Ƶ

Palestinians, Jordan say Israel to indefinitely close West Bank crossing

Update Palestinians, Jordan say Israel to indefinitely close West Bank crossing
Israeli security forces close off a road leading to the King Hussein (Allenby) bridge, the main border crossing between the Israel-occupied West Bank and Jordan. (File/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 6 sec ago

Palestinians, Jordan say Israel to indefinitely close West Bank crossing

Palestinians, Jordan say Israel to indefinitely close West Bank crossing
  • Israeli authorities have notified that the Al-Karama crossing will be closed

RAMALLAH, Palestinian Territories: Palestinian and Jordanian authorities said Israel was indefinitely closing the only crossing between the Israeli-occupied West Bank and Jordan from Wednesday.

There was no immediate confirmation from Israeli officials on Tuesday, which is a public holiday.

“The chairman of the Palestinian General Authority for Crossings and Borders, Mr. Nazmi Muhanna, announced that the Israeli side has informed us of the closure of the Al-Karama crossing starting tomorrow, Wednesday... until further notice, in both directions,” a statement from the Palestinian borders authority said, referring to the Allenby crossing.

The crossing in the Jordan Valley is the only international gateway for Palestinians from the West Bank that does not require entering Israel, which has occupied the territory since 1967.

The Jordanian Public Security Directorate also announced the closure of the crossing, which is also known as the King Hussein Bridge, saying it was being shut “to passenger and cargo traffic by the other side until further notice.”

The crossing has been largely closed since a Jordanian truck driver shot dead an Israeli soldier and a reserve officer at the border last week.

The announcement comes hours after France joined a flurry of Western countries in formally recognizing a Palestinian state, drawing sharp rebuke from Israel.


Israel to close West Bank-Jordan crossing from Wednesday, Palestinian border authority says

Updated 5 sec ago

Israel to close West Bank-Jordan crossing from Wednesday, Palestinian border authority says

Israel to close West Bank-Jordan crossing from Wednesday, Palestinian border authority says
REUTERS

JERUSALEM: Israel will close the Allenby Crossing, the sole gateway between the Israeli-occupied West Bank and Jordan, starting on Wednesday until further notice, the Palestinian General Authority for Borders and Crossings said on Tuesday.
It was not immediately clear why Israel was closing the crossing.
The office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the Israel Airports Authority, which manages the crossing, did not immediately respond to a request for comment during a public holiday in Israel.
Israel Airports Authority said on Monday that the crossing had reopened for passenger traffic, days after a Jordanian truck driver opened fire there, killing two Israeli soldiers.
Jordan's Public Security Directorate said on Tuesday the crossing was closed to passenger and freight traffic from the Israeli side until further notice.
The Allenby Crossing is the main route for transporting commercial goods between Jordan and the West Bank. (Reporting by Ali Sawafta and Alexander Cornwell, Writing by Ahmed Elimam; Editing by Sharon Singleton and Alex Richardson)

Syria to establish new parliament, testing inclusivity pledge 

Syria to establish new parliament, testing inclusivity pledge 
Updated 23 September 2025

Syria to establish new parliament, testing inclusivity pledge 

Syria to establish new parliament, testing inclusivity pledge 
  • Election excludes Kurdish-led areas and Druze province
  • People’s Assembly will have limited powers under presidential system

DAMASCUS: Syria is preparing to establish the first parliament since Bashar Assad was toppled, a milestone in the transition from his rule but one that has stirred new concerns about political inclusivity under President Ahmed Al-Sharaa.

Regional committees have selected electoral colleges that will elect two-thirds of the 210-member People’s Assembly, on October 5. Sharaa appoints the remaining third.

The authorities say they resorted to this system rather than universal suffrage due to a lack of reliable population data and displacement after years of war.

The process is unfolding as Sharaa tries to consolidate his hold over a fractured nation, with suspicion of his Sunni Islamist-led administration running deep among minority Kurds, Druze and Alawites.

How will the election take place?

The process is run by an 11-member body appointed by Sharaa in June. This body in turn appointed regional subcommittees that selected members of regional electoral colleges, after local consultations. A preliminary list of some 6,000 electors has been announced. To run for parliament, you must first be selected as a member of an electoral college.

The criteria rule out supporters of the former regime, and advocates of “secession, division or seeking foreign intervention.”

The 140 seats are distributed among 60 districts.

Will it take place across all Syria?

No. Citing security and political reasons, the authorities have postponed the process in areas controlled by a Kurdish-led administration in the northeast, which differs sharply with Sharaa over how Syria should be governed.

It was also delayed in predominantly Druze Sweida in the south, where tensions remain high following violence that pitted government forces against Druze fighters.

This means that around a dozen seats reserved for these areas will not be filled for now.

What do critics say?

Critics say the process is centralized and the eligibility criteria vaguely defined, among other concerns.

A statement from 15 civil society groups said it opens the way for “the executive authority to dominate an institution that should be independent of it and reflect the popular will.”

The Supreme Committee says an appeals process allows people to challenge selections of electors.

Though the rules stipulate that at least a fifth of electors should be women, there is no minimum requirement for their parliamentary representation. Likewise, there are no quotas for ethnic and sectarian minorities.

Combined with a winner-takes-all voting system, the election could produce a result dominated by men from Syria’s Sunni Muslim majority, analysts say. This may put the onus on Sharaa, who has repeatedly promised inclusivity, to use his third to appoint female lawmakers and members of minority groups.

Political scientist Radwan Ziadeh described it as a selection process that risked adding to a “crisis of legitimacy” by not providing “true representation.” “Critics ... will say this is not democratic, it’s not free, even though the state never claimed it was a democratic process,” he said.

The dominant Kurdish groups see the process as further evidence that Damascus wants to monopolize power. Sharaa has rejected their demand for decentralized government.

Thouraya Mustafa of the Kurdish Democratic Union Party (PYD) said it showed the new administration had the same mentality “as the previous authoritarian mentality.”

Under Assad, parliament acted as a rubber stamp for his decisions.

What has Sharaa said?

Sharaa has said the assembly was being formed in “an acceptable way” for a transition, and was “not a permanent state.” He said it was impossible to hold a national election due to “the loss of documents,” noting many Syrians are outside the country, also without documents.

Sharaa has previously indicated support for democratic governance, telling the Economist in January that “if democracy means that the people decide who will rule them and who represents them in the parliament, then yes Syria is going in this direction.”

What powers will the parliament have?

A temporary constitution introduced in March granted parliament limited authorities. There is no requirement for the government to win a parliamentary vote of confidence.

The Assembly can propose and approve laws. Its term is 30 months, renewable. It assumes legislative authority until a permanent constitution is adopted and elections are organized.


Vessel reports sound of nearby explosion off Yemeni coast, UKMTO says

Vessel reports sound of nearby explosion off Yemeni coast, UKMTO says
Updated 23 September 2025

Vessel reports sound of nearby explosion off Yemeni coast, UKMTO says

Vessel reports sound of nearby explosion off Yemeni coast, UKMTO says
  • UKMTO said on Tuesday a vessel reported a splash and the sound of an explosion in its vicinity 120 nautical miles (222 km) east of Yemen's port city, Aden

DUBAI: A British maritime security agency said an explosion was heard Tuesday near a vessel off Yemen, where Houthi militants have been targeting shipping since the Gaza war began in 2023.
United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO), run by the Britain’s Royal Navy, said it “received a report of an incident 120 nautical miles east of Aden, Yemen.”
It reported “splash and sound of explosion in the vicinity of vessel. Vessel and crew reported safe and proceeding to next port of call,” it added.
There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the blast, which UKMTO described as an “attack.”
The Iran-backed Houthi militants, who have controlled large swathes of Yemen for more than a decade, have been attacking vessels they deem linked to Israel since soon after the Gaza war began with the Hamas attack of October 2023.
Earlier this month, the rebels said they had fired a missile at a tanker in the Red Sea, days after Israeli strikes killed their prime minister and nearly half of his cabinet.

 

 

 

 


Egypt frees activist Alaa Abdel Fattah after El-Sisi pardon

Egypt frees activist Alaa Abdel Fattah after El-Sisi pardon
Updated 23 min 59 sec ago

Egypt frees activist Alaa Abdel Fattah after El-Sisi pardon

Egypt frees activist Alaa Abdel Fattah after El-Sisi pardon
  • Prominent British-Egyptian activist Alaa Abdel Fattah was released from prison in Cairo, his family said on Tuesday

CAIRO: Prominent British-Egyptian activist Alaa Abdel Fattah was released from prison in Cairo, his family said on Tuesday, prompting an emotional reunion with his loved ones after a pardon from President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi.
Abdel Fattah, 43, was a leading figure in Egypt’s 2011 uprising and an outspoken critic of the country’s authorities who had been jailed for the better part of the past decade.
His lawyer and a high-ranking Egyptian official confirmed on Monday that El-Sisi had granted him a presidential pardon and that he would soon walk free from Wadi Al-Natrun Prison, a major penitentiary on the outskirts of the capital Cairo.
Social media posts by his family members early on Tuesday showed Abdel Fattah enjoying an emotional reunion with his loved ones following his release.
“Home,” read a post from an official X account that had advocated for his release, accompanied by a photograph of a smiling Abdel Fattah in a baggy yellow T-shirt embracing his mother, Laila Soueif.
Abdel Fattah’s sister Mona Seif, herself a well-known activist, hailed on X “an exceptionally kind day” and posted a photo of herself, apparently overwhelmed with emotion, with her arm around her beaming brother’s shoulders.
Over the past two decades, Abdel Fattah has been imprisoned under every Egyptian administration, from ousted president Hosni Mubarak to the current president El-Sisi.
He was last arrested in 2019 and sentenced in 2021 to five years in prison for “spreading false news” after sharing a Facebook post about alleged torture in Egyptian jails.
His sentence was due to end in September 2024, but authorities refused to count his remand period as part of it.
Soueif recently ended a 10-month hunger strike demanding her son’s release.
Abdel Fattah had escalated his own such strike, held in solidarity with her, at the start of September.
On Monday, the state-affiliated Al-Qahera News channel reported that El-Sisi had pardoned “a number of convicted persons, after taking the constitutional and legal procedures in this regard.”
“The pardon includes... Alaa Ahmed Seif El-Islam Abdel Fattah,” added the channel, which is linked to Egypt’s state intelligence service.
Tarek Al-Awady, a member of Egypt’s presidential pardons committee, later said all procedures for the pardon had been finalized and Abdel Fattah was awaiting his imminent release.
Abdel Fattah’s lawyer separately confirmed the pardon, which took place along with five other people.
Pardon petition 
The move came after El-Sisi ordered relevant authorities earlier this month to study a petition submitted by the state-affiliated National Council for Human Rights to pardon a number of individuals, including Abdel Fattah.
It also followed a decision by a Cairo criminal court to remove Abdel Fattah from the country’s terrorism list, ruling that recent investigations showed no evidence linking him to the outlawed Muslim Brotherhood group.
Human Rights Watch (HRW) described the pardon as “long overdue good news,” calling for the release of other dissidents.
“Though we celebrate his pardon, thousands of people like Alaa are still languishing in Egyptian jails simply for exercising their rights to freedom of speech,” said Amr Magdi, HRW’s senior Middle East and North Africa researcher.
“Hopefully his release will act as a watershed moment and provide an opportunity for El-Sisi’s government to end the wrongful detention of thousands of peaceful critics.”
The British government had consistently raised Abdel Fattah’s case with Egyptian authorities, including during talks between Prime Minister Keir Starmer and El-Sisi.
British Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper welcomed the pardon on X, saying she was “grateful to President El-Sisi for this decision.”
“We look forward to Alaa being able to return to the UK, to be reunited with his family,” Cooper wrote.
In May, a United Nations panel of experts determined that Abdel Fattah’s detention was arbitrary and illegal, and called for his immediate release.
Last month, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk also urged the Egyptian authorities to end a practice allowing the prolonged arbitrary detention of government critics.
The practice, known as “rotation,” often involves lodging new charges against detainees just before their remand period comes to an end.
Turk said the practice “appears to be used to circumvent the rights of individuals to liberty, due process and equality before the law.”
Since 2022, El-Sisi’s administration has released hundreds of detainees and pardoned several high-profile dissidents, including Abdel Fattah’s lawyer Mohamed Al-Baqer.
Despite Abdel Fattah’s pardon, hundreds of other activists and politicians remain behind bars.


More experts are calling Israel’s actions in Gaza genocide

More experts are calling Israel’s actions in Gaza genocide
Updated 23 September 2025

More experts are calling Israel’s actions in Gaza genocide

More experts are calling Israel’s actions in Gaza genocide
  • Genocide was codified in a 1948 convention drawn up after the horrors of the Holocaust that defines it as acts “committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group”
  • Israeli leaders brand the argument as veiled antisemitism, saying the country abides by international law and urges Gaza’s civilians to evacuate ahead of major military operations

THE HAGUE: A growing number of experts, including those commissioned by a UN body, have said Israel’s offensive in the Gaza Strip amounts to genocide, deepening Israel’s isolation and risking untold damage to the country’s standing even among allies.
The accusation is vehemently denied by Israel, which was established in part as a refuge for Jews after the Holocaust. Others have rejected it or said only a court can make that determination.
Even so, global outrage over Israel’s wartime conduct has mounted in recent months, as images of starving children emerged, adding to the humanitarian catastrophe of a 23-month war that has killed tens of thousands of Palestinians and laid waste to much of Gaza.
A current offensive in the territory’s largest city further raised concern, with some of Israel’s European allies condemning it.
But the genocide accusation goes further, raising the question of whether a state forged in the aftermath of the crime is now committing it.
Israeli leaders brand the argument as veiled antisemitism, saying the country abides by international law and urges Gaza’s civilians to evacuate ahead of major military operations. They say Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, attack that sparked the war was itself a genocidal act.
In that attack, Hamas-led militants killed some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducted 251. Forty-eight hostages remain in Gaza, around 20 of whom Israel believes are alive.
Israel’s ensuing operation has reduced much of Gaza to rubble and led to famine in parts. Israeli leaders have also expressed support for the mass relocation of Palestinians from Gaza, a move Palestinians and others say would amount to forcible expulsion.
Gaza’s Health Ministry says over 65,000 Palestinians have been killed. The ministry — part of the Hamas-run government and staffed by medical professionals — doesn’t say how many were civilians or combatants, but says women and children make up around half.
The definition of genocide

Genocide was codified in a 1948 convention drawn up after the horrors of the Holocaust that defines it as acts “committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.”
According to the convention, genocidal acts include: killing; causing serious bodily or mental harm; and deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about the group’s physical destruction in whole or in part.
Experts and rights groups increasingly use the genocide label
In a report last week, a team of independent experts commissioned by the UN Human Rights Council concluded the war has become an attempt by Israel to destroy the Palestinian population in Gaza and constitutes genocide.
The group, which doesn’t speak for the UN, said its determination was based on a pattern of behavior, including Israel’s “total siege” of Gaza, killing or wounding vast numbers of Palestinians, and the destruction of health and educational facilities. Israel says Hamas uses such facilities for military purposes. It lifted a complete 2 1/2 month blockade in May.
Many of the world’s leading experts on genocide have reached the same conclusion, with at least two dozen using the term publicly in the past year. Among them is Omer Bartov, a professor of Holocaust and genocide studies at Brown University.
Early in the war, Bartov, who grew up in Israel and served in its military, argued Israel’s actions didn’t amount to genocide.
He changed his mind when Israel took over the city of Rafah, driving out most of its population. He now considers Israel’s actions “a genocidal operation.”
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez called Israel’s conduct genocide this month. “This is not self-defense, it’s not even an attack — it’s the extermination of a defenseless people,” he said.
Two Israeli rights groups have also said it’s genocide. While the groups are respected internationally, their views are not representative of the vast majority of Israelis.
In December, Amnesty International used the term, citing similar findings as the UN-commissioned experts. “Looking at the broader picture of Israel’s military campaign and the cumulative impact of its policies and acts, genocidal intent is the only reasonable conclusion,” it said.
Two weeks later, Human Rights Watch accused Israel of intentionally depriving Gaza of water, saying that amounted to “an act of genocide.”
Others do not see genocide — or say it’s for a court to decide
Israel — where the Holocaust plays a critical role in national identity — casts such allegations as an assault on its very legitimacy. It says Hamas — which doesn’t accept Israel’s right to exist — is prolonging the war by not surrendering and releasing the hostages.
The Foreign Ministry dismissed the report by the UN-commissioned experts as “distorted and false.”
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said that Israel could have committed genocide “in one afternoon” if it wanted, implying it has acted with restraint. Experts say there’s no numerical threshold for the crime.
Responding to a question in August, US President Donald Trump, whose country is Israel’s staunchest backer, said he didn’t think he’d seen evidence to support the accusation.
The Elie Wiesel Foundation, established by the Nobel laureate and Holocaust survivor, also rejected the characterization.
“Israel’s actions in Gaza do not constitute genocide — they are legitimate acts of self-defense against an organization that seeks Israel’s destruction,” it said in a statement.
Norman Goda, a professor of Holocaust studies at the University of Florida, sees the use of the word as part of “a long-standing effort to delegitimize Israel,” saying the accusations are “laced with antisemitic tropes.”
UN Secretary-General António Guterres and others say it’s not for politicians or scholars to make the determination.
“We have always been clear that that is a decision for international courts,” then-British Foreign Secretary David Lammy told Sky News in May.
The European Union has made a similar argument, as has the Auschwitz memorial, dedicated to the victims at the largest Nazi concentration camp, most of them Jews.
The top UN court has been asked to rule
In late 2023, South Africa accused Israel of genocide at the UN’s top court, the International Court of Justice. About a dozen countries have joined the case. A final ruling could take years.
To prove its case, South Africa must establish intent.
Lawyers for the country have already pointed to comments by Israeli leaders, including then-Defense Minister Yoav Gallant saying Israel was “fighting human animals,” and Deputy Knesset Speaker Nissim Vaturi saying that Israelis shared the goal of “erasing the Gaza Strip from the face of the Earth.”
Israeli leaders have downplayed the comments and argued they were taken out of context or directed at Hamas.
Even if it rules for South Africa, the court has no way to stop any genocide or punish perpetrators. Only the UN Security Council can do that — including through sanctions or authorizing military action. The US has a long history of using its veto power there to block resolutions against Israel.
The International Criminal Court, meanwhile, has issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant, but neither faces genocide charges. They are accused of using starvation as a method of warfare, allegations they deny.
Israel faces increasing pressure
Israel faces increasing pressure, even from countries not calling its actions genocide. There have been calls for exclusion in the cultural and sports sectors, and protests in several European cities.
The European Commission’s president, Ursula von der Leyen, one of Israel’s staunchest backers, has called for partially suspending trade ties with the country. Germany and the UK, both strong supporters of Israel, have suspended or restricted some military exports.
Goda, the academic who doesn’t think Israel is committing genocide, acknowledged the term has ramifications beyond the legal realm.
“’Genocide’ is a legal term, but it also carries a very heavy political and cultural weight,” he said. “A country committing genocide can never outrun the legacy of that crime.”