens of thousands of Palestinians, as “ethnic cleansing.”


British pro-Palestine protester launches legal action against police

British pro-Palestine protester launches legal action against police
Updated 08 August 2025

British pro-Palestine protester launches legal action against police

British pro-Palestine protester launches legal action against police
  • Laura Murton, 42, had held signs saying ‘Free Gaza’ and ‘Israel is committing genocide’
  • Armed police accused her of violating UK’s Terrorism Act, threatened her with arrest

LONDON: A pro-Palestine protester in the UK who was threatened with arrest under the Terrorism Act is taking legal action against the police force involved in the incident, The Guardian reported on Friday.

Laura Murton, 42, had held up a Palestinian flag and signs saying “Free Gaza” and “Israel is committing genocide” at her demonstration in the city of Canterbury last month.

Armed police who responded to the protest told Murton that she had expressed support for Palestine Action, the group banned in July and listed as a terrorist organization.

Neither of Murton’s signs mentioned Palestine Action, she told officers, who asked if she supported any proscribed organizations. “I do not,” she responded.

Murton’s solicitors have issued a letter of claim to Kent police’s chief constable, in what is viewed as a reminder of police responsibilities ahead of major pro-Palestine protests this weekend across the UK.

Murton is seeking damages over the incident and will donate any compensation toward Palestinian causes.

She is also requesting an apology and an overview of details that police officers recorded about the incident.

Shamik Dutta of law firm Bhatt Murphy, which is representing Murton, said: “The legal challenge is being brought because as matters stand our client has neither received any apology nor any acknowledgment that Kent police conduct has been unlawful.

“She has had no indication that no further action will be taken against her in relation to her protest on July 14 or that no further action will be taken against her if she wishes to engage in a materially similar protest in the future.”

Murton filmed her encounter. One officer told her: “Mentioning freedom of Gaza, Israel, genocide, all of that all come under proscribed groups, which are terror groups that have been dictated by the government.” He then claimed that the phrase “free Gaza” indicated support for Palestine Action.

Murton reluctantly provided her name and address to the officers, who had threatened her with arrest unless she did so.

 


Xi tells Putin China glad to see improved US-Russia relations

Xi tells Putin China glad to see improved US-Russia relations
Updated 08 August 2025

Xi tells Putin China glad to see improved US-Russia relations

Xi tells Putin China glad to see improved US-Russia relations
  • Putin briefed Xi on the “situation of recent contact and communications” between the US and Russia, as well as the situation in Ukraine, it said

BEIJING: President Xi Jinping told his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in a phone call on Friday that China was pleased to see Moscow and Washington improving their relations, state media said.
Putin and US President Donald Trump are set to hold talks in a bid to end the war in Ukraine. Both sides have confirmed preparations for a summit are underway and have suggested that a meeting could take place next week, although no firm date or venue has been set.
Chinese state broadcaster CCTV reported that Xi had talked to Putin on Friday at the Russian leader’s request.
Putin briefed Xi on the “situation of recent contact and communications” between the US and Russia, as well as the situation in Ukraine, it said.
“China is glad to see Russia and the US maintain contact, improve their relations, and promote a political settlement of the Ukraine crisis,” state news agency Xinhua’s English service quoted Xi as telling Putin.

HIGHLIGHT

Putin and US President Donald Trump are set to hold talks in a bid to end the war in Ukraine.

Moscow and Beijing have deepened their ties since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022.
China has never denounced Russia’s war nor called for it to withdraw its troops, and many of Ukraine’s allies believe that Beijing has provided support to Moscow.
It insists it is a neutral party, regularly calling for an end to the fighting while also accusing Western countries of prolonging the conflict by arming Ukraine.
In the call on Friday, Xi “pointed out that complex issues have no simple solutions” and said “China will always... support making peace and promoting talks,” CCTV reported.
Putin is set to visit China on a trip beginning in late August.
He will attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, as well as celebrations to mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II.
He will also hold talks with Xi.
China has been mentioned in media reports as a possible venue for the Putin-Trump summit, with speculation that Trump could join Putin there in early September. The Kremlin has not ruled out such a meeting.

 


A Spanish town’s ban on religious gatherings in sports centers becomes a flashpoint

A Spanish town’s ban on religious gatherings in sports centers becomes a flashpoint
Updated 08 August 2025

A Spanish town’s ban on religious gatherings in sports centers becomes a flashpoint

A Spanish town’s ban on religious gatherings in sports centers becomes a flashpoint
  • The ban — approved last week by the conservative local government of Jumilla, a town of 27,000 — has since become a flashpoint
  • Spain’s Migration Minister Elma Saiz said on Friday the ban was “shameful”

MADRID: Spain’s government on Friday criticized a ban enacted in a southeastern town that prohibits religious gatherings in public sports centers, a measure that will mainly affect members of the town’s Muslim community who in recent years have used the spaces to celebrate religious holidays.

The ban — approved last week by the conservative local government of Jumilla, a town of 27,000 — has since become a flashpoint. Its critics, including Spain’s leftwing national government, have condemned the measure as discriminatory while some on the right are celebrating it as a means to uphold the nation’s Christian culture.

Spain’s Migration Minister Elma Saiz said on Friday the ban was “shameful,” and urged local leaders to “take a step back” and apologize to local residents.

Saiz told Spain’s Antena 3 broadcaster that the measure is “attacking and harming people, citizens who have been living for decades in our towns, in our cities, in our country, contributing and perfectly integrated without any problems of coexistence.”

The ban is the latest controversy involving Spain’s hot-button issues of immigration and multi-culturalism, following clashes last month in the southern Murcia region between far-right groups and local residents and migrants. They erupted after an elderly resident in the town of Torre-Pacheco was beaten up by assailants believed to be of Moroccan origin, which prompted far-right groups to call for retribution on the area’s large migrant population.

Conservative officials in Jumilla, an agriculture-based economy of rolling vineyards, olive and almond trees, defended the ban on Friday.

The town’s mayor Seve González told Spain’s El País newspaper that the measure did not single out any one group and that her government’s wanted to “promote cultural campaigns that defend our identity.”

The measure was initially proposed by the far-right Vox party and then amended and approved by the center-right Popular Party, to which the mayor belongs. It stipulates that municipal sports facilities — where the town’s Muslim community has held religious celebrations — cannot be used for cultural, social or religious activities unrelated to the city council.

Mohamed El Ghaidouni, secretary of the Union of Islamic Communities of Spain that represents more than 900 Muslim communities in the country, called the ban “institutionalized Islamophobia.”

He criticized the local government’s justification for the motion and its allegation that two main Muslim festivals traditionally celebrated in the sports centers — Eid Al-Fitr, which marks the end of Islamic holy month of Ramadan, and Eid Al-Adha, or “Feast of the Sacrifice” — were “foreign to the town’s identity.”

The ban, he added, “clashes with the institutions of the Spanish state” that protect religious freedom.

Vox’s branch in the Murcia region celebrated it, saying Wednesday on X that “Spain is and always will be a land of Christian roots!”

“We must protect public spaces from practices foreign to our culture and our way of life,” the party’s leader Santiago Abascal wrote Friday, adding that “Spain is not Al Andalus,” referencing the historic name for Islamic Spain.

For centuries, Spain was ruled by Muslims, whose influence is present both in the Spanish language and in many of the country’s most celebrated landmarks, including Granada’s famed Moorish Alhambra Palace. Islamic rule ended in 1492 when the last Arab kingdom in Spain fell to the Catholics.

Right-wing governments elsewhere in Europe have passed measures similar to the ban in Jumilla, striking at the heart of ongoing debates about nationalism and religious pluralism.

Last year in Monfalcone, a large industrial port city in northeastern Italy with a significant Bangladeshi immigrant population, its far-right mayor, Anna Maria Cisint, banned prayers outside of places of worship. The move led to protests involving some 8,000 people. The city’s Muslim community is appealing the ban in a regional court.


Ukrainian troops have little hope for peace as Trump’s deadline for Russia arrives

Ukrainian troops have little hope for peace as Trump’s deadline for Russia arrives
Updated 08 August 2025

Ukrainian troops have little hope for peace as Trump’s deadline for Russia arrives

Ukrainian troops have little hope for peace as Trump’s deadline for Russia arrives
  • Ukrainian forces are locked in intense battles along the 1,000-kilometer front line
  • In the Pokrovsk area of Donetsk, a commander said he believes Moscow isn’t interested in peace

DNIPROPETROVSK, Ukraine: Ukrainian soldiers on the battlefield expressed little hope for a diplomatic solution to the war with Russia, as US President Donald Trump’s Friday deadline for the Kremlin to make peace arrived and he eyed a possible summit meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss Moscow’s invasion of its neighbor.

Trump, exasperated that Putin didn’t heed his calls to stop bombing Ukrainian cities, almost two weeks ago moved up his ultimatum to impose additional sanctions on Russia, as well as introduce secondary tariffs targeting countries that buy Russian oil, if no Kremlin moves toward a settlement were forthcoming. It was unclear what steps Trump intended to take Friday.

Trump’s efforts to pressure Putin into stopping the fighting have so far delivered no progress. Russia’s bigger army is slowly advancing deeper into Ukraine at great cost in troops and armor while it relentlessly bombards Ukrainian cities. Russia and Ukraine are far apart on their terms for peace.

Ukrainian forces are locked in intense battles along the 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line that snakes from northeast to southeast Ukraine. The Pokrovsk city area of the eastern Donetsk region is taking the brunt of punishment as Russia looks to break out from there into the neighboring Dnipropetrovsk region. Ukraine has significant manpower shortages.

Intense fighting is also taking place in Ukraine’s northern Sumy border region, where Ukrainian forces are engaging Russian soldiers to prevent reinforcements being sent from there to Donetsk.

In the Pokrovsk area of Donetsk, a commander said he believes Moscow isn’t interested in peace.

“It is impossible to negotiate with them. The only option is to defeat them,” Buda, the Spartan Brigade commander, told The Associated Press. He used only his call sign, in keeping with the rules of the Ukrainian military.

“I would like them to agree and for all this to stop, but Russia will not agree to that; it does not want to negotiate. So the only option is to defeat them,” he said.

In the southern Zaporizhzhia region, a howitzer commander using the call sign Warsaw, said troops are determined to thwart Russia’s invasion.

“We are on our land, we have no way out,” he said. “So we stand our ground, we have no choice.”

Trump said Thursday that he would meet with Putin even if the Russian leader will not meet with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky. That has stoked fears in Europe that Ukraine could be sidelined in efforts to stop the continent’s biggest conflict since World War II.

The Institute for the Study of War, a Washington think tank, said in an assessment Thursday that “Putin remains uninterested in ending his war and is attempting to extract bilateral concessions from the United States without meaningfully engaging in a peace process.”

“Putin continues to believe that time is on Russia’s side and that Russia can outlast Ukraine and the West,” it said.

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán said Friday that Europe should take the lead in efforts to
end the conflict.

Orbán said the leaders of Germany and France should go to Moscow “to negotiate on behalf of Europe.” Otherwise, “we will be sidelined in managing the security issues of our own continent,” Orbán told Hungary’s state broadcaster.

Orbán, who is a harsh critic of the European Union to which his country belongs, said Europe’s concerns that a Trump-Putin summit might not address the continent’s interests meant it should seize the diplomatic initiative.

“This war cannot be ended on the front line, no solution can be concluded on the battlefield,” he said. “This war must be ended by diplomats, politicians, leaders at the negotiating table.”


’Prepare for the worst’: Russians skeptical of progress at Putin-Trump summit

’Prepare for the worst’: Russians skeptical of progress at Putin-Trump summit
Updated 08 August 2025

’Prepare for the worst’: Russians skeptical of progress at Putin-Trump summit

’Prepare for the worst’: Russians skeptical of progress at Putin-Trump summit
  • “Hope for the best, prepare for the worst,” Irina, a 57-year-old lawyer, told AFP
  • “I don’t think we’ll get any clarity next week, unfortunately,” said Arseniy, a 21-year-old student

MOSCOW: Russians on the streets of Moscow on Friday held little hope that an upcoming summit between their president, Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart Donald Trump would help end the conflict in Ukraine.

Both presidents have said they are set to meet, possibly as early as next week, as Trump intensifies his bid to convince Moscow to halt its more than three-year-long military offensive.

The former reality TV star has spent his first months in office trying to broker peace — after initially boasting that he could end the conflict in 24 hours.

Multiple rounds of peace talks, telephone calls and diplomatic visits have failed to yield a breakthrough.

“Hope for the best, prepare for the worst,” Irina, a 57-year-old lawyer, told AFP in sunny central Moscow.

“To be honest, I have no hopes,” she added.

The fighting will likely go on until both sides run out of resources, she said.

Tens of thousands have been killed since Russia launched its offensive in February 2022, with millions forced to flee their homes and much of east and southern Ukraine destroyed.

Though Sergei, a 28-year-old car parts merchant welcomed the move toward peace, he said, “the conflict has got bogged down, it will definitely not end now.”

“I don’t think we’ll get any clarity next week, unfortunately,” said Arseniy, a 21-year-old student.

Noone that AFP spoke to agreed to give their surname, with Moscow having introduced strict censorship laws that prohibit any criticism of its offensive on Ukraine or comments that could be seen as going against the Kremlin.

Putin has stuck to his maximalist claims, demanding that Ukraine cede more territory if it wants his army to stop advancing on the ground.

“Whether you like it or not, we have to go all the way,” said Natalya, 79, a retired medical worker.

Russia will have to “clean up Ukraine — absolutely everything, including the western part,” she added.

At talks in June, Russia demanded that Ukraine pull its forces out of four regions Moscow claims to have annexed, shun Western military support and be excluded from joining NATO.

For Tatiana, 39, who works on Russia’s railways, talks felt like they had been ongoing for an “eternity,” without anything to show for them.

She had little interest in where the front line was or what land Russia might secure in a peace deal.

“It doesn’t matter. I’d rather it be frozen already,” she said.

“We have enough of our territory.”

Kyiv wants an immediate ceasefire and has said that it will never recognize Russian control over its land — although it has acknowledged that it would likely have to try to secure the return of land captured by Russia through diplomacy, not on the battlefield.

Leonid, a 70-year-old retiree with a short grey goatee beard, was one of the few to show a degree of optimism.

“Putin and Trump may agree on something, at least on some kind of ceasefire,” he told AFP.

“Any kind of peace is better than a quarrel.”