Ƶ

From looms to laptops, Afghan women lose lifeline in Taliban Internet ban

From looms to laptops, Afghan women lose lifeline in Taliban Internet ban
Afghan children read the copies of the holy Koran at a madrassa, or Islamic school, on the outskirts of Fayzabad district in Badakhshan province, Afghanistan. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 7 min 1 sec ago

From looms to laptops, Afghan women lose lifeline in Taliban Internet ban

From looms to laptops, Afghan women lose lifeline in Taliban Internet ban
  • The Internet has been a lifeline for students, especially girls barred from secondary schools and universities, but the shutdown has cut off even that option in northern Afghanistan
  • The measure is the first large scale Internet shutdown since the Islamist group seized power in 2021, though it is not nationwide

KABUL: In a dim home used as a small business in Afghanistan, women bent over bright cloth use needles to form intricate embroidery. But their fiber-optic network in Kandahar — their primary link to buyers — has now gone dark.
Local government officials confirmed a ban on fiber-optic services in five northern provinces — Balkh, Kunduz, Badakhshan, Takhar and Baghlan. Officials said the ban is to prevent “immoral activities.” Residents in other provinces, including Kandahar, Herat and Parwan have reported disruptions, though these have not been formally acknowledged by authorities.
The loss of access to the fiber-optic network has stranded thousands of homes, businesses and schools and left them reliant on costly, patchy mobile phone connections.
The measure is the first large-scale Internet shutdown since the Islamist group seized power in 2021, though it is not nationwide.
For Sabrinna Hayat, who runs Hayat Handicrafts with nine women breadwinners stitching firaq partug, the long embroidered dresses commonly worn by Afghan women, along with other handmade items, the outage has tripled Internet costs.
She said her group used to receive orders from Afghanistan and abroad but now must repeatedly activate mobile Internet packages that cost three times as much as fiber, just to keep up with customers.
“A complete ban has been imposed on fiber-optic cable … This action has been taken to prevent immoral activities, and an alternative solution will be developed within the country to meet necessary needs,” Hajji Zaid, a spokesman for the governor of the Balkh province said last week.
The Kunduz provincial media office issued a similar statement. The Ministry of Communications in Kabul did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Across town, a tailor who asked to be identified only by her family name Dawrani, said her workshop employing widows and women in need has been gutted, given that sales and orders depend on connectivity.
“If I cannot even earn this small piece of bread, I will be forced to leave this country,” she said.

CUT OFF FROM THE WORLD
The Internet has been a lifeline for students, especially girls barred from secondary schools and universities, but the shutdown has cut off even that option in northern Afghanistan.
Dawrani said her daughters were no longer able to take their online English classes.
Digital rights advocates say the Taliban’s reasoning is less about morality than about control.
Obaidullah Baheer, a Kabul-based academic, said the ban echoed earlier Taliban moves that used immorality as justification for restrictions, including on women’s education, and were followed by promises of reform that never materialized.
“It shows a very anti-modern version of the Taliban. Seems like their fight is against modernity and they’re fitting the bill of people who used to call them draconian.”
For some women, the debate is distant.
“Through this tailoring work, I managed to put food on the table. Without Internet, even that may disappear,” said Dawrani.


Top diplomats from US, South Korea, Japan voice concern on Taiwan Strait

Top diplomats from US, South Korea, Japan voice concern on Taiwan Strait
Updated 5 sec ago

Top diplomats from US, South Korea, Japan voice concern on Taiwan Strait

Top diplomats from US, South Korea, Japan voice concern on Taiwan Strait
  • The three also expressed strong opposition to “unlawful maritime claims” in the South China Sea and attempts to enforce such claims
SEOUL: The foreign ministers of South Korea, Japan and the United States expressed concern about increasingly frequent destabilising activities around Taiwan in a joint statement after their meeting.
The three also expressed strong opposition to “unlawful maritime claims” in the South China Sea and attempts to enforce such claims, the statement said.
The statement did not specifically mention China, but comes amid simmering tension between Beijing and Washington and its allies over the disputed South China Sea.
China’s foreign ministry said it strongly deplored and opposed the “irresponsible” remarks made by the three countries, urging them to “cease any form of connivance with separatist activities of Taiwan independence.”
Regarding the South China Sea, ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said at a press conference that the nations should respect efforts by regional countries to resolve issues through dialogue and consultation, and stop “exaggerating tensions and provoking confrontation.”
Taiwan’s foreign ministry welcomed the expression of concern.
Taiwan will cooperate with the United States, Japan, South Korea and other like-minded partners to ensure peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait and Indo-Pacific, ministry spokesperson Hsiao Kuang-wei told reporters in Taipei.
China claims almost the entire South China Sea, overlapping the exclusive economic zones of Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines and Vietnam. Unresolved disputes have festered for years over ownership of various islands and features.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, South Korean Foreign Minister Cho Hyun and Japanese Foreign Minister Iwaya Takeshi met in New York on Monday and also discussed the three countries’ continued commitment to ending North Korea’s nuclear program, their joint statement said.
China, which views the democratically-governed island as its own territory, has stepped up its military activities nearby, including staging war games. Taiwan’s government rejects China’s territorial claims.

UN slams ‘systematic’ Russian torture of Ukraine civilians

UN slams ‘systematic’ Russian torture of Ukraine civilians
Updated 29 min 57 sec ago

UN slams ‘systematic’ Russian torture of Ukraine civilians

UN slams ‘systematic’ Russian torture of Ukraine civilians
  • In a fresh report, the UN rights office concluded that Russia since the start of its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 “has subjected Ukrainian civilian detainees to consistent patterns of serious violations” of international law
  • “Many interviewees were subjected to multiple forms of torture or ill treatment while in detention,” the report said

GENEVA: Russian authorities have subjected civilian detainees in Ukrainian areas it occupies to torture, including sexual violence, in a “widespread and systematic manner,” the United Nations said Tuesday.
In a fresh report, the UN rights office concluded that Russia since the start of its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 “has subjected Ukrainian civilian detainees to consistent patterns of serious violations” of international law.
The report said UN investigators had interviewed 216 civilians released from detention in the occupied territories since June 2023.
A full 92 percent of them “gave consistent and detailed accounts of of having been subjected to torture or ill-treatment during their captivity,” it said.
“Severe beatings with a variety of instruments, such as batons and sticks, electric shocks to various body parts (and) mock executions,” were among the methods described.
Many also said they had suffered threats of death and violence to themselves or a loved one, various forms of humiliation and “a variety of stress positions.”
“Many interviewees were subjected to multiple forms of torture or ill-treatment while in detention,” the report said.
In May 2025, the Ukrainian authorities reported that around 1,800 Ukrainian civilians were being detained by Russia, the rights office said, stressing that the actual number was likely significantly higher.
The report cautioned that Russia’s frequent disregard of legal safeguards, combined with a dire lack of accountability had “placed many Ukrainian civilians outside the effective protection of the law during their detention.”
UN rights chief Volker Turk pointed out in a statement that “people have been arbitrarily picked off the streets in occupied territory, charged under shifting legal bases and held for days, weeks, months and even years.”
“It is essential that the human rights of civilian detainees, who have been severely impacted by this terrible conflict, are prioritized in any peace talks,” he said.
Tuesday’s report also documented “instances of torture and ill-treatment” of civilians detained by Ukrainian authorities.
As of late July, Ukraine counted more than 2,250 conflict-related detainees in official pre-trial and penal facilities, according to the report.
The vast majority were Ukrainian nationals and only a few were Russians.
It found that in territories it controlled, Ukraine had detained many of its own citizens on charges related to national security, including treason and espionage.
Others faced charges of collaboration linked to their interaction with the Russian occupying authorities, the report said.
Such charges covered a broad range of ordinary work, it said, pointing out that people had been prosecuted for carrying out emergency services, construction, humanitarian relief and garbage removal during the occupation.


Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger announce exit from International Criminal Court

Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger announce exit from International Criminal Court
Updated 36 min 36 sec ago

Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger announce exit from International Criminal Court

Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger announce exit from International Criminal Court
  • The three countries, which are ruled by military officers, have already split from the West African regional bloc ECOWAS and formed a body known as the Alliance of Sahel States

DAKAR: The military-led West African countries Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger have announced their withdrawal from the International Criminal Court, denouncing it as “a tool of neocolonial repression.”
The announcement, in a joint statement published on Monday, is the latest example of diplomatic upheaval in West Africa’s Sahel region following eight coups between 2020 and 2023.
The three countries, which are ruled by military officers, have already split from the West African regional bloc ECOWAS and formed a body known as the Alliance of Sahel States. They have also curbed defense cooperation with Western powers and sought closer ties with Russia.
Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger have been members of the ICC, located in The Hague, for more than two decades. But their statement said they viewed the court as incapable of prosecuting war crimes, crimes against humanity, crimes of aggression and genocide. It did not specify examples of where the countries believed the ICC had fallen short.
The three countries are battling Islamist militant groups that control large swathes of territory and have staged frequent attacks on military installations this year.
Human Rights Watch and other groups have accused the militants as well as the militaries and partner forces of Burkina Faso and Mali of possible atrocity crimes.
In April, United Nations experts said the alleged summary execution of several dozen civilians by Malian forces may amount to war crimes.
The ICC has had an investigation open in Mali since 2013 over alleged war crimes committed primarily in the northern regions of Gao, Timbuktu and Kidal, which had fallen under militant control. Later that year, France intervened to push back the insurgents.
The Mali investigation was opened following a referral from the government at the time.


Crimes against humanity charges against former Philippine President Duterte detailed by court

Crimes against humanity charges against former Philippine President Duterte detailed by court
Updated 23 September 2025

Crimes against humanity charges against former Philippine President Duterte detailed by court

Crimes against humanity charges against former Philippine President Duterte detailed by court
  • Supporters of Duterte criticized the administration of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., Duterte’s political rival, for arresting and surrendering the former leader to a court whose jurisdiction his supporters dispute

THE HAGUE: The crimes against humanity charges against former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte allege his involvement in the killings of at least 76 people while he was president and earlier a southern mayor, the International Criminal Court has revealed.
The first charge cites 19 victims killed while Duterte was mayor of Davao City between 2013 and around 2016. The second involves 14 who died in targeted killings between 2016 and 2017 when Duterte was president. The third cited the killings of 43 people during so-called “clearance operations” between 2016 and 2018.
The redacted charges were made public Monday after prosecutors submitted a 15-page charge sheet to the court on July 4. Among other things, they allege Duterte instructed and authorized “violent acts including murder to be committed against alleged criminals, including alleged drug dealers and users.”
Duterte, his lawyer and family did not immediately react to the detailed charges. Even when he was president, he denied authorizing extrajudicial killings although he openly threatened drug suspects with death and encouraged police to open fire if suspects violently resisted arrest and threaten law enforcers.
Duterte was arrested in March by Philippine authorities on a warrant issued by the ICC. He is now being held at an ICC facility in the Netherlands.
Supporters of Duterte criticized the administration of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., Duterte’s political rival, for arresting and surrendering the former leader to a court whose jurisdiction his supporters dispute.
A court hearing had been scheduled to begin Tuesday but was postponed to give judges time to evaluate arguments from Duterte’s attorneys that he is not fit to stand trial.


Sri Lanka jails immigration chief for two years

Sri Lanka jails immigration chief for two years
Updated 23 September 2025

Sri Lanka jails immigration chief for two years

Sri Lanka jails immigration chief for two years
  • Harsha Ilukpitiya pleaded guilty to ignoring court orders to end a multi-million dollar contract that outsourced visa services to a foreign consortium
  • A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court handed down the two-year sentence to Ilukpitiya – who has already spent a year in custody – for contempt

COOMBO: Sri Lanka’s immigration chief was sentenced to two years in prison Tuesday, the latest top official jailed under the government’s anti-corruption drive.
President Anura Kumara Dissanayake has revived corruption cases against members of the former administrations of the two Rajapaksa brothers – Mahinda and Gotabaya, and purged several top officials.
In the latest case, Harsha Ilukpitiya pleaded guilty to ignoring court orders to end a multi-million dollar contract that outsourced visa services to a foreign consortium.
A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court handed down the two-year sentence to Ilukpitiya – who has already spent a year in custody – for contempt.
The case centered on a visa handling contract awarded by the previous government, which replaced a local provider charging one dollar per visa with a foreign consortium that raised the fee to $25.
The consortium – comprising India’s GBS Technology Services and IVS Global FZCO, with VFS Global as a technology partner – even applied the fee to citizens of countries that did not need visas.
Opposition parties and then-tourism minister Harin Fernando had argued the fee would discourage tourists.
Petitioners alleged that the contract was not awarded transparently and estimated that the consortium stood to earn up to $2.75 billion over a 16-year period.
The Supreme Court last year ordered the temporary reinstatement of the previous provider, which Ilukpitiya ignored.
The court has yet to rule on the legality of the outsourcing deal.