Ƶ

French ex-president Sarkozy to go to prison on October 21: sources

French ex-president Sarkozy to go to prison on October 21: sources
Former French President Nicolas Sarkozy. (File/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 12 min 9 sec ago

French ex-president Sarkozy to go to prison on October 21: sources

French ex-president Sarkozy to go to prison on October 21: sources
  • French court sentenced Sarkozy to five years behind bars for criminal conspiracy
  • He will be the first former head of a European Union country to go to jail

PARIS: Former French president Nicolas Sarkozy will serve jail time at a Paris prison from October 21, informed sources told AFP Monday, after a court last month sentenced him to five years behind bars for criminal conspiracy.
The 70-year-old, who will be the first French postwar leader and the first former head of a European Union country to go to jail, will serve time at the La Sante prison in Paris, they said.
Sarkozy, France’s leader from 2007 to 2012, was convicted in late September over a scheme for late Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi to fund his 2007 presidential run.
Extra security measures are expected to ensure his safety in prison, with Sarkozy possibly placed in a unit for vulnerable prisoners or held in solitary confinement.
Earlier Monday, he arrived at the financial prosecutor’s office in Paris to learn the details of his upcoming incarceration.
He arrived in a car with tinted windows, then left again three-quarters of an hour later without making a comment, AFP journalists saw.
An AFP photographer then saw him return home.
Sarkozy has denied the charges and appealed against his conviction.
The former president immediately appealed his conviction in September and a new trial is expected in the coming months.
The Paris appeals court has up to 18 months to organize it.
Once jailed, his lawyers can petition the appeals court for his release but he will remain in custody unless it decides otherwise.

‘Exceptional gravity’

During the trial, prosecutors argued Sarkozy and his aides, acting with his authority and in his name, struck a deal with Qaddafi in 2005 to illegally fund his victorious French presidential election bid two years later.
Investigators believe that in return, Qaddafi was promised help to restore his international image after the West blamed Tripoli for bombing a plane in 1988 over Lockerbie, Scotland, and another over Niger in 1989, killing hundreds of passengers.
Presiding judge Nathalie Gavarino said the offenses were of “exceptional gravity” and therefore ordered that Sarkozy actually be incarcerated.
The court’s ruling found Sarkozy was guilty of criminal conspiracy.
But it did not follow the conclusion of prosecutors that he was the beneficiary of the illegal campaign financing.
He was acquitted on separate charges of embezzling Libyan public funds, passive corruption and illicit financing of an electoral campaign.

Legal woes

Sarkozy has faced a litany of legal problems since his mandate ended.
The country’s top court last year upheld his conviction and one-year jail sentence for graft over attempting in 2014 to secure favors from a judge.
He served three months of that time with an electronic tag earlier this year, before being granted conditional release.
Separately, he has received a one-year jail term — six months in prison with another six months suspended — for illegal financing of his 2012 campaign.
He has filed a final appeal with France’s top court, which is to issue its ruling late next month.
Sarkozy has also faced repercussions beyond the courtroom, including losing his Legion of Honour — France’s highest distinction — following the graft conviction.
Legal woes aside, the man who styled himself as the “hyper-president” while in office, still enjoys considerable influence and popularity on the right of French politics and has been known to regularly meet President Emmanuel Macron.


UK police apologize to pro-Palestine protester for ‘unlawful false imprisonment’

Kent Police apologized to Laura Murton, including for “unlawful false imprisonment” and processing of her personal data.
Kent Police apologized to Laura Murton, including for “unlawful false imprisonment” and processing of her personal data.
Updated 13 October 2025

UK police apologize to pro-Palestine protester for ‘unlawful false imprisonment’

Kent Police apologized to Laura Murton, including for “unlawful false imprisonment” and processing of her personal data.
  • Laura Murton had held signs saying ‘free Gaza’ and ‘Israel is committing genocide’
  • Police admit anti-terror laws should not have been applied, agree to compensation

LONDON: Police in the UK have apologized to a protester wrongly threatened with arrest under terrorism legislation.

Laura Murton, 43, had held signs saying “free Gaza” and “Israel is committing genocide” on July 14 in the English city of Canterbury. 

She was accosted by armed officers who claimed she was supporting banned group Palestine Action, and who threatened to arrest her unless she provided her name and personal address.

Murton filmed the incident as it happened, during which an officer told her: “Mentioning freedom of Gaza, Israel, genocide, all of that all come under proscribed groups, which are terror groups that have been dictated by the government.”

The officer added that stating “free Gaza” was “supportive of Palestine Action” and that “to express an opinion or belief that is supportive of a proscribed organization, namely Palestine Action, is an offence under section 12(1A) of the Terrorism Act.”

Palestine Action was proscribed earlier this year after a series of incidents, including a break-in at a Royal Air Force base.

Subsequent protests across the UK have featured demonstrators holding signs explicitly stating their support for the group, which is a criminal offense.

Kent Police apologized to Murton, including for “unlawful false imprisonment” and processing of her personal data, and agreed to delete the data and pay her damages and legal costs.

Chief Constable Tim Smith admitted in a letter to Murton that his officers had breached her rights to free speech as well as national counterterrorism policing guidelines.

“The chief constable apologises for any distress you may have suffered as a result of this incident and confirms that any materially similar protest to that which you undertook on 14 July 2025 would not give rise to any grounds to suspect an offence under the Terrorism Act 2000,” the letter said.

Murton said she would donate any damages received to pro-Palestine causes. “People should continue to exercise their lawful right to protest in support of Palestinian people despite the proscription of Palestine Action,” she added.

“I hope this case serves as a reminder to chief constables across the country that there should be no unlawful interference with those protest rights.”

Her lawyer Shamik Dutta said: “This is the first time a chief constable has been compelled to pay damages and offer an apology arising from the unlawful policing of the proscription of Palestine Action.

“Regrettably, Ms Murton’s experience is not unique and given the national failure of police forces to respect rights to free speech in this context, her case is unlikely to be the last.”


Gaza deal brings hope for Ukraine: Zelensky

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky speaks during a press conference in Kyiv on October 10, 2025.
Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky speaks during a press conference in Kyiv on October 10, 2025.
Updated 13 October 2025

Gaza deal brings hope for Ukraine: Zelensky

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky speaks during a press conference in Kyiv on October 10, 2025.
  • “When peace is achieved for one part of the world, it brings more hope for peace in other regions,” Zelensky said

KYIV: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Monday hailed the “extraordinary” Gaza ceasefire as bringing hope that US President Donald Trump could broker an end to the Russian invasion of his country.
“When peace is achieved for one part of the world, it brings more hope for peace in other regions,” Zelensky said on social media.
He added: “If a ceasefire and peace have been achieved for the Middle East, the leadership and determination of global actors can certainly work for us too, in Ukraine.”
Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, setting off the largest conflict in Europe since World War II.
Tens of thousands have been killed, millions forced from their homes and much of eastern and southern Ukraine decimated.
Trump had once vowed he could end the war in a matter of hours, but despite several rounds of talks and a summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, there has been no significant progress toward a peace deal.
Russia has refused multiple calls for a ceasefire and outlined hard-line demands, essentially calling for Kyiv to capitulate in exchange for peace.
The US leader has grown increasingly frustrated with Putin in recent weeks and recently said he could see Ukraine reclaiming every inch of territory seized by Russia.
Moscow’s army currently controls around a fifth of Ukraine, including the Crimean peninsula which it captured and annexed in 2014.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz also urged Trump to carry the momentum from brokering the Israel-Hamas ceasefire into efforts on Ukraine.
“We also hope that the American president will now use the influence he has exerted on the parties involved in the (Middle East) to work with us on the Russian government,” Merz said in Egypt, where he was to attend a summit of world leaders including Trump.
Merz added that he will discuss the Russia-Ukraine war settlement with Trump at the summit.


Half of Filipinos want Duterte to face ICC trial over drug war deaths: survey

Half of Filipinos want Duterte to face ICC trial over drug war deaths: survey
Updated 13 October 2025

Half of Filipinos want Duterte to face ICC trial over drug war deaths: survey

Half of Filipinos want Duterte to face ICC trial over drug war deaths: survey
  • 32% of respondents disagreed that Duterte should be held accountable
  • Last week, ICC rejected the former president’s appeal for interim release

MANILA: Half of Filipinos believe former President Rodrigo Duterte should be held accountable at the International Criminal Court over his controversial anti-drug campaign, an opinion poll showed on Monday.

Duterte, 80, has been in ICC custody since March, awaiting trial in relation to his administration’s “war on drugs” from 2016 to 2022, which ICC prosecutors estimate had resulted in the extrajudicial killing of 30,000 people.

The new survey, conducted by Social Weather Stations, an independent Philippine polling group, asked respondents how much they “agree or disagree that former President Rodrigo Duterte should be held accountable in the International Criminal Court for the killings related to illegal drugs during his administration?”

It found that 50 percent of respondents agreed Duterte should be held responsible, 32 percent disagreed, 15 percent were undecided and 4 percent said they did not know enough to answer.

Support for accountability was highest in Visayas, 54 percent, and Metro Manila, 53 percent. In Mindanao – where the former president traces his political roots and despite detention won the mayoral election in May – the support for his trial was the lowest at 39 percent.

The survey was conducted nationwide from Sept. 24-30, sampling 1,500 adults with a margin of error of three percentage points.

It comes as the ICC last week rejected Duterte’s appeal for interim release.

In a ruling issued on Friday, the court’s pre-trial chamber said it found that Duterte’s detention “remains necessary” to ensure his appearance at trial, prevent him from obstructing the investigation or proceedings and to stop potential commission of further crimes.

It cited Duterte’s repeated rejection of the court’s authority and public statements by his family, including Vice President Sara Duterte, and supporters.

“More specifically, the chamber notes that on July 19, 2025, Mr. Duterte’s daughter mentioned in public speeches the idea of breaking Mr. Duterte out of the ICC Detention Center,” the ruling said.

The Philippines withdrew from the ICC in 2019, as the court’s prosecutors began to investigate Duterte’s “war on drugs.” Despite the withdrawal, the court has issued an arrest warrant against the former president, as it still keeps jurisdiction over alleged crimes committed while the country was a member.


NATO chief mocks ‘broken’ Russian submarine as Moscow denies malfunction

NATO chief mocks ‘broken’ Russian submarine as Moscow denies malfunction
Updated 13 October 2025

NATO chief mocks ‘broken’ Russian submarine as Moscow denies malfunction

NATO chief mocks ‘broken’ Russian submarine as Moscow denies malfunction
  • Russia’s Black Sea Fleet said the diesel-powered submarine Novorossiysk had surfaced off France to comply with navigation rules in the English Channel

AMSTERDAM: NATO chief Mark Rutte mocked Russia on Monday over the “limping” condition of one of its submarines as Russian authorities denied it had been forced to surface because of technical problems.
Russia’s Black Sea Fleet said the diesel-powered submarine Novorossiysk had surfaced off France to comply with navigation rules in the English Channel, and rejected reports it had suffered a serious malfunction.
But Dutch authorities said at the weekend that the submarine was under tow in the North Sea. And Rutte, in a speech in Slovenia, said the vessel was “broken.”
“Now, in effect, there is hardly any Russian naval presence in the Mediterranean left. There’s a lone and broken Russian submarine limping home from patrol,” he said.
“What a change from the 1984 Tom Clancy novel ‘The Hunt for Red October’. Today, it seems more like the hunt for the nearest mechanic.”
VChK-OGPU, a shadowy Telegram channel that publishes purported Russian security leaks, reported on September 27 that fuel was leaking into the hold of the Novorossiysk, raising the risk of an explosion.
NATO’s Maritime Command published photographs on October 9 of what it said was a French navy frigate observing a Russian submarine operating on the surface off the coast of Brittany.
“NATO stands ready to defend our Alliance with constant vigilance and maritime awareness across the Atlantic,” it posted on X, without naming the submarine.
On Saturday, the Dutch defense ministry said the Dutch navy had escorted the Novorossiysk and a accompanying towing vessel, the Yakov Grebelsky, in the North Sea.
The Russian Black Sea Fleet said on Monday that the submarine was conducting a “scheduled inter-fleet transit” after completing tasks in the Mediterranean.
State news agency TASS said the vessel, which entered service in 2014, was part of a group of submarines that carry Kalibr cruise missiles.


Nobel economics prize goes to 3 researchers for explaining innovation-driven economic growth

Nobel economics prize goes to 3 researchers for explaining innovation-driven economic growth
Updated 13 October 2025

Nobel economics prize goes to 3 researchers for explaining innovation-driven economic growth

Nobel economics prize goes to 3 researchers for explaining innovation-driven economic growth

STOCKHOLM: Joel Mokyr, Philippe Aghion and Peter Howitt won the Nobel memorial prize in economics Monday for “having explained innovation-driven economic growth” including the key principle of creative destruction.
The winners represent contrasting but complementary approaches to economics. Mokyr is an economic historian who delved into long-term trends using historical sources, while Howitt and Aghion relied on mathematics to explain how creative destruction works.
Dutch-born Mokyr, 79, is from Northwestern University; Aghion, 69, from the Collège de France and the London School of Economics; and Canadian-born Howitt, 79, from Brown University.
Aghion said he was shocked by the honor. “I can’t find the words to express what I feel,” he said by phone to the press conference in Stockholm. He said he would invest his prize money in his research laboratory.
Asked about current trade wars and protectionism in the world, Aghion said that: “I am not welcoming the protectionist way in the US. That is not good for ... world growth and innovation.”
The winners were credited with better explaining and quantifying “creative destruction,” a key concept in economics that refers to the process in which beneficial new innovations replace — and thus destroy — older technologies and businesses. The concept is usually associated with economist Joseph Schumpeter, who outlined it in his 1942 book “Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy.”
The Nobel committee said Mokyr “demonstrated that if innovations are to succeed one another in a self-generating process, we not only need to know that something works, but we also need to have scientific explanations for why.”
Aghion and Howitt studied the mechanisms behind sustained growth, including in a 1992 article in which they constructed a mathematical model for creative destruction.
Aghion helped shape French President Emmanuel Macron’s economic program during his 2017 election campaign. More recently, Aghion co-chaired the Artificial Intelligence Commission, which in 2024 submitted a report to Macron outlining 25 recommendations to position France as a leading force in the field of AI.
“The laureates’ work shows that economic growth cannot be taken for granted. We must uphold the mechanisms that underlie creative destruction, so that we do not fall back into stagnation,” said John Hassler, Chair of the committee for the prize in economic sciences.
One half of the 11 million Swedish kronor (nearly $1.2 million) prize goes to Mokyr and the other half is shared by Aghion and Howitt. Winners also receive an 18-carat gold medal and a diploma.
The economics prize is formally known as the Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel. The central bank established it in 1968 as a memorial to Nobel, the 19th-century Swedish businessman and chemist who invented dynamite and established the five Nobel Prizes.
Since then, it has been awarded 56 times to a total of 96 laureates. Only three of the winners have been women.
Nobel purists stress that the economics prize is technically not a Nobel Prize, but it is always presented together with the others on Dec. 10, the anniversary of Nobel’s death in 1896.
Last year’s award went to three economists — Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson and James A. Robinson — who studied why some countries are rich and others poor and have documented that freer, open societies are more likely to prosper.
Nobel honors were announced last week in medicine, physics, chemistry, literature and peace.