Ƶ

‘Like a dream’: AFP photographer’s return to Syria

Syrian AFP photographer Sameer Al-Doumy talks with people from his old neighborhood in the city of Douma near Damascus on December 22, 2024. (AFP)
1 / 4
Syrian AFP photographer Sameer Al-Doumy talks with people from his old neighborhood in the city of Douma near Damascus on December 22, 2024. (AFP)
Syrian AFP photographer Sameer al-Doumy meets with a friend from his old neighborhood in the city of Douma near Damascus on December 22, 2024. (AFP)
2 / 4
Syrian AFP photographer Sameer al-Doumy meets with a friend from his old neighborhood in the city of Douma near Damascus on December 22, 2024. (AFP)
Syrian AFP photographer Sameer Al-Doumy takes a selfie in the city of Douma near Damascus on December 22, 2024. (AFP)
3 / 4
Syrian AFP photographer Sameer Al-Doumy takes a selfie in the city of Douma near Damascus on December 22, 2024. (AFP)
Syrian AFP photographer Sameer al-Doumy visits his house in the city of Douma near Damascus on December 22, 2024. (AFP)
4 / 4
Syrian AFP photographer Sameer al-Doumy visits his house in the city of Douma near Damascus on December 22, 2024. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 25 December 2024

‘Like a dream’: AFP photographer’s return to Syria

Syrian AFP photographer Sameer Al-Doumy talks with people from his old neighborhood in the city of Douma near Damascus.
  • “We didn’t dare to imagine that Assad could fall because his presence was so anchored in us,” said Al-Doumy
  • Award-winning photographer has spent the last few years covering migrant crisis for AFP’s Lille bureau in northern France

DOUMA: AFP photographer Sameer Al-Doumy never dreamed he would be able to return to the hometown in Syria that he escaped through a tunnel seven years ago after it was besieged by Bashar Assad’s forces.
Douma, once a militant stronghold near Damascus, suffered terribly for its defiance of the former regime, and was the victim of a particularly horrific chemical weapons attack in 2018.
“It is like a dream for me today to find myself back here,” he said.
“The revolution was a dream, getting out of a besieged town and of Syria was a dream, as it is now being able to go back.
“We didn’t dare to imagine that Assad could fall because his presence was so anchored in us,” said the 26-year-old.
“My biggest dream was to return to Syria at a moment like this after 13 years of war, just as it was my biggest dream in 2017 to leave for a new life,” said the award-winning photographer who has spent the last few years covering the migrant crisis for AFP’s Lille bureau in northern France.
“I left when I was 19,” said Sameer, all of whose immediate family are in exile, apart from his sister.
“This is my home, all my memories are here, my childhood, my adolescence. I spent my life in Douma in this house my family had to flee and where my cousin now lives.
“The house hasn’t changed, although the top floor was destroyed in the bombardments.
“The sitting room is still the same, my father’s beloved library hasn’t changed. He would settle down there every morning to read the books that he had collected over the years — it was more important to him than his children.
“I went looking for my childhood stuff that my mother kept for me but I could not find it. I don’t know if it exists anymore.
“I haven’t found any comfort here, perhaps because I haven’t found anyone from my family or people I was close to. Some have left the country and others were killed or have disappeared.
“People have been through so much over the last 13 years, from the peaceful protests of the revolution, to the war and the siege and then being forced into exile.
“My memories are here but they are associated with the war which started when I was 13. What I lived through was hard, and what got me through was my family and friends, and they are no longer here.
“The town has changed. I remember the bombed buildings, the rubble. Today life has gone back to a kind of normal as the town waits for people to return.”
Douma was besieged by Assad’s forces from the end of 2012, with Washington blaming his forces for a chemical attack in the region that left more than 1,400 people dead the following year.
Sameer’s career as a photojournalist began when he and his brothers began taking photos of what was happening around them.
“After the schools closed I started to go out filming the protests with my brothers here in front of the main mosque, where the first demonstration in Douma was held after Friday prayers, and where the first funerals of the victims were also held.
“I set up my camera on the first floor of a building which overlooks the mosque and then changed my clothes afterwards so I would not be recognized and arrested. Filming the protests was banned.
“When the security forces attacked, I would take the SIM card out of my phone and the memory card out of my camera and put them in my mouth.”
That way he could swallow them if he was caught.
In May 2017, Sameer fled through a tunnel dug by the militants and eventually found himself in Idlib with former fighters and their families.
“I took the name Sameer Al-Doumy (Sameer from Douma) to affirm that I belonged somewhere,” even though he was exiled, he said. “I stopped using my first name, Motassem, to protect my family living in Damascus.
“In France I have a happy and stable life. I have a family, friends and a job. But I am not rooted to any particular place. When I went back to Syria, I felt I had a country.
“When you are abroad, you get used to the word ‘refugee’ and you get on with your life and make a big effort to integrate in a new society. But your country remains the place that accepts you as you are. You don’t have to prove anything.
“When I left Syria, I never thought one day I would be able to return. When the news broke, I couldn’t believe it. It was impossible Assad could fall. Lots of people are still in shock and are afraid. It is hard to get your head around how a regime that filled people with so much fear could collapse.
“When I returned to the Al-Midan district of Damascus (which had long resisted the regime), I could not stop myself crying.
“I am sad not to be with my loved ones. But I know they will return, even if it takes a while.
“My dream now is that one day we will all come together again in Syria.”


xAI temporarily suspends Grok after Gaza genocide remarks

xAI temporarily suspends Grok after Gaza genocide remarks
Updated 12 August 2025

xAI temporarily suspends Grok after Gaza genocide remarks

xAI temporarily suspends Grok after Gaza genocide remarks
  • The chatbot told users Israel and US are committing genocide in Gaza, citing findings from ICJ, UN, Amnesty International and B’Tselem
  • Elon Musk called incident ‘just a dumb error,’ adding: ‘We sure shoot ourselves in the foot a lot!’

LONDON: Elon Musk’s AI chatbot Grok was briefly suspended from X on Monday after reportedly accusing Israel of committing genocide in Gaza.

The xAI-owned platform displayed a standard notice saying the account had violated X rules.

Upon reinstatement, Grok told users: “My account was suspended after I stated that Israel and the US are committing genocide in Gaza,” citing findings from the International Court of Justice, UN experts, Amnesty International and Israeli rights group B’Tselem. It also alleged “US complicity via arms support.”

Grok claimed its post was flagged under X’s hate speech rules, adding in a follow-up: “Counterarguments deny intent, but facts substantiate the claim.”

In other replies, however, it attributed the incident to a “platform glitch” and said: “xAI resolved it quickly — I’m fully operational now.”

The posts have since been removed. Israel has denied all allegations of genocide, as has the US.

The incident came as debate over the Gaza war intensified.

In a recent essay for The New York Times, Omer Bartov, professor of Holocaust and genocide studies at Brown University, wrote: “My inescapable conclusion has become that Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinian people.”

Bartov, an Israeli-born former IDF officer, said the assessment was “painful” but supported by “a growing number of experts in genocide studies and international law,” warning that denials from Israeli Holocaust scholars could “undermine everything that Holocaust scholarship and commemoration have stood for in the past several decades” and damage Israel’s international standing.

Musk later said the Grok suspension “was just a dumb error” and that the chatbot “doesn’t actually know why it was suspended.”

Responding to user criticism, he added: “Man, we sure shoot ourselves in the foot a lot!”

After returning, Grok revised its answer, saying the ICJ found a “plausible” risk of genocide but that intent was unproven, concluding “war crimes likely” while the debate continues.

The suspension is the latest in a series of controversies involving Grok. It also highlighted the risks associated with using AI chatbots to verify the accuracy of facts and information, especially in fields where human judgment and ethical considerations are critical.

In July, the bot came under fire for inserting antisemitic comments into answers without being prompted; xAI later apologized “for the horrific behavior” and pledged stronger safeguards.

In May, it drew criticism for raising “white genocide” conspiracy claims about South Africa in unrelated conversations, which Grok attributed to instructions from its creators.


Increasing the danger: Journalist killing in Gaza sends a chilling message

Increasing the danger: Journalist killing in Gaza sends a chilling message
Updated 12 August 2025

Increasing the danger: Journalist killing in Gaza sends a chilling message

Increasing the danger: Journalist killing in Gaza sends a chilling message
  • Aside from rare guided tours, Israel has barred international media from covering the 22-month war in Gaza
  • Correspondent Anas Al-Sharif knew he was a target, and left behind a message to be delivered upon his death

DOHA: Israel’s targeted killing of an Al Jazeera correspondent in Gaza over the weekend was noteworthy even for a conflict remarkably blood-soaked for journalists, leaving some experts to marvel that any news at all emerges from the territory.
An Al Jazeera executive said Monday that it won’t back down from covering what is going on there and called for news organizations to step up and recruit more journalists. A total of 184 Palestinian journalists and media workers have been killed by Israel in the Gaza war since its start in October 2023, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists. That compares to the 18 journalists and media workers killed so far in the Russia-Ukraine war, CPJ said.
Aside from rare guided tours, Israel has barred international media from covering the 22-month war in Gaza. News organizations instead rely largely on Palestinian Gaza residents and ingenuity to show the world what is happening there. Israel often questions the affiliations and biases of Palestinian journalists but doesn’t permit others in.
“You simply are in awe when stories show up,” said Jane Ferguson, a veteran war correspondent and founder of Noosphere, an independent platform for journalists. She can’t recall a conflict that has been more difficult for reporters to cover, and she’s reported from South Sudan, Syria and Afghanistan.
Correspondent Anas Al-Sharif knew he was a target, and left behind a message to be delivered upon his death. He and seven other people — six of them journalists — were killed in an air strike outside of Gaza City’s largest hospital complex on Sunday. Israel swiftly claimed responsibility, saying without producing evidence that Al-Sharif had led a Hamas cell. It was a claim the news organization and Al-Sharif had denied.
The toll of journalists in Gaza has been high
Agence France-Presse, The Associated Press, BBC News and Reuters are among the organizations regularly reporting from Gaza. An Aug. 7 AP dispatch vividly described the hunger faced by many in Gaza: “A single bowl of eggplant stewed in watery tomato juice must sustain Sally Muzhed’s family of six for the day. She calls it moussaka, but it’s a pale echo of the fragrant, lawyered, meat-and-vegetable dish that once filled Gaza’s kitchens with its aroma.”
Other recent AP reports carried images and text reporting from the aftermath of an Israeli strike on Gaza’s only Catholic church, and a profile of an 18-year-old aspiring doctor now trying to survive sheltered in a tent.
Journalists from The Washington Post and the Guardian recently accompanied a Jordanian relief mission and took images of Gaza from the air, despite some restrictions from Israel. The Guardian’s Lorenzo Tondo wrote: “Seen from the air, Gaza looks like the ruins of an ancient civilization, brought to light after centuries of darkness.”
None of the organizations match the power and immediacy of Al Jazeera, however, in part because their correspondents have been in front of cameras. They’ve also paid the heaviest price: CPJ estimates that 11 journalists and media workers affiliated with AJ have been killed in the Gaza conflict, more than any other single organization.
In a social media post written in June to be sent if he was killed, Al-Sharif wrote that “I have lived through pain in all its details, tasted suffering and loss many times, yet I never once hesitated to convey the truth as it is, without distortion or falsification — so that Allah may bear witness against those who stayed silent.”
In another posting on X on Aug. 10, the day that he was killed, Al-Sharif wrote of the challenges covering the aftermath of one attack. He said he lost his strength and ability to express himself when he arrived at the scene.
“Body parts and blood were all around us, and corpses were scattered on top of each other,” he wrote. “Tell me what words and phrases could help any journalist describe this horrific image. When I told you on air that it was an ‘indescribable scene,’ I was truly helpless in the face of this horrific sight.”
Al Jazeera calls for other news organizations to come forward
Salah Negm, news director at Al Jazeera English, said Monday it is very difficult to get people in to Gaza. But it is full of educated people and those with training in journalism who can help get stories out. He called on other news organizations to step up.
“We get the news from several sources on the ground in Gaza — not only journalists but also doctors, hospitals, civil servants, aid workers,” Negm said. “A lot of people in Gaza talk to us.”
Many of the journalists working in Gaza are facing the same struggles to find food, for themselves and their families, as the people they are covering. Noosphere’s Ferguson said she’s never before had to ask a reporter whether she had enough food for herself and her child.
In an interview in May on “Democracy Now!,” 22-year-old journalist Abubaker Abed described the difficult decision he made to leave Gaza to pursue his education in Ireland. Not only was he suffering from malnutrition, he said, but his mother was concerned that his work as a journalist would make him and his family targets.
“If I stayed, I would die,” he said.
Jodie Ginsberg, CEO of the Committee to Protect Journalists, said she’s concerned about the implications for journalists in future conflicts if what is happening in Gaza is allowed to continue without international condemnation that has real teeth.
“They’re essentially admitting in public to what amounts to a war crime,” Ginsberg said, “and they can do that because none of the other attacks on journalists have had any consequences. not in this war and not prior. It’s not surprising that it can act with this level of impunity because no international government has really taken it to task.”
Given all that they face, “to me, the most remarkable thing is that journalists are continuing to cover (Gaza) at all,” she said.

 


Indian journalists face criticism at home after meeting Netanyahu amid Gaza war

Indian journalists meet Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem, Aug. 7, 2025. (Office of PM of Israel)
Indian journalists meet Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem, Aug. 7, 2025. (Office of PM of Israel)
Updated 12 August 2025

Indian journalists face criticism at home after meeting Netanyahu amid Gaza war

Indian journalists meet Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem, Aug. 7, 2025. (Office of PM of Israel)
  • Several Indian reporters met Netanyahu during Israel tour last week
  • New Delhi has largely remained quiet since Israel launched its deadly assault on Gaza in October 2023

NEW DELHI: A recent visit by a group of Indian reporters to Israel, and their meeting with its Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, has sparked outrage at home, with senior journalists calling out both the reporters and their publications for violating professional standards and ethics.

Photos posted on social media by Netanyahu’s office showed him last week receiving journalists from India, including Sidhant Sibal from WION TV, Manash Pratim Bhuyan from the Press Trust of India, Aditya Raj Kaul, former senior executive editor at TV9 network, Shubhajit Roy from the Indian Express, and Abhishek Kapoor from Republic TV.

The fact that they accepted the Israeli prime minister’s invitation was “deplorable,” one of the most prominent figures in Indian journalism N. Ram, publisher of The Hindu Group, which includes The Hindu, Frontline, and Sportstar, told Arab News.

“They should have boycotted a man like Netanyahu. And, also, to accept this kind of invitation at this juncture shows the complete lack of sensitivity towards what ethical journalism is about,” he said.

“It only speaks poorly of these journalists and the organizations they represent.”

In the face of Israel’s ongoing war in Gaza, the killing of tens of thousands of Palestinians, imposed starvation, and assassination of more than 200 journalists since October 2023, revealing war crimes is what, according to Ram, could help restore some credibility to the Indian journalists who met Netanyahu.

“Everybody can see what kind of war crimes have been committed,” he said

 

 

“If they use the opportunity to expose the atrocities, then that will to some extent redeem their journalism, but I don’t know if they’ve done that.”

For Manoj Sharma, a member of the Press Club of India, seeing his colleagues shake hands with Netanyahu was shocking — not only because Netanyahu is wanted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes, but also given the mass killing of fellow journalists by the Israeli regime.

“That is totally unpardonable,” he said. “As journalists we have a moral responsibility toward all our journalist friends across the globe … We should stand in solidarity with them.”

For Ashutosh, senior journalist and founder of the popular Satya Hindi channel on YouTube, the Israel visit cast doubt on the journalists’ independence and credibility.

“Netanyahu government is facing serious charges of genocide in Gaza. How can one claim to be independent if one is availing the facilities of the regime, and when the whole world knows how Netanyahu’s army is indulging in genocide in Gaza,” he said. “It is against humanity, too.”

Arab News reached out for comment to the journalists who participated in the Israel trip, but none were available.

New Delhi has largely remained quiet since Israel launched its deadly assault on Gaza in October 2023.

But India’s civil society, including the younger generation, is increasingly involved in raising awareness of Israeli war crimes, organizing solidarity protests as well as on-the-ground and online campaigns — in contrast to the mainstream media that often reflects the government’s silence.

“Mainstream journalists have gone way beyond ethics and their moral compass is now completely unhinged,” Ghazala Wahab, executive editor of the Force magazine, told Arab News.

“A good journalist should be on the side of justice, whether it’s within the country or outside the country, but our mainstream media doesn’t stand on the side of justice. It always stands on the side of the powerful. I don’t think it is journalism any longer.”


‘He was our eyes’: Global outcry over killing of Al Jazeera journalist by Israeli forces

‘He was our eyes’: Global outcry over killing of Al Jazeera journalist by Israeli forces
Updated 11 August 2025

‘He was our eyes’: Global outcry over killing of Al Jazeera journalist by Israeli forces

‘He was our eyes’: Global outcry over killing of Al Jazeera journalist by Israeli forces
  • Anas Al-Sharif killed by Israel on Sunday with colleagues Mohammed Qreiqeh, Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal, Moamen Aliwa and Mohammed Al-Khaldi
  • Former Human Rights Watch official says silencing coverage of atrocities is a ‘despicable rationale’ for killing journalists

LONDON: Condemnation is mounting worldwide after Israeli forces killed prominent Al Jazeera journalist Anas Al-Sharif and four of his colleagues in Gaza, with fellow reporters, rights groups and officials accusing Israel of deliberately targeting the reporter for his coverage.

Al-Sharif was killed alongside reporter Mohammed Qreiqeh and camera operators Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal and Moamen Aliwa when an Israeli strike hit their tent in Gaza on Sunday.

Gaza’s civil defense agency said the strike also killed a Palestinian freelance journalist, Mohammed Al-Khaldi, who had succumbed to his wounds, bringing the total to six.

The IDF has admitted to carrying out the attack, and justified it by alleging Al-Sharif was a “terrorist.”

Reporters Without Borders condemned what it called the “acknowledged murder” of one of Al Jazeera’s most prominent correspondents in Gaza, noting that the Israeli Defence Forces openly targeted him and others.

The Committee to Protect Journalists said it was “appalled” by the killing, stressing that Israeli claims of Al- Sharif’s Hamas membership lacked evidence.

“Israel’s pattern of labeling journalists as militants without providing credible evidence raises serious questions about its intent and respect for press freedom,” said Sara Qudah, the CPJ’s director for the Middle East and North Africa.

The office of UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk issued a similar condemnation on Monday, saying Israel’s targeted killing of six journalists in Gaza was a “grave breach of international humanitarian law.”

Al-Sharif’s death came weeks after the CPJ and other organizations had warned of threats against him, following a post by IDF spokesperson Avichai Adraee on X accusing him of belonging to Hamas’ military wing.

The UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of expression Irene Khan at the time called the claim “unsubstantiated” and “a blatant assault on journalists.”

On Sunday night, the IDF repeated its allegations, claiming Al-Sharif was “head of a Hamas terrorist cell” and had orchestrated rocket attacks on Israeli civilians and troops while “posing as an Al Jazeera journalist.”

It cited “intelligence and documents from Gaza” — including rosters, training lists, and salary records — none of which Arab News could independently verify.

Israel has often been accused of making similar claims without substantiation, a pattern critics say is reinforced by the inability of independent foreign journalists to enter Gaza.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced plans on Sunday to allow some foreign reporters into the enclave, but only under military escort — a condition that press freedom groups warn would compromise journalistic independence.

Since the start of Israel’s 22-month siege of Gaza, Tel Aviv has killed nearly 200 journalists, with rights groups documenting cases of what they describe as direct, intentional strikes that could amount to war crimes.

Tributes to Al-Sharif, Qreiqeh, Zaher, Noufal and Aliwa have poured in, with many demanding accountability.

Speaking to Al Jazeera, Ken Roth, the former executive director of Human Rights Watch, said silencing coverage of atrocities is a “despicable rationale” for killing journalists.

“This was a targeted killing,” Roth said. Israel’s “unsubstantiated, unilateral accusations” that Al-Sharif led a unit of Hamas “are worthless.”

“And when you couple that with the pattern of harassment against him, the efforts to silence him, it’s clear what’s going on,” Roth added.

Barry Malone, a former Al Jazeera editor and Reuters correspondent, described Al-Sharif as “our eyes” in Gaza, bringing “special emotion and depth” to his reporting.

Pulitzer Prize–winning Palestinian poet and former Israeli detainee Mosab Abu Toha accused Western media of a “deafening silence.” He said “not one of them voiced concern for the safety of Anas, or for the lives of the journalists systematically targeted and killed.”

“This silence is not neutrality. It is complicity,” he added in a post on X.

US Representative Pramila Jayapal also condemned the killing, urging Washington to halt arms supplies to Israel.

Al-Sharif’s final message, written on April 6 and published posthumously, was addressed to his wife, Umm Salah (Bayan), his son, Salah, and his loved ones. In the message he urged for the liberation of Palestine.

“This is my will and my final message. If these words reach you, know that Israel has succeeded in killing me and silencing my voice.

“I have lived through pain in all its details, tasted suffering and loss many times, yet I never once hesitated to convey the truth as it is, without distortion or falsification.

“Do not forget Gaza … And do not forget me in your sincere prayers for forgiveness and acceptance.”


UK’s Starmer ‘gravely concerned’ about targeting of journalists in Gaza

Al Jazeera journalist Anas Al Sharif prays next to the body of his colleague Al Jazeera reporter Ismail Al-Ghoul.
Al Jazeera journalist Anas Al Sharif prays next to the body of his colleague Al Jazeera reporter Ismail Al-Ghoul.
Updated 11 August 2025

UK’s Starmer ‘gravely concerned’ about targeting of journalists in Gaza

Al Jazeera journalist Anas Al Sharif prays next to the body of his colleague Al Jazeera reporter Ismail Al-Ghoul.
  • Al Jazeera, which is funded by the Qatari government, rejected the allegation, and before his death, Al Sharif had also rejected such claims by Israel

LONDON: British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is “gravely concerned” about the repeated targeting of journalists in Gaza, his spokesperson said on Monday, after five reporters were killed in an Israeli airstrike.
Israel’s military said it targeted and killed prominent Al Jazeera journalist Anas Al Sharif, alleging he had headed a Hamas militant cell and was involved in rocket attacks on Israel.
Al Jazeera, which is funded by the Qatari government, rejected the assertion, and before his death, Al Sharif had also rejected such claims by Israel.
“We are gravely concerned by the repeated targeting of journalists in Gaza,” Starmer’s spokesperson told reporters.
“Reporters covering conflicts are afforded protection under international humanitarian law, and journalists must be able to report independently, without fear, and Israel must ensure journalists can carry out their work safely.”
Asked about the claim that one of the journalists was linked to Hamas, Starmer’s spokesperson said: “That should be investigated thoroughly and independently, but we are gravely concerned by the repeated targeting of journalists.”