ÂÜÀòÊÓÆ”

Israel ignores truce as bulldozers enter Lebanon border towns

Special Israel ignores truce as bulldozers enter Lebanon border towns
Israel forces caused massive destruction in the southern Lebanese village of Khiam before their pullout under the ceasefire deal. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 17 December 2024

Israel ignores truce as bulldozers enter Lebanon border towns

Israel ignores truce as bulldozers enter Lebanon border towns
  • World Bank in talks with Lebanese govt over reconstruction efforts
  • Rubble from attacks will be used to fill quarries, environment minister says

Ìę

BEIRUT: Israeli forces bulldozed roads and destroyed houses early on Tuesday in the village of Naqoura, near the southern Lebanese border.

Troops continued to violate the ceasefire agreement, firing bursts of machine-gun fire inside the coastal town, while bulldozing local landmarks.

Remaining houses in the border village of Kfarkila were also bulldozed.

Israeli forces invaded the Lebanese southern border region on Oct. 1 as part of their expanded war against Hezbollah.

Troops are slowly withdrawing from the area, taking advantage of the 60 days agreed in the ceasefire deal for their complete withdrawal.

The agreement took effect three weeks ago.

Israeli artillery on Monday targeted the outskirts of Halta, Kfarshouba, and Shebaa, while reconnaissance planes continued around-the-clock flights over the south and Beirut, mainly the southern suburbs.

The Lebanese army in coordination with UNIFIL is set to retrieve the bodies of 37 Hezbollah fighters killed in confrontations in the border villages of Odaisseh and Taybeh.

Hezbollah-affiliated Al-Manar TV said that the army is waiting on communications from UNIFIL before entering the towns. No implementation date has been set, it added.

The network also said Israel’s slow withdrawal from Al-Hamames Hill is delaying the Lebanese army’s entry into Khiam.

The withdrawal was part of the first phase of the agreement with UNIFIL.

Maj. Gen. Patrick Gauchat, head of the UN Truce Supervision Organization, held talks with Lebanese officials, including caretaker Foreign Minister Abdullah Bou Habib, in a bid to solve disputes over the withdrawal.

Habib emphasized the importance of clearly establishing the borders between Lebanon and Israel.

Six sections of the 120 km border between the two countries are still disputed.
Ìę
Meanwhile, Jean-Christophe Carret, World Bank country director for the Middle East, met with Lebanese officials to discuss reconstruction programs, and the rebuilding and repair of infrastructure.

Carret said the bank wanted to ensure the “effective operation, implementation, and sustainability of the work.”

Lebanon’s government is still discussing possible disposal sites for debris from Israeli attacks on residential buildings and facilities.

Environment Minister Nasser Yassin said that the rubble is likely to be taken to quarries around the country.

Interior Minister Bassam Mawlawi told governors in southern Lebanon and Nabatieh, Bekaa, Baalbek-Hermel, and other municipalities to ensure the Litani River and its tributaries area protected during reconstruction work.

Debris must not be dumped in the river or left on open land overlooking the waterway, he said.

On Monday, two Lebanese lawyers, Majd Harb and Eli Kirolos, submitted a complaint to the judiciary accusing the Al-Qard Al-Hassan Association, affiliated with Hezbollah, of violating monetary and credit laws.

Al-Qard Al-Hassan Association offices in various locations around Lebanon were hit by Israeli attacks during the final two weeks of the conflict.

Hezbollah announced the resumption of operations in some of the offices following the ceasefire.


Iraqi farmers protest cultivation ban amid drought

Iraqi farmers protest cultivation ban amid drought
Updated 04 October 2025

Iraqi farmers protest cultivation ban amid drought

Iraqi farmers protest cultivation ban amid drought
  • Hundreds of Iraqi farmers protested Saturday against the government’s policy of curbing land cultivation to preserve dwindling water supplies, an AFP correspondent said

DIWANIYAH: Hundreds of Iraqi farmers protested Saturday against the government’s policy of curbing land cultivation to preserve dwindling water supplies, an AFP correspondent said.
Year-on-year droughts and declining rainfall have brought agriculture to its knees in a country still recovering from decades of war and chaos, and where rice and bread are diet staples.
Water scarcity has forced many farmers to abandon their plots, and authorities have drastically reduced farm activity to ensure sufficient drinking water for Iraq’s 46 million people.
In the Ghammas area in the southern province of Diwaniyah, hundreds of farmers, including from neighboring provinces, gathered to urge the government to allow them to farm their lands.
They called on the authorities to compensate them for their losses and distribute water for agriculture.
“We have come from four provinces to demand the rights and compensation owed to farmers,” one of the protesters, Mahmoud Saleh, said.
“The farmer has been wronged. They will not let us cultivate the wheat crop next year, and they have cut off water supplies,” he added.
Mohammed Amoush, who used to cultivate 100 dunum (25 hectares) of farms, said “our land has become fallow.”
“There is no agriculture, only financial loss. We are devastated,” he added.
Iraq’s historically fertile plains stretched along the once-mighty Tigris and Euphrates, but water levels have plummeted drastically over the past decades.
In addition to the drought, authorities also blame upstream dams in neighboring countries for reducing the rivers’ flow.
In recent weeks, the Euphrates has seen its lowest levels in decades, especially in the southern provinces, and water reserves in artificial lakes are at their lowest in the country’s recent history.
Iraq currently receives less than 35 percent of its share of the river water allocated according to preexisting agreements and understandings with neighboring countries, according to authorities.
Decades of war have also left the country’s water management systems in disrepair.


Turkiye says 36 nationals from Gaza-bound flotilla due to return

Turkiye says 36 nationals from Gaza-bound flotilla due to return
Updated 04 October 2025

Turkiye says 36 nationals from Gaza-bound flotilla due to return

Turkiye says 36 nationals from Gaza-bound flotilla due to return
  • Turkiye said 36 of its citizens were expected to return home via a special flight on Saturday afternoon, after Israel intercepted a Gaza-bound aid flotilla

ISTANBUL: Turkiye said 36 of its citizens were expected to return home via a special flight on Saturday afternoon, after Israel intercepted a Gaza-bound aid flotilla.
“We expected 36 of our nationals on the Global Sumud Flotilla vessels seized by Israeli forces in international waters will return to our country this afternoon via a special flight,” Turkish foreign ministry spokesman Oncu Keceli said on X, adding that the final number has not been finalized.


Israel’s army says it will advance preparations for the first phase of Trump’s plan

Israel’s army says it will advance preparations for the first phase of Trump’s plan
Updated 04 October 2025

Israel’s army says it will advance preparations for the first phase of Trump’s plan

Israel’s army says it will advance preparations for the first phase of Trump’s plan
  • Israel’s army says it is preparing for the first phase of Trump’s plan to end the war in Gaza
  • Arab mediators are preparing for a dialogue aimed at unifying the Palestinian

TEL AVIV: Israel’s army said Saturday that it would advance preparations for the first phase of US President Donald Trump’s plan to end the war in Gaza and return all the remaining hostages, after Hamas said it accepted parts of the deal while others still needed to be negotiated.
The army said it was instructed by Israel’s leaders to “advance readiness” for the implementation of the plan. An official who was not authorized to speak to the media on the record said that Israel has moved to a defensive-only position in Gaza and will not actively strike. The official said no forces have been removed from the strip.
This announcement came hours after Trump ordered Israel to stop bombing Gaza once Hamas said it had accepted some elements of his plan. Trump welcomed the Hamas statement, saying: “I believe they are ready for a lasting PEACE.”
Trump appears keen to deliver on pledges to end the war and return dozens of hostages ahead of the second anniversary of the attack on Tuesday. His proposal unveiled earlier this week has widespread international support and was also endorsed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
On Friday, Netanyahu’s office said Israel was committed to ending the war, without addressing potential gaps with the militant group. Netanyahu has come under increasing pressure from the international community and Trump to end the conflict. The official told the AP that Netanyahu put out the rare late-night statement on the sabbath saying that Israel has started to prepare for Trump’s plan due to pressure from the US administration.
The official also said that a negotiating team was getting ready to travel, but there was no date specified.
A senior Egyptian official says talks are underway for the release of hostages, as well as hundreds of Palestinian prisoners in Israeli detention. The official, who is involved in the ceasefire negotiations, also said Arab mediators are preparing for a comprehensive dialogue among Palestinians. The talks are aimed at unifying the Palestinian position toward Gaza’s future.
On Saturday, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, the second most powerful militant group in Gaza, said it accepted Hamas’ response to the Trump plan. The group had previously rejected the proposal days earlier.
Progress, but uncertainty ahead
Yet, despite the momentum, a lot of questions remain.
Under the plan, Hamas would release the remaining 48 hostages — around 20 of them believed to be alive — within three days. It would also give up power and disarm.
In return, Israel would halt its offensive and withdraw from much of the territory, release hundreds of Palestinian prisoners and allow an influx of humanitarian aid and eventual reconstruction.
Hamas said it was willing to release the hostages and hand over power to other Palestinians, but that other aspects of the plan require further consultations among Palestinians. Its official statement also didn’t address the issue of Hamas demilitarizing, a key part of the deal.
Amir Avivi, a retired Israeli general and chairman of Israel’s Defense and Security Forum, said while Israel can afford to stop firing for a few days in Gaza so the hostages can be released, it will resume its offensive if Hamas doesn’t lay down its arms.
Others say that while Hamas suggests a willingness to negotiate, its position fundamentally remains unchanged.
This “yes, but” rhetoric “simply repackages old demands in softer language,” said Oded Ailam, a researcher at the Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs. The gap between appearance and action is as wide as ever and the rhetorical shift serves more as a smokescreen than a signal of true movement toward resolution, he said.
Unclear what it means for Palestinians suffering in Gaza
The next steps are also unclear for Palestinians in Gaza who are trying to piece together what it means in practical terms.
Israeli troops are still laying siege to Gaza City, which is the focus of its latest offensive. On Saturday Israel’s army warned Palestinians against trying to return to the city calling it a “dangerous combat zone.”
Experts determined that Gaza City had slid into famine shortly before Israel launched its major offensive there aimed at occupying it. An estimated 400,000 people have fled the city in recent weeks, but hundreds of thousands more have stayed behind.
Families of the hostages are also cautious about being hopeful.
There are concerns from all sides, said Yehuda Cohen, whose son Nimrod is held in Gaza. Hamas and Netanyahu could sabotage the deal or Trump could lose interest, he said. Still, he says, if it’s going to happen it will be because of Trump.
“We’re putting our trust in Trump, because he’s the only one who’s doing it. ... And we want to see him with us until the last step,” he said.


Many Syrians are unaware of the first parliamentary election since Assad’s fall

Many Syrians are unaware of the first parliamentary election since Assad’s fall
Updated 04 October 2025

Many Syrians are unaware of the first parliamentary election since Assad’s fall

Many Syrians are unaware of the first parliamentary election since Assad’s fall
  • Residents are unaware of the vote, the first since Islamic insurgents ousted former President Bashar Assad
  • Some activists criticize the process, citing a lack of transparency and inclusivity

DAMASCUS:The streets of Damascus barely showed sign Saturday a parliamentary election was set to take place the next day.
There were no candidate posters on the main streets and squares, no rallies, or public debates. In the days leading up to the polling, some residents of the Syrian capital had no idea a vote was hours away, the first since Islamic insurgents ousted former President Bashar Assad in a lightning offensive in December.
“I didn’t know — now by chance I found out that there are elections of the People’s Assembly,” said Elias Al-Qudsi, a shopkeeper in Damascus’ old city, after being asked for his views about the upcoming election. “But I don’t know if we are supposed to vote or who is voting.”
His neighborhood, known as the Jewish Quarter, although nearly all of its former Jewish residents have left, is one of the few that has a smattering of campaign fliers posted on walls in its narrow streets.
The posters announce the candidacy of Henry Hamra, a Jewish former resident of the neighborhood who emigrated to the United States with his family when he was a teenager and returned to visit Damascus for the first time after Assad’s fall. Hamra’s campaign announcement made a splash on social media but failed to make an impression on Al-Qudsi.
‘Not perfect’ but ‘realistic’
Under Assad’s autocratic rule, Al-Qudsi said he never voted. The outcome was a given: Assad would be president and his Ba’ath party would dominate the parliament.
The shopkeeper won’t vote on Sunday either, but for a different reason — there will be no popular vote. Instead, two-thirds of the People’s Assembly seats will be voted on by electoral colleges in each district, while one-third of the seats will be directly appointed by interim President Ahmad Al-Sharaa.
“The usual process is, of course, parliamentary elections through the direct vote of citizens, but this ideal is almost impossible now for several reasons,” Nawar Nejmeh, spokesperson for the committee overseeing the elections, told The Associated Press. Chief among them is the fact that large numbers of Syrians were displaced or lost their personal documentation during the country’s civil war, he said.
The interim authorities dissolved the former parliament and political parties after Assad’s fall. To end the “legislative vacuum,” Nejmeh said, the government settled on the current process.
“It is not perfect, but it is the most realistic at the current stage,” he said.
Concerns about credibility
Some Syrian activists who opposed Assad have lambasted the new authorities and the political transition process.
Among them is Mutasem Syoufi, executive director of The Day After, an organization working to support a democratic transition in Syria that trained electoral college members in two cities, at the government’s request, on the provisional elections law and their role in the process.
Syoufi said the elections commission turned down his organization’s proposal to provide independent observers on polling day. Nejmeh, the election committee spokesperson, said lawyers from the Syrian bar association will monitor the vote instead.
The process has also suffered other issues, Syoufi said, including a compressed timeline that gave only a few days for candidates to present their platforms and unexplained last-minute changes in the rosters of electoral college members.
Nejmeh said that in some cases, electors had been “dropped because they have been challenged as a result of their support for the former regime” or because they did not complete the required documentation. But in other cases, “there are people whose names were removed despite their patriotic affiliation and competence” to include more women and religious minorities.
Earlier this year, a national dialogue conference to help Syrians chart their political future was heavily criticized as hastily convened and not truly inclusive. In addition, outbreaks of sectarian violence have left religious minorities increasingly skeptical of the new leadership.
“Are we going through a credible transition, an inclusive transition that represents all of Syria?” Syoufi said. “I think we’re not there, and I think we have to take serious and brave steps to correct all the mistakes that we’ve committed over the last nine months” since Assad’s fall.
Waiting for the final result
Many Syrians are taking a wait-and-see attitude toward the election process — if they are following it at all.
Al Qudsi said he is not much bothered about not having a vote this time.
“We have no problem with how (the parliament members) are elected,” he said. “What is important is that they work for the people and the country.”
On the next street over, his neighbor, Shadi Shams, said he had heard there was an election but was fuzzy on the details. Like many Syrians, the father of six is more preoccupied with day-to-day concerns like the country’s moribund economy, lengthy daily electricity cuts, and struggling education system.
In Assad’s day, he would vote, but it felt performative.
“Everyone knew that whoever was sitting in the People’s Assembly didn’t really have a say about anything,” Shams said.
As for the new system, he said: “We can’t judge until after the elections, when we see the results and the final shape of things.”


Palestinian Islamic Jihad endorses Hamas’s response to Trump Gaza plan

Palestinian Islamic Jihad endorses Hamas’s response to Trump Gaza plan
Updated 04 October 2025

Palestinian Islamic Jihad endorses Hamas’s response to Trump Gaza plan

Palestinian Islamic Jihad endorses Hamas’s response to Trump Gaza plan

CAIRO: Palestinian Islamic Jihad, an ally of Hamas, endorsed the group’s response to US President Donald Trump’s plan to end the war in Gaza, saying it represents the stance of the Palestinian resistance.
Islamic Jihad’s approval of the plan would facilitate Hamas’s release of hostages both groups hold in Gaza.