Ƶ

Detained South Sudan ex-vice president ‘ready’ for trial

Detained South Sudan ex-vice president ‘ready’ for trial
South Sudan's detained former vice-president Riek Machar is "ready" to face trial and will appear in court on Monday, his lawyer told AFP on Saturday, as fears grow of renewed insecurity in Africa's youngest nation. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 13 sec ago

Detained South Sudan ex-vice president ‘ready’ for trial

Detained South Sudan ex-vice president ‘ready’ for trial
  • “The accused is ready for the trial. He is ready and he is in good health,” his lawyer, Kur Lual Kur, told AFP
  • “We are ready for the trial, but up to now we didn’t receive the formation of the court“

JUBA: South Sudan’s detained former vice president Riek Machar is “ready” to face trial and will appear in court on Monday, his lawyer told AFP on Saturday, as fears grow of renewed insecurity in Africa’s youngest nation.
The government of President Salva Kiir this month charged Machar with murder, treason and crimes against humanity and stripped him of his position as first vice president in the unity government.
His position was part of a 2018 deal between the two men that ended a five-year civil war that killed some 400,000, but the fragile agreement has been unraveling for months.
“The accused is ready for the trial. He is ready and he is in good health,” his lawyer, Kur Lual Kur, told AFP.
He confirmed Machar would attend the “special court” for the first sitting on Monday following a summons, but said they were still waiting for details.
“We are ready for the trial, but up to now we didn’t receive the formation of the court,” he said.
“We will go according to that summons and then we will see what is going to happen on that day,” he added.
Machar’s faction has denied the charges — which also include an accusation he ordered an ethnic militia to attack a military base this year — and says they are part of Kiir’s efforts to sideline the opposition and consolidate power.
South Sudan, which gained independence from Sudan in 2011, has remained mired in poverty and insecurity with repeated international attempts to ensure a democratic transition failing.
Elections due to have taken place in December 2024 were again postponed to 2026 and the two sides have not merged their armed forces.


Macron takes risk with Palestinian statehood recognition

Updated 8 sec ago

Macron takes risk with Palestinian statehood recognition

Macron takes risk with Palestinian statehood recognition
The implications are historic — France and the UK will be the first permanent UN Security Council members to recognize a Palestinian state
“It is not a symbolic recognition. It is part of a broader and very concrete action,” said French foreign ministry spokesman Pascal Confavreu

PARIS: French President Emmanuel Macron scored a major diplomatic coup by declaring his intention to recognize a Palestinian state but the move risks being followed by bitter retaliation from Israel while not providing concrete benefits to the Palestinians, analysts and sources say.
Macron sent a shockwave through the international community with his pledge over the summer. His announcement in a speech in New York at a conference on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly on Monday is now to be matched by recognition by nine other states including Australia, Belgium, Canada and the UK, according to the Elysee.
The recognition marks the growing international frustration with Israel over its assault and aid blockades on the Gaza Strip first launched in response to the October 7, 2023 attack on Israel by Palestinian militant group Hamas.
The implications are historic — France and the UK will be the first permanent UN Security Council members to recognize a Palestinian state and, along with Canada, the first G7 members to do so.
“This recognition is not the end of our diplomatic efforts. It is not a symbolic recognition. It is part of a broader and very concrete action,” said French foreign ministry spokesman Pascal Confavreux, pointing to the French-Saudi roadmap that is to accompany the recognition.
Defending the move on Israeli television this week, Macron said it was the “best way to isolate Hamas.”

- ‘Lot of noise’ -

Diplomats from both sides, asking not to be named, are expecting reprisals from Israel in the wake of the move although the retaliation is not expected to extend to Israel cutting diplomatic relations with France.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu could shut down France’s consulate in Jerusalem which is intensively used by Palestinians or annex part of the West Bank where Israel has expanded settlements in defiance of international outrage, they said.
“There is going to be a lot of noise,” said one diplomat, asking not to be named.
“The Israelis are prepared for anything, and the French response is likely to be quite limited,” said Agnes Levallois, deputy president of the Paris-based Institute for Research and Study of the Mediterranean and Middle East.
“Ultimately, it is the Palestinians who have the most to lose in this crisis,” she said, adding the move needed to be followed by sanctions against Israel to have any impact.
“The annexation of the West Bank is a clear red line,” warned a French presidential official, asking not to be named. “It is obviously the worst possible violation of UN resolutions.”
The United States also vehemently opposes the move and its ambassador to Paris, Charles Kushner, has made his feelings clear in a series of posts on X denouncing “unmet French conditions” for the recognition.
“From the beginning, we have made it clear that recognition of a Palestinian state by France, without any conditions, would complicate the situation on the ground rather than advance peace,” Joshua Zarka, Israel’s ambassador to France, told AFP.
Zarka said France should have not taken the step without demanding that all the Israeli hostages held by Hamas were released first.
But the Palestinian representative in France, Hala Abou Hassira, said France needed to go further, urging “concrete sanctions, such as an arms embargo on Israel, a severance of relations with Israel which includes the total termination of the association agreement between the European Union and Israel.”

- ‘Diplomatic lever’ -

After months of wavering on the issue, Macron made the decision on the plane traveling from the Egyptian border point of El-Arish in April where he met wounded Palestinians and could witness the suffering caused by the blockade, people close to him said.
Politically embattled at home — Macron just appointed his seventh prime minister — and failing despite intense efforts to end Russia’s war on Ukraine, the recognition gives the president a chance to seal a concrete step in his legacy.
He sees this recognition “as a diplomatic lever to put pressure on Netanyahu,” said a person close to him, asking not to be named.
For former ambassador Michel Duclos, resident fellow at the Montaigne Institute, “this could become a success for France,” in line with the French “no” under late president Jacques Chirac to oppose the American invasion of Iraq in 2003.

India explores maritime, space cooperation with UAE to boost strategic partnership

India explores maritime, space cooperation with UAE to boost strategic partnership
Updated 3 min 17 sec ago

India explores maritime, space cooperation with UAE to boost strategic partnership

India explores maritime, space cooperation with UAE to boost strategic partnership
  • Commerce minister concluded two-day official visit to Abu Dhabi and Dubai on Friday
  • India is also eyeing strategic collaboration in AI, energy security, infrastructure with UAE

NEW DELHI: India is exploring new areas of cooperation — including maritime and space — with the UAE in order to boost their strategic partnershipce, Indian Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal said on social media following his visit to the Gulf state. 

Goyal was in Abu Dhabi and Dubai for a two-day trip to review the progress of India’s Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement with the UAE and for talks with top Emirati officials and business leaders. 

While there, he co-chaired the UAE-India Business Council Roundtable with UAE Foreign Trade Minister Thani Al-Zeyoudi, as well as co-chairing the 13th India-UAE High Level Task Force on Investments alongside Sheikh Hamed Al-Nahyan, managing director of the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority. 

His meetings were focused on “expanding collaboration in diverse sectors and new investment opportunities,” Goyal wrote on X after concluding his trip late on Friday. 

“With a shared commitment to growth and prosperity, the India-UAE strategic partnership continues to further pave the way for deeper engagement, larger investments and greater business opportunities.” 

The meetings he attended in the UAE last week “explored new frontiers for investment and collaboration, especially in the maritime and space sectors, to drive mutual growth,” Goyal said.

The two countries also have “immense avenues … to collaborate across strategic sectors,” including in AI, energy security and infrastructure, he added. 

Under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, India has been cementing its place as a global space power. In January it became the fourth country to achieve docking in space by joining two small aircraft. 

Goyal’s trip follows Al-Zeyoudi’s visit to India last month, during which the two countries explored ways to further enhance trade ties under the UAE-India CEPA, which has been in effect since May 2022. The agreement has reduced tariffs on about 80 percent of all goods and provided zero-duty access to 90 percent of Indian exports. 

Bilateral non-oil trade between India and the Emirates amounted to $38 billion in the first half of 2025, according to data from India’s commerce ministry, marking a 34 percent increase over the first half of 2024. The surge has been led by sectors including gems and jewelry, machinery, chemicals, and smartphones.


ICE denies using excessive force as it broadens immigration arrests in Chicago

ICE denies using excessive force as it broadens immigration arrests in Chicago
Updated 8 min 47 sec ago

ICE denies using excessive force as it broadens immigration arrests in Chicago

ICE denies using excessive force as it broadens immigration arrests in Chicago
  • ICE launched the operation on Sept. 8, drawing concern from activists and immigrant communities fearful of the large-scale arrests or aggressive tactics used
  • Activists and critics of ICE say that’s increasingly not the norm in immigration operations

CHICAGO: It was 3:30 a.m. when 10 US Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers gathered in a parking lot in the Chicago suburbs for a briefing about a suspect they were hoping to arrest. They went over a description of the person, made sure their radios were on the same channel and discussed where the closest hospital was in case something went wrong.
“Let’s plan on not being there,” said one of the officers, before they climbed into their vehicles and headed out.
Across the city and surrounding suburbs, other teams were fanning out in support of “Operation Midway Blitz.” It has unleashed President Donald Trump’s mass deportations agenda on a city and state that has had some of the strongest laws preventing local officials from cooperating with immigration enforcement.
ICE launched the operation on Sept. 8, drawing concern from activists and immigrant communities fearful of the large-scale arrests or aggressive tactics used in other cities targeted by the Republican president. They say there has been a noticeable uptick in immigration enforcement agents, although a military deployment to Chicago has yet to materialize.
The Associated Press went on a ride-along with ICE in a Chicago suburb — much of the recent focus — to see how that operation is unfolding.
A predawn wait, then two arrests
A voice came over the radio: “He got into the car. I’m not sure if that’s the target.”
Someone matching the description of the man that ICE was searching for walked out of the house, got into a car and drove away from the tree-lined street. Unsure whether this was their target, the officers followed. A few minutes later, with the car approaching the freeway, the voice over the radio said: “He’s got the physical description. We just can’t see the face good.”
“Do it,” said Marcos Charles, the acting head of ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations.
Agents in multiple vehicles soon overtook the car and boxed it in. After talking to the man, they realized he was not the person being sought for but that he was in the United States illegally, so they took him into custody.
Eventually, a little after dawn broke on the one- and two-story brick houses, the man they were looking for came out of the house and got into a car. ICE officers closed in. The man got out of the car and was arrested. ICE said both men were in the country illegally and had criminal records.
Charles called it a “successful operation.”
“There was no safety issues on the part of our officers, nor the individuals that we arrested. And it went smoothly,” he said.
‘ICE does not belong here’
Activists and critics of ICE say that’s increasingly not the norm in immigration operations.
They point to videos showing ICE agents smashing windows to apprehend suspects, a chaotic showdown outside a popular Italian restaurant in San Diego, and arrests like that of a Tufts University student in March by masked agents outside her apartment in Somerville, Massachusetts, as neighbors watched.
Charles said ICE is using an “appropriate” amount of force and that agents are responding to suspects who increasingly are not following commands.
There has been “an uptick in people that are not compliant,” he said, blaming inflammatory rhetoric from activists who, he said, are encouraging people to resist.
Alderman Andre Vasquez, who chairs the Chicago City Council’s committee on immigrant and refugee rights, strenuously objected to that description, faulting ICE for any escalation.
“We’re not here to cause chaos. The president is,” Vasquez. He accused immigration enforcement agents of trying to provoke activists into overreacting in order to justify calling in a greater use of force such as National Guard troops. “ICE does not belong here.”
Shooting death of immigrant by ICE officer heightens tensions
Chicago was already on edge when a shooting Sept. 12 heightened tensions even more.
The US Department of Homeland Security said an ICE officer fatally shot Silverio Villegas González, a Mexican immigrant who tried to evade arrest in a Chicago suburb by driving his car at officers and dragging one of them. The department said the officer felt his life was threatened and had opened fire, killing the man.
Charles said he could not comment because there is an open investigation. But he said he met with the officer in the hospital, saw his injuries and felt that the force used was appropriate.
The officer was not wearing a body camera, Charles said.
Gov. JB Pritzker, D-Illinois, has demanded “a full, factual accounting” of the shooting. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum condemned the death and said Mexico is demanding a thorough investigation.
“These tactics have led to the loss of life of one of our community members,” said Democratic state Rep. Norma Hernandez.
In another use of force incident under “Midway Blitz” that has drawn criticism, a US citizen was detained by immigration agents alongside his father and hit by a stun gun three times Tuesday in suburban Des Plaines, the man’s lawyer said.
Local advocates have also condemned ICE agents for wearing masks, failing to identify themselves, and not using body cameras — actions that starkly contrast with Chicago Police Department policy.
’It was time to hit Chicago’
Charles said there is no timeline for the ICE-led operation in the Chicago area to end. As of Thursday, immigration enforcement officials have arrested nearly 550 people. Charles said 50 percent to 60 percent of those are targeted arrests, meaning they are people whom immigration enforcers are specifically trying to find.
He pushed back on criticism that ICE randomly targets people, saying agents weren’t “going out to Home Depot parking lots” to make indiscriminate arrests.
Charles said ICE has brought in more than 200 officers from around the country for the operation.
He said that for too long, cities such as Chicago that limited cooperation with ICE had allowed immigrants, especially those with criminal records, to remain in the country illegally. It was time to act, he said.
“It was time to hit Chicago.”


British Labour party blocks Palestine motions from debate at annual conference

British Labour party blocks Palestine motions from debate at annual conference
Updated 37 min 8 sec ago

British Labour party blocks Palestine motions from debate at annual conference

British Labour party blocks Palestine motions from debate at annual conference
  • Under party rules, only contemporary motions on subjects not covered by previous frameworks are eligible for debate

LONDON: The UK Labour Party has ruled out dozens of motions on Palestine from being debated at its annual conference in Liverpool, prompting criticism from grassroots members and campaign groups who accused party officials of stifling debate, it was revealed on Saturday.

The party’s Conference Arrangements Committee, or CAC, said that more than 30 motions submitted by local constituency Labour parties and affiliated organizations were ruled out of order because the issue had already been substantially addressed in the National Policy Framework, or NPF, report published in August.

Under party rules, only contemporary motions on subjects not covered by the NPF are eligible for debate.

Delegates have until Sunday evening to appeal against the CAC’s decisions, with hearings due on Monday. The conference begins on Sept. 28.

Labour leader and prime minister, Keir Starmer, is preparing to recognize Palestine as an independent state, a move expected this weekend. However, many Labour members and MPs argue that the government should go further by ceasing all arms trade and military cooperation with Israel, and by introducing comprehensive sanctions.

The Palestine Solidarity Campaign, or PSC, which has the backing of several Labour MPs, strongly criticized the decision, saying many of the motions related to developments that took place after the NPF report was published. These include the Israeli government’s announcement of its militarily offensive in Gaza City on Aug. 8 and the killing of five Al Jazeera journalists in Gaza City on Aug. 10.

PSC Director Ben Jamal said: “Just days after a UN Commission of Inquiry confirmed that Israel has committed and is committing genocide in Gaza, it is shocking that Labour officials are trying to block a large influx of motions in solidarity with Palestine from being debated at this year’s party conference.”

He continued: “By continuing to deny that Israel is committing genocide, the government seems determined to ignore the overwhelming evidence as well as growing public outrage at its ongoing failure to take meaningful action to end British complicity with Israel’s crimes against the Palestinian people.

“Labour Party members must be allowed to debate these issues in Liverpool.”

The surge in motions this year reflects the growing pressure inside Labour over its stance on Israel and Palestine. More than 30 motions were submitted this year compared with just three in 2024, a ten-fold increase. Campaigners say that this reflects rising anger among party members and the wider public, pointing to polling which found that 72 percent of Labour’s 2024 voters supported a full arms embargo on Israel.

Former Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell, a long-standing supporter of the PSC, said that the conference must not ignore the issue.

“With more than 30 motions on Palestine submitted to this year’s Labour Party conference, it is clear that party members see Israel’s genocide against the Palestinian people as a major issue that needs to be raised on the conference floor,” he said.

“The government should join those, including London Mayor Sadiq Khan, who have spoken out this week to make clear that what we are witnessing in Gaza is genocide and urgently implement sanctions, including a full arms embargo and a ban on all trade that aids or assists Israel’s crimes against the Palestinian people,” McDonnell added.


Germany slams Eurovision boycott threats over Gaza

Germany slams Eurovision boycott threats over Gaza
Updated 55 min 55 sec ago

Germany slams Eurovision boycott threats over Gaza

Germany slams Eurovision boycott threats over Gaza
  • Spain said this week it would boycott the world’s largest live televised music event in May if Israel participated
  • Ireland, Slovenia, Iceland and the Netherlands have made similar threats

BERLIN: Germany’s culture minister on Saturday slammed threats by several European countries to boycott next year’s Eurovision song contest if Israel took part as politicizing a cultural event.
Spain said this week it would boycott the world’s largest live televised music event in May if Israel participated, and Ireland, Slovenia, Iceland and the Netherlands have made similar threats.
“Eurovision was founded to bring nations together through music. Excluding Israel today goes against this fundamental idea and turns a celebration of understanding between peoples into a tribunal,” said Wolfram Weimer in a statement.
“It’s precisely because Eurovision was born on the ruins of war that it should not become a scene of exclusion.”
Austria, which is hosting the next Eurovision, had on Friday expressed regret over the threats.
Other countries like Belgium, Sweden, and Finland are also considering a boycott and have time till December to decide.
“Eurovision is based on the principle that artists are judged on their art and not on their nationality. The culture of cancelation is not the solution — the solution is diversity and cohesion,” Weimer said.
“It’s precisely because Eurovision was born on the ruins of war that it should not become a scene of exclusion,” he added.
The European Broadcasting Union, the organizer of Eurovision, is set to decide whether Israel will take part in the 2026 edition at its general assembly in December.
This year’s edition in Basel in Switzerland drew in 166 million viewers across 37 countries.
Pro-Palestinian activists protested in Malmo, Sweden in 2024 and in Basel in May over Israel’s participation amid its devastating offensive in Gaza.
The war was sparked by Hamas’s October 2023 attack on Israel that resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, most of them civilians, according to an AFP tally of official figures.
Israel’s retaliatory campaign has killed at least 65,174 people, also mostly civilians, according to figures from the territory’s health ministry that the United Nations considers reliable.