������Ƶ

WASHINGTON: The state of Illinois and the city of Chicago sued President Donald Trump on Monday, seeking to block the deployment of federalized National Guard troops to Chicago, as hundreds of National Guard troops from Texas headed to the nation’s third-largest city.
Trump then escalated the widening clash with Democratic-led states and cities over the domestic use of military forces, threatening to invoke the Insurrection Act as a means to circumvent court restrictions on deploying troops where they are unwanted by local officials.
Illinois had sued in response to Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth’s orders over the weekend to bring 300 Illinois National Guard members under federal control and then to mobilize another 400 Texas National Guard members for deployment to Chicago.

While Illinois’ request for a temporary restraining order plays out, US lawyers told a court hearing on Monday that Texas National Guard troops were already in transit to Illinois. Trump then issued another memorandum calling up the Illinois National Guard, reinforcing Hegseth’s previous order.
US District Judge April Perry allowed the federal government to continue the deployment in Chicago while it responds to Illinois’ suit. She set a deadline of midnight Wednesday for the US to reply.
Shortly after that ruling, Trump told reporters in the Oval Office he might invoke the Insurrection Act of 1792, which would allow troops to directly participate in civilian law enforcement, for which there is little recent precedent.
“I’d do it if it was necessary. So far, it hasn’t been necessary. But we have an Insurrection Act for a reason. If I had to enact it, I’d do that,” Trump said. “If people were being killed and courts were holding us up, or governors or mayors were holding us up, sure, I’d do that.”
The law has been used sparingly, in extreme cases of unrest. The law was last invoked by President George H.W. Bush in 1992, when the governor of California requested military aid to suppress unrest in Los Angeles following the trial of Los Angeles police officers who beat Black motorist Rodney King.
Today, Democratic-led states and cities are pushing back against Trump’s attempt to deploy military forces into cities, which the White House says are needed to protect federal government employees from “violent riots” and “lawlessness.”
Democratic leaders counter that their cities are being illegally targeted and falsely portrayed as awash in crime.
The Illinois dispute came after a federal judge in Oregon on Sunday temporarily blocked Trump’s administration from sending any National Guard troops to police the state’s largest city, Portland.
Trump has expanded the use of the US military in his second term, which has included deploying troops along the US border and ordering them to kill suspected drug traffickers on boats off Venezuela without due process.
National Guard troops are state-based militia forces that answer to their governors except when called into federal service.
Trump has ordered them to Los Angeles, Chicago, Washington, D.C. and Portland, prompting lawsuits from state and local leaders.
Chicago’s lawsuit is the fourth legal action opposing Trump’s unprecedented use of soldiers to police US cities. Courts have not yet reached a final decision in any of those cases, but judges in California and Oregon have made initial rulings that Trump likely overstepped his authority.
The Illinois lawsuit alleges the Republican president is deploying the military to Illinois based on a “flimsy pretext” that an ICE facility in a suburb of Chicago needs protection from protesters.
Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker, in a press conference, accused Trump of unnecessarily escalating tensions by attempting to add National Guard troops to heavily armed federal police from Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other agencies already operating in Chicago.
Pritzker said those officers have fired tear gas and rubber bullets on peaceful protesters, with US citizens, including children, being “traumatized and detained.”
“Donald Trump is using our service members as political props and as pawns in his illegal effort to militarize our nation’s cities,” Pritzker said.
“Donald Trump’s deranged depiction of Chicago as a hellhole, a war zone and the worst and most dangerous city in the world was just complete BS,” Pritzker said.
Trump, responding to Pritzker, reiterated his contention that Chicago was “like a war zone,” saying Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson had lost control.
“It’s probably worse than almost any city in the world. You could go to Afghanistan, you can go to a lot of different places, and they probably marvel at how much crime we have,” Trump said.
The state argues the Trump administration has not met the legal conditions needed to allow it to federalize National Guard troops without Pritzker’s blessing and is violating the Posse Comitatus Act, a federal law limiting the use of the military for domestic enforcement.
The lawsuit also argues Trump’s actions violate the US Constitution’s 10th Amendment, which protects states’ rights, by usurping Pritzker’s role as the commander-in-chief of the National Guard in Illinois and by infringing on the state’s authority over local law enforcement. 

SAN JOSE, California: Eleven pro-Palestinian demonstrators who were arrested at Stanford University last year after they occupied the president’s office building pleaded not guilty Monday for the second time after they were indicted by a grand jury on felony vandalism charges.
The group of current and former Stanford students and activists were charged in April with felony vandalism and felony conspiracy to trespass. All pleaded not guilty during their arraignment the following month.
But after preliminary hearings were delayed for months due to defense attorneys being unavailable, prosecutors took the case to a grand jury, Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen said in court documents.
Last week’s grand jury indictment superseded the charges filed in April, allowing for the legal proceedings to skip preliminary hearings, which are held to determine if there is enough evidence for a trial.
“The PEOPLE are ready for trial at the soonest possible date,” Rosen wrote.
Attorneys for the group had requested a preliminary hearing and set a date for Nov. 3, which would have given them the opportunity to publicly challenge the evidence presented, defense attorney Jeff Wozniak said.
“Grand Juries are secret proceedings where no defendants or defense attorneys are present to ask questions or defend themselves,” Wozniak said. “By avoiding a preliminary hearing, they are making secret a fundamentally important step in the case.”
A judge on Monday set a trial date for Nov. 17.
The Stanford takeover began around dawn on June 5, 2024, the last day of spring classes at the university in California’s Silicon Valley. Some protesters barricaded themselves inside the building, which houses the university president’s office. Others linked arms outside, The Stanford Daily reported at the time. The group chanted “Palestine will be free, we will free Palestine.” The takeover ended three hours later when they were arrested.
Authorities arrested and charged 12 people but last month a 21-year-old man pleaded no contest under a deferred entry of judgment agreement available to young defendants. If he completes probation without further legal trouble, the case could be dismissed, the Mercury News reported. The man testified for the prosecution before the grand jury.
Prosecutors accuse the demonstrators of spray-painting on the building, breaking windows and furniture, disabling security cameras and splattering a red liquid described as fake blood on items throughout the building. Damages were estimated at hundreds of thousands of dollars, according to prosecutors.