Ƶ

Anwar al-Sadat (L) shakes hands with Menachem Begin in the presence of US President Jimmy Carter. AFP
Anwar al-Sadat (L) shakes hands with Menachem Begin in the presence of US President Jimmy Carter. AFP

1978 - The Camp David Accords: A flawed path to peace

Short Url
Updated 19 April 2025

1978 - The Camp David Accords: A flawed path to peace

1978 - The Camp David Accords: A flawed path to peace
  • While the accords earned Sadat and Begin the Nobel Prize, they did little to secure lasting peace in the Middle East

CHICAGO: When Egypt’s President Anwar Sadat visited Jerusalem hoping to prevent future wars and resolve the Arab-Israeli conflict through negotiations, he did so believing a comprehensive peace would not only include Egypt, Jordan, Syria and Lebanon, but most importantly an Israeli agreement to withdraw from the occupied territories and allow for a the establishment of a Palestinian state. 

During his lengthy speech to the Knesset, Israel’s parliament, Sadat said: “I have not come here for a separate agreement between Egypt and Israel … Even if peace between all the confrontation states and Israel were achieved, in the absence of a just solution to the Palestinian problem, never will there be that durable and just peace upon which the entire world insists today.” 

Sadat did not live to see how right he was about how Israel’s refusal to withdraw from the occupied territories would fuel a surge in extremism, create more violence, disrupt his own nation and make regional peace impossible. 

Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin’s sole purpose was to remove the military threat posed by Egypt, divide the Arab “confrontation states” and block demands for Palestinian statehood.

Sadat was naive to trust Begin, one of the Middle East’s most vicious terrorists. Begin had orchestrated some of the most heinous civilian atrocities during the 1947-1948 Arab-Israeli conflict, including the massacre of nearly 100 civilians in the small Palestinian village of Deir Yassin.

How we wrote it




The front page of the newspaper reported the accords’ progress, noting the summit reached a “decisive stage.”

That massacre, including pregnant women butchered and their bodies thrown into the village water well, shocked the Arab population of Palestine, prompting a refugee flight of fear. Before his Knesset speech, Sadat visited the Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial which, ironically, is built on the remains of Deir Yassin. 

He was wooed by Israel and the US, and treated like a distinguished head of state for making peace with Israel. He toured the US in 1978 and was feted at dinners in several major American cities, including Chicago, where I joined 500 other Arab Americans protesting against his “surrender.” 

The Camp David Accords earned Sadat and Begin the 1978 Nobel Peace Prize but scorn in the Arab world. The Arab League reacted by removing Egypt from its membership and moving the organization’s headquarters from Cairo to Tunis. 

Israel’s strategy was clear to everyone but Sadat. He signed the accords after 12 days of intense negotiations in 1978, between Sept. 5 and 17. But just weeks before this, Begin inaugurated the settlement of Ariel, on seized land in the West Bank more than 16 kilometers east of the Green Line, which became a symbol of Israel’s continuing war against Palestinian statehood and the center of Israeli settlement expansion.

Despite the disconcerting reality on the ground, Sadat went ahead and signed a formal peace treaty with Israel at the White House on March 26, 1979, officially ending the conflict between the two countries.

Key Dates

  • 1

    US President Jimmy Carter writes to Egyptian counterpart Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin expressing his commitment to finding “a lasting peace settlement in the Middle East.”

    Timeline Image Feb. 14, 1977

  • 2

    In a handwritten letter, Carter appeals to Sadat for help: “The time has now come to move forward, and your early public endorsement of our approach is extremely important — perhaps vital.”

  • 3

    After Sadat announces his intention to visit Israel, the country’s new prime minister, Menachem Begin, addresses the Egyptian people from Jerusalem pleading for “no more wars, no more bloodshed.”

    Timeline Image Nov. 11, 1977

  • 4

    Carter writes private letters to Sadat and Begin, proposing they meet.

  • 5

    Sadat and Begin arrive at Camp David for 10 days of talks.

  • 6

    At 9:37 p.m. Carter, Begin and Sadat board presidential helicopter Marine 1 and fly from Maryland to the White House. At 10:31p.m., Begin and Sadat sign a framework for peace.

    Timeline Image Sept. 17, 1978

  • 7

    Sadat and Begin jointly awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.

    Timeline Image Oct. 27, 1978

  • 8

    Sadat and Begin sign the Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty in Washington.

  • 9

    Sadat assassinated in Cairo by Islamic extremists opposed to the peace treaty.

    Timeline Image Oct. 6, 1981

When you look at the five fundamentals of the accord, only two were actually achieved. Egypt did get the Sinai Peninsula back, under demilitarized conditions, and the two countries ended their state of war and established diplomatic relations. 

But three conditions were never met: meetings to resolve the Palestine question, with the involvement of Jordan, stalled; the introduction of Palestinian self-government in the West Bank and Gaza within five years failed; and an end to the Israeli settlements never even began. 

The accords were never allowed to stand in the way of plans to entrench Israel’s hold on the occupied territories. When US President Jimmy Carter lost his reelection bid on Nov. 4, 1980, and Sadat was assassinated while reviewing a military parade on Oct. 6, 1981, Begin was given the green light to close the door on Sadat’s “dream.” 

Despite political differences, US President Ronald Reagan attempted to follow up on Carter’s Middle East peace vision and in August 1982 proposed a “freeze” on settlements, urging Israel to grant Palestinians “autonomy” as a step toward statehood. 




Israeli Premier Menahem Begin (L) and Egyptian President Anwar al-Sadat converse and joke during a meeting in July 1979 in Alexandria. AFP

Begin’s reaction was swift. On Sept. 2, 1982, with Carter and Sadat out of the way, he led a Knesset move to consolidate Israel’s hold on the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Golan Heights, increasing the Jewish settler population. Israel, the Cabinet declared, would “reserve the right to apply sovereignty over the territories at the end of the five-year transition period” toward Palestinian “autonomy” that was specifically envisioned in the Camp David Accords. 

In 1978, the settler population was only 75,000. By 1990, it had tripled to 228,000. Today, in excess of half a million Israeli settlers occupy at least 370 settlements, or “outposts,” in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. 

This year, on Jan. 20, the first day of his second term in office, US President Donald Trump lifted the sanctions imposed by the Biden administration on far-right settler groups accused of violence against Palestinians. 

Ironically, while the Camp David accords were supposed to create an environment of hope and optimism, the failure to advance them beyond the return of the Sinai created a sense of fatalism that fueled extremism, evidenced most dramatically, and with such shocking consequences, by the fateful attacks by Hamas against Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. 

Although the peace between Egypt and Israel remains, the failure to achieve peace with the Palestinians has ensured the accords remain little more than a formal version of an armistice agreement, and relations between the two countries are defined solely by military cooperation. 

  • Ray Hanania is an award-winning former Chicago City Hall political reporter. He is a columnist for Arab News and hosts the Ray Hanania Radio Show. 


Ten-woman Brazil survive Colombia challenge in Copa goalless draw

Ten-woman Brazil survive Colombia challenge in Copa goalless draw
Updated 27 min 30 sec ago

Ten-woman Brazil survive Colombia challenge in Copa goalless draw

Ten-woman Brazil survive Colombia challenge in Copa goalless draw
  • Brazil’s goalkeeper Lorena was shown a red card in the 21st minute after handling the ball outside the penalty area
  • Despite enjoying a numerical advantage, Colombia were unable to break the deadlock

QUITO: Colombia failed to capitalize on their numerical advantage in Friday’s final Group B match at the Women’s Copa America, as the reigning champions Brazil held them to a goalless draw despite being a player down.

Brazil’s goalkeeper Lorena was shown a red card in the 21st minute after handling the ball outside the penalty area in a bid to stop Linda Caicedo’s shot during a rapid Colombian counterattack.

After consulting with assistant referee Mariana Aquino, referee Milagros Arruela dismissed Lorena, forcing Brazil to rely on substitute goalkeeper Claudia for the rest of the match.

Despite enjoying a numerical advantage, Colombia were unable to break the deadlock, with attempts from Valerin Loboa and Mayra Ramirez failing to find the back of the net.

“Today was a very tough game, very exhausting, and we wanted to win, but now we have to keep working hard for what’s coming,” Loboa said after the match.

Brazil stood firm in defense, and in the second half they tried to take the lead with attempts from Yasmim, Gabi Portilho and Dudinha, but they were all unsuccessful. They came closest with a free kick from Yasmim in added time that hit the crossbar.

“We knew it would be a very difficult game, but we’re very proud of this result with one player less. Now it’s time to rest and think about the semifinal,” Portilho said.

Both teams were already through to the semifinals, and Group B leaders Brazil will face Uruguay on Tuesday. Meanwhile, runners-up Colombia, with eight points, will take on Group A leaders Argentina on Monday.


Two Southwest flight attendants hurt after jet dives to avoid mid-air collision

Two Southwest flight attendants hurt after jet dives to avoid mid-air collision
Updated 38 min 45 sec ago

Two Southwest flight attendants hurt after jet dives to avoid mid-air collision

Two Southwest flight attendants hurt after jet dives to avoid mid-air collision
  • Southwest Flight 1496 sharply descended nearly 500 feet, according to flight tracking websites
  • The incident appeared to be the fourth involving military aircraft since March

WASHINGTON: Two flight attendants on a Southwest Airlines flight departing Burbank, California, were injured on Friday after pilots took evasive action to dodge another aircraft on takeoff, the airline said.

Southwest Flight 1496 sharply descended nearly 500 feet, according to flight tracking websites, marking the second time in a week that a US commercial jet was forced to make abrupt flight maneuvers to avoid a potential mid-air collision.

The incident also appeared to be the fourth involving military aircraft since March.

The airline and the Federal Aviation Administration said the Southwest pilots took action after receiving cockpit alerts of other aircraft traffic being dangerously close. The Southwest Boeing 737 continued on to Las Vegas, where it landed uneventfully.

Flight-tracking service Flightradar24 identified the other aircraft as a Hawker Hunter fighter jet – British-built aircraft – that crossed in front of the Southwest flight.

The planes came within 7.82km of each other laterally and 107m vertically. The US Air Force and Defense Department did not immediately respond to inquiries regarding the military jet’s presence near Burbank.

The FAA was investigating.

Two flight attendants were treated for injuries, the airline said, without providing detail.

No injuries were immediately reported by passengers, according to Southwest. But one passenger told Fox News Digital the sharp descent stirred panic onboard.

“It was terrifying. We really thought we were plummeting to a plane crash,” Caitlin Burdi said in an on-camera interview. After the incident, “the pilot came on (the intercom), and he told us we almost collided with another plane.”

According to a statement from Southwest, the incident began when its crew responded to “two onboard traffic alerts” while taking off from the Hollywood Burbank Airport north of Los Angeles, “requiring them to climb and descend to comply with the alerts.”

Three earlier close calls

In a separate incident one week ago, a SkyWest Airlines jet operating as a Delta Connection flight from Minneapolis reported taking evasive action to avoid a possible collision with a US Air Force bomber during a landing approach over North Dakota on July 18.

The FAA said on Monday it was investigating last Friday’s near-miss incident involving SkyWest Flight 3788, an Embraer ERJ-175 regional jet, which landed safely at Minot, North Dakota.

The Air Force confirmed a B-52 jet bomber assigned to Minot Air Force Base had conducted a ceremonial flyover of the North Dakota State Fair last Friday around the time of the SkyWest incident.

The Air Force said the bomber cockpit crew was in contact with local air traffic control before, during and after the flyover, and that the Minot International Airport control tower “did not advise of the inbound commercial aircraft” as the B-52 was departing the area.

The FAA has said that air traffic services were provided by the Minot air traffic control tower, which is run by a private company and not FAA employees.

The National Transportation Safety Board and FAA are investigating a March 28 close call involving a Delta Airbus A319 jet and a group of Air Force jets near Reagan Washington National Airport. The four Air Force T-38 Talons were heading to nearby Arlington National Cemetery for a flyover at the time.

There has been intense focus on military traffic near civilian airplanes since an Army helicopter collided with an American Airlines regional jet on January 29 near Reagan National, killing 67 people.

In early May, the FAA barred Army helicopter flights around the Pentagon after another near miss.


Pakistan’s Air Karachi in talks with Chinese jetmaker for aircraft as it gears up for operations

Pakistan’s Air Karachi in talks with Chinese jetmaker for aircraft as it gears up for operations
Updated 52 min 30 sec ago

Pakistan’s Air Karachi in talks with Chinese jetmaker for aircraft as it gears up for operations

Pakistan’s Air Karachi in talks with Chinese jetmaker for aircraft as it gears up for operations
  • New airline is backed by 100 Pakistani businessmen who pooled $17.6 million in seed funding
  • Air Karachi is also exploring aircraft deals with Boeing and Airbus to launch domestic flights

KARACHI: Air Karachi, Pakistan’s new private airline in the making, has engaged the Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China (COMAC) for the supply of airliners to start its flight operations, the group chairman Hanif Gohar told Arab News on Friday.

Spearheaded by a group of leading businessmen from Pakistan’s southern port city, the airline is also negotiating with global aerospace giants like Boeing and Airbus for the acquisition of at least three passenger aircraft. It was launched in November 2024 by 100 stakeholders with Rs5 billion ($17.6 million) in seed money.

“We are talking with COMAC regarding the 919, as well as with Boeing and Airbus, to acquire the aircraft,” Gohar said, referring to a narrow-body passenger jet developed by China.

Business leaders in the South Asian nation have stepped up to fill the gap as the state-run Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) has become a liability for the cash-strapped government, which is now making a second attempt to privatize the national carrier.

“We will start our flight operations as soon as we reach an agreement with any of the suppliers, whoever comes first,” Gohar said when asked about the timeline to start operations.

Gohar, a business tycoon himself, expects a deal within the next month.

He said Air Karachi would initially fly three aircraft domestically, and the fleet would later be expanded with four more planes to start international flights within a year.

The idea to launch a business-backed airline was conceived to develop an entity that can operate with efficiency and financial autonomy amid growing challenges faced by PIA.

Last month, Air Karachi received its Regular Public Transport (RPT) license from Pakistan’s Civil Aviation Authority.

The airline has been modeled after the success of Air Sial, another private carrier launched by industrialists in Sialkot, the manufacturing hub of Pakistan’s exportable sports and surgical goods.


Mahmoud Abbas praises Saudi support after Paris recognizes Palestinian statehood

Mahmoud Abbas praises Saudi support after Paris recognizes Palestinian statehood
Updated 26 July 2025

Mahmoud Abbas praises Saudi support after Paris recognizes Palestinian statehood

Mahmoud Abbas praises Saudi support after Paris recognizes Palestinian statehood

RIYADH: Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas thanked Ƶ for its efforts which contributed to a historic French commitment to recognizing Palestine as a state. 

The French President Emmanuel Macron made the announcement on Thursday.

“This solution is the only path that can address the legitimate aspirations of both the Israelis and the Palestinians. It must now be brought about as quickly as possible,” said Macron in a letter to Abbas.

“The prospect of a negotiated solution to the conflict in the Middle East seems increasingly distant. I cannot resign myself to that,” he said.

The Palestinian leader said the French move represented a victory for his people and urged other countries to take a similar stance to support a two-state solution to the decades long conflict.

The Kingdom has long been a backer of Palestinian statehood and has repeatedly condemned Israel’s treatment of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank.

More than 140 countries already recognize Palestine as a state. Macron has said France will formally declare the recognition at the UN General Assembly in September.


UN gathering eyes solution to deadlocked Palestinian question

UN gathering eyes solution to deadlocked Palestinian question
Updated 26 July 2025

UN gathering eyes solution to deadlocked Palestinian question

UN gathering eyes solution to deadlocked Palestinian question
  • In 1947, a resolution of the UN General Assembly decided on the partition of Palestine, into two independent states — one Jewish and the other Arab
  • But with the ongoing expansion of Israeli settlements and Israeli plans to annex occupied territory, it is feared a Palestinian state could be geographically impossible

UNITED NATIONS: Fired by France’s imminent recognition of Palestinian statehood, UN members meet next week to breathe life into the push for a two-state solution as Israel, expected to be absent, presses its war in Gaza.
Days before the July 28-30 conference on fostering Israeli and Palestinian states living peacefully side-by-side to be co-chaired by Riyadh and Paris, French President Emmanuel Macron announced that France would formally recognize the State of Palestine in September.
His declaration “will breathe new life into a conference that seemed destined to irrelevance,” said Richard Gowan, an analyst at International Crisis Group.
“Macron’s announcement changes the game. Other participants will be scrabbling to decide if they should also declare an intent to recognize Palestine.”
According to an AFP database, at least 142 of the 193 UN member states — including France — now recognize the Palestinian state proclaimed by the Palestinian leadership in exile in 1988.
In 1947, a resolution of the UN General Assembly decided on the partition of Palestine, then under a British mandate, into two independent states — one Jewish and the other Arab.
The following year, the State of Israel was proclaimed, and for several decades, the vast majority of UN member states have supported the idea of a two-state solution: Israeli and Palestinian, living side-by-side peacefully and securely.
But after more than 21 months of war in Gaza, the ongoing expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, and senior Israeli officials declaring designs to annex occupied territory, it is feared a Palestinian state could be geographically impossible.
The war in Gaza started following a deadly attack by Hamas on Israel, which responded with a large-scale military response that has claimed tens of thousands of Palestinian lives.
The New York conference is a response to the crisis, with Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Mustafa and several dozen ministers from around the world expected to attend.

The meeting comes as a two-state solution is “more threatened than it has ever been (but) even more necessary than before, because we see very clearly that there is no alternative,” said a French diplomatic source.
Beyond facilitating conditions for recognition of a Palestinian state, the meeting will have three other focuses — reform of the Palestinian Authority, disarmament of Hamas and its exclusion from Palestinian public life, and normalization of relations with Israel by Arab states that have not yet done so.
The diplomatic source warned that no announcement of new normalization deals was expected next week.
Ahead of the conference, which was delayed from June, Britain said it would not recognize a Palestinian state unilaterally and would wait for “a wider plan” for peace in the region.
Macron has also not yet persuaded Germany to follow suit and recognize a Palestinian state in the short term.
The conference “offers a unique opportunity to transform international law and the international consensus into an achievable plan and to demonstrate resolve to end the occupation and conflict once and for all, for the benefit of all peoples,” said the Palestinian ambassador to the UN Riyad Mansour, calling for “courage” from participants.
Israel and the United States will not take part in the meeting.
Israel’s ambassador to the UN Danny Danon “has announced that Israel will not be taking part in this conference, which doesn’t first urgently address the issue of condemning Hamas and returning all of the remaining hostages,” according to embassy spokesman Jonathan Harounoff.
As international pressure continues to mount on Israel to end nearly two years of war in Gaza, the humanitarian catastrophe in the ravaged coastal territory is expected to dominate speeches by representatives of more than 100 countries as they take to the podium from Monday to Wednesday.
Gowan said he expected “very fierce criticism of Israel.”
abd-gw/aks