Ƶ

Britain and Australia to sign 50-year nuclear submarine treaty

Britain and Australia to sign 50-year nuclear submarine treaty
Australia’s Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Defense Richard Marles, left, walks with Britain’s Defense Secretary John Healey before the start of the Australia-UK Ministerial Consultations meeting in Sydney on July 25, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 12 sec ago

Britain and Australia to sign 50-year nuclear submarine treaty

Britain and Australia to sign 50-year nuclear submarine treaty
  • The three-way alliance was announced in 2021 to contend with growing Chinese military might in the Asia-Pacific region
  • It would deliver Australia at least eight submarines including three to five second-hand US Virginia-class submarines

MELBOURNE: Britain and Australia announced they will sign a cooperation treaty to build Australian nuclear-powered submarines and welcomed a review by President Donald Trump’s administration of the United States’ role in the trilateral defense deal.

Britain’s Defense Secretary John Healey and Foreign Secretary David Lammy met Friday with their Australian counterparts Richard Marles and Penny Wong in Sydney for an annual bilateral meeting.

Marles said he and Healey will sign a 50-year treaty Saturday that will underpin bilateral cooperation on building an Australian fleet of submarines powered by US nuclear technology.

“It is as significant a treaty as has been signed between our two countries since federation,” Marles said, referring to the unification of several British colonies to form the Australian government in 1901.

The three-way alliance was announced in 2021 to contend with growing Chinese military might in the Asia-Pacific region. It would deliver Australia at least eight submarines including three to five second-hand US Virginia-class submarines. Britain and Australia would cooperate to build their own SSN-AUKUS submarines.

US reviewing AUKUS trilateral submarine deal

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is reviewing the pact, known by the acronym AUKUS, that was entered into by US President Joe Biden’s administration. There are concerns that the US won’t provide Australia with its first Virginia-class submarine by the early 2030s as planned because US submarine-building was behind schedule.

Marles and Healey declined to speculate on whether Britain and Australia would continue with jointly building submarines if the US pulled out when questioned at a press conference.

“Australia and the UK welcome the review because we see this as a chance for a new administration to renew their commitment to AUKUS. And that’s what we expect,” Healey said.

“Any sort of hypotheticals that you suggest simply aren’t part of the picture,” Healey added, referring to the prospect of Britain and Australia proceeding without the US

The Australian government confirmed this week it had paid the US a second $500 million installment on the AUKUS deal. The first $500 million was paid in February.

The submarines are expected cost Australia up to $245 billion.

The meeting comes as 3,000 British military personnel take part in the largest military exercise ever conducted in Australia.

British aircraft carrier joins Australian war games

More than 35,000 military personnel from 19 nations are taking part in Exercise Talisman Sabre, which began in 2005 as a biennial joint exercise between the US and Australia.

Marles and Healey will inspect the British aircraft HMS Prince of Wales at the northern port of Darwin on Sunday. The carrier is in Australia to take part in the war games.

Lammy said the carrier’s arrival in Darwin was meant to send a clear signal to the world.

“With our carrier strike group docking in Darwin, I think we’re sending a clear signal, a signal of the UK’s commitment to this region of the world. Our determination to keep the Indo-Pacific free and open, and that we stand together,” he said.


Seven children killed in India school roof collapse: police

Seven children killed in India school roof collapse: police
Updated 59 min 41 sec ago

Seven children killed in India school roof collapse: police

Seven children killed in India school roof collapse: police
  • At least seven children were killed and 26 others injured Friday after part of the roof and walls of a government-run school collapsed in western India, police said

JAIPUR: At least seven children were killed and 26 others injured Friday after part of the roof and walls of a government-run school collapsed in western India, police said.
“Seven children have lost their lives so far and 26 others are injured,” Nand Kishore, a senior police officer in the state of Rajasthan, told AFP.


Philippines top court voids impeachment complaint against VP Duterte

Philippines top court voids impeachment complaint against VP Duterte
Updated 25 July 2025

Philippines top court voids impeachment complaint against VP Duterte

Philippines top court voids impeachment complaint against VP Duterte
  • The outcome could be a huge boost for the political ambitions of Sara Duterte

MANILA: Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte scored a major legal victory on Friday after the Supreme Court struck down an impeachment complaint against her, ruling it was unconstitutional.

The Philippines’ lower house of Congress impeached Duterte in February, accusing her of misusing public funds, amassing unusual wealth and threatening to kill Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr, the First Lady, and the House Speaker.

The court said it was not absolving Duterte of the charges.

The outcome could be a huge boost for the political ambitions of Duterte. She is widely seen as a strong contender for the 2028 presidency, which Marcos cannot contest due to a single-term limit for Philippine presidents.

A conviction in an impeachment trial would have seen Duterte banned from office for life. She has said the move to impeach her, which came amid a bitter feud with Marcos, was politically motivated.

Duterte is the daughter of firebrand former President Rodrigo Duterte, who is now in the custody of the International Criminal Court over his bloody war on drugs. He has denied wrongdoing.


Court frees men accused in 2006 train bombings India blamed on Pakistan-based group

Court frees men accused in 2006 train bombings India blamed on Pakistan-based group
Updated 25 July 2025

Court frees men accused in 2006 train bombings India blamed on Pakistan-based group

Court frees men accused in 2006 train bombings India blamed on Pakistan-based group
  • Pakistan has always denied state complicity in evening rush-hour attacks that killed 187 people and wounded hundreds 
  • Ansari, now 48, was one of 12 men convicted in 2015 for murder, conspiracy, waging war against India 

MUMBAI: Nearly two decades lost, a family fractured and a city still without closure — the scars of the 2006 Mumbai train bombings remain, even as the men once blamed for the deadly attacks walk free.

After 19 years behind bars, Mohammad Sajid Margub Ansari can finally hold his daughter in his arms.

Ansari, now 48, was one of 12 men convicted in 2015 for murder, conspiracy and waging war against India over the 2006 train blasts.

The evening rush-hour attacks, carried out with pressure-cooker bombs hidden in bags beneath newspapers and umbrellas, killed 187 people and wounded hundreds more.

Five of the accused were sentenced to death, while the other seven — including Ansari — were given life imprisonment.

At the time of the blasts, Ansari was just 29, running a modest mobile and computer repair shop.

He was arrested soon after the explosions, reportedly accused of assembling the bombs and sheltering two Pakistani nationals.

But this week, a two-judge bench of the Bombay High Court overturned the convictions, ruling that the prosecution had “utterly failed” to prove the men were responsible.

The prosecution appealed to the Supreme Court to halt their release, but it declined to intervene.

“It feels amazing to be free,” Ansari told AFP. “We are innocent.”

Freedom, however, feels bittersweet for Ansari.

“My whole youth is gone. My family had to face financial troubles,” he said.

His wife was pregnant when Ansari was arrested, leaving him to miss his daughter’s entire childhood. In her early years, she wouldn’t even come near him.

“As a dad that felt terrible, that I could not hold my own daughter,” he said.

“I used to feel very helpless and think why do we have to go through all this when I am innocent.”

The 2006 attacks were initially blamed on the Pakistan-based militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba, although a little-known outfit, Lashkar-e-Qahhar, later claimed responsibility.

Pakistan denied the allegations.

For survivor Chirag Chauhan, who was paralyzed from the waist down in one of the blasts, the acquittal of the men felt like being dragged “back to square one.”

“We don’t know what to do and where to start from. The entire system is hopeless,” he told AFP.

In 2006, Chauhan, now 40, was returning home from chartered accountancy training when the train he boarded was hit by an explosion.

Prosecutors said the explosives were deliberately placed in first-class coaches to target the city’s wealthy Gujarati community.

They also said the bombings were intended as revenge for riots in the western state of Gujarat in 2002, which left around 2,000 people dead, most of them Muslims.

A spinal cord injury left Chauhan requiring the use of a wheelchair.

“After 19 years if the accused are let free, who carried out the blasts then?” he asked.

But he also said there should be a “fair investigation,” noting that the now freed men could have been framed.

“All are equally to be blamed, the judiciary, the investigative agencies, everyone,” he said.

For Ansari, his years behind bars demand more than an acquittal.

“The agencies should be ashamed of what they did and should definitely apologize to us,” he said.

While his old mobile and computer repair shop is no longer an employment option, given the advances in technology since he was imprisoned, Ansari is aiming to rebuild his life.

He plans to finish the undergraduate law degree which he enrolled in while in prison.

“I hope to put it to good use,” he said.


Ukraine’s Zelensky says ‘listened’ to protesters on anti-graft law

Ukraine’s Zelensky says ‘listened’ to protesters on anti-graft law
Updated 25 July 2025

Ukraine’s Zelensky says ‘listened’ to protesters on anti-graft law

Ukraine’s Zelensky says ‘listened’ to protesters on anti-graft law
  • The adoption of the bill, which curbed the powers of two anti-graft bodies, triggered the biggest public protests in Ukraine
  • Ukrainian leader acknowledged there should ‘probably have been more of a dialogue’ before the law was adopted

KYIV: Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky said his government had heard protesters opposing a law revoking the independence of anti-corruption agencies and had responded by proposing new legislation.

The adoption of the bill, which curbed the powers of two anti-graft bodies, triggered the biggest public protests in Ukraine since Russia’s invasion and drew criticism from Kyiv’s European allies.

“It is absolutely normal to react when people don’t want something or when they dislike something,” Zelensky said in comments released to journalists on Friday, adding it was “very important that we listened and responded adequately.”

“For me, it was very important that we listened and responded adequately,” Zelensky added.

The government has since submitted a bill aimed at restoring the independence of the anti-graft bodies – the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAPO).

It remains to be seen whether parliament, mostly loyal to Zelensky, will approve the draft law.

Zelensky acknowledged there should “probably have been more of a dialogue” before the law was adopted.

“I am focused on the issue of the war because right now, the number one issue in Ukraine is the war. The biggest problem is the war. The main enemy is Russia.”


Europeans and Iran meet in Istanbul as the return of sanctions looms over nuclear deadlock

Europeans and Iran meet in Istanbul as the return of sanctions looms over nuclear deadlock
Updated 25 July 2025

Europeans and Iran meet in Istanbul as the return of sanctions looms over nuclear deadlock

Europeans and Iran meet in Istanbul as the return of sanctions looms over nuclear deadlock
  • The talks are centered on the possibility of reimposing sanctions on Iran that were lifted in 2015 in exchange for Iran accepting restrictions and monitoring of its nuclear program
  • European leaders have said the reinstating of sanctions will start by the end of August if there is no progress on containing Iran’s nuclear program

ISTANBUL: Iranian and European diplomats are set to meet in Istanbul Friday to embark on the latest drive to unpick the deadlock over Tehran’s nuclear program.
Representatives from Britain, France and Germany, known as the E3 nations, will gather at the Iranian consulate building for the first talks since Iran’s 12-day war with Israel in June, which involved US bombers striking nuclear-related facilities.
The talks are centered on the possibility of reimposing sanctions on Iran that were lifted in 2015 in exchange for Iran accepting restrictions and monitoring of its nuclear program.
The return of sanctions, known as a “snapback” mechanism, “remains on the table,” according to a European diplomat speaking on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the talks.
“A possible delay in triggering snapback has been floated to the Iranians on the condition that there is credible diplomatic engagement by Iran, that they resume full cooperation with the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), and that they address concerns about their highly-enriched uranium stockpile,” the diplomat said.
European leaders have said sanctions will resume by the end of August if there is no progress on containing Iran’s nuclear program.
Tehran, meanwhile, has said the US, which withdrew from the 2015 deal during President Donald Trump ‘s first term, needs to rebuild faith in its role in negotiations.
Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said Iran’s engagement was dependent on “several key principles” that included “rebuilding Iran’s trust – as Iran has absolutely no trust in the United States.”
In a social media post Thursday, he also said the talks shouldn’t be used “as a platform for hidden agendas such as military action.” Gharibabadi insisted that Iran’s right to enrich uranium “in line with its legitimate needs” be respected and sanctions removed.
Iran has repeatedly threatened to leave the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, which commits it to refrain from developing nuclear weapons, if sanctions return.
Friday’s talks will be held at the deputy ministerial level, with Iran sending Deputy Foreign Minister Majid Takht-e Ravanchi. A similar meeting was held in Istanbul in May. The identity of the E3 representatives were not immediately clear but the European Union’s deputy foreign policy commissioner is expected to attend.
The UK, France and Germany were signatories to the 2015 deal, alongside the US, Russia and China. When the US withdrew in 2018, Trump insisted the agreement wasn’t tough enough. Under the original deal, neither Russia nor China can veto reimposed sanctions.
Since the Israeli and US strikes on Iran, which saw American B-52 bombers hit three nuclear sites, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has accused the E3 of hypocrisy, saying they failed to uphold their obligations while supporting Israel’s attacks.
Against the backdrop of the conflict, which saw Iran respond with missile attacks on Israel and a strike on a US base in Qatar, the road ahead remains uncertain
While European officials have said they want to avoid further conflict and are open to a negotiated solution, they have warned that time is running out.
Tehran maintains it is open to diplomacy, though it recently suspended cooperation with the IAEA.
A central concern for Western powers was highlighted when the IAEA reported in May that Iran’s stockpile of uranium enriched to 60 percent – just below weapons-grade level – had grown to over 400 kilograms (882 pounds).
In an interview with Al Jazeera that aired Wednesday, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said Iran is prepared for another war and reiterated that its nuclear program will continue within the framework of international law while adding the country had no intention of pursuing nuclear weapons.
A spokesman for Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization said Thursday the country’s nuclear industry would “grow back and thrive again” after the recent attacks by Israel and the US