Ƶ

Why a crumbling Baghdad house linked to Agatha Christie has sparked such debate

Special Why a crumbling Baghdad house linked to Agatha Christie has sparked such debate
Historic house on the banks of the Tigris River, where British crime writer Agatha Christie lived for many years in Baghdad, Iraq, is in need of repair. (Photo by Murtadha Al-Sudani/Anadolu via Getty Images)
Short Url
Updated 16 min 34 sec ago

Why a crumbling Baghdad house linked to Agatha Christie has sparked such debate

Why a crumbling Baghdad house linked to Agatha Christie has sparked such debate
  • The house where the British crime author is said to have lived now stands derelict, its roof missing and balconies sagging
  • Scholars remain divided on which house Christie called home — a mystery the Queen of Crime herself might have relished

LONDON: Among the fans of the British crime writer Agatha Christie, it’s no secret that the literary mother of such enduring fictional characters as Miss Marple and Hercule Poirot loved Iraq and, for some years after the Second World War, lived in a house in Baghdad.

According to recent reports originating from Turkiye’s Anadolu Agency, that house, in the city’s Karrada Maryam district on the west bank of the Tigris, is now a near-ruin, in danger of imminent collapse.

As the story goes, it isn’t only Christie’s association with the property that makes it a heritage gem worth saving for posterity.

Known as the Beit Melek Ali, legend has it that the house once belonged to Ali bin Hussein, the former King of Hejaz who sought sanctuary in Baghdad after being deposed in 1925.




English detective novelist, Agatha Christie (1890-1976) typing at her home, Greenway House, Devon, January 1946. (Getty Images/AFP File)

But there’s a problem with this narrative, which is somewhat undermined by a mystery that Christie herself might have relished, and to which she left few clues behind.

It is clear from recently published photographs of the house in the city’s Karrada Maryam district, on the riverbank in the shadow of Al-Jumariyah bridge and close to the northerly edge of the Green Zone, that this abandoned building is indeed in an advanced state of disrepair. Most of its roof is missing and its river-facing balconies are sagging.

But did Christie ever really stay here and, if so, when, exactly?

The author first came to Baghdad in 1928, at the age of 38, in the wake of her much-publicised divorce from her first husband, Col. Archibald Christie, whom she had married in 1914.

She travelled from England in style, as far as Istanbul on board the luxurious Orient Express — a journey that inspired her 1934 novel, “Murder on the Orient Express” — and from there on to Baghdad, via another train to Damascus and from there across 880 km of desert by a specially equipped car, part of a fleet operated on the route by the Nairn Transport Company, which was run by two New Zealand brothers.




Cover of Agatha Christie’s “Murder on the Orient Express” book.

The 48-hour journey, as Christie recalled in her autobiography, was “fascinating and rather sinister,” broken by an overnight stay at a well-guarded fort in the isolated town of Rutbah in western Iraq, midway between Damascus and Baghdad.

Christie described her first sight of Baghdad: “In the distance, on the left, we saw the golden domes of Kadhimain, then on and over another bridge of boats, over the river Tigris, and so into Baghdad — along a street full of rickety buildings, with a beautiful mosque with turquoise domes standing, it seemed to me, in the middle of the street.”

On this occasion she stayed with one of the many expat British couples based in Baghdad. The capital had been seized from Ottoman forces in 1917 and, like the rest of the country, would remain under British control until Iraq was granted independence in 1932.




English detective novelist, Agatha Christie (1890 - 1976), circa 1950. (ullstein bild via Getty Images)

At that time, as Christie’s biographer Laura Thompson wrote, Baghdad “was a city where the British traveller could find racing, tennis, clubs and no doubt Marmite on toast; in the pre-war years it was not at all unusual to find people of Agatha’s class in such places.”

Christie embarked on the obligatory round of social calls, during which she met the famous archaeologist Sir Leonard Woolley, who in 1922 had begun excavating the ancient Sumerian royal city of Ur. Christie became friends with Woolley and his wife, Katherine, and was invited to the dig, 300 km southeast of Baghdad.

Christie returned to England, but came back to Baghdad, and to Ur, in 1930. On this trip she met her future husband, Woolley’s assistant Max Mallowan, and they were married in September that year.




'Modern Baghdad, the City of Caliphs', Iraq 1925. A print from Baghdad, Camera Studio Iraq, published by Hasso Bros, Rotophot AG, Berlin, 1925. (Print Collector photo/Getty Images)

From 1930 to 1939, and then again — after the Second World War — from 1949 to the late 1950s, Christie accompanied Mallowan on an estimated 15 or more archaeological digs in Iraq or Syria, frequently staying in Baghdad en route.

However, in her autobiography, begun in 1950 and completed in 1965, only once did Christie mention living in Baghdad.

“I have not yet mentioned our house in Baghdad,” she writes near the end of the book, which was published posthumously in 1977, the year after her death.

“We had an old Turkish house on the West bank of the Tigris. It was thought a very curious taste on our part to be so fond of it, and not to want one of the modern boxes, but our Turkish house was cool and delightful, with its courtyard and the palm-trees coming up to the balcony rail.”

This, possibly, was the house that now stands derelict on the Tigris. But there is evidence that after the war Christie and her husband moved into a far grander property in Baghdad.

An Agatha Christie fan site repeats the story that “Christie lived in the Beit Melek Ali with Max Mallowan for a time.” In 1949, it adds, the Iraqi-Palestinian author Jabra Ibrahim Jabra wrote of meeting the Mallowans there.

Robert Hamilton, an archaeologist who invited Jabra to meet the Mallowans, told him it was “the house of King Ali ... an old Turkish house that goes back to the Ottoman period, and it is one of the most beautiful homes of old Baghdad.”




Ashar Creek leading to the Shatt al-Arab, Basra, Iraq, 1925. (Photo by The Print Collector/Print Collector/Getty Images)

But even in its heyday, the house now decaying on the river’s edge in the Karradat Maryam neighborhood would not have fitted that description.

King Ali of the Hejaz had fled to Baghdad in 1925 because his brother Faisal had been installed as King of Iraq four years earlier. Ali died in Baghdad in 1935 and Christie, whose first trip to Baghdad was in 1928, seven years before the exiled king died, was certainly aware of the house where he lived.

She set two books in Iraq: Murder in Mesopotamia, inspired by her archaeological adventures and published in 1936, and the 1951 adventure They Came to Baghdad.

In this spy thriller a character is told to walk along the Tigris until she comes to the Beit Melek Ali. She finds “a big house built right out on to the river with a garden and balustrade. The path on the bank passed on the inside of what must be the Beit Melek Ali or the House of King Ali. She could not go along the bank any further and so turned inland.”

This description fits the only known photograph of the Beit Melek Ali, held in the archives of the US Library of Congress. Unlike the altogether less impressive house by Jumariyah bridge, this building — far grander, and clearly fit for a king — is right on the waterfront, with no path in front of it.

It seems improbable that in her autobiography Christie would have made no mention of the history of her Baghdad house had she in fact lived in the Beit Melek Ali — and, besides, there are other candidates for the title “Agatha Christie’s Baghdad house.”




This photo taken on June 5, 1957, shows an excavation site of an ancient Assyrian Fortress built more than 25 centuries ago, at Nimrud, in what is now Iraq. British Archeologist M.E. Mallowan, aided by his wife, mystery story writer Agatha Christie, supervised the excavation. (Getty Images)

Mallowan, her husband, was a member of an organization called the British School of Archaeology in Iraq, which in 1946 purchased a building in Baghdad. As a paper published in 2018 in the journal of the American Society of Overseas Research recalled, Mallowan was appointed as the school’s first director “and immediately took up residence, along with a secretary, six students and Agatha Christie.”

This, then, was Christie’s house in Baghdad during the 1940s and 1950s. There is an oblique reference to it in her obituary, published in 1976 in the British School of Archaeology’s journal Iraq, which recorded only that “in the old schoolhouse overlooking the river Tigris in Baghdad where she wrote ‘They Came to Baghdad,’ she would read and write in peace.”

But where it was, and whether it is still standing today — questions that can also be asked of the true Beit Melek Ali — remains a mystery.


READ MORE:

Agatha Christie and her Middle Eastern mysteries

Agatha Christie had little-known role in ancient Nimrud


The likelihood that the now-decrepit old house by Al-Jumariyah bridge was the headquarters of the British School of Archaeology in Iraq, and the home for several years of Christie and Mallowan, is further undermined by two photographs, both of which purport to show Christie on the balcony of the BSAI, and neither of which appears to have been taken at the claimed Christie house in the Karrada Maryam district.

In terms of pinpointing the exact location of the BSAI house she shared with Mallowan in Baghdad, inquiries with both the organization (which in 2007 was renamed The British Institute for the Study of Iraq) and the Christie Archive Trust have so far drawn a blank.

Meanwhile, an email this week from an archaeologist who has written about the history of the BSAI has muddied the waters further.

“As far as I know, there was nothing particularly special about the (BSAI) house,” Mary Shepperson, who specializes in the urban archaeology of the Middle East at the University of Liverpool’s School of Architecture, told Arab News.

“It was chosen because it was cheap -– archaeology always operates on a shoestring. It was notoriously basic. I think it’s still standing today but in very poor shape.”




Caption

And then she added: “I don’t think either of the two photos you sent are the old BSAI house.”

Attached to the email was a photograph of yet another building in Baghdad. “This,” Shepperson declared, “is a picture of the river side of the house.”

As Christie wrote in her very first detective novel, “The Mysterious Affair at Styles,” published in 1920, “everything must be taken into account. If the fact will not fit the theory — let the theory go.”

Ultimately, though, Christie, who died in 1976 at the age of 85, would probably have found the fascination with her living arrangements in Baghdad tedious.

“People,” as she once said, “should be interested in books, not their authors.”


WHO chief urges Israel to stop starvation ‘catastrophe’

WHO chief urges Israel to stop starvation ‘catastrophe’
Updated 05 September 2025

WHO chief urges Israel to stop starvation ‘catastrophe’

WHO chief urges Israel to stop starvation ‘catastrophe’
  • “People are starving to death while the food that could save them sits on trucks a short distance away,” he lamented
  • “The starvation of the people of Gaza will not make Israel safer, nor will it facilitate the release of the hostages,” he insisted

GENEVA: The World Health Organization chief on Friday urged Israel to stop the “catastrophe” of people starving to death in Gaza, saying at least 370 people have died from malnutrition since the war began.
“This is a catastrophe that Israel could have prevented, and could stop at any time,” said Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.
“Starvation of civilians as a method of war is a war crime that can never be tolerated: doing so in one conflict risks legitimising its use in future conflicts,” he said.
His comments came two weeks after the UN declared a famine in Gaza, blaming the “systematic obstruction” of humanitarian deliveries by Israel.
The Health Ministry in Gaza reported on Friday that 373 people, including 134 children, had died from starvation and malnutrition in the besieged Palestinian territory since the war there erupted in October 2023.
Tedros repeated the number and said that it included “more than 300 just in the past two months.”
“People are starving to death while the food that could save them sits on trucks a short distance away,” he lamented.
“The most intolerable part of this man-made disaster is that it could be stopped right now,” he said, questioning why Israel was allowing the situation to persist.
“The starvation of the people of Gaza will not make Israel safer, nor will it facilitate the release of the hostages,” he insisted.
The WHO chief also stressed that “where hunger goes, disease follows.”
“Lack of food and clean water and cramped living conditions are leaving people with weakened immune systems exposed to more disease,” he said.
He said that in the past month alone, more than 100 cases had been reported of Guillain-Barre Syndrome, which can occur after another infection and lead to paralysis.
He also decried that there are currently more than 15,000 patients in Gaza in need of urgent specialized care who are awaiting evacuation.
“More than 700 people have died while waiting for medical evacuation, including almost 140 children,” he said.
“We call on the government of Israel to end this inhumane war,” Tedros said.
“If it will not, I call on its allies to use their influence to stop it.”

 


Mandela grandson says he will join Gaza aid boat

Mandela grandson says he will join Gaza aid boat
Updated 05 September 2025

Mandela grandson says he will join Gaza aid boat

Mandela grandson says he will join Gaza aid boat
  • “As Africans, we know very well what it means to live under occupation, under oppression,” Mandela said
  • The Maghreb Sumud Flotilla will set sail on Sunday

TUNIS : A grandson of South Africa’s anti-apartheid icon Nelson Mandela said Friday he would join pro-Palestinian activists seeking to break Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza with an aid boat from Tunisia.
“We particularly chose, as the South African delegation, to join the Global Sumud Flotilla here in Tunisia from an African point to say: Africa is part of this struggle,” Mandla Mandela told journalists in Tunis.
“As Africans, we know very well what it means to live under occupation, under oppression,” he said.
The Maghreb Sumud Flotilla will set sail on Sunday, organizers say, aiming to join other Gaza-bound boats that have already left from Spain and Italy.
Initially scheduled for last Thursday, it was postponed due to bad weather, and organizers have yet to confirm the place and time of departure.
Organizers have said about 100 activists have registered to join the flotilla from Tunis.


UN General Assembly backs Saudi-French plan to resume two-state summit on Sept. 22

UN General Assembly backs Saudi-French plan to resume two-state summit on Sept. 22
Updated 05 September 2025

UN General Assembly backs Saudi-French plan to resume two-state summit on Sept. 22

UN General Assembly backs Saudi-French plan to resume two-state summit on Sept. 22
  • ‘Resumption of the conference is a substantive commitment by the international community to act with resolve, consistency and responsibility,’ says Saudi envoy
  • Israel and the US reject the decision, describing the initiative as politically motivated and harmful to peace efforts

NEW YORK CITY: The UN General Assembly on Friday voted to resume a high-level international summit on the two-state solution on Sept. 22, reviving a process that was suspended during the summer amid escalating violence in the Middle East.

It followed a proposal by Ƶ and France that was adopted despite strong objections from Israel and the US, both of which disassociated themselves from the decision and described the initiative as politically motivated and harmful to peace efforts.

The High-Level International Conference for the Peaceful Settlement of the Question of Palestine initially convened during the 79th session of the General Assembly but was suspended on July 30. The conference will now resume during the General Assembly’s 80th session, at the level of heads of state and government, underscoring the need for what proponents describe as an urgent international push toward a just and lasting peace between Israel and Palestine.

Speaking before the vote on the proposal, the Saudi representative to the UN, Abdulaziz Alwasil, delivering remarks on behalf of Riyadh and Paris, said the initiative was not aimed at any particular side or party but was “a reflection of our shared commitment to uphold international law and relevant UN resolutions.”

He added: “The situation on the ground in Palestine has never been more dire. Escalating violence, deepening humanitarian suffering and the erosion of hope for peace all underscore the urgency of our collective responsibility.

“This process cannot be allowed to stall. The resumption of the conference is a substantive commitment by the international community to act with resolve, consistency and responsibility.”

Israel rejected the decision, accusing backers of the proposal of “procedural bullying” and complaining of a lack of transparency in the process behind it.

“This is not a serious attempt at peacemaking, it is a performance, a publicity stunt,” the Israeli representative said.

“Far from advancing peace, it threatens to prolong the war, embolden Hamas, and undermine real diplomatic efforts.”

The representative warned that such gestures send the wrong signal to militants, and that terrorist groups such as Hamas have publicly praised recent international initiatives, interpreting them as validation of their tactics.

The US also formally opposed the decision by the General Assembly, warning that the conference itself, along with the resolution mandating it, lacks legitimacy.

“We were surprised and dismayed to see this proposal added to the agenda only yesterday,” the US envoy said, bemoaning a lack of transparency surrounding the text, the timing and the budgetary implications of the move.

Describing the resumption of the summit as an “ill-timed publicity stunt,” the envoy warned that the conference could embolden Hamas and prolong the conflict, and stated that Washington would not participate.

“This is an insult to the victims of Oct. 7,” the US representative said, referring to the Hamas-led attacks on Israel in 2023.

“Our focus remains on serious diplomacy, not stage-managed conferences designed to manufacture the appearance of relevance.”


Arab League foreign ministers adopt resolution on regional security and Palestine

Arab League foreign ministers adopt resolution on regional security and Palestine
Updated 05 September 2025

Arab League foreign ministers adopt resolution on regional security and Palestine

Arab League foreign ministers adopt resolution on regional security and Palestine
  • It reaffirms principles of mutual respect, noninterference and peaceful settlement of disputes, plus the need to uphold international law, political independence and territorial integrity

CAIRO: The Arab League’s Council of Foreign Ministers adopted a resolution on Friday outlining a shared vision for security and cooperation in the region, while condemning any activities that threaten the sovereignty or territorial integrity of Arab states.

The resolution reaffirmed the principles of mutual respect, noninterference and peaceful settlement of disputes, stressing the need to uphold international law, and to preserve political independence and territorial integrity, the Saudi Press Agency reported.

Central to the resolution was a call for a just and comprehensive settlement of the Palestinian cause, including an end to Israeli occupation of Palestinian and other Arab territories, the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital, and an immediate halt to settlement expansions by Israel.

The council warned that lack of progress on the Palestinian issue remained the main driver of regional instability and a pretext for extremism. It further called for a Middle East free of nuclear weapons, and urged all states to respect each other’s sovereignty and security.


Lebanese Cabinet receives military’s weapons plan

Lebanese Cabinet receives military’s weapons plan
Updated 05 September 2025

Lebanese Cabinet receives military’s weapons plan

Lebanese Cabinet receives military’s weapons plan
  • Move to restrict arms welcomed despite withdrawal of Hezbollah and Amal ministers
  • Opposition stems from failure of Israel to adhere to ceasefire agreement in the south

BEIRUT: The Lebanese Cabinet on Friday received the Lebanese Armed Forces’ plan to restrict the possession of weapons to state personnel on Friday. 

While the Cabinet “took note” of the plan, four ministers from Hezbollah and its ally, the Amal Movement, along with a neutral Shiite minister, walked out at the start of the session in protest over the plan. 

Since disarmament talks began earlier this year, Hezbollah has firmly rejected handing over its weapons. Despite repeated objections, the government last month confirmed its intention to proceed, giving the Lebanese Army Command a month to develop, present, and implement the plan by the end of the year. 

Hezbollah and the Amal Movement objected, citing Israel’s failure to fulfill its ceasefire obligations to withdraw from occupied positions and cease violations, attacks, and assassinations on Lebanese soil. 

Last November, Hezbollah negotiated a ceasefire agreement with Israel via Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and a US mediator. While the party agreed to all the provisions of the agreement, the Lebanese government has yet to receive the full details.  

Israel refuses to implement the agreement before Lebanon implements the clause related to the disarmament of Hezbollah. The Israeli stance was communicated to US diplomat Tom Barrak less than two weeks ago. 

Though Hezbollah and Amal ministers had agreed to the government’s ministerial statement — which included arms restriction clauses — they exited the Cabinet when Army Commander Gen. Rodolphe Heikal began presenting the plan. 

“We withdrew from the session, not from the government, in line with our positions,” Hezbollah Minister of Labour Mohammed Haidar said after leaving the Presidential Palace. “Because this session is a continuation of the session to decide on the arms monopoly, we cannot continue attending it. The position is political and directed against one item: arms. We participated in the discussion of four items on the agenda, and when the discussion reached the arms item, we withdrew.”

He added that while the group “respects the Army commander and the military establishment,” it “will await the results of the session to build upon what is required, and contacts are still ongoing.” 

In a statement to Hezbollah’s Al-Manar TV station, Haidar said that “any decision taken during the session in the absence of the Shiite community is contrary to the national charter.”

Minister of Administrative Development Fadi Makki, who has maintained a neutral stance on the issue and faced pressure from Hezbollah in previous sessions, addressed President Joseph Aoun before departing Friday’s meeting, saying: “I place my resignation in your hands if the situation continues to deteriorate.”

A political source who attended the session explained to Arab News that this step “does not mean a verbal resignation, but rather a position to avoid further embarrassment from Hezbollah and the Amal Movement, as well as from the president and prime minister.”

After the Cabinet meeting, Mekki said: “I sought, as much as I could, to overcome the obstacles. I was among those calling to discuss the Army’s plan and leaving the issue of the timeframe to the discretion of the Army Command, an institution we consider the guarantor of the nation’s unity and sovereignty.

“However, given the current situation and the withdrawal of a key component, I cannot bear the burden of such a decision again, and I have decided to withdraw from the session. I stated that if my resignation from the government serves the national interest, then I am prepared to place this resignation at the disposal of President Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam.”

Mekki urged ministers and political leaders to discuss the plan within the framework of the agreed-upon ministerial statement concerning the restriction of weapons to the state and its institutions. He emphasized the need for thoughtful deliberation and prioritizing the “nation’s interests, the welfare of the south, and civil peace above all else.” 

Finance Minister Yassin Jaber, the Amal Movement representative in the government, said: “We withdrew from the session, but not from the government, and we will participate in the next Cabinet session and await the final statement to build on it.”

Calls circulated on social media for a gathering in Beirut’s southern suburbs to organize a motorcycle rally in support of Hezbollah and the Amal Movement. However, a security source said the call was “incorrect.”

The Lebanese Armed Forces took strict measures in public squares and at the entrances to Beirut’s southern suburbs before the end of the Cabinet session to prevent any protests from spiraling out of control. 

Interior Minister Ahmad Hajjar confirmed before entering that “the security situation is under control, and God willing, nothing will happen during or outside the session.”

According to reports, the Shiite ministers cited “the Israeli attacks that occurred during the last 72 hours deep in southern Lebanon, which led to the killing and wounding of civilians, in addition to targeting Hezbollah members,” in expressing their positions during the Cabinet session.