Ƶ

Illinois sues to stopNational Guard deployment as Trump escalates clash with states

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker speaks at a news conference October 06, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois. (AFP)
Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker speaks at a news conference October 06, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 12 sec ago

Illinois sues to stopNational Guard deployment as Trump escalates clash with states

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker speaks at a news conference October 06, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois. (AFP)
  • Today, Democratic-led states and cities are pushing back against Trump’s attempt to deploy military forces into cities, which the White House says are needed to protect federal government employees from “violent riots” and “lawlessness”
  • The Illinois dispute came after a federal judge in Oregon on Sunday temporarily blocked Trump’s administration from sending any National Guard troops to police the state’s largest city, Portland

WASHINGTON: The state of Illinois and the city of Chicago sued President Donald Trump on Monday, seeking to block the deployment of federalized National Guard troops to Chicago, as hundreds of National Guard troops from Texas headed to the nation’s third-largest city.
Trump then escalated the widening clash with Democratic-led states and cities over the domestic use of military forces, threatening to invoke the Insurrection Act as a means to circumvent court restrictions on deploying troops where they are unwanted by local officials.
Illinois had sued in response to Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth’s orders over the weekend to bring 300 Illinois National Guard members under federal control and then to mobilize another 400 Texas National Guard members for deployment to Chicago.

HIGHLIGHTS

• Illinois lauches fourth legal challenge over federal use of National Guard in cities

• Courts in Oregon and California say Trump likely overstepped

• US government lawyers say Texas National Guard troops in transit to Chicago

• Trump threatens to use Insurrection Act to sidestep any court restrictions

While Illinois’ request for a temporary restraining order plays out, US lawyers told a court hearing on Monday that Texas National Guard troops were already in transit to Illinois. Trump then issued another memorandum calling up the Illinois National Guard, reinforcing Hegseth’s previous order.
US District Judge April Perry allowed the federal government to continue the deployment in Chicago while it responds to Illinois’ suit. She set a deadline of midnight Wednesday for the US to reply.
Shortly after that ruling, Trump told reporters in the Oval Office he might invoke the Insurrection Act of 1792, which would allow troops to directly participate in civilian law enforcement, for which there is little recent precedent.
“I’d do it if it was necessary. So far, it hasn’t been necessary. But we have an Insurrection Act for a reason. If I had to enact it, I’d do that,” Trump said. “If people were being killed and courts were holding us up, or governors or mayors were holding us up, sure, I’d do that.”
The law has been used sparingly, in extreme cases of unrest. The law was last invoked by President George H.W. Bush in 1992, when the governor of California requested military aid to suppress unrest in Los Angeles following the trial of Los Angeles police officers who beat Black motorist Rodney King.
Today, Democratic-led states and cities are pushing back against Trump’s attempt to deploy military forces into cities, which the White House says are needed to protect federal government employees from “violent riots” and “lawlessness.”
Democratic leaders counter that their cities are being illegally targeted and falsely portrayed as awash in crime.
The Illinois dispute came after a federal judge in Oregon on Sunday temporarily blocked Trump’s administration from sending any National Guard troops to police the state’s largest city, Portland.
Trump has expanded the use of the US military in his second term, which has included deploying troops along the US border and ordering them to kill suspected drug traffickers on boats off Venezuela without due process.
National Guard troops are state-based militia forces that answer to their governors except when called into federal service.
Trump has ordered them to Los Angeles, Chicago, Washington, D.C. and Portland, prompting lawsuits from state and local leaders.
Chicago’s lawsuit is the fourth legal action opposing Trump’s unprecedented use of soldiers to police US cities. Courts have not yet reached a final decision in any of those cases, but judges in California and Oregon have made initial rulings that Trump likely overstepped his authority.
The Illinois lawsuit alleges the Republican president is deploying the military to Illinois based on a “flimsy pretext” that an ICE facility in a suburb of Chicago needs protection from protesters.
Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker, in a press conference, accused Trump of unnecessarily escalating tensions by attempting to add National Guard troops to heavily armed federal police from Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other agencies already operating in Chicago.
Pritzker said those officers have fired tear gas and rubber bullets on peaceful protesters, with US citizens, including children, being “traumatized and detained.”
“Donald Trump is using our service members as political props and as pawns in his illegal effort to militarize our nation’s cities,” Pritzker said.
“Donald Trump’s deranged depiction of Chicago as a hellhole, a war zone and the worst and most dangerous city in the world was just complete BS,” Pritzker said.
Trump, responding to Pritzker, reiterated his contention that Chicago was “like a war zone,” saying Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson had lost control.
“It’s probably worse than almost any city in the world. You could go to Afghanistan, you can go to a lot of different places, and they probably marvel at how much crime we have,” Trump said.
The state argues the Trump administration has not met the legal conditions needed to allow it to federalize National Guard troops without Pritzker’s blessing and is violating the Posse Comitatus Act, a federal law limiting the use of the military for domestic enforcement.
The lawsuit also argues Trump’s actions violate the US Constitution’s 10th Amendment, which protects states’ rights, by usurping Pritzker’s role as the commander-in-chief of the National Guard in Illinois and by infringing on the state’s authority over local law enforcement.


UN refugee agency chief suggests that US deportation practices violate the law

UN refugee agency chief suggests that US deportation practices violate the law
Updated 20 sec ago

UN refugee agency chief suggests that US deportation practices violate the law

UN refugee agency chief suggests that US deportation practices violate the law
  • In the politically charged environment of today, Grandi said, “putting the (UN) Refugee Convention and the principle of asylum on the table would be a catastrophic error”
  • The Trump administration has said it has an obligation to remove the “worst of the worst”

GENEVA: The head of the UN refugee agency suggested Monday that President Donald Trump’s America has carried out deportation practices that violate international law, and criticized a wider “backlash” in some countries against migrants and refugees.
Filippo Grandi, the UN high commissioner for refugees, used a speech to lament that drastic funding cuts and shortages have forced his agency, UNHCR, to slash nearly 5,000 jobs this year, or nearly a quarter of its workforce. The cuts may not be finished, he said.
“This was certainly not an easy year for any of us,” Grandi told the opening of UNHCR’s executive committee. “But remember, please: There has never been an easy year to be a refugee — and there never will be.”
He did cite some bright spots and praised the Trump administration-led peace efforts in Congo, where conflict has displaced millions of people.
At the UN General Assembly last month, the Trump administration — which has slashed support this year for international humanitarian aid — pitched other countries on its view that the global system of seeking asylum has been abused and needs to be revamped, in part by cracking down on migration.
Other traditional donors have cut back their aid outlays for UNHCR this year.
In recent years, the agency has received roughly $5 billion a year — or half its budgetary requirements — even as conflict and repression in places like Afghanistan, Myanmar, Sudan, Venezuela and Ukraine have led the number of people fleeing their homes to roughly double over the last decade — to 122 million.
In the politically charged environment of today, Grandi said, “putting the (UN) Refugee Convention and the principle of asylum on the table would be a catastrophic error.” He insisted that “national sovereignty and the right to seek asylum ”are not incompatible. They are complementary.”
Grandi, whose term is up at the end of this year, decried an erosion of respect for international law in certain developed countries and noted that most refugees are taken in by poorer ones.
“I am worried that the current debate – in Europe, for example – and some current deportation practices – such as in the United States – address real challenges in manners not consistent with international law,” he said.
The Trump administration has said it has an obligation to remove the “worst of the worst.”
Grandi also cited some optimistic developments: More than 1 million refugees from Syria have now returned home. A “glimmer of hope” has emerged in the eastern Congo conflict between Rwanda-backed forces and Congo’s armed forces.
“Thanks to peace efforts spearheaded by the United States, instead of speaking only of more bloodshed, or more refugees, we can start to think – cautiously, but a little bit more optimistically — of stability and returns,” he said.

 


Pro-Palestinian demonstrators who occupied Stanford building are arraigned

Pro-Palestinian demonstrators who occupied Stanford building are arraigned
Updated 5 min 58 sec ago

Pro-Palestinian demonstrators who occupied Stanford building are arraigned

Pro-Palestinian demonstrators who occupied Stanford building are arraigned
  • Some protesters barricaded themselves inside the building, which houses the university president’s office

SAN JOSE, California: Eleven pro-Palestinian demonstrators who were arrested at Stanford University last year after they occupied the president’s office building pleaded not guilty Monday for the second time after they were indicted by a grand jury on felony vandalism charges.
The group of current and former Stanford students and activists were charged in April with felony vandalism and felony conspiracy to trespass. All pleaded not guilty during their arraignment the following month.
But after preliminary hearings were delayed for months due to defense attorneys being unavailable, prosecutors took the case to a grand jury, Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen said in court documents.
Last week’s grand jury indictment superseded the charges filed in April, allowing for the legal proceedings to skip preliminary hearings, which are held to determine if there is enough evidence for a trial.
“The PEOPLE are ready for trial at the soonest possible date,” Rosen wrote.
Attorneys for the group had requested a preliminary hearing and set a date for Nov. 3, which would have given them the opportunity to publicly challenge the evidence presented, defense attorney Jeff Wozniak said.
“Grand Juries are secret proceedings where no defendants or defense attorneys are present to ask questions or defend themselves,” Wozniak said. “By avoiding a preliminary hearing, they are making secret a fundamentally important step in the case.”
A judge on Monday set a trial date for Nov. 17.
The Stanford takeover began around dawn on June 5, 2024, the last day of spring classes at the university in California’s Silicon Valley. Some protesters barricaded themselves inside the building, which houses the university president’s office. Others linked arms outside, The Stanford Daily reported at the time. The group chanted “Palestine will be free, we will free Palestine.” The takeover ended three hours later when they were arrested.
Authorities arrested and charged 12 people but last month a 21-year-old man pleaded no contest under a deferred entry of judgment agreement available to young defendants. If he completes probation without further legal trouble, the case could be dismissed, the Mercury News reported. The man testified for the prosecution before the grand jury.
Prosecutors accuse the demonstrators of spray-painting on the building, breaking windows and furniture, disabling security cameras and splattering a red liquid described as fake blood on items throughout the building. Damages were estimated at hundreds of thousands of dollars, according to prosecutors.


25 years after landmark UN resolution, UN chief says women are too often absent from peace talks

UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres speaks at the UN headquarters in New York City on September 24, 2025. (AFP)
UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres speaks at the UN headquarters in New York City on September 24, 2025. (AFP)
Updated 07 October 2025

25 years after landmark UN resolution, UN chief says women are too often absent from peace talks

UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres speaks at the UN headquarters in New York City on September 24, 2025. (AFP)
  • “Around the globe, we see troubling trends in military spending, more armed conflicts, and more shocking brutality against women and girls,” Secretary-General Antonio Guterres told a UN Security Council meeting marking the anniversary

UNITED NATIONS: Twenty-five years after a landmark UN resolution demanded equal participation for women in all efforts to promote peace, the United Nations chief said Tuesday that far too often women remain absent.
At the same time, sexual violence against women and girls is on the rise and 676 million women live within 50 kilometers (30 miles) of deadly conflicts, which the head of the UN women’s agency says is the highest number since the 1990s.
“Around the globe, we see troubling trends in military spending, more armed conflicts, and more shocking brutality against women and girls,” Secretary-General Antonio Guterres told a UN Security Council meeting marking the anniversary.
Since the resolution’s adoption on Oct. 31, 2000, there has been some progress, he said. The number of women in uniform as UN peacekeepers has doubled, women have led local mediation, advanced justice for survivors of gender-based violence, and women’s organizations have been instrumental in promoting recovery from conflicts and reconciliation.
“But gains are fragile and – very worryingly – going in reverse,” Guterres said.
In no-nonsense language, Guterres said too often nations gather in rooms like the Security Council chamber “full of conviction and commitment,” but fall far short of the resolution’s demand for equal participation of women in peace negotiations — and protection of women and girls from rape and sexual abuse in conflicts.
Despite the horrors of war, UN Women Executive Director Sima Bahous also pointed to some progress. She said women have reduced community violence in the disputed Abyei region between Sudan and South Sudan and in the Central African Republic.
In Haiti, women have achieved near parity in the new provisional electoral council, and women’s representation in Chad’s National Assembly has doubled, she said. Syria’s interim constitution guarantees rights and protections for women, and in war-torn Ukraine women have succeeded in getting national relief efforts helping women codified into law.
But Bahous also said it’s lamentable that the world today is witnessing “renewed pushback against gender equality and multilateralism.” She said the situation is being exacerbated by what she called short-sighted funding cuts.
These cuts are undermining education opportunities for Afghan girls, curtailing life-saving medical care for tens of thousands of sexual violence survivors in Sudan, Haiti and beyond, and limiting access to food for malnourished women and children in Gaza, Mali, Somalia and elsewhere, Bahous said.
She stressed that change is possible.
“It is understandable that some might conclude that the rise and normalization of misogyny currently poisoning our politics and fueling conflict is unstoppable,” Bahous said. “It is not. Those who oppose equality do not own the future, we do.”
Guterres urged the UN’s 193 member nations to increase their commitment to women caught in conflict with new funding and by ensuring their participation in peace negotiations, accountability for sexual violence and their protection and economic security.

 


EU must follow law in using frozen Russian assets to help Ukraine, Lagarde says

EU must follow law in using frozen Russian assets to help Ukraine, Lagarde says
Updated 07 October 2025

EU must follow law in using frozen Russian assets to help Ukraine, Lagarde says

EU must follow law in using frozen Russian assets to help Ukraine, Lagarde says
  • Lagarde says any decision should be agreed by all the parties that hold Russian assets

FRANKFURT: Any European Union decision on using frozen Russian state assets to help Ukraine must follow international law and the European Central Bank is “very attentive” to the process, ECB President Christine Lagarde said on Monday.
The EU is searching for a way to finance Ukraine’s defense and reconstruction with some of the 210 billion euros worth of Russian sovereign assets immobilized in the West after Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
As outright confiscation would be illegal, the bloc’s political leadership is working on a plan to invest the Russian cash in zero-coupon bonds issued by the European Commission with guarantees from EU governments.
The EU would then use the cash to issue a “Reparations Loan” to Ukraine.
“We very much expect that any scheme that is discussed and eventually introduced at some point in time will be done in accordance with international rules, with international law,” Lagarde told European lawmakers in Strasbourg.
Lagarde is worried that a legally contentious move would damage the credibility of the euro and discourage investors from holding euro assets, potentially damaging financial stability.
“From my vantage point, and with in mind financial stability and the strength of the euro, we will be looking very attentively to make sure that what is proposed is in accordance with international law (and) is mindful of financial stability,” Lagarde said in a parliamentary hearing.
When the Russian assets were frozen at the outset of the war, the money was invested in bonds. Those bonds have now matured and the cash is stuck at the Euroclear central securities depository in Belgium.
Lagarde said any decision should be agreed by all the parties that hold Russian assets.


US government shutdown enters second week, no end in sight

US government shutdown enters second week, no end in sight
Updated 07 October 2025

US government shutdown enters second week, no end in sight

US government shutdown enters second week, no end in sight
  • With the government out of money since Wednesday and grinding to a halt, Senate Democrats looked set to vote against a House-passed temporary funding bill for a fifth time

WASHINGTON: The US government shutdown entered its second week on Monday, with no sign of a deal between President Donald Trump’s Republicans and Democrats to end the crisis.
Democrats are refusing to provide the handful of votes the ruling Republicans need to reopen federal departments, unless an agreement is reached on extending expiring “Obamacare” health care subsidies and reversing some cuts to health programs passed as part of Trump’s signature “One Big Beautiful Bill.”
With the government out of money since Wednesday and grinding to a halt, Senate Democrats looked set to vote against a House-passed temporary funding bill for a fifth time.
The hard line taken by Democrats marks a rare moment of leverage for the opposition party in a period when Trump and his ultra-loyal Republicans control every branch of government and Trump himself is accused of seeking to amass authoritarian-like powers.
With funding not renewed, non-critical services are being suspended.
Salaries for hundreds of thousands of public sector employees are set to be withheld from Friday, while military personnel could miss their paychecks from October 15.
And Trump has upped the ante by threatening to have large numbers of government employees fired, rather than just furloughed — placed on temporary unpaid leave status — as is normally done during shutdowns.
The president said Sunday that workers were already being fired, but White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt walked back the comments a day later, saying he was only “referring to the hundreds of thousands of federal workers who have been furloughed.”
Republicans are digging in their heels, with House Speaker Mike Johnson telling his members not even to report to Congress unless the Democrats cave, insisting any health care negotiation be held after re-opening the government.
“If he’s serious about lowering costs and protecting the health care of the American people, why wait?” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a challenge to Johnson on Monday.
“Democrats are ready to do it now,” he wrote on X.

- Shutdown impacts -

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill,” which he signed into law on July 4, would strip 11 million Americans of health care coverage, mainly through cuts to the Medicaid program for low-income families.
That figure would be in addition to the four million Americans Democrats say will lose health care next year if Obamacare health insurance subsidies are not extended — while another 24 million Americans will see their premiums double.
Republicans argue the expiring health care subsidies have nothing to do with keeping the government open and can be dealt with separately before the end of the year.
As the shutdown begins to bite, the Environmental Protection Agency, space agency NASA and the Education, Commerce and Labor departments have been the hardest hit by staff being furloughed — or placed on enforced leave — during the shutdown.
The Transport, Justice, Homeland Security and Veterans Affairs Departments are among those that have seen the least effects so far, the contingency plans of each organization show.
With members of Congress at home and no formal talks taking place in either chamber, a CBS News poll released Sunday showed the public blaming Republicans by a narrow margin for the gridlock.
Kevin Hassett, the director of the White House National Economic Council, said Sunday layoffs would begin “if the president decides that the negotiations are absolutely going nowhere.”
Trump has already sent a steamroller through government since taking office for his second term in January.
Spearheaded by billionaire Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, 200,000 jobs had already been cut from the federal workforce before the shutdown, according to the nonpartisan Partnership for Public Service.