Ƶ

US begins sending nuke workers home as shutdown drags

US begins sending nuke workers home as shutdown drags
The agency responsible for safeguarding the US nuclear stockpile began placing the vast majority of its staff on enforced leave on October 20, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 10 min 47 sec ago

US begins sending nuke workers home as shutdown drags

US begins sending nuke workers home as shutdown drags

WASHINGTON: The agency responsible for safeguarding the US nuclear stockpile began placing most staff on enforced leave Monday, an official said, as yet another congressional vote to end the crippling government shutdown failed.
With the standoff about to enter its fourth week, some 1,400 workers at the National Nuclear Security Administration were due to receive notices telling them they had been placed on unpaid furlough.
“Due to the Democrat shutdown, approximately 1,400 NNSA federal employees will be furloughed as of today, October 20th and nearly 400 NNSA federal employees will continue to work to support the protection of property and the safety of human life,” a Department of Energy spokesperson said in a statement.
The United States has an arsenal of 5,177 nuclear warheads, with about 1,770 deployed, according to the global security nonprofit Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.
The NNSA, which oversees 60,000 contractors, is responsible for designing, manufacturing, servicing and securing the weapons.
The Department of Energy did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but CNN reported that the furloughs will initially hit sites that assemble nuclear weapons, such as Pantex in Texas and Y-12 in Tennessee.
At 20 days, the United States is enduring its longest full government shutdown ever — the third-longest if partial stoppages are included.
President Donald Trump has been ratcheting up pressure on Democrats to vote with his Republicans to reopen the government, with increasingly ominous threats to slash public services and ramp up mass layoffs.
“So we’re hoping the Democrats become much less deranged and that we will get the vote pretty soon. And I hear they’re starting to feel that way, too,” Trump said at the White House.
Kevin Hassett, director of the White House National Economic Council, told CNBC he expected the shutdown to end “some time this week” — but he warned Democrats of “stronger measures... to bring them to the table” if it dragged on further.

Democrats’ key condition for backing a House-passed funding resolution that would reopen the government through late November is the renewal of expiring health care subsidies for 24 million Americans.
Senate Republicans have offered a vote on renewing the subsidies, but many Democrats insist that any deal in the upper chamber will be meaningless without the sign-off of Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson.
A Senate vote Monday evening on a House-passed resolution to reopen the government failed, for the 11th time.
Johnson has vowed to keep the House closed until the shutdown ends, and it has already been out of session since September 19.
“Every day that the government is shut down, it is a danger to the American people,” Johnson told reporters on Monday when asked about the NNSA furloughs.
He warned that falling behind US adversaries in the nuclear arms race would be a “very serious” threat to the country’s status as “the last great superpower.”
Trump has been clear that he believes Republicans are winning the messaging war and has not felt the need so far to intervene.
But Democratic strategists are confident that they can stick Republicans with the blame for skyrocketing premiums and health care coverage losses that would hit millions of Americans in 2026 if no action is taken.
“In Georgia, Virginia and Maryland, people are now finding out that their health insurance premiums are about to increase, in some instances by more than $2,000 per month, for a total of $24,000 per year,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters.
“No one can afford those types of increases.”
Federal employees — who generally get paid every two weeks — are expected to miss the entire amount for the first time on Thursday, and troop pay is another issue pressuring lawmakers to strike a deal.
The Senate is due to consider legislation midweek that would allow members of the military and other federal workers to receive pay, though it is not clear that the effort has sufficient Democratic buy-in.


France's former president Sarkozy will begin serving a 5-year prison sentence Tuesday

France's former president Sarkozy will begin serving a 5-year prison sentence Tuesday
Updated 45 sec ago

France's former president Sarkozy will begin serving a 5-year prison sentence Tuesday

France's former president Sarkozy will begin serving a 5-year prison sentence Tuesday

Nicolas Sarkozy will become the first former French president in living memory to be imprisoned when he is expected to begin a five-year sentence Tuesday in Paris’ La Santé prison.
Convicted of criminal conspiracy in a scheme to finance his 2007 election campaign with funds from Libya, Sarkozy maintains his innocence. Regardless, he will be admitted to serve his time in a prison that has held some of the most high-profile inmates since the 19th century. They include Capt. Alfred Dreyfus, wrongly convicted of treason because he was Jewish, and the Venezuelan militant known as Carlos the Jackal, who carried out several attacks on French soil.
Sarkozy told Le Figaro newspaper that he expects to be held in solitary confinement, where he would be kept away from all other prisoners for security reasons. Another possibility is that he is held in the prison’s section for “vulnerable″ inmates, colloquially known as the VIP section.
Former La Santé inmates described their experiences and what the former president might expect to face. The prison, which was inaugurated in 1867, has been fully renovated in recent years.
“It’s not Nicolas Sarkozy, president of the Republic, that’s coming … It’s a man and he will live exactly the same thing that everyone'' does, Pierre Botton, a former businessman-turned-author who was imprisoned in La Santé’s vulnerable section between 2020 and 2022 for misappropriation of funds from a charitable organization, told The Associated Press.
In an unprecedented judgment, the Paris judge ruled that Sarkozy would start to serve prison time without waiting for his appeal to be heard, due to “the seriousness of the disruption to public order caused by the offense.”
Sarkozy to hold his ‘head high’
The former president has denied any wrongdoing and protested the decision that he should be imprisoned pending appeal.
“I’m not afraid of prison. I’ll hold my head high, including in front of the doors of La Santé,” Sarkozy told La Tribune Dimanche newspaper. “I'll fight till the end.”
La Tribune Dimanche reports Sarkozy has his prison bag ready with clothes and 10 family photos he is allowed to bring.
Sarkozy also told Le Figaro newspaper he would bring three books — the maximum allowed — including “The Count of Monte Cristo” in two volumes and a biography of Jesus Christ. The hero of “The Count of Monte Cristo,” by French author Alexandre Dumas, escapes from an island prison where he spent 14 years before seeking revenge.
One of Sarkozy’s sons, Louis, called for a rally Tuesday morning in support of his father in the high-end Paris neighborhood where Sarkozy lives with his wife Carla Bruni-Sarkozy. The supermodel-turned-singer has shared photos of Sarkozy’s children and songs in his honor on her social media feeds since his conviction.
Under the ruling, the 70-year-old Sarkozy will only be able to file a request for release to the appeals court once he is behind bars, and judges will then have up to two months to process the request.
9-square-meter cells
The National Financial Prosecutor’s office told Sarkozy the specifics of his detention last Monday, but details have not been made public. Justice Minister Gérald Darmanin confirmed that Sarkozy will enter La Santé on Tuesday and that he'll personally visit him to make sure security conditions are met.
In the so-called VIP section, Sarkozy could have his own room in one of 18 identical 9-square-meter cells  in a wing separated from other general prison inmates.
Botton, who says he has known Sarkozy for decades, expressed doubt that the former president will be accorded many special privileges in prison. “Even if you are president of the Republic, even if you are a very rich man, you decide nothing.”
Based on his own experience inside La Santé, about which he wrote the book “QB4,″ Botton described what Sarkozy might expect. After being processed, convicts are handed personal kit by the guards and then led to their cells.
“They will open the cell, and  will discover where he will go,” he said. Botton described the cell he’d lived in La Santé: “A small 70-centimeter  bed fixed to the floor, a hot plate, a pay refrigerator, a pay TV.”
He said that inmates’ rooms in the VIP section were equipped with fixed landline phones they can use to make calls, which are recorded by prison authorities, but they cannot receive calls on the same line.
The shock of incarceration
Patrick Balkany, a longtime friend of Sarkozy who spent five months in La Santé for tax evasion in 2019-2020, described the first hours of newly admitted inmates.
“They’re going to take his photo, to make him a card because over there we’re a number, we’re no longer a person with a name,” he told RTL radio.
Then, “if he’s considered like any other inmate, he undresses and his clothes are searched to make sure he doesn’t have any prohibited items on him,” Balkany said.
“The hardest part is when you arrive in your cell, it’s a shock,” he added.
Botton, also, recalled the shock he experienced when his affluent life crumbled when he was sent to prison the first time. “I went for my first time from my 1,200 square meter  mansion to 9 square meters,'' he said.
From having a private staff of 11 people outside prison, he found himself cleaning a filthy cell when he arrived, he said. “That’s what we call the shock of incarceration.''
“When you are at 7 p.m., you are in jail, alone, and you heard that everything is locked, you are alone,” Botton says. “Everything is finished. The game is finished.”


Biden completes a round of radiation therapy as part of his prostate cancer treatment

Biden completes a round of radiation therapy as part of his prostate cancer treatment
Updated 14 min 53 sec ago

Biden completes a round of radiation therapy as part of his prostate cancer treatment

Biden completes a round of radiation therapy as part of his prostate cancer treatment
  • Prostate cancers are graded for aggressiveness using what is known as a Gleason score

WASHINGTON: Former President Joe Biden on Monday completed a round of radiation therapy treatment for the aggressive form of prostate cancer he was diagnosed with after leaving office, a spokesperson said.
Biden had been receiving treatment at Penn Medicine Radiation Oncology in Philadelphia, said aide Kelly Scully.
The 82-year-old Democrat left office in January, six months after he dropped his bid for reelection following a disastrous debate against Republican Donald Trump amid concerns about Biden’s age, health and mental fitness. Trump defeated Democrat Kamala Harris, who was Biden’s vice president.
In May, Biden’s postpresidential office announced that he had been diagnosed with prostate cancer and that it had spread to his bones. The discovery came after he reported urinary symptoms.
Prostate cancers are graded for aggressiveness using what is known as a Gleason score. The scores range from 6 to 10, with 8, 9 and 10 prostate cancers behaving more aggressively. Biden’s office said his score was 9, suggesting his cancer is among the most aggressive.
Last month, Biden had surgery to remove skin cancer lesions from his forehead.


US appeals court says Trump can deploy soldiers in Portland

US appeals court says Trump can deploy soldiers in Portland
Updated 44 min 39 sec ago

US appeals court says Trump can deploy soldiers in Portland

US appeals court says Trump can deploy soldiers in Portland
  • Portland, along with Chicago, became the latest flashpoints in the Trump administration’s rollout of raids, following the deployment of troops to Los Angeles, Washington and Memphis

LOS ANGELES, United States: A US appeals court said Monday that President Donald Trump can send National Guard troops to Portland, despite objections from Oregon’s governor.
The ruling is the latest step in a battle pitting the White House against liberal states who have pushed back against what they characterize as Trump’s authoritarian over-reach and a creeping militarization of US society.
“After considering the record at this preliminary stage, we conclude that it is likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority” when he federalized the state’s National Guard, the Ninth Circuit of the US Court of Appeals said.
The ruling clears the way for 200 National Guard personnel to be deployed to protect federal buildings, where authorities say protesters — many dressed in animal costumes — are impeding immigration enforcement.
Portland, along with Chicago, became the latest flashpoints in the Trump administration’s rollout of raids, following the deployment of troops to Los Angeles, Washington and Memphis.
In such raids, groups of masked, armed men in unmarked cars or armored vehicles target residential neighborhoods and businesses.
The state of Oregon took the administration to court to try to prevent its forces being used, obtaining a stay from a lower court that prevented any boots on the ground while the matter was decided.
Monday’s decision — by two out of the three justices on the appeals panel — overturns the stay.
Trump has repeatedly called Portland “war-ravaged” and riddled with violent crime. But in her original ruling granting the stay, US District Judge Karin Immergut dismissed his comments as “simply untethered to the facts.”
Although the city has seen scattered attacks on federal officers and property, the Trump administration failed to demonstrate “that those episodes of violence were part of an organized attempt to overthrow the government as a whole,” Immergut wrote.
Protests in Portland did not pose a “danger of rebellion” and “regular law enforcement forces” could handle such incidents, Immergut said.
Circuit Judge Susan Graber, dissenting from the ruling released Monday, said the administration’s seizing of Oregon’s National Guard — a force usually under the control of the state’s governor — was a dangerous erosion of constitutional rights.
“Given Portland protesters’ well-known penchant for wearing chicken suits, inflatable frog costumes, or nothing at all when expressing their disagreement with the methods employed by ICE, observers may be tempted to view the majority’s ruling, which accepts the government’s characterization of Portland as a war zone, as merely absurd,” she wrote.
“But today’s decision is not merely absurd. It erodes core constitutional principles, including sovereign States’ control over their States’ militias and the people’s First Amendment rights to assemble and to object to the government’s policies and actions.”
Oregon’s Attorney General Dan Rayfield called for an immediate “en banc” hearing — a gathering of the most senior judge on the circuit and 10 other justices, who could override Monday’s judgment.
“Today’s ruling, if allowed to stand, would give the president unilateral power to put Oregon soldiers on our streets with almost no justification. We are on a dangerous path in America,” he said.
Governor Tina Kotek said she wanted to hear from Trump exactly what he expected National Guard troops to do in a city where people protest peacefully.
“The Trump Administration is being dishonest, and these actions to deploy troops are a gross, un-American abuse of power,” she said.


UN warns of decline in women’s role in peace and security, 25 years after landmark commitment

UN warns of decline in women’s role in peace and security, 25 years after landmark commitment
Updated 21 October 2025

UN warns of decline in women’s role in peace and security, 25 years after landmark commitment

UN warns of decline in women’s role in peace and security, 25 years after landmark commitment
  • The world is seeing more conflicts than at any time since 1946, yet ‘last year, 87% of peace talks took place without a woman at the table,’ says senior UN Women official
  • Report reveals 700m women and girls live within 50km of armed conflict, casualties among women and children have quadrupled in 2 years, conflict-related sexual violence is up by 87%

NEW YORK CITY: Twenty-five years after the adoption of UN Security Council Resolution 1325, which committed world leaders to advancing the inclusion of women in peace and security processes, a new UN report reveals a troubling reversal of progress.

While global military spending is surging and armed conflicts are intensifying, women are increasingly shut out of peace processes.

“Despite the promise and the engagement around Resolution 1325, military spending is at record levels, gender equality is under attack, and multilateralism is weakening,” said Nyaradzayi Gumbonzvanda, the deputy executive director of UN Women.

“Last year, 87 percent of peace talks took place without a single woman at the table,” she said, at a time when the world is seeing more conflicts than at any time since the Second World War, with devastating consequences for women and girls.

According to the report, nearly 700 million women and girls now live within 50 kilometers of armed conflict, the highest number since the 1990s. Civilian casualties among women and children have quadrupled over the past two years, while conflict-related sexual violence has increased by 87 percent.

“Women and children are called ‘collateral damage’ — but it is death and suffering,” Gumbonzvanda said. “We are seeing more wars today than at any time since 1946.”

Despite mounting evidence that the participation of women ensures peace processes are more inclusive and lasting, the report highlights the continued marginalization of women in such negotiations. In 2024, for example, 87 percent of peace talks took place without a single female negotiator. Only 7 percent of negotiators and 14 percent of mediators were women.

“This exclusion at the table translates to exclusion in governance and power long after conflict ends,” said Sarah Hendriks, the director of UN Women’s Programme and Policy Division.

“The world is still choosing war over women — and women are paying the price.”

She noted that in conflict-affected countries, women hold only 18 percent of local government seats, about half the global average.

The consequences of exclusion, the report argues, are deadly. In Gaza alone in the past two years, women and girls have been killed at a rate of two per hour, Hendriks said.

The report also found that 58 percent of global maternal deaths now occur in only 29 crisis-affected countries, a number that is expected to rise as a result of shrinking access to reproductive healthcare and a global rollback of women’s rights.

UN Women warned that funding for women-led organizations, which are often at the front lines of peacebuilding efforts, is drying up. Only 0.4 percent of aid to conflict-affected countries reaches groups of this kind directly, and nearly half of the women’s organizations surveyed for the report said they expected to shut down within six months.

At the same time, the budget for the UN’s Peacebuilding Fund, long considered a model for gender-sensitive approaches, has been cut almost in half as donors shift funding toward militarization.

“Women-led networks that reduce violence are being left without support,” Hendriks said. “If these trends continue, we risk erasing two decades of progress.”

The report calls for binding targets for the participation of women in peace processes, the commitment of at least 1 percent of donor aid to women’s organizations during crises, and the redirection of resources from arms to peace-building efforts.

Global military expenditure now stands at $2.7 trillion, $2 trillion more than when Resolution 1325 was adopted. Hendriks described this as a “shocking figure,” adding that the amount is nine times what would be needed to provide universal social protection for women and girls in the world’s poorest countries.

“The heart of the WPS (Women, Peace and Security) agenda is not about making war safer for women and girls,” she said. “It is about ending wars once and for all.”

Gumbonzvanda told Arab News that the effects of war on women are not monolithic.

“The situation of a woman in a refugee camp is very different from that of a widow who has lost property, or a teacher still working under threat,” she said.

“We must understand the diverse realities of women — those living near landmines, those in informal settlements, or those providing healthcare under fire. This cannot be a linear, singular narrative.”

She also emphasized the value of multilateralism and shared learning across regions.

“Land-rights issues in Latin America can inform policies in Southern Africa,” Gumbonzvanda said. “The strength of Resolution 1325 lies in its global scope and collective learning.”

Hendriks told Arab News that one in four governments have identified a backlash against gender equality as a significant barrier to progress.

“Conflict acts as a magnifying glass for rights violations women face across contexts,” she said.

UN Women estimates that 151 million women and girls could be pushed into extreme poverty by 2030, and those in conflict zones are 7.7 times more likely to experience the most extreme forms of deprivation.

As the UN marks the 25th anniversary of Resolution 1325, and 30 years since the adoption of the Beijing Platform for Action at the UN’s Fourth World Conference on Women, UN Women said this current moment must become a turning point.

“Resolution 1325 remains one of the most celebrated milestones for the women’s peace movement,” Gumbonzvanda said.

“But 25 years on, women are still shut out of decisions on war and peace. That must change.”


The White House starts demolishing part of the East Wing to build Trump’s ballroom

The White House starts demolishing part of the East Wing to build Trump’s ballroom
Updated 21 October 2025

The White House starts demolishing part of the East Wing to build Trump’s ballroom

The White House starts demolishing part of the East Wing to build Trump’s ballroom
  • The White House insists it does not need approval from the National Capital Planning Commission for the demolition work, only for new construction

WASHINGTON: The White House on Monday started tearing down part of the East Wing, the traditional base of operations for the first lady, to build President Donald Trump’s ballroom.
The Washington Post shared dramatic photos of the demolition work on its website showing a backhoe tearing through the East Wing façade and windows and other building parts in tatters on the ground. Some reporters watched from a park near the Treasury Department, which is next door to the East Wing.
The clearing of trees and other site preparation work started in September.
The White House insists it does not need approval from the National Capital Planning Commission for the demolition work, only for new construction. The commission is responsible for approving construction work and major renovations to government buildings in the Washington area. Its chairman is Will Scharf, who also is the White House staff secretary and a top aide to Trump.
The commission has not approved the construction and it was unclear whether the White House had submitted the ballroom plans to the agency. The commission’s offices are closed because of the government shutdown.
The Republican president has said he’s adding a massive a 90,000-square-foot ballroom because the East Room, which is the largest room in the White House with an approximately 200-person capacity, is too small and he does not like the idea of hosting events in pavilions on the South Lawn.
The ballroom will fit 999 people, Trump said last week.
The White House has said it will be completed before his term ends in January 2029.